Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 5103
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 694-696

A novel simplified method for managing inadvertent tube cut during aurolab aqueous drainage implant surgery for refractory glaucoma


1 Department of Glaucoma, Mungale Eye Hospital, Vinraj Plaza, Kothi, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
2 Department of Glaucoma, Dave Eye Clinic, 301 Sanket Heights, Akshar Chowk, Sun Pharma Road, Atladara, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission12-Oct-2018
Date of Acceptance08-Jan-2019
Date of Web Publication22-Apr-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Paaraj Dave
Dave Eye Clinic, 301, Sanket Heights, Akshar Chowk, Atladara, Vadodara - 390 020, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1708_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


We report a novel simplified method for managing inadvertent tube cut in a patient undergoing the Aurolab aqueous drainage implant (AADI) surgery for refractory neovascular glaucoma. Tube cut occurred while applying the polyglactin ligature suture used to avoid early postoperative hypotony. The short end of the cut tube was removed and the long end reinserted into the base plate of AADI. The surgery was then completed as usual. Following the surgery, the intraocular pressure reduced to 20 mmHg which stabilized and was maintained at 10 mmHg till the last follow-up at 12 months without any glaucoma medication.

Keywords: Aurolab aqueous drainage implant, management, tube cut


How to cite this article:
Mungale S, Dave P. A novel simplified method for managing inadvertent tube cut during aurolab aqueous drainage implant surgery for refractory glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:694-6

How to cite this URL:
Mungale S, Dave P. A novel simplified method for managing inadvertent tube cut during aurolab aqueous drainage implant surgery for refractory glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 22];67:694-6. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2019/67/5/694/256674



The Aurolab aqueous drainage implant or AADI 350 (Aurolab, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India) is a nonvalved glaucoma shunt. It consists of a 13 mm radius base plate made of silicone with a surface area of 350 mm2 along with a straight silicone tube measuring 35 mm in length for easy insertion into the anterior chamber.[1] Like all nonvalved implants, a temporary tube ligature is essential to prevent hypotony in the early postoperative period.[2] Typically, this is done by using an absorbable polyglactin suture. Tying the suture too tight may result in inadvertent tube cut. The aim of our report is to discuss a novel simplified method of managing this rare complication.


  Case Report Top


The patient was a 55-year-old male with pseudophakia in both eyes who had developed neovascular glaucoma following a central retinal vein occlusion in his right eye. His presenting visual acuity was counting fingers close to face in the right eye and 20/20 in the left eye. His medical history was remarkable for uncontrolled hypertension. Slit-lamp examination of the right eye revealed diffuse stromal and microcystic corneal edema with neovascularization of the iris. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 40 and 16 mmHg in the right and left eye, respectively. Gonioscopy showed 360-degree closed angles in the right eye and open angles in the left eye. The left eye was otherwise unremarkable. Patient was started on brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and timolol 0.5% eye drop combination twice a day, dorzolamide 2% eye drops thrice a day, and oral tablet acetazolamide 250 mg four times a day. Intravitreal bevacizumab was injected and panretinal photocoagulation was performed in the right eye. Subsequently, his IOP continued to remain high at 30 mmHg despite regression of the iris neovascularization. Hence, a decision to implant the AADI for his intractable glaucoma was taken. A standard surgical method was followed.[3] Fornix based conjunctival opening was made. The AADI tube was primed and the base plate was positioned 8–10 mm posterior to the limbus, with its wings under the superior and lateral rectus muscles. The plate was secured by two interrupted 10-0 prolene suture (monofilament polypropylene blue; Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Himachal Pradesh, India). While ligating the tube with absorbable 6-0 vicryl suture (braided coated polyglactin 910 violet; Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson) for prevention of hypotony in the early postoperative period, we encountered an inadvertent tube cut [Figure 1]. Due to the unavailability of a spare valve and other materials for tube extension, the operating surgeon removed the short end which was attached to the implant and reinserted the long end into the back plate of the implant [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. The long end of the tube near the plate was again ligated taking care not to apply too much force and the tube occlusion was checked. Venting incisions were made anterior to the ligation (four pairs) and tested for patency. The tube was shortened with a bevel up opening made so that 2–3 mm length would remain in the anterior chamber. A 23-gauge needle was used to create a track 1.5 to 2 mm behind the limbus through which the tube was inserted into the anterior chamber parallel to the iris. The tube was secured to the sclera with 10-0 nylon suture (monofilament polyamide black, Ethilon; Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Himachal Pradesh, India) and subsequently covered with a partial thickness scleral patch graft. The Tenon's capsule and conjunctiva were sutured with 8–0 vicryl (Braided coated polyglactin 910 violet) [Figure 4]. On postoperative day 1, the cornea became clear with IOP of 20 mmHg which stabilized and was maintained at 10 mmHg till the last follow-up at 12 months without any glaucoma medication. He was given tapering doses of topical steroid, antibiotic, and cycloplegic eye drops in the postoperative period. His final visual acuity improved to 20/200.
Figure 1: Inadvertent tube cut while applying the polyglactin ligature suture

Click here to view
Figure 2: Inserting the long end into the back plate of the implant after the short end was removed

Click here to view
Figure 3: Schematic representation of the technique (a) Tube ligature with 6-0 vicryl to prevent postoperative hypotony (b) Inadvertent tube cut (c) Short end of the tube pulled and removed from its attachment with the episcleral plate. (d) Long end of the tube re-inserted in its place to the episcleral plate

Click here to view
Figure 4: Final appearance of the eye at the completion of the surgery

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The AADI is a relatively new cost-effective implant used in the management of refractory glaucoma. Its one year safety and efficacy has been published.[4],[5] A rare complication like tube cut has been reported before with the Baerveldt implant which was managed with the help of a Tube Extender (New World Medical, Inc, Rancho Cucamonga, CA).[6] The use of an angiocatheter segment or a 22-G intravenous catheter for retracted tube has also been reported.[7],[8] These methods could have been used; however, their nonavailability was a major limitation in our case. Fortunately, the small stump of the tube attached to the base plate of the valve could be easily removed and the larger end reinserted in its place without much difficulty. Despite tube ligation, a relatively low post operative IOP of 20 mmHg in our case could have resulted because of peritubular leak and the venting incisions. We do not know if this method can be used for other nonvalved implants as they are currently not available in this region. This method may not work with valved implants like the Ahmed valve where the tube snugly fits into the base plate and any forceful pulling may damage the valve mechanics present near the tube insertion. In such cases, the conventional methods for tube extension should be used. A 12-month follow-up of our patient managed with this novel method for inadvertent tube cut proves that it works for the AADI implant in dire situations where a spare implant or other alternatives are not available.


  Conclusion Top


We report a novel simplified method for managing inadvertent tube cut in a patient undergoing AADI surgery.

Acknowledgements

The manuscript, or parts of it, have not been and will not be submitted elsewhere for publication. All co-authors have read the final manuscript within their respective areas of expertise and participated sufficiently in the study to take responsibility for it and accept its conclusion.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Aurolab aqueous drainage implant brochure. Available from: http://www.aurolab.com/images/AADI%20issue%2002%20final.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Oct 12].  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sarkisian SR Jr. Tube shunt complications and their prevention. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009;20:126-30.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Panarelli JF, Banitt MR, Gedde SJ, Shi W, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ. A retrospective comparison of primary baerveldt implantation versus trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmology 2016;123:789-95.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Pathak Ray V, Rao DP. Surgical outcomes of a new low-cost nonvalved glaucoma drainage device in refractory glaucoma: Results at 1 year. J Glaucoma 2018;27:433-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Pathak Ray V, Rao DP. Surgical outcomes of a new affordable non-valved glaucoma drainage device and Ahmed glaucoma valve: Comparison in the first year. Br J Ophthalmol 2018. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311716.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sarkisian SR, Netland PA. Tube extender for revision of glaucoma drainage implants. J Glaucoma 2007;16:637-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Moghimi S, Mohammadi M. Extension of a retracted ciliary sulcus tube of Ahmed glaucoma implant with angiocatheter segment. Int Ophthalmol 2012;32:409-12.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bansal A, Fenerty CH. Extension of retracted glaucoma drainage tube using a 22-gauge intravenous catheter in complex pediatric glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2010;19:248-51.  Back to cited text no. 8
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed332    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded69    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal