Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 4137
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 350-357

Iris varix: 10-year experience with 28 eyes


Department of Ocular Tumor, Orbital Disease and Ophthalmic Radiation Therapy, The New York Eye Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA

Date of Submission08-Aug-2018
Date of Acceptance08-Nov-2018
Date of Web Publication18-Feb-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Paul T Finger
The New York Eye Cancer Center, 115 East 61st Street, New York City, New York - 10065
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1253_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics, multimodality imaging findings, and clinical course of iris varices. Methods: Retrospective, noncomparative, observational case series of 28 eyes of 26 patients with iris varices, diagnosed between 2007 and 2017, has been used. Results: The mean (±SD) age was 58.3 ± 12.5 years (median 57.5, range 37–81). Patients were 57.7% male and 27% hypertensive. Varices were bilateral in two patients. The mean and median visual acuities were both 20/20 (range 20/16–20/40). Intraocular pressures were 16 mmHg (10–23 mmHg). Secondary glaucoma did not occur. The inferotemporal iris quadrant was affected in 75%. A single varix was seen in 64% and 36% appeared multiple. Varix orientation was radial in 57% and circumferential in 21%. Combined radial and circumferential varix orientation was noted in 18%. One had independent radial and circumferential varices in separate quadrants. A single episcleral sentinel blood vessel directed to the varix was present in 36%. Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) showed a slightly increased mean iris thickness of 0.8 mm and multiple echolucent iris stromal vascular channels. Iris angiography showed no leakage of dye. Managed by observation over a mean follow-up of 37.7 months (range, 3–129), 96.4% eyes were stable and one (3.6%) regressed. No corectopia, ectropion uveae, hyphema, or metachronous anterior segment benign or malignant tumors occurred. Conclusion: Iris varix is primarily located in the inferotemporal quadrant and not associated with dysmorphic pupillary findings, progression, secondary glaucoma, or malignancy. Iris varices were benign vasculopathies with no associated ocular or vision-related morbidity.

Keywords: Imaging, iris, tumor, varix, vasculopathy


How to cite this article:
Jain P, Finger PT. Iris varix: 10-year experience with 28 eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:350-7

How to cite this URL:
Jain P, Finger PT. Iris varix: 10-year experience with 28 eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 24];67:350-7. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2019/67/3/350/252404



Varix is defined as an elongated, dilated, typically tortuous vein reported in the eyelid, conjunctiva, iris, optic disk, and orbit.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] In review of the literature, iris varices have only been described in nine case reports misdiagnosed as capillary hemangiomas, cavernous hemangiomas, and arteriovenous malformations.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] Consequently, these cases were treated by observation, excision, and laser photocoagulation.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17] In general, iris varices have been thought to be unilateral, solitary, and without systemic associations.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] This study provides the literature with a clinical profile, multimodality imaging findings, disease course, and long-term outcomes of iris varices in 28 eyes.


  Methods Top


A retrospective, noncomparative, observational case series was conducted. It adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Approval was obtained from the Internal Review Board to perform a retrospective chart review. No informed patient consent was required in view of retrospective noninterventional nature of the study. This study was limited to patients with iris varix diagnosed between 2007 and 2017. Thus, 28 eyes of 26 patients were initially diagnosed with iris varix by clinical examination and followed for change. No patients with iris hemangioma or clinically indeterminate vascular iris lesions were included.

Data parameters

The demographic data included age, gender, and associated ocular and systemic diseases. Ophthalmologic examinations were inclusive of, but not limited to, visual acuity with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts in Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study certified rooms, slit-lamp biomicroscopy with photography, tonometry, gonioscopy with photography, dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy, high-frequency ultrasonography (20–50 MHz), and iris fluorescein angiography.

Focused anterior segment examination included noting laterality of the varix, pupil shape, pupillary ruff, quadrant of the iris varix, number of varices, varix orientation (radial, circumferential, combined), associated iris nevus, hyphema, corneal endothelial pigment dusting, and dilated episcleral sentinel blood vessel in the quadrant of the iris varix.

Definitions of orientation

  • Radial iris varix defined by a clinically visible portion of the varix was seen traversing from the root of the iris to the pupillary margin in one or more meridians [Figure 1]a.
  • Circumferential iris varix was defined by a clinically visible portion, running parallel to the pupillary margin [Figure 1]b.
  • Combined iris varix contained both radial and circumferential components [Figure 1]c.
Figure 1: Photography reveals the visible portions of iris varices: (a) radial varix, (b) circumferential varix, (c) combined varix (radial and circumferential components), (d) nevus in the same meridian as the varix, (e) nevus in same quadrant as the varix, and (f) varices with an episcleral sentinel blood vessel (black arrow)

Click here to view


Slit-lamp photography: Digital imaging was performed in each case. We routinely use side-by-side comparisons over time as a method to screen for change in anterior segment anomalies.[19] Gonioscopy focused on angle (open, narrow or focal angle closure, pigment dispersion, and bridging blood vessels). High-frequency ultrasound imaging: Longitudinal and transverse images in the central meridian of the varix were recorded. This was followed by a 360° screening of the entire anterior segment. Ultrasonography evaluated for iridociliary angle blunting, maximum iris thickness (meridian of the varix), adjacent ciliary body thickness (meridian of the varix), and iris pigment epithelium (IPE) characteristics (intact, erosion, posterior bowing, or anterior displacement). In addition, iris nodularity was measured and vascular channels were noted. Based on normative values, iris thickness of more than 0.7 mm was considered as increased.[20]

Fluorescein angiography: Intravenous anterior segment angiography was not typically performed. However, when obtained, we observed appearance of hyperfluorescence (early, mid-phase, and late), duration of hyperfluorescence (transient, persistent), and dye leakage.

Follow-up

First follow-up examination was performed at 3 months. Subsequent examination included two 6-monthly visits and then at 12-month intervals thereafter. A detailed clinical evaluation, photographic documentation, and high-frequency ultrasound imaging were performed at each visit.


  Results Top


Demographics

From 2007 to 2017, 26 patients with iris varix were referred for evaluation and treatment. Two were bilateral; therefore, 28 eyes of 26 patients were analyzed in this study. The mean (±SD) age at presentation was 58.3 ± 12.5 years (median 57.5 and range 37–81). There were 57.7% (n = 15/26) males and 42.3% (n = 11/26) females. All patients in this series were Caucasian. Past medical histories at presentation revealed that 27% (n = 7/26) had hypertension. Past ocular history revealed two cases with bilateral treated open angle glaucoma and two bilateral glaucoma suspects [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic and historical characteristics

Click here to view


Ophthalmic findings

Mean, median, and range of visual acuity at presentation were 20/20, 20/20, and 20/16–20/40. Visual acuities less than 20/20 (n = 2/28) were unrelated to the varices (1 choroidal melanoma and 1 vitelliform macular degeneration). Varices involved the left eye in 68% (n = 19/28) resulting in a Chi-square 7.1429 and a significant P value of 0.007526 (P < 0.05). There were no relative afferent pupillary defects. No corectopia, ectropion uveae, or hyphema was noted in our series. One eye had bilateral corneal endothelial pigmentation in a case with open angle glaucoma. The mean (±SD), median, and range of initial intraocular pressures were 15.6 (± 2.9), 16, and 10–23 mmHg. No early or late glaucoma could be attributed to a varix in this series. Dilated fundus examination findings are shown in [Table 2].
Table 2: Clinical and varix characteristics

Click here to view


Varix characteristics

  • Laterality: Unilateral varices (n = 24/26, 92.3%) and bilateral varix (n = 2/26, 7.7%)
  • Number of varices in each eye: (n = 18/28, 64.3%) had a single varix, (n = 10/28, 35.7%) contained multiple varices. All circumferential varices and bilateral varices were single
  • Location (quadrant): Varices involved one or more iris quadrants. They were most commonly observed in the inferotemporal (n = 21/28, 75%) followed by superotemporal (n = 11/28, 39.2%). Five eyes (17.9%) had more than 1 quadrant involvement (2 quadrants: n = 3/28, 10.7%; and 3 quadrants: n = 2/28, 7.1%). Circumferential varices occurred only in the inferotemporal quadrant. Radial and combined varix showed no quadrantic predilection.
  • Orientation: Most common varix orientation was radial (n = 16/28, 57.1%), followed by circumferential varices (n = 6/28, 21.4%). Radial and circumferential varices (same eye but different quadrants) were also seen (n = 1/28, 3.6%).


In consideration of the multiple varix characteristics, the most common presentation was unilateral, radial, and inferotemporal (n = 7/28, 25%). Second most common presentation was unilateral, circumferential, and inferotemporal (n = 4/28, 14.3%).

An iris nevus was seen in 10.7% (n = 3/28) eyes. Of these nevi, 3.6% (n = 1/28) were in the primary meridian of the varix [Figure 1]d and 7.1% (n = 2/28) were in the quadrant of the varix [Figure 1]e. A dilated episcleral sentinel blood vessel was present in 35.7% (n = 10/28) in the quadrant of the varix [Figure 1]f. Gonioscopy revealed bridging vessels in 7.1% (n = 2/28), focal angle closure in the primary meridian of the varix 3.6% (n = 1/28) eyes, and glaucoma-related pigment dispersion in 3.6% (n = 1/28).

High-frequency ultrasound imaging

The iris involved by varix was most commonly within than the normative range for thickness (n = 15/28, 53.6%). However, increased iris stromal thickness (n = 13/28, 46.4%) was seen and iris nodularity was noted (n = 12/28, 42.9%). Among all 28 iris varices, the mean (±SD) meridional iris thickness was 0.8 ± 0.1 mm (median 0.7, range 0.6–1.0 mm). Further, the ciliary body thickness in the meridian of the varix was a normative 1.3 ± 0.2 mm (median 1.3, range 1.1–1.7 mm). Additional ultrasonographic characteristics associated with the iris varices included presence of distinct, varix-related, echolucent, dot-shaped vascular channels in 14.3% (n = 4/28) eyes. The underlying IPE was eroded (n = 1/28, 3.6%), anteriorly displaced (n = 1/28, 3.6%), irregular and wavy (n = 2/28, 7.1%), and showed posterior bowing (n = 3/28, 10.7%) without discontinuity [Figure 2]. No case in our series had iridociliary angle blunting or prominent vascular channels within the adjacent ciliary body [Table 3].
Figure 2: High-frequency ultrasound images (longitudinal sections): (a) varix with increased iris thickness (0.8 mm), (b) prominent hypoechoiec spot signifies a vascular channel (yellow-arrow), (c) zoomed-in view: nodular iris stroma with multiple dot-like and linear hypo-echoic vascular channels (red arrows), and (d) focal angle narrowing (red arrow) with posterior bowing of iris pigment epithelium (yellow arrow)

Click here to view
Table 3: High-frequency ultrasound findings

Click here to view


Iris varix angiography

Fluorescein iris angiography was not routinely performed. In two cases, it showed early hyperfluorescence, which persisted up to 10 min [Video clip 1]. However, no leakage of the dye into the anterior chamber was noted [Figure 3].
Figure 3: (a) Photograph of a circumferential iris varix. (b) Gonioscopic photography revealed no extension to the ciliary body. Note no bridging vessels or pigment dispersion. (c) Iris fluorescein angiography (40 s) showed a dilated hyperfluorescent vessel with no leakage. (d) Iris fluorescein angiography (5 min) showed persistent hyperfluorescence without leakage

Click here to view





Follow-up and outcomes

All patients were managed by observation. At a mean (±SD), follow-up of 37.7 ± 34.9 months (median 28, range 3–129 months), 27 eyes (96.4%) had stable varix, and 1 eye (3.6%) showed regression. No secondary iris or ciliary body melanomas evolved in this series.


  Discussion Top


This is the first long-term observational case series of eyes with iris varix. Multiple unique clinical and imaging findings were revealed. These included that varices were 92.3% unilateral and that bilateral cases occurred. Varices were most commonly located in the inferotemporal quadrant (n = 21/28, 75%) and radial (n = 16/28, 57%) in orientation. More than one variceal vein was noted in (n = 10/28, 36%) eyes. A single single synchronous iris nevus was seen in (n = 3/28, 11%). Though dilated episcleral sentinel blood vessels were seen (n = 10/28, 36%), high-frequency ultrasound imaging revealed no evidence of ciliary body tumor. High-frequency ultrasound findings included slightly increased iris stromal thickness in 46%, nodularity in 43% eyes, cross-sectional dot-like vascular channels in 14% eyes, and one focally eroded IPE. This patient had no additional suspicious clinical or imaging findings and remained stable over a 37-month follow-up. In our series, all varices monitored with serial ultrasonographic imaging remained stable throughout follow-up.

Though limited to two cases, iris fluorescein angiography revealed no dye leakage. At a mean follow-up of 38 months, 96% of varices were stable and one showed regression. No secondary iris or ciliary body melanomas occurred.

Previously, only isolated, unilateral cases of iris varix have been published with no associated ocular or systemic medical problems. Like our study, prior iris varices have not been associated with permanent loss of vision. Unlike our study, descriptions have not highlighted quadrantic predilection, sentinel blood vessels, or ultrasonographic characteristics [Table 4].
Table 4: Review of literature on iris varix

Click here to view


All the aforementioned cases suggest that iris varix is an acquired condition. The youngest reported case was of a 31-year-old male by Ang et al.[13] In our series, the median patient age was 57.5, range 37–81 years. Six of the nine varix-reported cases were male and we also found a slight male preponderance (male-to-female of 1:1.36).[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17]

In contrast to prior studies where ultrasonographic findings have included irregular, echo-dense mass in the iris stroma, in our study, iris varices have been shown to be moderately reflective mass, dotted with echolucent varix-related ultrasonographic cross-sections.[9],[14] Though the involved iris stroma was marginally thickened, benign findings included a general respect for tissue planes (IPE and ciliary body).

Fluorescein iris angiography has been reported. Broaddus et al. described a varix to be a hypo-fluorescent mass, whereas Kuchle et al. found a well-circumscribed hyperfluorescence with surrounding hypofluorescence.[9],[11] However, in our series, we noted early hyperfluorescence without any leakage of the dye indicating that the anomalous varix contains an intact vascular endothelium and thus blood–aqueous barrier.

Iris varix is most often confused with iris hemangioma. More than half of the iris varix cases till date have been histopathologically diagnosed [Table 4].[9],[10],[12],[13],[14] Iris hemangiomas tend to be lobulated, bleed recurrently into the anterior chamber, and leak dye on fluorescein iris angiography.[9] In addition, iris varix has been presumed as a clinical pointer to a forme-fruste iris melanoma or irido-ciliary melanoma.[14] The presence of pupillary dysmorphism, episcleral sentinel blood vessel, erosion of IPE, and dye leakage can be used to clinically distinguish between iris melanoma and varix [Table 5]. The main limitation of our study was the retrospective nature and lack of pathological confirmation.
Table 5: Comparison of common features in the differential diagnoses of iris varix

Click here to view



  Conclusion Top


This long-term observational study of iris varix reveals it to be a benign vasculopathy without associated morbidity or risk of secondary malignant transformation.

Financial support and sponsorship

The study was financially supported by Eye Cancer Foundation, New York, USA (http://eyecancerfoundation.net). Dr. Puneet Jain received a fellowship grant from the foundation.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Atta HM. Varicose veins: Role of mechanotransduction of venous hypertension. Int J Vasc Med 2012;2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/538627.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Jakobiec FA, Werdich XQ, Chodosh J, Freitag SK. An analysis of conjunctival and periocular venous malformations: Clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features with a comparison of racemose and cirsoid lesions. Surv Ophthalmol 2014;59:236-44.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Rosenblum P, Zilkha A. Sudden visual loss secondary to an orbital varix. Surv Ophthalmol 1978;23:49-56.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Margo CE, Rowda J, Barletta J. Bilateral conjunctival varix thromboses associated with habitual head-standing. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;113:726-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mudgil AV, Meyer DR, Dipillo MA. Varix of the angular vein manifesting as a medial canthal mass. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;116:245-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Khan SR, Burton BJ, Beaconsfield M, Rose GE. The varix of angular vein. Eye (Lond) 2004;18:645-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Levy J, Yagev R, Shelef I, Lifshitz T. Varix of the vortex vein ampulla: A small case series. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005;15:424-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Joffe L, Annesley WH Jr, Shields JA, Federman JL. Varix of the optic disk. Am J Ophthalmol 1978;86:520-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Broaddus E, Lystad LD, Schonfield L, Singh AD. Iris varix: Report of a case and review of iris vascular anomalies. Surv Ophthalmol 2009;54:118-27.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Andersen SR, Other A. Varix of the iris. Arch Ophthalmol 1975;93:32-3.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Küchle M, Naumann GO. Varix node of the iris with spontaneous regression. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1992;200:233-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rohrbach JM, Eckstein A, Schuster I. Varicose vein of the iris. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1995;207:206-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ang LP, Sim DH, Chiang GS, Yong VS. Iris varix. Eye (Lond) 1997;11:733-5.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Shields JA, Shields CL, Pulido J, Eagle, RC, Nothnagel AF. Iris varix simulating an iris melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:707-10.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ammermann A, Platzeck H, Hoerauf H. Unilateral tumor of the iris. Ophthalmologe 2011;108:174-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tschuor P, Hafezi F, Majo F. Iris varix as a cause of late-onset inflammation after implantation of a phakic iris claw lens. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2012;229:462-3.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Matlach J, Kasper K, Kasper B, Klink T. Successful argon and diode laser photocoagulation treatment of an iris varix with recurrent hemorrhage. Eur J Ophthalmol 2013;23:431-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Radcliffe NM, Finger PT. Eye cancer related glaucoma: Current concepts. Surv Ophthalmol 2009;54:47-73.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Chaugule SS, Finger PT. Regression patterns of Iris melanoma after Palladium-103 (103Pd) plaque brachytherapy. Ophthalmology 2017;124:1023-30.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Garcia JP Jr, Spielberg L, Finger PT. High-frequency ultrasound measurements of the normal ciliary body and iris. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42:321-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed372    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded64    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal