|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 528-529
Bilateral Chandler's syndrome: Uncommon entity diagnosed by ultrasound biomicroscopy and confocal microscopy
Parul Ichhpujani1, Sushmita Kaushik2, Amit Gupta2, Surinder S Pandav2
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India
2 Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
|Date of Submission||25-Jul-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||07-Oct-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||14-Feb-2020|
Dr. Sushmita Kaushik
Room No.326, Professor, Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh - 160 012
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
A 22‑year‑old female presented with bilateral, progressive diminution of vision. Slit‑lamp examination revealed bilateral sectoral corneal edema. Gonioscopy showed broad‑based peripheral anterior synechiae and a membrane obscuring angle structure in both the eyes. On ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), a membrane extending from corneal endothelium to anterior iris surface causing traction was seen. Confocal microscopy showed an "epithelium‑like" transformation of the corneal endothelium. This case demonstrates a bilateral Chandler variant of the iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome where the diagnosis of Chandler's disease was confirmed by confocal microscopy, after the mechanism of secondary angle closure was demonstrated by the UBM.
Keywords: Chandler's syndrome, confocal microscopy, iridocorneal endothelial cells, ultrasound biomicroscopy
|How to cite this article:|
Ichhpujani P, Kaushik S, Gupta A, Pandav SS. Bilateral Chandler's syndrome: Uncommon entity diagnosed by ultrasound biomicroscopy and confocal microscopy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:528-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Ichhpujani P, Kaushik S, Gupta A, Pandav SS. Bilateral Chandler's syndrome: Uncommon entity diagnosed by ultrasound biomicroscopy and confocal microscopy. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 9];68:528-9. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/3/528/278344
| Case Report|| |
A 22-year-old Asian Indian female presented with a history of bilateral, painless, progressive diminution of vision. On examination, best-corrected visual acuity was 20/200(OD) and 20/30(OS) and intraocular pressure was 16 mmHg in both the eyes. Slit-lamp examination of the right eye revealed sectoral corneal edema in the nasal quadrant associated with peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b, arrow], corectopia, and minimal iris stromal atrophy temporally [Figure 1]c. The left eye examination revealed sectoral stromal edema accompanied by subepithelial calcareous deposits along with multiple PAS [Figure 2]a, [Figure 2]b, [Figure 2]c. Gonioscopy of both the eyes revealed broad-based PAS and a membrane obscuring the angle structures. Central corneal thickness in the right and left eye were 565 microns and 556 microns, respectively.
|Figure 1: (a) Diffuse illumination photograph of the right eye showing sectoral corneal edema in the nasal quadrant associated with peripheral anterior synechiae and corectopia. There was also minimal iris stromal atrophy temporally. (b) Gonioscopy picture of the right eye showing presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (arrow) and a membrane obscuring angle structures. (c) Ultrasound biomicroscopy scan of the angle showing tenting of iris.(d) Confocal micrograph showing a distinct transition between ICE cells and normal-appearing endothelial cells. The ICE cells were characterized by light-dark reversal, hyper-reflective nuclei, and a highly irregular cellular arrangement|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: (a) Diffuse illumination photograph of the left eye showing similar findings. The sectoral stromal edema was accompanied by subepithelial calcareous deposits along with multiple peripheral anterior synechiae (b) Gonioscopy picture of the left eye showing the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae obscuring angle structures. Note the heavy pigmentation. (c) Ultrasound biomicroscopy scan of the angle showing a membrane overlying the angle. (d) Confocal micrograph showing large, irregular cells with hyper-reflective nuclei typical of ICE cells. Normal endothelial cells were absent|
Click here to view
Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM Model 840, Paradigm Medical Industries Inc.) of the angle in both the eyes revealed a membrane-like structure extending from corneal endothelium to anterior iris surface. In-vivo confocal microscopy (Confoscan 2, Nidek, Japan) clearly showed an “epithelium-like” transformation of the corneal endothelium with polymegathism and hyper-reflective nuclei and surrounding areas with relatively normal-appearing cells. The ICE cells so imaged established the diagnosis of Chandler's syndrome [Figure 1]d and [Figure 2]d.
| Discussion|| |
A review of scientific literature shows sparse evidence.,,,,, Huna et al. have reported two different clinical variants in the same subject. In a study from south India, bilaterality was seen in 10% of cases among 223 ICE syndrome patients. Among the eyes with bilateral involvement, six patients had Chandler's syndrome in both the eyes while five patients had bilateral progressive iris atrophy. Malhotra has reported a case with apparent heterogeneity that may represent two different stages of the disease process at the level of the corneal endothelium. In a recent study by Malhotra and coworkers, out of 21 patients with ICE syndrome, only two patients had bilateral and asymmetric Chandler's disease. These studies suggest that bilaterality of this entity may be unrecognized, rather than as uncommon as was believed. The poor vision in patients with Chandler's syndrome can be explained by corneal endothelial dysfunction (even in subclinical forms).
Zhang and colleagues have used UBM in cases with Chandler's syndrome and noted the presence of marked corneal edema with Descemet's folds while PAS were less evident in their series. Most case reports in literature use only one modality, i.e., confocal microscopy and do not describe the use of UBM to document the angle changes resulting in secondary glaucoma.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Des Marchais B, Simmons RB, Simmons RJ, Shields MB. Bilateral Chandler syndrome. J Glaucoma 1990;8:276-7.
Hemady RK, Patel A, Blum S, Nirankari VS. Bilateral iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: Case report and review of the literature. Cornea1994;13:368-72.
Kupfer C, Kaiser-Kupfer MI, Datiles M, McCain L. The contralateral eye in the iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome. Ophthalmology 1983;90:1343-50.
Huna R, Barak A, Melamed S. Bilateral iridocorneal endothelial syndrome presented as Cogan-Reese and Chandler's syndrome. J Glaucoma 1996;5:60-2.
Islam F, Azad N, Khan A. Bilateral iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome with microspherophakia. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011;21:374-5.
Gupta V, Kumar R, Gupta R, Srinivasan G, Sihota R. Bilateral iridocorneal endothelial syndrome in a young girl with Down's syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:61-3.
] [Full text]
Chandran P, Rao HL, Mandal AK, Choudhari NS, Garudadri CS, Senthil S. Glaucoma associated with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome in 203 Indian subjects. PLoS One 2017;12:e0171884.
Malhotra C, Pandav SS, Gupta A, Jain AK. Phenotypic heterogeneity of corneal endothelium in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome by in vivo
confocal microscopy. Cornea 2014;33:634-7.
Malhotra C, Seth NG, Pandav SS, Jain AK, Kaushik S, Gupta A, et al
. Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: Evaluation of patient demographics and endothelial morphology byin vivo
confocal microscopy in an Indian cohort. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:604-10.
] [Full text]
Zhang M, Chen J, Liang L, Laties AM, Liu Z. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of Chinese eyes with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:64-9.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]