Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 4946
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE - AIOS AWARD PAPER*
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 565-572

Evaluation of thrombospondin–1 gene polymorphisms in corneal allograft rejection in Asian Indian patients


1 Cornea, Ocular Surface, Cataract and Refractive Services, Dr R P Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Pediatric Genetics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Submission20-Mar-2019
Date of Acceptance22-Oct-2019
Date of Web Publication16-Mar-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Murugesan Vanathi
Cornea and Ocular Surface Services, Room No 475, IVth Floor, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_552_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: To evaluate the frequency and the association of Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Asian Indian patients with optical full thickness corneal grafting surgery. Methods: Prospective case–control analysis of optical penetrating keratoplasty patients with and without immune rejection and controls for genotyping of 3 THBS1 gene SNPs (rs1478604 A>G; rs2228261 C>T; rs2228262 A>G) by Amplification Refractory Mutation System-Polymerase Chain Reaction (ARMS PCR). Results: Among 58 patients [45 with immune allograft rejection (DNA isolation was possible in 38 samples) and 13 without immune corneal allograft rejection] and 65 controls, allele frequencies observed for rs1478604 (A>G) are A: 69.7% and 72.6%, G: 30.2% and 27.3%; for rs2228261 (C>T) are T: 70.2% and 62.3%, C: 29.7% and 37.6%; and for rs2228262 (A>G) A: 97.4% and 98.4%; G 2.5% and 1.5% respectively. Genotype frequencies were rs1478604 (A>G) AA: 57.8% and 59.3%, AG 23.6% and 26.5%; GG 18.4% and 14%; for rs2228261 (C>T) TT: 40.5% and 33.8%, TC: 59% and 56.9%, CC: 0% and 9.2%; for rs2228262 (A>G) AA: 94.8% and 96.8%, AG: 5.1% and 3.1% in rejection and controls respectively. The allele and genotype frequency for the 3 described THSB1 SNPs did not show any difference between the corneal graft immune rejection patients and controls. Conclusion: Asian Indian population evaluated for THBS1 gene SNPs by ARMS PCR genotyping in Asian Indian population did not show any genetic association to immune rejection occurrence in our study.

Keywords: Alleles, Amplification Refractory Mutation System-Polymerase Chain Reaction, corneal transplantation, genotype, rejection, single nucleotide polymorphism, thrombospondin-1


How to cite this article:
Vanathi M, Shukla R, Balakrishnan P, Dwivedi R, Gupta N, Tandon R. Evaluation of thrombospondin–1 gene polymorphisms in corneal allograft rejection in Asian Indian patients. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:565-72

How to cite this URL:
Vanathi M, Shukla R, Balakrishnan P, Dwivedi R, Gupta N, Tandon R. Evaluation of thrombospondin–1 gene polymorphisms in corneal allograft rejection in Asian Indian patients. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 10];68:565-72. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/4/565/280688

FNx01Winner of the Best Poster Award (Cornea and Refractive Surgery) at the All India Ophthalmological Society Annual Meeting, 2019, Indore, India




Corneal grafting or cornea transplant is the only option for replacing the diseased corneal tissue in corneal eye disease (CED) with a healthy tissue, which has been received from an organ donor. CED is one of the most common causes of blindness and affects irrespective of age and sex. Keratoplasty is the treatment of choice for replacing the diseased corneal tissue in corneal diseases with donor corneal tissue. Corneal grafting surgery has good success despite the grafts not being HLA matched. This success of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) unmatched corneal grafts with minimal immunosuppression have been attributed to the immune privilege in the anterior chamber resulting in the prevention of allograft rejection.[1] Immune graft rejection remains one of the most importance concerns for corneal graft failure. Studies have shown that corneal graft survival for all indications is 90% at one year, which declines to 70% by 5 years. In patients with corneal graft rejection, the 5-year survival is 50% which declines to less than 35% at 10 years.[2],[3] The loss of immune privilege of the cornea by the presence of stromal vascularization in all four corneal quadrants leads to an enhanced risk of rejection.[2] Rejection rates of 14% in avascular corneas have been described to increase to 32% in the presence of preoperative vascularized host corneal bed.[4]

The 2-year survival rate in low-risk grafts is about 90%,[5],[6] with the 5 years and 10 years survival rates being 90% and 82% respectively.[7],[8] Survival rate for 2 years in corneal grafting in high risk recipient beds is less than 50%.[5] Immune-mediated graft rejection carries a heightened threat of failure to the subsequent grafting with a reported cumulative increase in the risk of corneal graft rejection increased by a factor of 1.2 with every subsequent re-graft.[2] The corneal graft rejection rates rise to rates of 40%, 68%, and 80% after the first, second, and third re-grafts in these high-risk recipients' corneal bed. As corneal graft survival rates decrease with increased risk of graft rejection, it is imperative to explore strategies to evaluate the underlying molecular pathogenesis responsible for graft rejection and the factors for reducing the risk of corneal graft rejection.

The lack of vascularity in normal cornea prevents the direct access of the immune system to it while the lack of lymphatics limits the free transport of antigens and antigen processing cells (APCs) to T-cell-rich secondary lymphoid organs. The low expression of major histocompatibility (MHC) antigens (MHC-I and –II antigens) in all the layers of the cornea retards the onset of immunogenicity to foreign antigens. The dendritic cells (DCs) present in the central and peripheral cornea, exist in an immature, inactivated state, facilitating the immune privilege in normal healthy cornea. Several cell membrane-bound molecules expressed by the cornea that protect it from immune-mediated inflammation and enable apoptosis of immune effector cells include complement regulatory proteins (CRP), Fas ligand (FasL), MHC-Ib, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL).[9]

Soluble immunosuppressive factors abundant in the anterior chamber of the eye include the TGF-β, alpha melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), CRP, somatostatin (SOM), indoleamine dioxygenase (IDO), vaso-intestinal peptide (VIP), and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), which inhibit T cell and complement activation.[10]

The anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) is of significant importance as a system of alloantigen-specific peripheral immune tolerance to antigens in the anterior chamber, which is capable of altering the systemic cytotoxic immune response.[11] ACAID promotes corneal graft survival by way of effecting the suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response and maintaining the humoral immunity.[9]

Recent evidence strongly points to the matricellular glycoprotein, thrombospondin THBS1, as a key immunoregulatory factor. Thrombospondins are multidomain, calcium binding, extracellular glycoproteins, that maintain an anti-angiogenic environment in the eye and the human thrombospondin-1 glycoprotein gene (THBS1) is located on chromosome 15q15.[12]THBS1 glycoprotein is expressed by the human corneal epithelial basement membrane, the corneal endothelium, posterior Descemet's membrane, the trabecular meshwork, lens epithelium, and blood vessels.[13]THBS1 is known to be involved in the immune response of the anterior chamber of the eye by binding and activating latent TGF-β2 [Figure 1].[14] TGF-β2 has an inhibitory effect on the activity of T lymphocytes, suppresses DCs maturation, and promotes the generation of phenotypically and functionally immature DCs, resident antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that are found in human corneal stroma in allograft rejections.[9],[15]THBS1 functions as a potent suppressor of immune rejection is by downregulating the capacity of APCs to induce allosensitization of T cells,[16] and by THBS1 glycoprotein expression of the APCs impeding the APCs from embracing a phenotypically and functionally mature form. The discovery of this important function for THBS1 glycoprotein in the transplant setting now directs future strategies to targeting upregulation of THBS1 in APCs as an effective means to enhance allograft survival[16] and targeting THBS1-mediated TGF-β2 activation can enable new therapeutic approaches to corneal allograft rejections. The possibility of a genetic association to immune-mediated inflammation in corneal graft patients has been noted by an earlier study identifying three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the THBS1 gene that have been postulated to influence the THBS1 glycoprotein expression in the Caucasian population.[17] This prompted us to explore for the possibility of the same in Asian Indian population. This pilot study on THBS1 gene polymorphisms in Asian Indians in corneal allograft rejection in penetrating keratoplasty patients has been undertaken to evaluate if these patients had a genetic predisposition to immune-mediated inflammation involved in corneal graft rejection.


  Methods Top


This is a prospective case–control study of patients with optical penetrating keratoplasty and controls to evaluate for THBS1 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Institute ethics approval and informed consent were obtained from all recruited study subjects. The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki. Cases comprised of 58 patients of optical penetrating keratoplasty (45 patients of optical penetrating keratoplasty with history of immune graft rejection (group 1) and 13 patients with clear full thickness corneal grafts for a minimum of 3 years without any previous episodes of rejection (group 2) were recruited from the outpatient and follow-up keratoplasty clinic our tertiary care center between the period of January to December 2016. Patients with corneal graft failures due to definite nonimmunologic causes, such as primary graft failure, acquired infection, or recurrence of original disease and those not consenting for participation in the study were excluded. Sixty-five normal subjects between 15 years to 75 years (age and gender matched) were taken as controls (group 3). Data recorded for all recruited study subjects included demographic details relating to indication, details of corneal graft surgery, details of immune graft rejection, graft status, and visual acuity. Complete ocular examination including visual acuity, IOP, slit lamp biomicroscopy, graft status were done for all recruited patients.

Blood sample analysis for DNA from study recruits for genotyping for SNPs in THBS1 gene in patients with high risk corneal recipient bed and controls to identify a genetic predisposition in the corneal graft rejection was the primary outcome that was evaluated.

Peripheral blood collected from each study subject was used for isolation of DNA. DNA was extracted by using Qiagen DNA isolation kit following manufacturer's instruction. Three THBS1 gene SNPs (rs1478604, A>G; rs2228261, C>T; and rs2228262, A>G) that had been identified earlier[17] were analyzed by Amplification Refractory Mutation System-Polymerase Chain Reaction (ARMS PCR) method.

Tetra-ARMS PCR genotyping was designed to analyze the THBS1 gene polymorphism as described below. Tetra-primer ARMS methodology [Figure 2] utilizes two primer pairs to amplify the two different alleles of a given SNP in a single PCR reaction (Since these genotypes are single nucleotide polymorphisms, presence of either nucleotide, A or G/C or T is normal. Different individuals in a population can have different genotypes and be normal). In this method, two allele-specific amplifications occur in opposite directions with two outer primers that amplify the region of the SNP and two inner allele-specific primers. In this method, the allele-specific primers have a mismatch at 32 terminal base, but in addition they have a second deliberate mismatch at position 2 from the 32 terminus. The inner primers have an average length of 28 bases in order to minimize the difference in stability of primers annealed to the target and nontarget alleles, ensuring that specificity results from differences in extension rate rather than hybridization rate. To achieve the required level of reliability and reproducibility, the tetra-primer ARMS-PCR technique requires an initial primer design analysis and optimization process. Four primers were designed for each SNP by Primer1 software [Figure 3]. The common fragment length varied according to the SNPs and the primers used [Table 1]. PCR products were visualized under UV after running it in horizontal 3% agarose gel.
Table 1: Tetra-primer Amplification Refractory Mutation System-Polymerase Chain Reaction primers for the 3 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

Click here to view
Figure 1: Simplified diagrammatic representation of role of THBS1 (THBS1 thrombospondin 1; SNP-single nucleotide polymorphism, TGF – Transforming growth factor; DC – dendritic cells; APCs – antigen presenting cells; Th – T helper)

Click here to view
Figure 2: Diagrammatic representation of the ARMS–PCR assay for the A>G substitution SNP genotyping as an example. (a) both A and G allele with complementary base pair; (b) All four sets of primers and its binding positions; (c) respective amplified products according to the allele and with the non specific control non specific outer product and (d) corresponding gel picture

Click here to view
Figure 3: Genotyping for SNPs using 3 TSP-1 tagging SNPs rs1478604 A>G (a), rs2228261 C>T (b), rs2228262 A>G (c) by Tetra-ARMS PCR genotyping

Click here to view


All data were recorded on a predesigned proforma. Data was analyzed in three groups:

Group 1 – patients with corneal grafts with immune graft rejection, Group 2 – patients with corneal grafts without rejection, and Group 3 – Controls.

Statistical analysis

The quantitative data was compared using nonparametric Kruskal Wallis test for more than 2 groups. Qualitative data was compared using Chi square test. Spearman test was used for correlation analysis. P- value of <0.05 was considered significant.


  Results Top


Demographic data of study subjects and controls

Our study evaluated 58 patients [33 male patients of mean age 32 ± 18.2 (range 2.5 to 71 years); 25 female patients of mean age 38.4 ± 25.1 (range 4 to 80 years)] who had undergone corneal grafting over a mean follow-up period of 73.5 ± 31.7 months (range 36 to 120 months). Of these, 45 patients of mean age 33.7 ± 21.5 years (range 2.5 to 74 years) [26 males (mean age 31.7 ± 19.1 years); 19 females (mean age 36.3 ± 24.7 years)] had experienced corneal graft rejection episodes (group 1).

The mean time of occurrence of immune graft rejection was at 39.3 ± 84.9 months (range 1.2 to 570 months) following corneal grafting surgery over a mean follow up of 79.73 ± 79.53 months (range 11 to 374 months); 33 patients had one episode of graft rejection at a mean time interval of 27.12 + 27.6 months (range 1.2 to 144) after the grafting while 11 eyes had two episodes at a mean time interval of 77.04 months (range 6 to 570 months) and 3 episodes of graft rejection in one patient at a mean time interval of 37.96 months.

Group 2 comprised of 13 patients of mean age of 38.5 ± 22 years (range 4 to 80 years) [7 males (mean age 33.14 ± 15.78; range 17–60 years); 6 females (mean age 44.8 ± 27.8; range 4–80 years)] who had undergone corneal grafting surgery and did not have any history of rejection over mean follow up period of 63.07 + 30.3 months (range 23–112 months).

None of the recruited patients had vascularized host corneal beds. Sixty-five normal individuals of mean age 31.2 ± 11.3 years (range 16–74 years) [males - 46 (30.8 ± 11 years; range 16–61 years); females 19 (32.3 ± 12.2 years; range 22–74 years)] were recruited as control subjects (group 3).

Of the blood samples of the 45 patients with immune graft rejection following corneal grafting that were collected, DNA isolation could be performed in 38 samples. A total 116 blood samples were therefore analyzed for the three THBS1 gene SNPs. The study group and the controls were population matched for age and gender. The demographic details, indications, time of surgery, time of occurrence of graft rejection are elaborated in [Table 2] (corneal grafts with immune rejection) and [Table 3] (corneal grafts without rejection). The details of the allele frequencies and genotype frequencies between the three groups are given in [Table 4] and [Table 5] respectively. The allele frequencies were noted to be in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium.
Table 2: Demographic characteristics of Patients with corneal grafts with immune graft rejection

Click here to view
Table 3: Demographic characteristics of patients with clear corneal grafts without immune graft rejection

Click here to view
Table 4: Details of allele frequencies in the study groups

Click here to view
Table 5: Details of Genotype frequencies for TSP-1 SNPs in the study groups

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Documented mechanisms of the underlying ocular immune privilege of the cornea[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23] include factors such as absence of blood and lymphatic vessels in the graft bed in low risk corneal grafts, an immunosuppressive ocular microenvironment due to regulatory molecules [TGF-β2, THBS1, a-MSH), VIP, CGRP], cortisol, and ACAID. Thrombospondins[24],[25] help maintain an anti-angiogenic environment in the eye and THBS1 is known to be involved in the immune response of the anterior chamber of the eye, by binding and activating latent TGF-β2,[14] thereby facilitating peripheral and systemic tolerance in allograft rejections,[17],[26] and thwarting the proangiogenic activity of VEGF.[27]

The potential anti-lymphangiogenic therapeutic effects of THBS1 glycoprotein suggest that targeting THBS1-mediated TGF-2 activation can enable new therapeutic approaches for treatment of corneal neovascularization in high risk corneal graft patients and increase corneal graft survival rates.[9],[17] Graft survival can perhaps also be promoted by targeted upregulation of THBS1 glycoprotein in the antigen presenting cells. The presence of THBS1 gene SNPs has been shown to interfere with the corneal immune privilege thereby providing a genetic predisposition to immune graft rejection.[17] Genotype frequency which may also be referred to as genomic profiling can help to predict a person's genetic predisposition to a particular disease or event. Hence this current study of THBS1 gene polymorphisms in Asian Indians in corneal allograft rejection patients has been undertaken to evaluate if the eyes of Asian Indians has a genetic predisposition to immune-mediated inflammation as noted by the earlier study in Caucasian population.[17] This is a study of patients with corneal grafts to evaluate for THBS1 gene SNPs in 38 of the 45 patients of corneal grafting with history of immune graft rejection (group 1) and 13 patients with clear grafts without any previous episodes of rejection (group 2) and 65 normal subjects (group 3). The frequencies of allele for rs1478604 (A>G) A was found to be 69.7% and 72.6%; for G was 30.2% and 27.3% in the corneal graft with immune rejection patients and the control population respectively (not statistically significant). The frequencies of allele for rs2228261(C>T) T was found to be 70.2% and 62.3%; for C was 29.7% and 37.6% in the corneal graft with immune rejection patients and the control population respectively not statistically significant. This implies that the frequency of occurrence of SNP for thymine and cytosine was similar in both the immune rejection patients and controls. The frequencies of allele for rs2228262 (A>G) A were found to be 97.4% and 98.4%; for G was 2.5% and 1.5% in the corneal graft with immune rejection patients and the control population respectively (not statistically significant). The occurrence of frequency of SNP for adenine and guanosine was also found to be similar in both the immune graft rejection patients and controls.

Similarly on looking at the frequencies of genotype for rs1478604 (A>G) AA (homozygosity for adenine) was found to be 57.8% and 59.3%; for AG (heterozygosity for adenine) 23.6% and 26.5%; for GG (homozygosity for cytosine) was 18.4% and 14% in the corneal graft with immune rejection patients and the control population respectively (not statistically significant), which implies that there was not much difference of their occurrences in both the groups. The frequencies of genotype frequencies for rs2228261(C>T) TT (heterozygosity for thymine) were found to be 40.5% and 33.8%; for TC (heterozygosity) 59% and 56.9%; for CC (homozygosity for cytosine) was 0% and 9.2% in the corneal graft with immune rejection patients and the control population respectively (not statistically significant), which implies that there was again not much difference in the genotype frequency occurrences between the two groups. The frequencies of genotype frequencies for rs2228262 (A>G) AA were found to be 94.8% and 96.8%; for AG 5.1% and 3.1% in the corneal graft with immune rejection patients and the control population respectively (not statistically significant).

From our results, there seems to be no significant difference in the genotype frequencies of the three markers for THBS1 gene SNPs between the rejection and the control group. The allele frequency between the study groups also does not show a significant difference. An earlier study by Winton et al.,[17] evaluating the role of SNPs of THBS1 gene in Caucasian population on the risk of corneal allograft rejection analyzed 378 corneal graft patients with risk factors for allograft rejection and found that THBS-1 rs1478604A SNP was associated significantly with an increased risk of corneal allograft rejection (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–2.45; P ¼ 0.04). Their study also showed a trend toward the rs1478604, rs2228261, rs2228262 ACA haplotype increasing risk of rejection. This led them to suggest that THBS1 rs1478604 AA homozygotes may be at increased risk of immune rejection following corneal grafting surgery especially if they harbor the ACA haplotype. However, our data does not seem to predict the association of any allele with rejection of corneal graft. A larger sample size study can perhaps re-evaluate for this association.


  Conclusion Top


In conclusion, genetic predisposition for occurrence of immune corneal allograft rejection in form of the reported three SNPs in THBS1 glycoprotein is not noted in our Asian Indian population.

Acknowledgements

Mr Hem Sati (Dept of Biostatistics, AIIMS) for Statistical Analysis.



Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by funding from the AIIMS Intramural Research Grant (Project No A-323).

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Niederkorn JY. High-risk corneal allografts and why they lose their immune privilege. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;10:493-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
The collaborative corneal transplantation studies (CCTS). Effectiveness of histocompatibility matching in high-risk corneal transplantation. The Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1392-403.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Maguire MG, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, Stulting RD, Sugar A, Fink NE, et al. Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejection in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1536-47.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Alldredge OC, Krachmer JH. Clinical types of corneal transplant rejection. Their manifestations, frequency, preoperative correlates, and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:599-604.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Streilein JW, Yamada J, Dana MR, Ksander BR. Anterior chamber-associated immune deviation, ocular immune privilege, and orthotopic corneal allografts. Transplant Proc 1999;31:1472-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Küchle M, Cursiefen C, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Wenkel H, et al. Risk factors for corneal allograft rejection: Intermediate results of a prospective normal-risk keratoplasty study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:580-4.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Thompson RW Jr, Price MO, Bowers PJ, Price FW Jr. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1396-402.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Port FK, Dykstra DM, Merion RM, Wolfe RA. Trends and results for organ donation and transplantation in the United States, 2004. Am J Transplant 2005;5:843-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Qazi Y, Hamrah P. Corneal allograft rejection: Immunopathogenesis to therapeutics. J Clin Cell Immunol 2013(Suppl 9):pii: 006. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.S9-006.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Chong EM, Dana MR. Graft failure IV. Immunologic mechanisms of corneal transplant rejection. Int Ophthalmol 2008;28:209-22.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Stein-Streilein J, Streilein JW. Anterior chamber associated immune deviation (ACAID): Regulation, biological relevance, and implications for therapy. Int Rev Immunol 2002;21:123-52.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wolf FW, Eddy RL, Shows TB, Dixit VM. Structure and chromosomal localization of the human thrombospondin gene. Genomics 1990;6:685-91.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hiscott P, Paraoan L, Choudhary A, Ordonez JL, Al-Khaier A, Armstrong DJ. Thrombospondin 1, thrombospondin 2 and the eye. Prog Ret Eye Res 2006;25:1-18.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Crawford SE, Stellmach V, Murphy-Ullrich JE, Ribeiro SM, Lawler J, Hynes RO, et al. Thrombospondin-1 is a major activator of TGF-beta1 in vivo. Cell 1998;93:1159-70.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zamiri P, Masli S, Kitaichi N, Taylor AW, Streilein JW. Thrombospondin plays a vital role in the immune privilege of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:908-19.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Saban DR, Bock F, Chauhan SK, Masli S, Dana R. Thrombospondin-1 derived from APCs regulates their capacity for allosensitization. J Immunol 2010;185:4691-7.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Winton HL, Bidwell JL, Armitage WJ. Thrombospondin-1 polymorphisms influence risk of corneal allograft rejection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:2115-20.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Williams KA, Coster DJ. The immunobiology of corneal transplantation. Transplantation 2007;84:806-13.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Niederkorn JY, Larkin DF. Immune privilege of corneal allografts. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2010;18:162-71.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Hori J, Vega JL, Masli S. Review of ocular immune privilege in the year 2010: Modifying the immune privilege of the eye. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2010;18:325-33.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Taylor AW. Ocular immunosuppressive microenvironment. Chem Immunol Allergy 2007;92:71-85.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Denniston AK, Kottoor SH, Khan I, Oswal K, Williams GP, Abbott J, et al. Endogenous cortisol and TGF-beta in human aqueous humor contribute to ocular immune privilege by regulating dendritic cell function. J Immunol 2011;186:305-11.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Wilbanks GA, Mammolenti M, Streilein JW. Studies on the induction of anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) depends upon intraocular transforming growth factor-beta. Eur J Immunol 1992;22:165-73.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Kaur S, Martin-Manso G, Pendrak ML, Garfield SH, Isenberg JS, Roberts DD. Thrombospondin-1 inhibits VEGF Receptor-2 signaling by disrupting its association with CD47. J Biol Chem 2010;285:38923-32.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Cursiefen C, Maruyama K, Bock F, Saban D, Sadrai Z, Lawler J, et al. Thrombospondin 1 inhibits inflammatory lymphangiogenesis by CD36 ligation on monocytes. J Exp Med 2011;208:1083-92.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Larkin DF, Alexander RA, Cree IA. Infiltrating inflammatory cell phenotypes and apoptosis in rejected human corneal allografts. Eye 1997;11:68-74.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Jimenez B, Volpert OV, Crawford SE, Febbraio M, Silverstein RL, Bouck N. Signals leading to apoptosis-dependent inhibition of neovascularization by thrombospondin-1. Nat Med 2000;6:41-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed404    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded97    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal