Glyxambi
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 2069
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 1056-1059

Procurement, storage and utilization trends of eye banks in India


1 Department of Ophthalmology, National Eye Bank, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Ramayamma International Eye Bank, LVPEI, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Pujyaniya Mata Kartar Kaur Ji Intl. Eye Bank, Sirsa, Haryana, India
4 Department of Ophthalmology, Aravind Eye Care, Madurai, India
5 Department of Ophthalmology, C J Shah Cornea Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India
6 Department of Ophthalmology, Vasan Eye Bank, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
7 Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Bank Society of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
8 Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Bank Association, Angamally, Kerela, India
9 Department of Ophthalmology, Lions International Eye Bank, Bangalore, India
10 Department of Ophthalmology, Eye Bank, Guru Nanak Eye Centre, Delhi, India
11 Department of Ophthalmology, Disha Eye Hospitals, Barrackpore, Kolkata, India

Date of Submission13-Sep-2018
Date of Acceptance07-Feb-2019
Date of Web Publication25-Jun-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Namrata Sharma
Professor of Ophthalmology, Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery Services, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1551_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: To study the trends in collection, storage and utilization of donor corneas in eye banks in India. Methods: The data was collected from 12 eye banks in India that collected more than 1000 corneas per year. The retrospective analysis of the parameters like characteristics of the donor and the host, storage media used, number of eyes collected, number of eyes utilized, causes of non-utilization of the tissue and the procedures performed was done. Results: A total of 20,564 eyes were collected by the 12 eye banks during the year 2013–2014. Voluntary eye donation (VED), and hospital cornea retrieval program (HCRP) contributed to 59.6% and 40.4% of tissue procurement respectively. Whole globe enucleation (52.3%) was more commonly performed as compared to in-situ excision of the donor corneas. The most commonly used storage media at all eye banks was McCarey-Kaufman (MK) media (83.3%). The utilization rate of the donor eyes was 50.5%. The most frequent indication for corneal transplantation was infection (active infection - 33.13%, healed infection - 10.78%) followed by Pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) (13.57%). Full thickness keratoplasty (optical penetrating keratoplasty - 47.23%, therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty - 31.74%) was performed most often followed by endothelial keratoplasty (12.41%) in the developing country. Conclusion: VED still contributes to majority of the donor tissue retrieval in India. The majority of the eye banks still utilize whole globe enucleation technique and store tissues in MK media. Trends from previous years showed a change towards HCRP, in-situ excision technique and preservation in the long-term storage media.

Keywords: Corneal blindness, corneal transplantation, eye bank


How to cite this article:
Sharma N, Arora T, Singhal D, Maharana PK, Garg P, Nagpal R, Murthy S, Gunnam S, Arora A, Prajna V, Rajaraman R, Padmanabhan P, Kumar A, Kumar R, Tomar S, Thomas A, Gyanchand R, Arora R, Biswas B, Basak S. Procurement, storage and utilization trends of eye banks in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:1056-9

How to cite this URL:
Sharma N, Arora T, Singhal D, Maharana PK, Garg P, Nagpal R, Murthy S, Gunnam S, Arora A, Prajna V, Rajaraman R, Padmanabhan P, Kumar A, Kumar R, Tomar S, Thomas A, Gyanchand R, Arora R, Biswas B, Basak S. Procurement, storage and utilization trends of eye banks in India. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Jul 16];67:1056-9. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2019/67/7/1056/260992



Corneal blindness is the third leading cause of blindness after cataract and glaucoma in the world.[1] In India, it is estimated that there are approximately 6.8 million people who have vision less than 6/60 in at least one eye due to corneal diseases; of these, about a million have bilateral involvement.[2],[3] It is estimated that approximately 20,000 patients with corneal blindness are added to the backlog each year and that 50% of corneal blindness is treatable.[4],[5] Many of these corneal blind patients may be visually rehabilitated by corneal transplantation.

An efficient and precise utilization of the donor corneas in developing countries like India is only possible after a complete knowledge of the collection, storage and utilization of donor tissues. Thus, this study was conducted with the objective of identifying trends in collection, storage and utilization of corneal tissues in the top 12 eye banks in a developing country that had collected more than 1000 donor corneas per year.


  Methods Top


A retrospective chart analysis of the data from all eye banks in India that have a collection of more than 1000 eyes per year was undertaken from April 2013 to March 2014. There are about 12 eye banks that are satisfied in these criteria. The research was conducted adhering to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. A predesigned proforma was sent for completion to these eye banks. An evaluation of the donor and the recipient characteristics was done. The parameters evaluated were the number of eyes collected, the storage media used, number of eyes utilized and the number of eyes that are not fit for surgery. The causes for non-utilization of the donor eyes were also evaluated. The donor parameters evaluated were the donor age, sex, death to preservation time (DPT), and method of retrieval that is whole globe or in-situ excision. The recipient characteristics analyzed were the age, sex, indications for surgery and the type of the surgery performed.


  Results Top


The total number of eyes collected by the 12 eye banks over a 12-month period (1st April 2013-31st March 2014) was 20,564. The average collection of eyes per year per eye bank was 1713 (range 1047-4652 eyes/year). The number of donor corneas procured through the voluntary eye donation (VED) program was significantly higher [59.6% (9492/15,926)] as compared to hospital cornea retrieval program (HCRP) [40.4% (6434/15,926)]. The whole globe enucleation was more commonly performed method [52.3% (8339/15,956)] as compared to the in situ corneo-scleral rim excision [47.7% (7617/15,956)]. A greater number of donors were present in the age group more than 60 years [65.2% (6504/9973)], followed by those between 30 to 60 years of age [26.3% (2625/9973)]. There were more male donors [59.5% (6074/10,210)] as compared to females [40.5% (4136/10,210)]. DPT was less than six hours in 77.3% (8497/10,999) of eyes whereas 6–12 hours in 18.1% (1992/10,999) of the eyes.

Majority of the eye banks reported use of multiple storage media for donor tissues. The most commonly used storage media was the McCarey-Kaufman's (MK) media (Aurora, Buffalo, NY) [83.33%], followed by the Moist chamber storage [50%], Cornisol (Aurolab, Madurai, India) [50%], Optisol (Baush and Lomb, St Louis, Missouri) [33.33%], Eusol (AL.CHI.MI.A.SRL, Padova, Italy) [25%] and Life 40 C medium (Numedis, Isanti, Minnesota)[8.3%].

Of the total eyes collected, almost half [50.5% (10,387/20,564)] were utilized for corneal transplantation, out of which, 40.36% were non-optical grade whereas 59.64% were optical grade.

About 26 donor corneo-scleral rims had been used for more than one recipient. The eyes that are not suitable for surgery were used either for medical education [58.6% (4976/8351)] or for experimental research [40.4% (3375/8351)]. The data for the cause of non-utilization of tissues was available only for 291 eye [Table 1].
Table 1: Causes of non-utilization of donor eyes

Click here to view


Most recipients were in the age group between 16 to 60 years of age [61.3% (5178/8449)] followed by those more than 60 years of age [26.5% (2241/8449)]. There were more male recipients [62.1% (3675/5921)] as compared to females [37.9% (2246/5921)].

The most common indication for corneal transplantation was infection (active infection 33.13% (2281/6884), healed infection 10.78% (742/6884)) followed by pseudophakic bullous keratopathy [13.57% (934/6884)] [Table 2]. Full thickness penetrating keratoplasty (optical penetrating keratoplasty 47.23% (4737/10,029)], therapeutic keratoplasty 31.74% (3183/10,029)) was the most commonly performed procedure followed by endothelial keratoplasty (12.41% (1245/10,029)) [Table 3].
Table 2: Indications for surgery

Click here to view
Table 3: Type of surgeries performed

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


There are more than 740 institutional members (Eye Banks and Eye Donation Centers) under the aegis of Eye Bank Association of India (EBAI). Out of these 15 eye banks i.e. 2% of the 740 organizations account for more than half of the total collection. To meet the demand of the donor corneas, efficient functioning of the eye banks is necessary. High growth rates in the procurement of transplantable tissues, improved utilization rates, operating efficiency realization and increased financial sustainability are vital for successful functioning of an eye bank.

Most donors (65.2%) in our study were in the age group of age 60 years or older. The mean age of donors in past studies ranged from 42.7 years to 75.9 years.[6],[7],[8],[9] In our study, males were more as compared to that of females as has also been reported previously.[10],[11],[12] Majority of donor corneas in our study were procured from the VED program as compared to HCRP. The higher age group of donors in VED program results in procurement of more eyes with non-optical grade quality. Due to paucity of good quality donor tissues, non-optical grade corneas are used for therapeutic keratoplasty in emergency.

Most eyes were retrieved within six hours of death (77.3%) however 18.1% of eyes were retrieved within 6 to 12 hours and remaining eyes were retrieved after 12 hours. The cause for delay was requirement of completion of formalities in medico legal cases before retrieval. Woodford et al.[13] showed that DPT longer than 6 hours was more likely to result in sloughing of the donor epithelium. Even though the majority of the tissues were collected early within 6 hours, the major factors behind such low utilization rate could be lack of protection measures after death to prevent exposure as well as contamination of the eye, largely due to lack of awareness among the health care professionals.

Whole globe enucleation was still widely performed in more (52.3%) donors as compared to in situ corneo-scleral rim excision (47.7%). Kim et al.[14] and Jhanji et al.[15] compared the two techniques in a large, single eye bank series and found that in situ excision was equivalent to whole-globe enucleation when various parameters such as endothelial cell counts, ultrasonic corneal pachymetry, microbial contamination, graft clarity, and postoperative median visual acuity at the end of 3 months were studied. Although in-situ excision is the most preferred method worldwide, whole globe enucleation is still prevalent in India. The utilization rate in our study was only 50.5% of the total eyes collected. This is much lower as compared to other international eye banks.

The New Zealand Eye bank study reported 90% of donor corneas suitable for transplantation with a high utilization rate of 88%.[10] This lower rate of utilization in developing countries can be explained by two reasons. Firstly, the most commonly used storage media is MK media (83.33%) in our study, organ culture is the most widely used method of storage in European countries and Optisol is the most common in America (USA). Secondly, these medium term storage media suffice our needs since the most commonly performed keratoplasties are for therapeutic or emergency indications while elective procedures are the most common in Europe and USA where long-term storage media are well suited.

In our study, 1.82% of tissues were discarded in view of positive serology (Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis C virus, Hepatitis B virus or Syphilis). This is in contrast to a study by Viegas et al.[16] who discarded 33.4% of corneas in their study due to positive or inconclusive serological tests. Cahane et al.[17] reported 6.7% of discarded corneas due to HCV positive serology in contrast to this study where only 0.43% of corneas were HCV positive. They reported that a delay in harvesting of donor corneas might give rise to a false positive HCV serology, which may be partially responsible for the high rate of HCV positivity among the donor corneas, with consequent tissue wastage.[17] As most of the corneas in our study were retrieved within six hours, this may have led to a lower rate of positive HCV serology. Armstrong et al.[18] reported the prevalence of HBV, HCV and HIV to be 0.25%, 0.93%; and 0.031% in the donor corneas. These values were closest to the results of our study. The prevalence of these results may vary depending on the prevalence of the disease in various geographical regions and also different diagnostic tests that may have been used.

More than half of the recipients in this study were between 16 to 60 years of age group with male preponderance. Cunningham et al. reported similar results in their study with the median recipient age of 45 years and 54.0% of recipients as male.[11] The most common indications for corneal transplantation in our study were active infection (33.13%) constituting about one-third of the recipients followed by PBK and healed keratitis. Keratoplasty was most commonly performed for cases of infection, which were either acute or healed. High rate of therapeutic keratoplasty performed for active infection may be due to a delay in initiation of treatment and late referral to tertiary eye care centres. According to a study that had been previously conducted in India, the leading indication for penetrating keratoplasty was corneal scarring due to healed keratitis (38.03%) followed by acute infectious keratitis (28.38%).[19]

PBK has been the leading indication for keratoplasty in the western world however; it is the second most common cause for keratoplasty in our part of the world constituting 13.57% cases.[20] Keratoconus is also a leading cause reported in developed countries however; it accounted for only 5.46% of our cases.[11] Pediatric keratoplasty was performed in only 5.24% of cases in our study. The reason for high rate of patients operated for graft failure (10.63%) in this study was due to poor quality donor corneas being utilized for therapeutic keratoplasty, which then have to be operated at a later stage with an optical quality graft.

In our study, penetrating keratoplasty (78.97%) remains the most common surgery that was performed in three- fourth of the patients. Cunningham et al. reported penetrating keratoplasty in 90.7% of the recipients.[11] However, during the latter half of their study there was a progressive shift in transplantation type, with deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and Descemets stripping endothelial keratoplasty combined accounting for 32.3% of all transplants in the final year of the study period. Endothelial keratoplasty is now the most common keratoplasty procedure performed in the United States with the most common indication being Fuch's dystrophy.[21] Comparing our data with the last year data (unpublished), we observe a similar increase in number of lamellar keratoplasty. This may be due to a greater number of surgeons acquiring the skills to perform lamellar corneal procedures.

Recently, Gain et al.[1] conducted a global survey of corneal transplantation supply and demand in 148 countries. They reported that about 53% of the world's population had no access to corneal transplantation and only one cornea is available for 70 recipients in need indicating a vast shortage of corneal grafts. A total of 2,84,000 corneas were reported to be procured in 82 countries with approximately 185 000 corneal transplants being performed in 116 countries indicating a utilization rate of 65.1%. The maximum numbers of transplants were performed in Fuchs dystrophy (39%) followed by keratoconus (27%), and sequellae of infectious keratitis (20%). India constituted one of the leading countries in corneal procurement along with United States and Brazil (55% of total procurement). Also, maximum number of eye banks were identified in India (238), followed by the United States (84) and China (75) out of the total 742 eye banks. Though, the procurement of tissues and number of eye banks are amongst the maximum in India; the utilization rate is still low. Thus, there is a great need of increasing the utility of the donor corneas by eye banks in developing countries like India. This can be achieved with continued increase in donor procurement through HCRP system.

One of the major limitations of the study is that the questionnaire was completed by the eye bank itself. Thus, there could be a potential source of bias. Also, there are no uniform guidelines for recording of data in various eye banks of India. This could be another source of bias in the conducted study. In addition, being a retrospective study, the detailed data from all eye banks was not available like the data of the type of retrieval and method used out of the total eyes collected.


  Conclusion Top


Continued assessment of all eye banks with periodic review of trends in eye donation would be required to effectively increase the procurement and utilization of donor corneas and to reduce the imbalance between the corneal transplant supply and demand. The cause of non-utilization must be reviewed yearly and continuous efforts should be made to minimize the same.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of all eye banks including Mr. D Sarvanan for helping in maintaining records of eye bank data that helped in the analysis.

We would also like to thank Mr. Aditya Arora for helping in data acquisition and analysis.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Gain P, Jullienne R, He Z, Aldossary M, Acquart S, Cognasse F, et al. Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016;134:167-73.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
National Programme for Control of Blindness. Report of National Programme for Control of Blindness, India and World Health Organization 1986-89.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Dandona R, Dandona L. Corneal blindness in a southern Indian population: Need for health promotion strategies. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:133-41.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Saini JS, Reddy MK, Jain AK, Ravindra MS, Jhaveria S, Raghuram L. Perspectives in eye banking. Indian J Ophthalmol 1996;44:47-55.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Eye Donation. NPCB India Newsletter; 2010, Jul-Sep. Available from: http://npcb.nic.in/writereaddata/mainlinkfile/File200.pdf.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pantaleão GR, Zapparolli M, Guedes GB, Dimartini Junior WM, Vidal CC, Wasilewski D, et al. Evaluation of the quality of donor corneas in relation to the age of donor and cause of death. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2009;72:631-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Adán CB, Diniz AR, Perlatto D, Hirai FE, Sato EH. Ten years of corneal donation to the Hospital São Paulo Eye Bank: Characteristics of cornea donors from 1996 to 2005. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2008;71:176-81.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Meyer HJ, Labjuhn S. Keratoplasty and donor age distribution. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1999;214:367-71.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Raychaudhuri A, Raychaudhuri M, Banerjee AR. Availability of donor corneal tissue for transplantation. Trop Doct 2004;34:99-101.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Cunningham WJ, Moffatt SL, Brookes NH, Twohill HC, Pendergrast DG, Stewart JM, et al. The New Zealand National Eye Bank study: Trends in the acquisition and storage of corneal tissue over the decade 2000 to 2009. Cornea 2012;31:538-45.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cunningham WJ, Moffatt SL, Brookes NH, Moffatt SL, Pendergrast DG, Stewart JM, et al. Trends in the distribution of donor corneal tissue and indications for corneal transplantation: The New Zealand National Eye Bank study 2000-2009. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012;40:141-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Linke SJ, Eddy MT, Bednarz J, Fricke OH, Wulff B, Schröder AS, et al. Thirty years of cornea cultivation: Long-term experience in a single eye bank. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91:571-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Van Meter WS, Katz DG, White H, Gayheart R. Effect of death-to-preservation time on donor corneal epithelium. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2005;103:209-24.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kim JH, Kim MJ, Stoeger C, Clover J, Kim JY, Tchah H. Comparison of in situ excision and whole-globe recovery of corneal tissue in a large, single eye bank series. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:427-33.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Jhanji V, Tandon R, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, Satpathy G, Vajpayee RB. Whole globe enucleation versus in situ excision for donor corneal retrieval-a prospective comparative study. Cornea 2008;27:1103-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Viegas MT, Pessanha LC, Sato EH, Hirai FE, Adán CB. Discarded corneas due to positive donor's serologic test in the Hospital São Paulo Eye Bank: A two-year study. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2009;72:180-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Cahane M, Barak A, Goller O, Avni I. The incidence of hepatitis C virus positive serological test results among cornea donors. Cell Tissue Bank 2000;1:81-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Armstrong SA, Gangam N, Chipman ML, Rootman DS. The prevalence of positive hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV serology in cornea donors prescreened by medical and social history in Ontario, Canada. Cornea 1997;16:512-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Sony P, Sharma N, Sen S, Vajpayee RB. Indications of penetrating keratoplasty in northern India. Cornea 2005;24:989-91.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Boimer C, Lee K, Sharpen L, Mashour RS, Slomovic AR. Evolving surgical techniques of and indications for corneal transplantation in Ontario from 2000 to 2009. Can J Ophthalmol 2011;46:360-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Statistical report of Eye bank association of America (EBAA)-2013.  Back to cited text no. 21
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed185    
    Printed3    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded81    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal