Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 690
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
CASE REPORT
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 2031-2033

Anterior chamber angle granuloma: A rare ocular manifestation of histoid lepromatous leprosy


Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Saket Nagar, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Submission12-May-2020
Date of Acceptance18-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication20-Aug-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Samendra Karkhur
(Retina, Uveitis and ROP Services), Department of Ophthalmology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal - 462 020, Madhya Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1381_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Leprosy is a chronic multisystem disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae with frequent ocular manifestations such as madarosis, lagophthalmos, lid abnormalities, impaired corneal sensations, chronic uveitis, and cataract. Granulomas are characteristic lesion of lepromatous leprosy commonly seen as conjunctival and iris granulomas. We report a case of leprosy with a rare ocular manifestation in the form of angle mass lesion or suspected granuloma which has not been reported before and its successful management following treatment with favorable outcome. The index case also highlights the anterior segment fluorescein angiography features of the lesion and study of its vascular pattern.

Keywords: Angle granuloma, anterior segment fluorescein angiography, anterior uveitis, leprosy, leprosy granuloma


How to cite this article:
Soni D, Sharma B, Karkhur S. Anterior chamber angle granuloma: A rare ocular manifestation of histoid lepromatous leprosy. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:2031-3

How to cite this URL:
Soni D, Sharma B, Karkhur S. Anterior chamber angle granuloma: A rare ocular manifestation of histoid lepromatous leprosy. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Sep 25];68:2031-3. Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/9/2031/292528



Hansen's disease, commonly known as leprosy, is a chronic granulomatous infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae.[1] Ocular involvement in Hansen's disease is very common with reported incidence ranging from 50%–85%.[2],[3] The incidence of ocular complication in leprosy depends on multiple factors varying from type and duration of disease per se to antileprosy drug treatment received.[4] Granuloma or leproma, a circumscribed and discrete granulomatous nodule rich in lepra bacilli, is a characteristic lesion of lepromatous leprosy commonly seen as conjunctival and iris granuloma. We present a histopathologically proven case of leprosy with a constellation of dermatological manifestations and mild anterior uveitis with a rare presentation of anterior chamber angle mass, presumably a granuloma.


  Case Report Top


A 40-year-old Indian male patient presented with pain, redness, and whitish lesion in left eye (LE) for 1 month for which he was using topical ayurvedic medicine prescribed over the counter. Symptoms had worsened with associated diminution of vision in LE for last 1 week. Past ocular history was unremarkable. Patient was a diagnosed case of histopathologically confirmed histoid lepromatous leprosy 6 years back and was irregular on treatment for leprosy.

His BCVA was 20/20 in right eye (RE) and 20/60 in LE. Ocular examination revealed madarosis in eyebrows with normal contour of lids and eye-lashes in both eyes [Figure 1]. A nodular nontender lesion with normal appearing overlying skin was present just below the right eyebrow [Figure 1]b. Corneal sensations and pupils were normal and intraocular pressure was 14 and 16 mmHg in right and left eye, respectively. There was circumciliary congestion with dilated episcleral and conjunctival vessels [Figure 2]a. LE slit-lamp examination revealed an orange-brown lesion arising from the angle with surface tortuous vessels; associated with cells 0.5+ and minimal flare. Anteriorly the lesion was in contact with corneal endothelium and posteriorly limited to iris plane, overall, two clock hours in circumferential extension [Figure 2]a and [Figure 2]b. Gonioscopy revealed open angles except for the temporal angle, which was not visualized due to the lesion. Both eye fundus examination was unremarkable.
Figure 1: Clinical photograph. (a-c) Madarosis in both eyebrows with normal contour of lids and multiple plaques to nodular lesions over face (white arrows). (b) Right eye showing a nodular nontender lesion (red arrow) with normal appearing overlying skin was present just below the right eyebrow

Click here to view
Figure 2: Anterior segment clinical and fluorescein angiography image. (a and b) Anterior segment slit-lamp photograph showing orange-brown color lesion with surface tortuous vessels arising from the angle in temporal quadrant. (c) Anterior segment fluorescein angiography shows early hypofluorescence of the mass lesion with filling of the feeder vessel. (d) In later frames, the lesion remains hypofluorescent; however, the interphase becomes hyperfluorescent

Click here to view


Anterior segment fluorescein angiography showed early hypofluorescence of the mass lesion with filling of the feeder vessel [Figure 2]c and [Figure 2]d. In later frames, the interphase became hyperfluorescent owing to the surface vascularization, while the lesion per se remained hypofluorescent, indicating its relatively avascular nature.

On general examination, patient had multiple skin lesions [Figure 1]a, [Figure 1]b and [Figure 3]a, [Figure 3]b, [Figure 3]c for which a dermatological consultation was sought. Patient had multiple well-defined papules/plaques and nodular lesions over face, forearm, and hip; some of which were ulcerated and surrounded by widespread xerosis [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b and nodular lesions of about 1 × 1 cm over the distal part of the penile shaft [Figure 3]c. Routine blood investigations, Mantoux, chest X-ray, VDRL, HIV I and II tests were negative. Ziehl-Nielsen (ZN) staining of slit-skin smear from ear lobe revealed the presence of acid-fast bacilli with high bacterial index [Figure 3]d.
Figure 3: Dermatological features. (a and b) Multiple well-defined papules/plaques over forearm and hip (yellow arrows); some of which were ulcerated (white arrow) and surrounded by widespread xerosis. (c) Multiple, well-defined, shiny, nodular lesions of about 1 × 1 cm over the distal part of the penile shaft on the ventral aspect (yellow arrow). (d) Ziehl-Nielsen (ZN) staining of slit skin smear revealed the presence of acid-fast bacilli (black arrow)

Click here to view


A diagnosis of LE presumed angle granuloma with mild anterior uveitis secondary to histoid lepromatous leprosy was made. Patient was started systemically on multidrug treatment (MDT) therapy (standard regime—rifampicin: 600 mg once a month, dapsone: 100 mg daily, clofazimine: 300 mg once a month and 50 mg daily; duration = 24 months) in liaison with dermatologist. In addition to the systemic antileprosy therapy, topical steroids (prednisolone acetate 1%) and cycloplegic (homatropine 2%) were started. Follow-up visit after 1 month showed reduction in the size of the angle granuloma [Figure 4]a and [Figure 4]b with significant improvement in skin papules and penile lesions. Patient was continued on antileprosy treatment and topical steroids were gradually tapered until the anterior segment was quiet and no cells or flare was present. However, the patient is still under follow-up with dermatology clinics for MDT and with ophthalmology clinics as required, with no relapses till date.
Figure 4: Anterior segment image of follow-up visit after 1 month. (a) Anterior segment photograph showing more than 50% reduction in the size of the angle mass lesion. (b) Anterior segment autofluorescence (AF) shows no significant autofluorescence of the mass lesion during resolution

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Hansen's disease has the highest incidence, up to 85%, of ocular involvement than any other single systemic disease.[2],[3] Ocular involvement in leprosy can be classified into two groups, potentially-sight-threatening (PST) and the nonsight threatening lesions.[5] PST lesions comprise lagophthalmos and its sequelae, decreased corneal sensations and its sequelae, scleritis, chronic iridocyclitis, and cataract. Although nonsight threatening lesions like madarosis have no visual consequences, they contribute significantly to the social stigma which these patients face.[6]

Cases of ocular granuloma reported in literature are only few. Iris granuloma has been reported with granulomatous anterior uveitis [7] and hypopyon uveitis [8] in leprosy. Nirankariand Chaddah described a case of ciliary body granuloma with chronic uveitis in a young patient of lepromatous leprosy.[9] Yuen et al. reported a case of very rare corneal leproma as an initial feature of lepromatous leprosy.[10] Earlier different types of uveal involvements have been described such as typical acute granulomatous iridocyclitis, pathognomonic lesions of ocular leprosy—iris-pearls and lepra-pearls, uveitis with hypopyon, and neuroparalytic uveitis.[7] We report a unique case of granuloma of anterior chamber angle with mild uveitis in a patient with lepromatous leprosy. In general, the ocular clinical picture of leprosy is usually mixed, with several features involving multiple ocular structures simultaneously. In our case, only finding was angle granuloma with associated mild anterior uveitis. Most common features like lagophthalmos and corneal hypoesthesia were missing.[2]

Histoid leprosy originally described by Wade is a well-recognized rare variant of lepromatous leprosy with characteristic clinical picture.[11] It is characterized by the presence of well-defined, shiny nodular lesions or papules, with stretched overlying skin and at times with constriction around their base. Histoid lesions can arise as part of relapse especially in patients who had received dapsone as monotherapy or occur de novo.[11] Patient in our case was irregular on treatment and was lost to follow-up for leprosy treatment in the past. Genital lesions have been infrequently described as a manifestation of leprosy, predominantly with histoid type.[11]


  Conclusion Top


We report a rare case of histoid leprosy with a unique ocular manifestation in the form of angle mass without associated, significant anterior chamber inflammation in the form of granulomatous uveitis. This is also the first-time anterior segment angiography has been performed to study the vascular pattern in such a lesion, which also helped us to predetermine the amount of bleeding; should the biopsy of the lesion have been undertaken. The case was successfully managed using systemic MDT therapy and topical corticosteroids. We did not resort to biopsy, since the lesion responded well to primary treatment and the associated complications of the biopsy from anterior segment could be avoided.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Han XY, Seo YH, Sizer KC, Schoberle T, May GS, Spencer JS, et al. A new Mycobacterium species causing diffuse lepromatous leprosy. Am J Clin Pathol 2008;130:856-64.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Reddy SC, Raju BD. Ocular lesions in the inmates of Leprosy rehabilitation centre. Int J Biomed Sci 2006;2:289-94.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ebeigbe JA, Kio F. Ocular leprosy in institutionalized Nigerian patients. Ghana Med J 2011;45:50-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hobbs HE, Choyce DP. The blinding lesions of leprosy. Lepr Rev 1971;42:131-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hogeweg M. Ocular leprosy. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 2001;69(2; SUPP):S30-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Parikh DA, Parikh AC, Ganapati R. Penile and scrotal lesions in leprosy. Lepr Rev 1989;60:303-5.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mahendradas P, Avadhani K, Ramachandran S, Srinivas S, Naik M, Shetty KB. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography findings of iris granulomas in Hansen's disease: A case report. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2013;3:1-4.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Rathinam S, Prajna L. Hypopyon in leprosy uveitis. J Postgrad Med 2007;53:46-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Nirankari M, Chaddah MR. Leproma of the ciliary body. Indian J Ophthalmol 1953;1:66-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
  [Full text]  
10.
Yuen HK, Liu DT, Lam DS. Corneal leproma as an initial feature of lepromatous leprosy. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1661-2.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kaliyadan F, Dharmaratnam AD, Cyriac MJ. Histoid leprosy with penile shaft lesions. Indian Dermatol Online J 2012;3:68-70.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed239    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded43    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal