Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 2837
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 1929-1933

Biological therapy in refractory cases of uveitis and scleritis: An analysis of 18 cases from a tertiary eye care center from South India


Department of Uvea, Medical and Vision Research Foundations, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jyotirmay Biswas
Department of Uvea and Ocular Pathology, Sankara Nethralaya, 18, College Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_966_20

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of biologic therapy in a cohort of patients with various types of refractory non-infectious uveitis and scleritis. Methods: A retrospective observational study on patients with non-infectious uveitis and scleritis who were not responding or had a high recurrence rate with the conventional treatment and had received biologic therapy. Results: We studied 18 patients (33 eyes) who received biological therapy between January 2017 and November 2019. The mean age was 30 ± 17 years and mean duration of uveitis was 36.8 months (range 1–120 months). Anterior uveitis (27.7%) was most commonly observed followed by scleritis, panuveitis, posterior, and intermediate uveitis. The most common etiology was Behçet's disease (4 patients, 22.2%) followed by juvenile idiopathic arthritis (3 patients, 16.6%), granulamotosis polyangitis, and idiopathic (2 patients each, 11.1%). Majority had trialled one or more immunosuppressive and were refractory in nature. Maximum patients had received adalimumab (61%) followed by infliximab (22%), rituximab (12%), and golimumab (6%). The median prednisolone dose was reduced from 30 mg (range 7.5–60 mg) to 5 mg (range 0–10 mg) after biological therapy (P = 0.002). Significant visual improvement was observed post biologic therapy (mean log mar VA 0.41 ± 0.62 improved to 0.23 ± 0.48 at the final visit, P = 0.008). Maximum number of patients (16 patients, 89%) responded well with biological therapy. Three patients developed recurrence and systemic complications were observed in two patients. Conclusion: Biologic therapy is effective in non-infectious refractory uveitis who were resistant to conventional therapy and may prolong disease recurrence.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed255    
    Printed2    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded124    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal