Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3850
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
PHOTO ESSAY
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 1310-1311

Corneal regularization following customized corneal collagen cross-linking


Cataract and Refractive Services, The Eye Foundation, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission08-Nov-2017
Date of Acceptance07-Jan-2018
Date of Web Publication20-Aug-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Gitansha Shreyas Sachdev
Cataract and Refractive Services, The Eye Foundation, 582-A, DB Road, RS Puram, Coimbatore - 641 002, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1101_17

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Keywords: Customised corneal collagen crosslinking, CXL, PiXL, Keratoconus


How to cite this article:
Sachdev GS, Ramamurthy S. Corneal regularization following customized corneal collagen cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:1310-1

How to cite this URL:
Sachdev GS, Ramamurthy S. Corneal regularization following customized corneal collagen cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Sep 19];66:1310-1. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2018/66/9/1310/239325



Keratoconus exhibits a focal biomechanical modification rather than a uniform generalized weakness.[1] A differential biomechanical weakening in the area of the cone, with a greater efficacy of cone centric treatments for the reduction of corneal curvature has been demonstrated.[2] Clinical application of this principle forms the basis of customized cross-linking (PiXL). A handful of studies report promising results with this novel technique, demonstrating corneal surface regularization and visual improvement.[3],[4],[5]


  Case Top


We present the case of a 14-year-old who underwent PiXL using an epithelium-off approach in the right eye for progressive keratoconus [Figure 1]a. Ultraviolet A irradiation of 5.4, 10, and 15 J/cm 2 was applied in three concentric circles (7 mm, 5 mm, and 3 mm, respectively) centered on the maximum elevation of the posterior float, using the Mosaic delivery system (KXL II, Avedro Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). A mean keratometric reduction of 1.4 D [Figure 1]b and [Figure 1]c with a subsequent improvement in best-corrected distance visual acuity from 6/12 to 6/7.5 was noted at 3-months, with a subsequent stabilization up till 1-year follow-up [Figure 1]d. No visually significant haze or endothelial cell loss was noted. The fellow eye was within normal limits.
Figure 1: Preoperative corneal topography (a). Significant mean astigmatism reduction with anterior surface regularization at 6 weeks (b) and 3 months (c) postoperative visit, with subsequent stabilization up till 1-year follow-up (d)

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In our case, the treatment was centered on the maximum posterior float elevation. The use of varying treatment patterns including customized toric, asymmetric arcuates, and concentric circles has been described. In a majority of the earlier studies, the treatment was centered on the area of greatest curvature. However, centration of irradiation around the maximum point of posterior float elevation may be more intuitive since pachymetry as well as curvature is modulated by epithelial thickness and tear film.


  Conclusion Top


In conclusion, we describe the clinical changes that ensue following PiXL over a 1-year follow-up. This ophthalmic image highlights the corneal tomographic changes and adds to the limited literature on this novel technique.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Roberts CJ, Dupps WJ Jr. Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40:991-8.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sinha Roy A, Dupps WJ Jr. Patient-specific computational modeling of keratoconus progression and differential responses to collagen cross-linking. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:9174-87.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kanellopoulos AJ, Dupps WJ, Seven I, Asimellis G. Toric topographically customized transepithelial, pulsed, very high-fluence, higher energy and higher riboflavin concentration collagen cross-linking in keratoconus. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2014;5:172-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nordström M, Schiller M, Fredriksson A, Behndig A. Refractive improvements and safety with topography-guided corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: 1-year results. Br J Ophthalmol 2017;101:920-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Seiler TG, Fischinger I, Koller T, Zapp D, Frueh BE, Seiler T, et al. Customized corneal cross-linking: One-year results. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;166:14-21.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Case
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed942    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded204    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal