Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 10873
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 890-894

Study of onchocerciasis-related visual impairment in North Kivu province of the Democratic Republic of Congo in Africa


1 Department of Ophthalmology, Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Command Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Bethesda Hospital, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo, Africa, Democratic Republic of Congo
4 Department of Uveitis and Ocular Pathology, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
5 Spark Eye Care Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Date of Submission17-Nov-2018
Date of Acceptance09-Apr-2019
Date of Web Publication20-Apr-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kripanidhi Shyamsundar
Department of Ophthalmology, Command Hospital, Pune - 411 040, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1653_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: The Objective of this study is to determine baseline data regarding onchocercal eye lesions and associated visual loss in the Nord Kivu province, an onchocerciasis hyperendemic tropical rain forest area in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Nord Kivu province of the DRC during which 2150 subjects were examined ophthalmologically. The eye examination included visual acuity (VA), slit-lamp examination, ophthalmoscopy, intraocular pressure, and visual field assessment by the confrontation test. Patients with suspicion of glaucoma were further evaluated by Humphreys automated perimeter. Results: 39 (1.81%) out of 2150 subjects had onchocerciasis-related eye lesions and 4 (0.19%) were blind (VA <3/60). Chorioretinitis (0.88%) was the most frequent onchocerciasis lesion followed by keratitis (0.46%), microfilaria in the anterior chamber (0.28%), iridocyclitis (0.28%), secondary glaucoma (0.19%), complicated cataract (0.19%), and optic atrophy (0.19%). Visual impairment was discovered in 114 (5.3%) out of 2150 subjects, of whom 39 (0.19%) had blindness and 75 (3.4%) had low vision. Visual impairment was mostly caused by nononchocerciasis-related diseases like cataract (27.2%), retinal diseases (19.3%), glaucoma (15.8%), and iridocyclitis (15.8%) rather than because of onchocerciasis (9.6%) among all causes of visual impairment. Conclusion: Features of ocular onchocerciasis usually described in forest and savanna areas were relatively less common than expected in and around Goma, the capital of the Nord Kivu province of the DRC.

Keywords: Onchocerciasis, uveitis, epidemiology, community ophthalmology, parasitic diseases


How to cite this article:
Baranwal VK, Shyamsundar K, Kabuyaya V, Biswas J, Vannadil H. Study of onchocerciasis-related visual impairment in North Kivu province of the Democratic Republic of Congo in Africa. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:890-4

How to cite this URL:
Baranwal VK, Shyamsundar K, Kabuyaya V, Biswas J, Vannadil H. Study of onchocerciasis-related visual impairment in North Kivu province of the Democratic Republic of Congo in Africa. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 May 26];68:890-4. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/5/890/282941



Onchocerciasis is an insidious nonfatal insect-borne disease caused by filarial nematode onchocerciasis volvulus. It is transmitted to humans by the bite of the black fly of the genus Simulium. The Simulium fly breeds in rapidly flowing rivers. Because of this, the onchocerciasis infection of the eye is called river blindness.

It is the world's second-leading cause of infectious blindness.[1] It is endemic in many countries of Africa and a few countries of central and South America. An estimated at least 1 million are either blind or severely visually disabled out of 18 million people infected with the disease living in these endemic countries.[1] Life expectancy is reduced to one-third of the sighted in these blind and most die within 10 years of onset of blindness.[1] Onchocerciasis because of itching, fatigue, weakness, social stigma, and lack of sleep leads to poor school performance and higher school drop-out rates in children and low productivity, low income, and higher health-related costs in adults. Often scratching leads to bleeding wounds in affected parts.

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is the third largest country by area (2.345 million km 2) of Central Africa with an estimated population of 62.6 million. About 48% of the population is under the age of 15 years. The life expectancy is estimated to be 50 and 53 years, respectively, for men and women. Approximately 65% of the population lives in rural areas. About 84% of men and 61% of women are literate. Most parts of the country are endemic for onchocerciasis.[2] Out of the 18 million people infected in Africa and Central and South America, ~270,000 (40,000 in the DRC)) are blind and 500,000 severely visually impaired.[1] The implementation of the Onchocerciasis Control Programme in 1974 has resulted in marked reduction and control of disease in most parts of West Africa. It was initially launched in 7 and then in 11 West African countries. Aerial application of larvicides to the breeding sites of black flies was done for vector control. High effectiveness, safety, and free of cost provision of ivermectin by the manufacturer led to the WHO officially celebrating the elimination of onchocerciasis in most West African countries in October 1999.[3]

WHO in 1995 launched the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC) in 11 new countries. DRC is one of these.[4],[5] APOC is based on ivermectin distribution by a community-directed strategy. Its ultimate goal was to treat the remaining 60 million people at risk of contracting the disease and to eliminate onchocerciasis as a public health problem in Africa by 2007. It is expected that the prevalence of onchocercal eye lesions have fallen down with the implementation of APOC and it has been successful in controlling onchocerciasis in cities and towns but villages have a large number of cases even now. The specific aims of the study were to estimate the prevalence of eye diseases in the region with special emphasis on onchocerciasis.


  Methods Top


Study area

This prospective cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in the Nord Kivu province of the DRC having 59,483 square km area and a population of 5,767,945 (2010 est.). L The base hospital was UN level-3 hospital in Goma. Data were collected by organizing camps at Base hospital in Goma and outreach camps held in Beni, Butembo, Lubero, Massisi, Rutshru, and Walikale [Figure 1] and [Figure 2], which were rural areas. The camps were located in different places every time. This province is supposed to be hyperendemic for onchocerciasis. The climate is tropical with the rainy season from September to April and the dry season from May to August. The vegetation is primary forest furrowed by several streams and degraded by several savanna areas. The study was conducted from April 2008 to June 2009. There is only 1 eye specialist looking after an area of ~ 300 km radius. Therefore, eye care services are very poor. Slit-lamp examination was done in camps but Humphreys field analyser test was only done at Base hospital at Goma. This area was chosen for the study for the following reasons: first, it is supposed to be hyperendemic for onchocerciasis; second, it is reasonably accessible throughout the year.
Figure 1: Map of the DRC showing the North Kivu province. DRC: Democratic Republic of Congo

Click here to view
Figure 2: Distance scale of the North Kivu province of the DRC. DRC: Democratic Republic of Congo

Click here to view


Ophthalmological examination

A total of 2150 subjects were examined ophthalmologically. The eye examination included uncorrected and corrected visual acuity measurement, slit-lamp examination, direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy with the 20D lens, intraocular pressure measurement, and visual field assessment by the confrontation test. Patients with suspicion of glaucoma were further evaluated by Humphreys automated perimeter at Base hospital in Goma. The diagnosis of Onchocerciasis was arrived based on a dermatological examination>, slit-lamp examination depicting microfilaria in the anterior chamber, and skin biopsy.…

Consent and ethical considerations

This study adheres to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and the study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Bethesda Hospital, Goma, DRC. Written informed consent was taken from the participants of the study.


  Results Top


Demographical characteristics of the participants [Table 1]
Table 1: Distribution of participants in age groups (n=2150)

Click here to view


Out of a total of 2150 individuals who attended the survey, 1259 (58.56%) were males. Their distribution in age groups is displayed in [Table 1]. Most (70.24%) were < 40 years of age.

The ocular lesions were found in 564 (26.23%) subjects who underwent a complete eye examination. We tried to establish a single diagnosis as a cause for visual impairment in each case as far as possible. However, some cases had multiple diseases and had >1 diagnosis [Figure 3]. Thirty-nine out of 2150 subjects had onchocerciasis-related eye lesions. Among onchocerciasis-related eye lesions, chorioretinitis in 19 (0.88%) subjects was the most prevalent condition. The other onchocercial lesions were keratitis in 10 (0.46%) and microfilariae in the anterior chamber in 6 (0.28%), iridocyclitis in 6 (0.28%, [Figure 4]), secondary glaucoma in 4 (0.19%), complicated cataract in 4 (0.19%, [Figure 5]), and optic atrophy in 4 (0.19%) subjects [Table 2].
Figure 3: "Leopard skin" appearance in a child. The classic general appearance of a patient of onchocerciasis

Click here to view
Figure 4: Iridocyclitis related to onchocerciasis

Click here to view
Figure 5: Resultant complicated cataract

Click here to view
Table 2: Prevalence of onchocercal ocular lesions (n=2150)

Click here to view


Prevalence of visual loss

Cases with visual acuity of less than 6/18 and 3/60 in the better eye with the best correction were considered as having low vision and blind, respectively, in this study. All cases with visual acuity of 6/18 or more in the better eye with correction were considered having normal vision. The overall prevalence of visual loss increased with age and ranged from 12.28% in people aged 0–20 years to 24.56% in those aged >50 years. Overall, 114 out of 2150 (5.30%) had various degrees of visual impairment. Out of these the prevalence of blindness and low vision were 1.86% and 3.44%, respectively. Among these, people aged ≥40 years (47.37%) were most affected [Table 3].
Table 3: Distribution of prevalence of visual impairment by all diseases in various age groups (n=114)

Click here to view


Causes of visual impairment [Table 4]
Table 4: Causes of visual impairment by all diseases (n=114)

Click here to view


Among the 114 subjects with different degrees of visual impairment, onchocercal pathologies were thought to be the cause in 11 (9.6%) of them, whereas non-onchocercal conditions were incriminated in the remaining 103 (90.4%) of subjects. Among the total 114 subjects with visual impairment, the major causes were cataract 31 (27.19%), retinal diseases 22 (19.30%), glaucoma 18 (15.79%), iridocyclitis 18 (15.79%), phthisis bulbi 8 (7.02%), and optic atrophy 5 (4.39%).


  Discussion Top


The overall prevalence of eye lesions was 26.23%. Onchocercal lesions like chorioretinitis, punctate keratitis, microfilariae in the anterior chamber, and white intraretinal deposits were very less than expected. This pattern differs from that found in other similar ecological areas.[6],[7] In addition, the prevalence of chorioretinal diseases, microfilariae in the anterior chamber, sclerokeratitis, and punctate keratitis is lower than in other countries supposed to be endemic of onchocerciasis [Figure 6]. However, the cases of onchocerciasis are much more common in villages than in urban areas. However, a study is needed to support this statement >. When comparing the prevalence of this condition in men and women, we found that women were more affected than men. A similar finding has been reported by others.[6],[8] The reason for such a difference is unclear, as both men and women are exposed in the same way. It has been hypothesized that in women, hormones would play a protective role during their productive age.[8] So far, it has not been confirmed. However, women have a higher life expectancy than men.
Figure 6: A case of sclerokeratitis. The skin involvement is evident with onchodermatitis (lichenification, loss of skin elasticity, atrophy, and/or depigmentation)

Click here to view


Previous studies regarding the prevalence of blindness in this region are not available. However, the following estimates have been reported from other African areas: 0.4%−1.9% in Liberia,[6],[9],[10] 1.3% in Sierra Leone,[11] 2.2% in the Central African Republic,[12] 3.3%−5.4% in Nigeria,[7],[13],[14] and 2% in Cameroon.[8] The onchocerciasis blindness rate in forest areas is low.[8],[15]

Previous reports indicate that posterior segment lesions, especially chorioretinitis, cause most onchocercal blindness cases in forest-savanna areas. However, in our study, though the posterior segment onchocercal lesions were more common than anterior segment, the low vision was more common with anterior segment lesions especially iridocyclitis [Table 4].


  Conclusion Top


The findings of this study suggest that the prevalence of onchocerciasis has gone down since the introduction of APOC in this region when compared with the general prevalence of the country. However, onchocerciasis is more prevalent in rural parts of the province as compared with urban areas where it has been largely controlled.[15] Senile cataract is less prevalent because of low life expectancy. However, congenital cataract is common. It is important to note that onchocerciasis is no more a public health problem in most of the other countries currently. The condition still poses a major health problem in these backward and resource-poor locations.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Daniel EM. VISION 2020: Update on onchocerciasis. Comm Eye Heal 2001;14:19-21.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Evans TG. Socioeconomic consequences of blinding onchocerciasis in west Africa. Bull World Health Organ 1995;73:495-506.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Hougard JM, Yaméogo L, Sékétéli A, Boatin B, Dadzie KY. Twenty-two years of blackfly control in the onchocerciasis control programme in West Africa. Parasitol Today 1997;13:425-31.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Remme JHF. The African programme for onchocerciasis control: Preparing to launch. Parasitol Today 1995;11:403-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Onchocerciasis and its control. Report of a WHO Expert Committee on Onchocerciasis Control. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1995;852:1-104.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Newland HS, White AT, Greene BM, Murphy RP, Taylor HR. Ocular manifestations of onchocerciasis in a rain forest area of west Africa. Br J Ophthalmol 1991;75:163-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Umeh RE, Chijioke CP, Okonkwo PO. Eye disease in an onchocerciasis-endemic area of the forest-savanna mosaic region of Nigeria. Bull World Health Organ 1996;74:95-100.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Anderson J, Fuglsang H, de C. Marshall TF. Studies on onchocerciasis in the United Cameroon Republic: III. A four year follow-up of 6 rain-forest and 6 Sudan-Savanna villages. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1976;70:362-73.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Frentzel-Beyme R. The prevalence of onchocerciasis and blindness in the population of the Bong Range, Liberia. Z Tropenmed Parasitol 1973;24:339-57.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Frentzel-Beyme RR. Visual impairment and incidence of blindness in Liberia and their relation to onchocerciasis. Tropenmed Parasitol 1975;26:469-88.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Whitworth JA, Gilbert CE, Mabey DM, Morgan D, Foster A. Visual loss in an onchocerciasis endemic community in Sierra Leone. Br J Ophthalmol 1993;77:30-2.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Schwartz EC, Huss R, Hopkins A, Dadjim B, Madjitoloum P, Hénault C, et al. Blindness and visual impairment in a region endemic for onchocerciasis in the Central African Republic. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:443-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Abiose A, Murdoch I, Babalola O, Cousens S, Liman I, Onyema J, et al. Distribution and aetiology of blindness and visual impairment in mesoendemic onchocercal communities, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Kaduna collaboration for research on onchocerciasis. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:8-13.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Umeh RE. The causes and profile of visual loss in an onchocerciasis-endemic forest-savanna zone in Nigeria. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1999;6:303-15.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Dadzie KY. Onchocerciasis control: The APOC strategy. Afr Health 1997;19:13-5.  Back to cited text no. 15
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed193    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded37    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal