• Users Online: 32573
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 1285-1290

Angle closure glaucoma in rural and urban populations in eastern India—The Hooghly River Glaucoma Study


Glaucoma Service, B B Eye Foundation, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Date of Submission09-Mar-2018
Date of Acceptance31-Aug-2018
Date of Web Publication20-Aug-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Chandrima Paul
B B Eye Foundation; Sukhsagar, 2/5, Sarat Bose Road, Kolkata - 700 020, West Bengal
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_344_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: To estimate the prevalence, features, and associations of primary angle closure disease (PACD) in rural and urban populations from West Bengal in eastern India. Methods: This was a population-based cross-sectional study with two arms, rural and urban. The rural study area consisted of 28 contiguous villages from 13 gram panchayats in Balagarh Police Station, with rural base hospital at Dhobapara, Balagarh Police Station, in the village Kuliapara of Hooghly district. A tertiary eye hospital in central Kolkata was the urban study center. Individuals residing in the study area aged 40 years and above were included in this study using multistage random cluster sampling. All subjects underwent a detailed ophthalmic examination at our base hospitals including applanation tonometry, ultrasound pachymetry, gonioscopy, and frequency doubling technology perimetry. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS 13. Multiple logistic regressions were used to analyze risk factors for PACD. Results: A total of 7,408 and 7,248 subjects aged 40 years or older were enumerated from Hooghly district and Kolkata city, respectively. PACD was detected in 1.9% subjects in rural arm and 1.54% subjects in the urban arm (P < 0.001). In rural arm, 0.3% had PACS, 0.56% had PAC, and 1.03% had PACG. In urban arm, 0.22% had PACS, 0.35% had PAC, and 0.97% had PACG. Conclusion: The study concludes that higher age, higher CCT, and shorter axial length/presence of hyperopia are important independent predictors of ACD. ACD is more common in eastern India than previous estimates.

Keywords: Frequency doubling perimetry, hyperopia, primary angle closure disease, primary angle closure glaucoma


How to cite this article:
Paul C, Sengupta S, Banerjee S, Choudhury S. Angle closure glaucoma in rural and urban populations in eastern India—The Hooghly River Glaucoma Study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:1285-90

How to cite this URL:
Paul C, Sengupta S, Banerjee S, Choudhury S. Angle closure glaucoma in rural and urban populations in eastern India—The Hooghly River Glaucoma Study. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2024 Mar 29];66:1285-90. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2018/66/9/1285/239352



Glaucoma is the leading cause of global irreversible blindness [1] and an important public health issue.[2] Population-based studies are important for assessment of disease burden, health-care policy planning, and appropriate resource allocation.[2] The Hooghly river glaucoma study (HRGS) is a population-based cross-sectional study from rural and urban populations in eastern India, which spanned from April 2011 to January 2014.[1] In the HRGS, primary angle closure disease (PACD), and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) were defined as per ISGEO guidelines.[3] There is a wide variation in the reported prevalence of angle closure glaucoma (ACG) within India. The prevalence of PACG in southern India ranges from 0.5% to 4.3%[4] whereas the reported prevalence of PACG in eastern India was only 0.23%.[5]

In the present paper, we report the prevalence, features, and associations of angle closure disease (ACD) in rural and urban populations from eastern India.


  Methods Top


The methodology of HRGS has been discussed in details elsewhere.[1] This cross-sectional study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and adheres to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Kolkata city, our urban study area, is divided into 15 boroughs and 141 wards.[6],[7],[8] Subjects were enumerated from eight randomly selected divisions from each of these 15 boroughs. The rural study area consisted of 28 contiguous villages from 13 gram panchayats in Balagarh Police Station of Hooghly district in West Bengal.

After enumeration of subjects at field visits, residents of Kolkata were transported to our urban examination center, a tertiary eye hospital in Kolkata and those from Hooghly district were transported to our rural examination center in Kuliapara village, Balagarh Police Station for hospital-based examination. After consenting, the subjects proceeded through various ophthalmic examinations and diagnostic procedures, which have been discussed in details elsewhere.[1] The current paper deals with ACD. The following definitions, based on the ISGEO guidelines,[3] were used for the current work:

  1. Primary angle closure suspect (PACS): An eye in which appositional contact was present on gonioscopy between the peripheral iris and posterior trabecular meshwork and more than 270° of posterior trabecular meshwork could not be visualized.[9]
  2. Primary angle closure (PAC): An eye with an occludable drainage angle on gonioscopy (posterior trabecular meshwork seen for less than 90°) and features indicating that trabecular obstruction by the peripheral iris had occurred, such as peripheral anterior synechiae, elevated intraocular pressure, iris whorling (distortion of the radially orientated iris fibers), “glaucomflecken” lens opacities, or excessive pigment deposition on the trabecular surface. The optic disc did not have glaucomatous damage.
  3. PACG: PAC, along with evidence of glaucoma with characteristic disc and field changes. The diagnostic criteria for glaucoma in the HRGS has been discussed elsewhere.[1]


Among the subjects diagnosed with glaucoma, patients with history of use of topical steroids in the last 6 months, history of trauma or ocular surgery (excluding squint or oculoplastic surgeries), history of chronic uveitis, evidence of pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion on slit lamp examination and those with hypermature or intumescent cataract were grouped under secondary glaucomas.

Statistical analysis

The data collected from both the rural and urban cohorts were analyzed using SPSS Statistics software package version 13 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). P < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant and P < 0.001 was taken to be statistically highly significant. The primary outcome was the prevalence PACG with 95% confidence interval. Age- and gender-specific prevalence estimates of PACG were also calculated. Prevalence of PACD, PACS, and PAC were also calculated. Multiple logistic regressions were used to analyze the risk factors for PACD. The independent risk factors analyzed include age, sex, IOP, CCT, presence of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperopia.


  Results Top


A total of 7,248 subjects aged 40 years or older were enumerated from Kolkata city using multistage random cluster sampling whereas 7,408 subjects were enumerated in the rural phase. Data from 7,128 subjects were analyzed in the urban phase and 6,964 subjects were analyzed in the rural phase of this largest Indian epidemiological study on glaucoma prevalence. A sum of 52.6% of the subjects analyzed were males in the urban group and 51.8% were males in the rural group (no statistically significant difference between the rural and urban sex distribution) [Table 1]. The average age of the subjects in our study was 59.34 (±12.63) years for the urban group and 59.25 (±9.28) years for the rural group (P > 0.05; no significant difference).
Table 1: Various ocular parameters in the PACD, PACS, and PACG subgroups in both the rural and urban arms of the HRGS

Click here to view


One hundred and ten subjects (1.54%) in the urban arm of HRGS had PACD. Of them, 60 were males and the rest 50 females. PACD in both the eyes was detected in 62 subjects and PACG was detected in 69 subjects. A total of 53.4% of those with PACG were males [Table 1]. No cases of secondary angle closure glaucoma were detected in our urban cohort.

One hundred and thirty-two subjects (1.9%) in the rural arm of HRGS had PACD. ACD in both the eyes was detected in 50 subjects. Among the subjects diagnosed with glaucoma in the rural arm, 72 subjects had PACG. Eight subjects (six females and two males) had secondary angle closure glaucoma due to hypermature/intumescent cataract. Out of the 80 subjects with angle closure glaucoma, 47 (59%) were males and the rest 41% females [Table 2]. No cases of acute angle closure glaucoma were detected in either the rural or the urban division of our study cohort. It is clearly evident from [Table 3] that subjects in the PACG group had a statistically significantly higher IOP.
Table 2: The age and sex distribution of subjects detected with PACG in the two divisions of the HRGS

Click here to view
Table 3: Distribution of IOP in the subjects not detected to have glaucoma and comparison of the same with those detected with PACG in each of the two divisions of the HRGS

Click here to view


A further analysis of the ocular axial lengths, anterior chamber depths and crystalline lens thickness of the various subjects in the rural and urban arms of the HRGS is detailed in [Table 4]a and [Table 4]b. [Table 5] shows that increasing age, male sex, higher IOP, presence of diabetes or hypertension and hyperopia are risk factors for PACG.


Click here to view
Table 5: Relation between PACD and age, sex, IOP, CCT, presence of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperopia

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Glaucoma has been estimated to affect 60.6 to 79.6 million people during 2010 to 2020.[10] Among those detected with glaucoma, approximately 26% have angle closure glaucoma, which accounts for half of the cases blinded from glaucoma.[11] The HRGS is one of the largest population-based glaucoma prevalence cross-sectional studies from Asia and the results have been discussed elsewhere.[12] In the current paper, we deal with subjects detected with ACD and the various subtypes of the same.

Primary angle-closure glaucoma is a multifactorial disease. Major risk factors include age, female gender, ocular biometric features, and ethnicity (e.g., African and Chinese). Shallow anterior chamber depth, thicker lens with increased anterior curvature, short axial length, small corneal diameter, and short radius of curvature also are known factors related to PACG.[11] There is also evidence for a genetic basis of PACG. First, reported prevalence of PACG varied among different ethnicities, such as 0.4% in white subjects,[12] 1.4% in Chinese,[13],[14] and 2% to 8% in Eskimos;[15],[16] second, PACG is more prevalent in first-degree relatives of patients;[17] and third, the heritabilities for a shallow anterior chamber and narrow angle (both are key features of PACG) are approximately 93%[18] and 49%,[19] respectively. However, majority of PACG cases are silent and chronic with the majority remaining undiagnosed.[20]

In a recent systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Tham et al., the prevalence of PACG was found to be highest in Asians.[21] This finding provides evidence consistent with previous PACG reviews,[10],[22] indicating that greater emphasis on the development of methods to identify and treat PACG would be particularly needed in Asia.[21] One of the highest prevalence of PACG ever reported in the previous population-based studies in which diagnosis was based on gonioscopic findings and the presence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy was 2.7% in northwest Alaskan Inuits, followed by 2.5% in Myanmar.[23] The prevalence of PACG in a rural population of Kumejima in Japan was 2.2% that was 3.7 times higher than that in the Takmi Study carried out in an urban center in Japan.[23] The prevalence of PACG in southern India ranges from 0.5% to 4.3%.[20] It is worth mentioning that the South Indian study that reported a prevalence of 4.3% did not include the VF findings for diagnosing PACG.[4] The WBGS, which included 1,324 subjects from rural West Bengal found a crude PACG prevalence of 0.23% in people aged 50 years or more.[5] The prevalence of PACG in the current study from Eastern India, in which gonioscopic findings along with glaucomatous optic neuropathy, VF test results, or both were considered in diagnosing PACG, was 1.03% in the rural population and 0.97% in the urban population (no statistically significant difference between the two groups). There was however no significant difference between the two groups with respect to age distribution, as is seen in [Table 3]. The average IOP among those detected with PACG was very significantly higher than the IOP in those not detected with glaucoma in both the rural and urban groups, as is seen in [Table 3]. The prevalence of PACD was also found to be higher in the rural group (1.9%) as compared to the urban group (1.54%) and the difference was found to be statistically highly significant, which can possibly be attributed to the ethnic variation between the two groups.

From [Table 4]a and [Table 4]b, it is evident that the AC depth in subjects diagnosed with PACD is lesser than normal subjects in both the rural and urban groups, though the results are not statistically significant. The lens thickness also showed no statistically significant difference between subjects diagnosed with PACD and normal subjects. However, we did observe a statistically significant association between PACD and hyperopia [Table 5]. There was however no significant difference between the rural and urban arms with respect to this association. Most studies have reported a significant association between hyperopia and PACD [24] whereas some studies have found no such association.[2],[25] From [Table 5], it is also evident that axial length and anterior chamber depth are inversely related to PACD. We are aware that hyperopia is inversely related to ocular axial length and anterior chamber depth. It is also established that anterior chamber depth is affected by race, ethnicity, age, and gender that suggests a potential role for genetic influences, which is consistent with a recent report of a genetic variant within the ABCC5 gene that influences anterior chamber depth and the risk of PACG among Asians.[25]


  Conclusion Top


In conclusion, the current epidemiological cross-sectional study carried in rural and urban eastern Indian populations found the prevalence of PACD to be 1.9% in the rural population and 1.54% in the urban population (P < 0.0001). Among those detected with PACG, 94% of the respondents were unaware of the disease. Similar findings have also been found in the CGS,[23] which further states that even among those diagnosed with PACG, a significant proportion were being treated as POAG. The study also concludes that higher age, higher CCT, and shorter axial length/presence of hyperopia are important independent predictors of ACD. No significant relationship could however be established between ACD and female sex, presence of diabetes or hypertension, and smaller anterior chamber depth. The findings of this study establishes the fact that ACD is more common in eastern India than previous estimates have shown, hence adequate changes in health-care policies should be introduced to address this issue. As a first step, the authors recommend that a simple and inexpensive procedure like gonioscopy should be made mandatory in basic eye check-up protocols.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Paul C, Sengupta S, Choudhury S, Banerjee S, Sleath BL. Prevalence of glaucoma in Eastern India: The Hooghly River Glaucoma Study. Indian J Ophthalmol2016;64:578-83.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Senthil S, Garudadri C, Khanna RC, Sonnapaneni K. Angle Closure in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1729-35.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol2002;86:238-42.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Jacob A, Thomas R, Koshi SP, Braganza A, Muliyil J. Prevalence of primary glaucoma in an urban South Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol1998;46:81-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Raychaudhuri A, Lahiri SK, Bandyopadhyay M, Foster PJ, Reeves BC, Johnson GJ. A population based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in rural West Bengal: The West Bengal Glaucoma Study. Br J Ophthalmol2005;89:1559-64.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
7.
Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/PopulationFinder/District_Master.aspx?state_code=19. [Last accessed on 2013 Dec 06].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hugli (Hooghly) District Population Census 2011, West Bengal Literacy, Sex Ratio and Density. Available from: http://www.census2011.co.in/census/district/12-Hooghly.html. [Last accessed on 2014 Nov 20].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Ichhpujani P, Pandav SS, Ramasubramanian A, Kaushik S. Profile of angle closure in a tertiary care center in north India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2010;58:199-203.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
10.
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cyrlin MN. Primary and secondary angle-closure glaucomas. In: Samples JR, Schacknow PN, editors. Clinical Glaucoma Care: The Essentials. New York: Springer; 2014. P 287-322.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Day AC, Baio G, Gazzard G, Bunce C, Azuara-Blanco A, Munoz B, et al. The prevalence of primary angle closure glaucoma in European derived populations: A systematic review. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96:1162-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, Cook DG, Ashby D. Variations in primary open-angle glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4254-61.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Cheng JW, Cheng SW, Ma XY, Cai JP, Li Y, Wei RL. The prevalence of primary glaucoma in mainland China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glaucoma 2011;22:301-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Van Rens GH, Arkell SM, Charlton W, Doesburg W. Primary angle-closure glaucoma among Alaskan Eskimos. Doc Ophthalmol 1988;70:265-76.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Congdon N, Wang F, Tielsch JM. Issues in the epidemiology and population-based screening of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 1992;36:411-23.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Angle-closure glaucoma. Chapter 5 in Section 10. In: American Academy of Ophthalmology, editor. Basic and Clinical Science Course. Singapore: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2011.p 12-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tu YS, Yin ZQ, Pen HM, Yuan CM. Genetic heritability of a shallow anterior chamber in Chinese families with primary angle closure glaucoma. Ophthalmic Genet 2008;29:171-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Amerasinghe N, Zhang J, Thalamuthu A, He M, Vithana EN, Viswanathan A, et al. The heritability and sibling risk of angle closure in Asians. Ophthalmology 2011;118:480-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Vijaya L, George R, Arvind H, Baskaran M, Ve Ramesh S, Raju P, et al. Prevalence of Primary Angle-Closure Disease in an Urban South Indian Population and Comparison with a Rural Population – The Chennai Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:655-60.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040. Ophthalmology 2014;121:2081-90.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: How big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol2001;85:1277-82.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Sawaguchi S, Sakai H, Iwase A, Yamamoto T, Abe H, Tomita G, et al. Prevalence of Primary Angle Closure and Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma in a Southwestern Rural Population of Japan – The Kumejima Study. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1134-42.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Shen L, Melles RB, Metlapally R, Barcellos L, Schaefer C, Risch N, et al. The Association of Refractive Error with Glaucoma in a Multiethnic Population. Ophthalmology 2016;123:92-101.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
van Romunde SH., Thepass G, Lemij HG. Is hyperopia an important risk factor for PACG in the Dutch Population? A case control study. J Ophthalmol 2013;2013:630481.  Back to cited text no. 25
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Primary glaucomas in adults: Epidemiology and public health—A review
Tulio F. Reis, Jayter S. Paula, Joćo M. Furtado
Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Smartphone-Acquired Image Photogrammetry for Detection of Shallow Anterior Chamber
Ravi Chandna, Neetha IR Kuzhuppilly, Yogish S Kamath
Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021; Volume 15: 1875
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2427    
    Printed19    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded265    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal