Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 10655
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 927-929

Reappearance of limbal pigmentation post-simple limbal epithelial transplant


1 Department of Cornea, Refractive Surgery and Ocular Surface Disorders, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
3 Moorifelds Eye Hospital, London, UK

Date of Submission18-Jan-2019
Date of Acceptance28-Oct-2019
Date of Web Publication20-Apr-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nidhi Gupta
Department of Cornea, Refractive Surgery and Ocular Surface Disorders, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, 5027, Kedarnath Marg, Daryaganj, New Delhi - 110 002
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_155_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


We report the repigmentation at the limbus in patients who underwent simple limbal epithelial transplant (SLET) for uniocular chemical injury. The first case is of an 8-year-old child who presented with grade 4 chemical injury, with limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) corresponding to 6 o' clock till 11 o' clock. He was managed by amniotic membrane graft in the acute stage and SLET after 6 months of the initial injury. The second case is of a 15-year-old female who presented with lime injury, which had resulted in 6 o' clock of limbal involvement (10 o' clock till 4 o' clock). The patient was managed on similar lines with amniotic membrane graft (AMG) in the acute phase and SLET after 6 months of injury. The ocular surface was stable in both the patients post-SLET. The effected limbus showed pigmentation at 8 months of follow-up which eventually became distinct and remained stable. We speculate that the pigmentation at limbus could be attributed to proliferation and movement of melanocytes from limbal biopsy in SLET. These may be capable of supporting the proliferation of limbal epithelial cells and modulation of corneal wound healing.

Keywords: Chemical injury, limbal stem cell deficiency, simple limbal epithelial transplant


How to cite this article:
Gupta N, Farooqui JH, Dziasko MA, Daniels JT, Umang M, Sangwan VS. Reappearance of limbal pigmentation post-simple limbal epithelial transplant. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:927-9

How to cite this URL:
Gupta N, Farooqui JH, Dziasko MA, Daniels JT, Umang M, Sangwan VS. Reappearance of limbal pigmentation post-simple limbal epithelial transplant. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 May 26];68:927-9. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/5/927/282886



Various factors, including avascularity and collagen lamellar arrangement, contribute toward maintaining a transparent human cornea.[1] Transparency is also maintained by the stem cells, which continuously replace the stratified squamous epithelium of the ocular surface, and these cells are located at the limbus in a microenvironment known as niche.[2] Since Schofield [3] gave the concept of stem cell niche in 1978, much work has been done to understand its role in harboring the limbal stem cells (LESC), which are clinically identified as palisades of Vogt.[4] These palisades are identified due to pigmented melanocytes and are infiltrated with antigen presenting Langerhan's cells and suppressor T-lymphocytes.[5]

There are different roles melanocytes play in the human body, including protection of keratinocytes from oxidative DNA base damage from UV rays in the skin and maintaining clear and unpigmented central cornea in the palisades.[6] Injury to these cells (mechanical or chemical) may cause limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). LSCD is a severe cause of corneal blindness, manifesting as corneal neovascularization and conjunctivalization, loss of palisades of Vogts, and irregularities of the corneal epithelium.[7] Cultivated limbal epithelial transplant (CLET), as an ex vivo technique, has been successfully used in treating patients with ocular burns over the years.[8] Since 2011, SLET has shown to be produce comparable results to CLET with minimal dependence on laboratory.[9],[10] But how limbal stem cell transplantation actually works, whether by stimulating the damaged or quiescent limbal stem cells or by replacing the niche with healthy stem cells, is still poorly understood. We are describing an interesting observation in patients who underwent SLET at our center, which we believe could be an area of future research.


  Case Reports Top


Case 1

An 8-year-old boy presented to us with acute chemical burn with lime/chuna. Immediately after exposure, he developed pain and redness in his right eye. At presentation, patient had a visual acuity of 20/200. Patient was diagnosed with grade 4 chemical burn [11] and received treatment for acute chemical injury. Amniotic membrane grafting (AMG) with bandage contact lens was performed on day 3 of presentation. Four months post-AMG; limbal stem cell deficiency of more than 5 clock hours (6 o' clock till 11 o' clock) was noted, with conjunctivalization of the cornea and corneal scar [Figure 1]a. Once a stable ocular surface was achieved, 6 months after the initial insult, SLET was performed using limbal biopsies from the unaffected eye. SLET was performed in a similar manner to what has been described in literature.[9] One-month post-SLET, limbal stem cells and dissolving AMG was noted [Figure 1]b. Interesting, at the 9th month follow-up, the stable ocular surface showed a pigmented line, which was noted from 6 o' clock to 10 o' clock limbal area, corresponding to the initial area of LSCD [Figure 1]c. The patient maintained a best corrected visual acuity of 20/20 at the final follow-up.
Figure 1: (a) Slit-lamp photo of the affected eye showing limbal stem cell deficiency from 6 o' clock till 11 o' clock (black arrows) with conjunctivalization of the cornea, 4 months after initial insult. (b) One month post-SLET photo showing limbal stem cells and dissolving AMG (black arrows). (c) Ninth month follow-up, showing stable ocular surface with a pigmented line, noted from 6 o' clock to 10 o' clock (black arrows) limbal area, corresponding to the initial area of LSCD

Click here to view


Case 2

A 15-year-old female presented to the cornea clinic with 1-month history of lime injury to her right eye. She presented with pain, redness, and photophobic in the affected eye. Her unaided visual acuity was 20/80 in the right eye. Early symblepharon was noted in the superonasal quadrant with absence of limbal palisades and more than 6 o' clock hours of limbal involvement (10 o' clock till 4 o' clock) [Figure 2]a Superior cornea was involved with stromal edema present superiorly adjacent to the area of limbal stem cell deficiency. The patient was managed with AMG and topical steroids, and was kept on regular follow-up. Eight weeks after the initial presentation, after the corneal surface stabilized, SLET was performed for the patient to address the limbal stem cell deficiency [Figure 2]b. Over the next several months, a similar pigmented line was noted as was seen in Case 1. This line was seen in the area of corneal wound healing and was seen most prominently around the 8th month period extending from 10 o' clock till 3 o' clock [Figure 2]c.
Figure 2: (a) Symblepheron in the superonasal quadrant with absence of limbal palisades and more than 6 o' clock hours of limbal involvement (10 o' clock till 4 o' clock; black arrows). (b) Slit-lamp photo post-SLET showing limbal biopsies in the superior aspect. (c) Eighth month post-SLET, showing pigmented line from 10 o' clock till 4 o' clock limbal area (black arrows), corresponding to the area of LSCD

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


As clinicians, our observation in successful SLET patients prompted us to report these cases. We observed appearance of pigmentation at the involved limbus over a period of 8–12 months post-SLET and that remained stable thereafter.

SLET preserves the epithelial–mesenchymal microenvironment in the transplanted biopsies and this probably helps recreating the stem cell niche.[9] We speculate that probably the functional involvement of melanocytes in the microenvironment of the transplanted biopsies promotes wound healing or may be the wound healing promotes melanocyte migration, at the limbus. This requires further research.

This, of course, is fundamentally different from other methods of LSCT, like CLET. Evidence shows that limbal epithelial stem cells account for only 2–9% of the entire limbal epithelial population in vivo,[12] and hence, we believe, it is likely that not all cells of the niche on ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial grafts are stem cells. Therefore, it is possible, since the stem cell niche is not transplanted in total; the movement of melanocytes is probably not noted.

Very few studies have actually dealt with characterizing melanocytes in human cornea, vis-à-vis the skin where their role has been described more extensively.[13] However, both in cornea and skin, two types of melanin are present—brownish black eumelanin (pigmented melanin) and reddish yellow pheomelanin (non-pigmented).[14] In the human ocular surface, melanocytes can be observed around the limbal circumference. Interestingly, these cells concentrate within the basal layer of the limbal crypts (downwards projections of the limbal epithelium into the limbal stroma between the palisades of Vogt) that also concentrate limbal epithelial stem cells.[2] Laboratory studies have developed anin vitro of the limbal stem cell niche in which mitotically active limbal melanocytes have been used as feeders for the expansion of limbal epithelial cells. In fact, limbal melanocytes are capable to support the proliferation of limbal epithelial cells that maintain stem cell properties (morphological aspects, high proliferative potential, expression of putative stem cell markers).[4] These observations suggested that limbal melanocytes, more than providing protection against UV rays by the release of melanin, could also act as niche cells for the functional maintenance of the progenitors in their native environment.

Lastly, we would like to acknowledge the limitations while reporting this observation. There are no current investigative (biopsy or scan) modalities to prove the movement of melanocytes clinically. The role of anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) has not been defined for studies of the limbus, pigmented lesions, or for lesions less than 5 microns in size.[15],[16] Other possibility that could be considered is denatured hemoglobin from subconjunctival hemorrhage that also collects in the area of hyperpigmentation, however this is less likely and would be difficult to prove. These observations of reappearance of pigmentation at the limbus have been observed with few of the SLET cases operated upon at our center. Whether melanocytes have a bigger role to play in corneal wound healing and if this can lay a foundation for understanding the mechanism of SLET is something only time (and research) will tell.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Meek KM, Knupp C. Corneal structure and transparency. Prog Retin Eye Res 2015;49:1-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Dziasko MA, Armer HE, Levis HJ, Shortt AJ, Tuft S, Daniels JT. Localisation of epithelial cells capable of holoclone formation in vitro and direct interaction with stromal cells in the native human limbal crypt. PLoS One 2014;9:e94283.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Schofield R. The relationship between the spleen colony forming cell and the haemopoietic stem cell. Blood Cells 1978;4:7-25.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Dziasko MA, Tuft SJ, Daniels JT. Limbal melanocytes support limbal epithelial stem cells in 2D and 3D microenvironments. Exp Eye Res 2015;138:70-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Vantrppen L, Geboes K, Missotten L, Maudgal PC, Desmet V. Lymphocytes and Langerhans cells in the normal human cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:220-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Bessou Touya S, Picardo M, Maresca V, Surlève-Bazeille JE, Pain C, Taïeb A. Chimeric human epidermal reconstructs to study the role of melanocytes and keratinocytes and photoprotection. J Invest Dermatol 1998;111:1103-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Atallah MR, Palioura S, Amescua G. Limbal stem cell transplantation: Current prespectives. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:593-602.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Pellegrini G, Traverso CE, Franzi AT, Zingirian M, Cancedda R, De Luca M. Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet 1997;349:990-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Basu S, Sureka SP, Shanbhag SS, Kethiri AR, Singh V, Sangwan VS. Simple limbal epithelial transplantation: Long-term clinical outcomes in 125 cases of unilateral chronic ocular surface burns. Ophthalmology 2016;123:1000-10.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gupta N, Joshi J, Farooqui JH, Mathur U. Results of simple limbal epithelial transplantation for unilateral ocular surface burns. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:45-52.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Dua HS, King AJ, Joseph A. A new classification of ocular surface burns. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1379-83.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Shortt AJ, Secker GA, Notara MD, Limb GA, Khaw PT, Tuft SJ, et al. Transplantation of ex vivo cultured limbal epithelial stem cells: A review of techniques and clinical results. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52:483-502.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Higa K, Shimmura S, Miyashida H, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Melanocytes in the corneal limbus interact with K19-positive basal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res 2005;81:218-23.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
D'Mello SA, Finlay GJ, Baguley BC, Askarian-Amiri ME. Signaling pathways in melanogenesis. Int J Mil Sci 2016;17:E1144.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Garcia JPS Jr, Rosen RB. Anterior segment imaging: Optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2008;39:476-84.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Salim S. The role of anterior segment optical coherence tomography in glaucoma. J Ophthalmol 2012;2012:476801.  Back to cited text no. 16
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Case Reports
Discussion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed208    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded56    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal