|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 7 | Page : 1240-1245
Solitary orbital myofibroma in a child: A rare case report with literature review
Bejjanki Kavya Madhuri1, Devjyoti Tripathy1, Ruchi Mittal2
1 Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Orbit and Ocular Oncology Services, The Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
2 Kanupriya Dalmia Ophthalmic Pathology Laboratory, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
|Date of Submission||14-Sep-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||18-Oct-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||25-Jun-2019|
Dr. Ruchi Mittal
Kanupriya Dalmia Ophthalmic Pathology Service, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulasi Chanrai Campus, Patia, Bhubaneswar - 751 024, Odisha
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Myofibroma is a rare benign mesenchymal tumor of uncertain histogenesis. A six-year-old boy presented with a unilateral lower eyelid mass of six weeks' duration. MRI revealed a circumscribed mass in the inferolateral orbit with bony erosion. A systemic examination was unremarkable. Excision with histopathology revealed a partially infiltrative spindle cell tumor with bland nuclear morphology expressing smooth muscle actin and muscle-specific actin, compatible with myofibroma. Solitary myofibroma is a rare childhood orbital tumor and may clinico-radiologically closely mimic a malignancy. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry can help reach a definitive diagnosis. Systemic evaluation and close follow up are crucial in such cases.
Keywords: Benign, bone erosion, children, myofibromatosis, orbital myofibroma
|How to cite this article:|
Madhuri BK, Tripathy D, Mittal R. Solitary orbital myofibroma in a child: A rare case report with literature review. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:1240-5
|How to cite this URL:|
Madhuri BK, Tripathy D, Mittal R. Solitary orbital myofibroma in a child: A rare case report with literature review. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Feb 21];67:1240-5. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2019/67/7/1240/260994
Myofibromas are benign soft tissue neoplasms, and were previously classified as fibroblastic/myofibroblastic in origin. WHO classification of tumors of the soft tissue in 2013, reclassified them as pericytic tumors. They commonly occur in early infancy, and are clinically classified as solitary, multicentric without visceral involvement and multicentric with visceral involvement (generalized)., Though labeled as the commonest fibrous tissue tumor of infancy,, they are still quite rare. The term “myofibroma” is used to describe the solitary form and is the commonest form of presentation, whereas “myofibromatosis” denotes the multicentric form. The most common site is the head and neck regions followed by limbs and trunk.
Orbital myofibromas are extremely rare. Herein, we report a case of an orbital myofibroma presenting in a six-year-old child and a review of literature of pediatric orbital myofibromas.
| Case Report|| |
A six-year-old male child presented with a painless progressive swelling over the lateral left lower eyelid of about six weeks' duration. There was no other associated ocular or systemic complaint.
On examination, a well-defined, firm, nodular, non-tender soft tissue mass was palpated in the lower eyelid at the lateral edge of the inferior orbital rim [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. The lower fornix and overlying skin were uninvolved. There was no globe displacement, proptosis or ocular motility restriction. Visual acuity in both eyes, and the ocular examination was normal. A detailed systemic clinical examination was unremarkable. A chest radiograph and ultrasonography of the abdomen and the pelvis were both within normal limits. On MRI of the orbits, the mass appeared hypointense on T1W images [[Figure 1]c, red arrow] and lay adjacent to the left zygomatic bone with changes suggestive of underlying bony erosion. On T2W images, it was isointense, relatively homogeneous, and well circumscribed [[Figure 1]d, yellow arrow].
|Figure 1: Clinical and radiological features: Well-defined, firm, non-tender soft tissue mass present on the inferolateral orbital rim (black arrow, a, b). Magnetic resonance imaging shows a well-circumscribed soft tissue mass noted to be hypointense on the T1W image (yellow arrow, c) and changes evident in the adjacent zygomatic bone (red arrow, c). The mass shows an increase in signal intensity on the T2W image (yellow arrow, d)|
Click here to view
An excision biopsy was performed. Intraoperatively, the mass appeared pinkish and firm. The underlying bony orbital rim was eroded [[Figure 2]a, yellow arrow]. The mass was excised from its bony attachment with a ragged base [Figure 2]a. Clear surgical margins were not obtained. The eroded bony base was curetted. Intra-operative squash and imprint cytology demonstrated bland appearing spindle cells suggestive of a benign spindle cell tumor.
|Figure 2: Intra-operative and Gross tumor morphology: intra-operatively, the portion of the zygomatic bone underlying the lesion was eroded (yellow arrow, a). On gross examination, the mass was found to be partially circumscribed (red arrow, b) with an irregular base that was abutting the underlying bone (yellow arrow, b)|
Click here to view
Gross examination showed a partially circumscribed mass, with a pseudocapsule surrounding three-quarters of the tumor [[Figure 2]b, red arrow]. One-quarter displayed irregular edges [[Figure 2]b; yellow arrow]. The tumor comprised predominantly of variably sized spindle cells in fascicles, and whorls intersecting at places [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b. It displayed a rich vascularity [Figure 3]c with thin-walled slit-like branching vessels imparting a staghorn appearance [[Figure 3]c, black arrow]. Individual cells showed ill-defined cell membranes, abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, bland, elongated, oval to round nuclei with uniform nuclear morphology. Scattered pale myxoid foci were noted around vessels. Mitotic count was 7 per 20 HPF. There was no necrosis, cytological atypia, or inflammation. A fragment of curetted bony tissue showed spicules of lamellar bone encircled by tumor cells with bland nuclear morphology [[Figure 3]d, yellow asterix].
|Figure 3: Morphology of Myofibroma: (a) Spindle cell tumor, cells arranged in a fascicular and whorled pattern (a: 10×). Individual cells are spindly with ill-defined cell membrane, abundant eosinophilic fibrillary cytoplasm, bland, elongated, oval, spindly to round nuclei with uniform nuclear morphology (b: 40×). Tumor is richly vascular with thin-walled slit-like to branching vessels imparting a staghorn appearance (c: 6×, black arrow marked). Tumor cells with bland nuclear morphology are seen surrounding fragments of cancellous bone (d, asterix marked, 10×; Haematoxylin and Eosin stain)|
Click here to view
Tumor cells showed strong cytoplasmic expression of vimentin [Figure 4]a, smooth muscle actin [SMA, [Figure 4]b], and muscle-specific antigen (MSA), and were negative for desmin, ALK-1, and S-100. CD34 decorated the vessels [Figure 4]c, but not the tumor cells. Ki-67 showed a labeling index of 1–2% [Figure 4]d. The morphological and immunohistochemical features were consistent with myofibroma. A systemic evaluation was unremarkable, and a diagnosis of solitary orbital myofibroma was made.
|Figure 4: Immunohistochemical staining of Myofibroma: tumor cells strongly express Vimentin (a) and SMA (b); CD 34 decorated the vessel walls (c), but was not expressed in tumor cells. Ki -67 shows 1–2% (d), yellow arrow marked) of proliferative activity|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Myofibroma has a diverse clinical presentation varying from aggressive multicentric to benign localized forms. It is rarely self-regressing and was historically identified by several names, such as infantile myofibromatosis (IM), congenital-infantile hemangiopericytoma (CIH), and congenital-infantile fibrosarcoma (CIF). A systematic review of similar lesions had led to the introduction of the term juvenile fibromatoses. The disease was described to have solitary, multiple, and generalized forms. Subsequently, the skin tumors and tumors of soft tissue and bone working groups advocated usage of the terms “myofibroma”, “solitary myofibroma”, or “solitary cutaneous myofibroma” to denote solitary lesions of IM and the term “myofibromatosis” for the multicentric forms.
Solitary and multicentric forms can involve the skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and bone. In solitary myofibroma, visceral involvement is very rare.
Multicentric forms with visceral involvement can involve heart wall, pulmonary parenchyma, pleura, thyroid gland, adrenal gland, kidney, pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, mesentery, liver, and rarely the central nervous system. Multicentric forms may demonstrate familial inheritance, present earlier in life, and the number of lesions may widely vary (even upto 100). Mortality due to mass effect and visceral involvement, recurrence, and spontaneous regression on observation has been reported in multicentric forms.
Orbital myofibromas are a group of rare, benign, but locally infiltrative tumors of infants with only a few case reports described in children. Kodsi et al. reported only a single case of myofibroma in a review of 340 orbital tumors in children accumulated over a period of sixty years.
A review of English literature revealed 25 cases of orbital myofibroma [Table 1] of which one case had limited information and was excluded from tabulation. There was male preponderance with a M:F ratio of 2.12:1.00. One-third of the cases were congenital, with 60% presenting at the age of less than two years. In total, 72% of the cases had involvement on the left side.
The commonest presentation was a gradually progressive unilateral (100%) orbital mass with soft tissue and bony involvement [47.8%, [Table 1].,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, The presence of bony erosion can make the clinicoradiological diagnosis of myofibroma more challenging. None of the orbital myofibromas demonstrated recurrence at a mean follow up of 20 months (range 6–84 months).
The major differential diagnoses include fibrous histiocytoma, nodular fasciitis, fibromatosis, infantile fibrosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, neurofibroma, and hemangiopericytoma., Rarely, malignant lesions like Ewings sarcoma family of tumors and rhabdomyosarcoma may need exclusion. Fibrous dysplasia and non-ossifying fibroma may also need exclusion in cases with predominant osseous involvement. In recent years, studies have revealed consistent pathological findings with a typical fascicular pattern of a rich vascular spindle cell tumor with occasional staghorn-like channels. The centre of the lesion might display more cellularity. Review of published literature showed that all the cases in which IHC was performed (15/25) expressed SMA [Table 1]. These tumors were also found to have strong expression of vimentin, muscle-specific actin, and were negative for desmin, CD34, ALK-1 and S-100.
Though recurrences in myofibroma are extremely rare in spite of positive surgical margins, complete surgical excision should still be the goal. Conservative debulking followed by close observation can be considered in cases with difficulty in total excision. There is no conclusive evidence supporting the benefit of adjunctive radiotherapy or chemotherapy in solitary orbital myofibromas. Therefore, a regular follow-up is probably the best-recommended policy.
| Conclusion|| |
In conclusion, myofibroma can rarely present in children as a progressive orbital mass with bony erosions simulating a malignant tumor. A conservative/complete excision may cure the tumor with a very low rate of recurrence. A definitive diagnosis and differentiation from other tumors are dependent upon the microscopic findings and immunohistochemistry.
The authors acknowledge the technical support of Kalandi Charan Muduli.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation and Operation Eyesight Universal Institute for Eye Cancer.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Jo VY, Fletcher CD. WHO classification of Soft Tissue Tumours: An update based on the 2013 (4th
) edition. Pathology 2014;46:95-104.
Chung EB, Enzinger FM. Infantile myofibromatosis. Cancer 1981;48:1807-18.
Mynatt C, Feldman K, Thompson L. Orbital infantile myofibroma: A case report and clinicopathologic review of 24 cases from the literature. Head Neck Pathol 2011;5:205-15.
Mahajan P, Hicks J, Chintagumpala M, Venkatramani R. Myofibroma in infancy and childhood. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017;39:e136-9.
Kodsi S, Shetlar D, Campbell R, Garrity J, Bartley G. A review of 340 orbital tumors in children during a 60-year period. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;117:177-82.
Fletcher CDM, Unit KK, Martens F. WHO Classification of Tumors. Pathology and Genetics. Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002. p. 59-61.
Larsen AC, Prause JU, Petersen BL, Heegaard S. Solitary infantile myofibroma of the orbit. Acta Ophthalmol 2011;89:e600-1.
Shields CL, Husson M, Shields JA, Mercado G, Eagle RC Jr. Solitary intraosseous infantile myofibroma of the orbital roof. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:1528-30.
Tokano H, Ishikawa N, Kitamura K, Noguchi Y. Solitary infantile myofibromatosis in the lateral orbit floor showing spontaneous regression. J Laryngol Otol2001;115:419-21.
Wiswell TE, Sakas EL, Stephenson SR, Lesica JJ, Reddoch SR. Infantile myofibromatosis. Pediatrics 1985;76:981-4.
Rodrigues E, Shields C, Eagle R, Marr B, Shields J. Solitary intraosseous orbital myofibroma in four cases. Ophthalmic Plastic Reconstr Surg 2006;22:292-5.
Persaud T, Nik N, Keating R, Boyajian MJ, Przygodzki RM, Nemi A, et al
. Solitary orbital infantile myofibroma: A case report and review of the literature. JAAPOS 2006;10:283-4.
Waeltermann JM, Huntrakoon M, Beatty EC Jr, Cibis GW. Congenital fibromatosis (myofibromatosis) of the orbit: A rare cause of proptosis at birth. Ann Ophthalmol 1988;20:394-6, 399.
Duffy MT, Harris M, Hornblass A. Infantile myofibromatosis of orbital bone. A case report with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and histologic findings. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1471-4.
Nasr AM, Blodi FC, Lindahl S, Jinkins J. Congenital generalized multicentric myofibromatosis with orbital involvement. Am J Ophthalmol1986;102:779-87.
Stautz CC. CT of infantile myofibromatosis of the orbit with intracranial involvement: A case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:184-5.
Campbell RJ, Garrity JA. Juvenile fibromatosis of the orbit: A case report with review of the literature. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:313-6.
Linder JS, Harris GJ, Segura AD. Periorbital infantile myofibromatosis. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:219-22.
Westfall AC, Mansoor A, Sullivan SA, Wilson DJ, Dailey RA. Orbital and periorbital myofibromas in childhood: Two case reports. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2000-5.
Cruz AA, Maia EM, Burmamm TG, Perez LC, Santos AN, Valera ET, et al
. Involvement of the bony orbit in infantile myofibromatosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:252-4.
Nam DH, Moon HS, Chung DH, Baek SH. Solitary infantile myofibroma of the orbital bone. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;33:549-52.
Koujok K, Ruiz RE, Hernandez RJ. Myofibromatosis: Imaging characteristics. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:374-80.
Galassi E, Pasquini E, Frank G, Marucci G. Combined endoscopy- assisted cranionasal approach for resection of infantile myofibromatosis of the ethmoid and anterior skull base. Case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008;2:58-62.
Bloom RI, Schwarch RM, Zhang C, Rosenberg JB. A case of congenital myofibroma of the orbit presenting at birth. Orbit 2013;32:33-5.
Eshraghi B, Dehghani S, Anari GS. A rare erosive orbital mass in a child: Case report of myofibroma. J Curr Ophthalmol 2017;29:224e227.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]