Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 5770
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 13  |  Page : 27-31

Spectrum of Eye Disease in Diabetes (SPEED) in India: A prospective facility-based study. Report # 3. Retinal vascular occlusion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus


1 Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati, Assam, India
2 L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
3 L V Prasad Eye Institute, KAR Campus, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
4 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
5 Indian School of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
6 Dr. Mohan's Diabetes Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission23-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance29-Nov-2019
Date of Web Publication17-Jan-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Harsha Bhattacharjee
Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati, Assam
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1934_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: To determine the proportion of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attending large eye care facilities across India who have retinal vascular occlusion (RVO). Methods: A 6-month descriptive, multicenter, observational hospital-based study of people was being presented to the 14 eye care facilities in India. The retina-specific component of comprehensive eye examination included stereoscopic biomicroscopy, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, and fundus fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography was also available when needed. Data recording of the duration of diabetes, hypertension (HTN), stroke, and other variables was obtained from the medical history. The statistical analysis included frequencies, mean, and standard deviations for continuous variables. Odds ratio (OR) and multivariate analysis were undertaken to assess the associations between risk factors and RVO. Results: The study recruited 11,182 consecutive patients (22,364 eyes) with T2DM. About 59.0% (n = 6697) were male. The mean age was 58.2 ± 10.6 years. In this cohort, RVO was detected in 3.4% (n = 380) of patients; 67.6% (n = 257) of them had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and the remaining 32.4% (n = 123) had central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). The frequency of unilateral BRVO (n = 220, 85.6%) and unilateral CRVO (n = 106, 86.18%) was much common. Unilateral RVO was more frequent (n = 326, 85.8%) than bilateral diseases (n = 54, 14.2%) (χ2 = 126.95, P < 0.001). Ischemic CRVO was more common (n = 103, 73.6%) than nonischemic CRVO (n = 37, 26.4%). Macula-involving BRVO was found in 58.5% (n = 172) of cases, suggesting more than 50% of cases in RVO carries a risk of severe vision loss. The duration of diabetes apparently had no influence on the occurrence of RVO. On the multivariate analysis, a history of HTN [OR: 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3–2.1; P = 0.001) and stroke (OR: 5.1; 95% CI: 2.1–12.4; P < 0.001) was associated with RVO. Conclusion: RVO is a frequent finding in people with T2DM. History of stroke carries the highest risk followed by HTN. The management of people with T2DM and RVO must also include comanagement of all associated systemic conditions.

Keywords: Retinal vascular occlusion, Spectrum of Eye Disease in Diabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus


How to cite this article:
Bhattacharjee H, Barman M, Misra D, Multani PK, Dhar S, Behera UC, Das T, Gilbert C, Murthy G V, Rajalakshmi R, Pant HB, on behalf of the SPEED study group. Spectrum of Eye Disease in Diabetes (SPEED) in India: A prospective facility-based study. Report # 3. Retinal vascular occlusion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68, Suppl S1:27-31

How to cite this URL:
Bhattacharjee H, Barman M, Misra D, Multani PK, Dhar S, Behera UC, Das T, Gilbert C, Murthy G V, Rajalakshmi R, Pant HB, on behalf of the SPEED study group. Spectrum of Eye Disease in Diabetes (SPEED) in India: A prospective facility-based study. Report # 3. Retinal vascular occlusion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Feb 28];68, Suppl S1:27-31. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/13/27/275729



Retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disorder after diabetic retinopathy (DR) and is an important cause of vision loss in people with diabetes mellitus (DM).[1],[2],[3] However, the pathogenesis of RVO is vaguely understood. This condition may be due to the combination of three systemic changes (Virchow's triad), which include hemodynamic changes (venous stasis), degenerative changes in the vessel wall, and blood hypercoagulability.[4] Systemic diseases such as hypertension (HTN) and dyslipidemia are the major risk factors for arteriolar thickening.[5],[6] Other systemic risk factors include diabetes and smoking. Ophthalmic risk factors include glaucoma, hypermetropia, and ocular inflammatory disease.[7],[8] Many studies have shown an inconsistent association of RVO with the above-mentioned risk factors.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]

This study has estimated the proportion of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) recruited into the Spectrum of Eye Disease in Diabetes (SPEED) study across India, also who had RVO, and explored the systemic associations.


  Methods Top


The SPEED study was a multicenter study that involved 14 eye care facilities in India. The details are described in report # 1. In brief, the SPEED was a descriptive observational study of consecutive ophthalmic patients with T2DM presenting to the vitreoretinal service of participating eye care facilities which were widespread across India between the period of August 2016 and January 2017. Approval was obtained from the institutional ethics committee of each study center and the study was conducted as per the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki on human research, after taking a written consent. The approvals from the individual ethics committee were submitted to the Indian Institute of Public Health (IIPH), Hyderabad. No patient or family was given any financial assistance in cash or kind.

The pretested questionnaire was administered to people who were included in the study. The data collection software and app base using Java were supplied to all participating centers on-line. Stata14SE for Windows (Stata Corp., TX, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

The study proforma included age, gender, type of DM and duration, history of other systemic risk factors [HTN, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and history of stroke], treatment for diabetes, and status of diabetes-related biochemical parameters including HbA1c levels on presentation to the retina service. Ocular evaluation consisted of comprehensive eye examination (measurement of distance and near-visual acuity using the Snellen's chart placed at 6 m, ocular motility, adnexal examination, slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment, and measurement of intraocular pressure with applanation tonometer, detailed slit-lamp biomicroscopy using 90D lens, and indirect ophthalmoscopy), and investigations such as fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) when needed were also done.

Retinal vein occlusion, when present, was classified into either branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Based on the location and FFA characteristics, the BRVO was further classified into BRVO major and BRVO macula. The CRVOs were classified into ischemic or nonischemic CRVO. The diagnosis was separately made for the right and left eyes.

The status of the diabetes was determined based on the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines.[15] We defined a good control of DM when the recent plasma glucose level was as follows: fasting: <110 mg/dL, 2-h post-load glucose <140 mg/dL, and HbA1c < 5.7%. We defined a person as diabetic when the recent plasma glucose level was >126 mg/dL, 2-h post-load glucose >200 mg/dL, random >200 mg/dL, and HbA1c >6.5%. HTN was defined (as per the Indian standards) as normal when the blood pressure was less than 130/85 mmHg and hypertensive when the blood pressure was more than 140/90 mmHg.[16] Stroke was defined as per the World Health Organization (WHO) standards by three criteria [17]: (1) in which an area of brain is transiently or permanently affected by ischemia or bleeding or (2) in which one or more brain blood vessels are primarily involved in a pathological process, or (3) a combination of these conditions.

Statistical analysis was performed using Stata14SE software for the Windows (Stata Corp, TX, USA) and the analysis was performed using Chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were undertaken to identify the risk. To evaluate the effects of the systemic association, discrete logistic regression analysis was performed using the association of HTN and CVD, with stroke as an independent variable along with the RVO as the dependent variable. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


The study was conducted among all patients with T2DM who attended vitreoretina department with various eye complains in 14 different eye care facilities spread across different geographical locations of India. The study period was from August 2016 to January 2017. A total of 11,182 consecutive patients (22,364 eyes) suffering from T2DM were recruited for the study. All the cases fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the study.

In this cohort, a total of 380 (3.4%) subjects had RVO (both BRVO and CRVO together) and the remaining subjects had other vitreoretinal diseases. About 59.0% (n = 6597) of participants were male. The mean age of the patients was 58.2 ± 10.6 years. The duration of diabetes varied from ≥5 to ≥16 years.

BRVO was found in 294 eyes of 257 patients (67.6% of all RVO) and 37 patients (14.4%) of them had bilateral involvement. CRVO was found in 140 eyes of 123 patients (32.4% of all RVO) and 17 patients (13.8%) had bilateral involvement. The ratio between BRVO and CRVO in the diabetic population was found to be 2:1. Altogether, unilateral RVO is more common (χ2 = 126.95, P < 0.001) [Table 1]. Among the unilateral group, right eye involvement was marginally more than the left eye.
Table 1: Clinical profile of RVO in diabetic population

Click here to view


About 58.5% (n = 172) of eyes of BRVO had macula involvement, where superior temporal retinal vein or tributary branch vein was affected. Around 41.5% of eyes (n = 122) had BRVO in one of the four major venules without macular involvement. Macula-involving BRVO was found to be more common than nonmacula-involving BRVO. Ischemic CRVO (n = 103) was found 2.8 times more than the nonischemic CRVO (n = 37) [Table 2].
Table 2: Vision-threatening RVO in diabetic population

Click here to view


The maximum frequency of BRVO was within 5 years of detection of DM (n = 151, 34.4%), and thereafter the frequency is more or less the same in each 5 years interval up to more than 16 years of diabetic age, whereas CRVO was less in the group of patients who were within 6–10 years of diabetic age. In other age groups, the frequency distribution was similar [Table 3].
Table 3: Duration of diabetes in people with retinal vascular occlusions

Click here to view


RVO is more common in patients with uncontrolled and poorly controlled diabetes (n = 208, 72.5%) [Table 4]. On the multivariate analysis, a history of HTN (57.2% of subjects) [odds ratio (OR): 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3–2.1; P = 0.001] and stroke (OR: 5.1; 95% CI: 2.1–12.4; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with RVO [Table 5].
Table 4: Status of diabetes control at presentation in people with retinal vascular occlusions

Click here to view
Table 5: Association between systemic diseases and retinal vascular occlusion: univariate and multivariate analyses, and age- and sex-adjusted analysis

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The association of DM with RVO has been studied worldwide. This is the first study in India where data were collected from 14 different cities covering the entire country and a standard diagnostic criterion was adopted. DR is the important and blinding complication of DM in the adult population. RVO and DR share certain common clinical ophthalmoscopic findings in the ocular fundus. In retinal vein occlusion, the venules of the retina are dilated and tortuous and there are cotton wool spots with retinal edema. CRVO occurs at the disc,[18] whereas BRVO occurs at the arteriovenous crossing site.[19] RVO is further subdivided into ischemic and nonischemic types.

Epidemiological and other studies documented various findings regarding the association of RVO and DM. Shahsuvaryan and Melkonyan [20] and others [9],[11],[14],[21] reported positive association between RVO and DM. In a pooled data analysis of different cohorts, Cugati et al.[22] described RVO as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in the diabetic population of 43–69 years of age group. Mohamed et al.[23] and Ehters and Fekrat [24] found that only 5% of RVO had a systemic association with diabetes. In a meta-analysis of public health data (Brno, Czech Republic), Kolar [25] found that DM and some other systemic factors such as HTN, high-density lipoprotein, and PAD are strong risk factors for RVO. The authors also concluded that pathogenesis of CRVO and BRVO is multifactorial and ill-understood till date.

Hayreh et al.[13] and others [14],[26],[27],[28] documented that uncontrolled DM in the male gender and older age increases the risk of RVO. Beaver Dam Study [9] similarly documented strong association between BRVO and DM (OR: 2, 43; 95% CI: 1.04–5.70) and HTN (OR: 542; 95% CI: 2.18–3.47). Stem et al.[28] in a longitudinal study conducted among 1,300 clinic-based patients in the United States found an association between CRVO and end-organ damage from DM [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.53; 95% CI: 1.28–1.84] along with other systemic risk factors. Several studies have also shown that uncontrolled DM in male gender and older age increases the risk of RVO in them.[13],[14],[26],[27]

Klen et al.[26] and others [29],[30],[31] could not find any constant relationship between DM and RVO. The Eye Disease Case-control Study Group [7] documented that DM in a diverse group of patients in the United States did not increase the risk of CRVO, but HTN alone increases the risk of CRVO in 66% of subjects. However, DM, HTN, and HLD together increase the risk of developing CRVO in 58% of subjects in comparison to those who do not have the above three systemic conditions together.

Jeganathan et al.[32] compiled different studies and found a constant but varied association of DM and RVO. The Eye Disease Case-control Study Group [7] implicated HTN as a risk factor for BRVO in 50% of cases. Lam et al.[33] also could not find any association between DM and BRVO. Zhou et al.[4] and Rehak and Rehak [34] described only HTN as risk factor for RVO. In the Beijing eye study [4] (population-based longitudinal study), no risk association was found between DM and BRVO.

Singapore Malay Eye Study [35] recorded HTN as a risk factor for RVO rather than DM. The study also documented a lower prevalence of RVO in the Asian population than Caucasians as found in the Blue Mountains Eye Study.[9] However, Dodson et al.[12] described Asians are at higher risk for RVO than Caucasians in the diabetic population. Stem et al.[28] found a higher risk of CRVO in the African American general population but did not comment about the association between DM and RVO. So it is apparent that epidemiological and other studies could not establish a definite relationship between DM and RVO.

About 3.4% of the patients with diabetes with vitreoretinal problems of the present cohort had RVO. This is higher than in the population-based prevalence studies such as Blue Mountain Eye Study, the Framingham Eye Study,[27] and Beaver Dam Eye Study [26] where the prevalence of RVO was 1.6%, 0.15%, and 0.8%, respectively. Unlike other studies, this study was a facility-based study and almost 50% of RVO cases had a visual impairment. Opportunistic screenings explain the proportionally higher prevalence of RVO in the diabetic population in the study. All the recruited patients self-reported in the eye care facilities for treatment of their eye complaints. It probably reflects the eye-care-seeking behavior of the population. In this study, unilateral RVO was more frequent than bilateral disease (326/54 eyes) and it was statistically significant (χ2 = 126.95, P < 0.001). BRVO was more frequent than CRVO which does not differ from other reports. More than half of the BRVO patients had a risk of developing vision loss due to macular edema. In diabetic population, ischemic CRVO was 2–8 times more in comparison to nonischemic group suggesting risk of vision loss.

We observed that uncontrolled or poorly controlled DM was related to RVO and not merely the duration of DM. We also report a strong association of HTN and CVD with RVO in the Indian population. On the multivariate analysis, a history of HTN (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3–2.1; P = 0.001) and stroke (OR: 5.1; 95% CI: 2.1–12.4; P < 0.001) was associated with RVO. Many investigators as described earlier also implicated HTN and CVD as important risk factors for RVO in the diabetic population.

The limitation of this study was that it was an opportunistic hospital-based screening among the patients who attended in VR department, and hence it did not estimate the prevalence of RVO in the population. We did not collect renal function or hematocrit data. This study did not measure anthropometry, particularly body mass index which is also associated with RVO.[12] Despite the odds, the strength of the study was that it was the first pan India study and used a uniform protocol.


  Conclusion Top


This facility-based opportunistic study provides summary data on the occurrence and risk factors of RVO disease among people with T2DM in India. Though the patient pool was from different parts of the country, yet it did not represent the entire population in general. The study documented that vascular retinopathy was the second most common vascular lesion in people with diabetes and which occurred more often in uncontrolled diabetes. About 3.4% of the vitreoretinal problems in patients with diabetes are due to RVO. Stroke, HTN, and CVDs are important systemic association and HTN and stroke were significant risk factors. For prevention and holistic management of retinal vascular disease in people with diabetes, attention to the systemic condition is important.

SPEED study participating clinical facility organizations and investigators

  1. Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai (Dr. Kim Ramasamy, MD)
  2. Divyajyoti Trust, Surat, India (Dr. Rohan Chariwala, MD; Dr. Uday Gajiwala, MD)
  3. Dr Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India (Dr. R Rajalakshmi, MD)
  4. Dr. Rajendra Prasad Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, New Delhi (Dr. Rohan Chawla, MD; Dr Atul Kumar, MD)
  5. Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, Delhi, India (Dr. Manisha Agarwal, MD)
  6. H V Desai Eye Hospital (Dr. Kuldeep Dole, MD; Dr. Madan Despande, MD)
  7. Little Flower Eye Hospital, Angamaly, India (Dr. Thomas Cherian, MD)
  8. L V Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India (Dr. Umesh C Behera, MD)
  9. L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India (Dr. Rajeev Reddy, MD; Dr. Taraprasad Das, MD)
  10. Netra Nirmay Niketan, Purba Midnapur, Bengal (Dr Asim Sil, MD)
  11. Post Graduate institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India (Dr. Ramandeep Singh, MD; Dr. Mangat Dogra, MD)
  12. Pushpagiri Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India (Dr. K Viswanath, MD)
  13. Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India (Dr. Muna Bhende, MD)
  14. Sri Sankaradeva Netralaya, Guwahati, India (Dr. Harsha Bhattacharjee, MS)


Acknowledgement

The authors wish to extend their gratitude to all the 14 eye care facilities across which participated in the SPEED study and for sharing their valuable data for the same.

Financial support and sponsorship

The Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust, London, UK.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Rogers S, McIntosh RL, Cheung N, Lim L, Wang JJ, Mitchel P. et al. International Eye Disease Consortium. The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: Pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology 2010;117:313-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
David R, Zangwill L, Badarna M, Yassur Y. Epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion and its association with glaucoma and increased intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologica 1988;197:69-74.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Klein R, Wang Q, Klein BE, Moss SE, Meuer SM. The relationship of age-related maculopathy, cataract, and glaucoma to visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:182-91.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Zhou JQ, Xu L, Wang S, Wang YX, You QS, Tu Y, et al. The 10-year incidence and risk factors of retinal vein occlusion: The Beijing eye study. Ophthalmology 2013;120:803-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bowers DK, Finkelstein D, Wolff SM, Green WR. Branch retinal vein occlusion. A clinicopathologic case report. Retina 1987;7:252-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Frangieh GT, Green WR, Barraquer-Somers E, Finkelstein. Histopathologic study of nine branch retinal vein occlusions. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:1132-40.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
The Eye Disease Case-control Study Group. Risk factors for branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 1993;116:286-96.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Majji AB, Janarthanan M, Naduvilath TJ. Significance of refractive status in branch retinal vein occlusion: A case-control study. Retina 1997;17:200-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Mitchell P, Smith W, Chang A. Prevalence and associations of retinal vein occlusion in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:1243-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Glacet-Bernard A, Coscas G, Chabanel A, Zourdani A, Lelong F, Samama MM. Prognostic factors for retinal vein occlusion: Prospective study of 175 cases. Ophthalmology 1996;103:551-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sperduto RD, Hiller R, Chew E, Seigel D, Blair N, Burtoin TC, et al. Risk factors for hemiretinal vein occlusion: Comparison with risk factors for central and branch retinal vein occlusion: The Eye Disease Case-control Study Group. Ophthalmology 1998;105:765-71.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dodson PM, Kritzinger EE, Clough CG. Diabetes mellitus and retinal vein occlusion in patients of Asian, west Indian and white European origin. Eye (Lond) 1992;6:66-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, Podhajsky P. Incidence of various types of retinal vein occlusion and their recurrence and demographic characteristics. Am J Ophthal 1994;117:429-41.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Rath EZ, Frank RN, Shin DH, Kim C. Risk factors for retinal vein occlusions. A case-control study. Ophthalmology 1992;99:509-14.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Available from: https://medibulletin.com/wp-content/.../2018/05/ICMR.diabetesGuidelines. 2018.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Feb 26].  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Indian guidelines for hypertension III. J Assoc Physicians India 2013;61:12.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Available from https://apps.who.int>iris. [Last accessed on 2019 Oct 16].  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Green WR, Chan CC, Hutchins GM, Terry JM. Central retinal vein occlusion: A prospective histopathologic study of 29 eyes in 28 cases. Retina 1981;1:27-55.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Christoffersen NL, Larsen M. Pathophysiology and hemodynamics of branch retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2054-62.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Shahsuvaryan ML, Melkonyan KC. Central retinal vein occlusion risk profile: A case-control study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2003;13:445-52.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Hayreh SS, Zimmerman B, Mc Carthy MJ, Podhajsky P. Systemic disease associated with various types of retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;131:61-7.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Cugati S, Wang JJ, Knudtson MD, Rochtchina E, Klein R, Klein BE, et al. Retinal vein occlusion and vascular mortality: Pooled data analysis of 2 population based cohorts. Ophthalmology 2007;114:520-4.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Mohamed Q, McIntosh RL, Saw SM, Wong TT. Interventions for central retinal vein occlusion. An evidence based systematic review. Ophthalmology 2007;114:507-19.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ehters JP, Fekrat S. Retinal vein occlusion: Beyond the acute event. Surv Ophthalmol 2011;56:281-99.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kolar P. Risk factor for central and brunch retinal vein occlusion. A meta-analysis of published clinical data. J Ophthalmol 2014; Article ID 724780: 5 pages.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, Meuer. The epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000;98:133-43.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Leibowitz HM, Krueger DE, Maunder LR, Milton RC, Kini MM, Kahn HA, et al. The Framingham Eye Study monograph: An ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975. Surv Ophthalmol 1980;24:335-610.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Stem MS, Talwar N, Comer GM, Stein JD. A longitudinal analysis of risk factors associated with central retinal vein occlusion. Ophthalmology 2013;120:362-70.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
The Eye Disease Case-control Study Group. Risk factors for central retinal vein occlusion. Arch Ophthalmol 1996;114:545-54.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Wong TY, Larsen EK, Klein R, Mitchell P, Couper DJ, Klein BE, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors for retinal vein occlusion and arteriolar emboli: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities and Cardiovascular Health Studies. Ophthalmology 2005;112:540-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Pinn A, Carru C, Solins G, Zinelloca, Carta F. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenease deficiency in retinal vein occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:2747-52.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Jeganathan VS, Wang JJ, Wong TY. Ocular association of diabetes other than diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Care 2008;31:1905-12.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Lam HD, Lahey JM, Kearney RR Ng, Lehmer JM. Tanka SC. Young patient with brunch retinal vein occlusion: A review of 60 cases. Retina 2010;30:1520-3.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Rehak J, Rehak M, Brunch retinal vein occlusion: Pathogenesis, visual prognosis and treatment modality. Curr Eye Res 2008;33:111-23.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Lim LL, Cheung N, Wang JJ, Islam FMA, Mitchell P, Saw SM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of retinal vein occlusion in an Asian population. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1316-9.  Back to cited text no. 35
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed152    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded47    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal