Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

SYMPOSIUM
Year
: 2011  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 114--117

Lasers in primary open angle glaucoma


Ramanjit Sihota 
 Glaucoma Research Facility and Clinical Services, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Ramanjit Sihota
Glaucoma Research Facility and Clinical Services, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
India

Abstract

Lasers have been used in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) over the years, with the hope that they would eventually replace medical and surgical therapy. Laser trabeculoplasty (LT) is an application of argon, diode, or selective laser energy to the surface of the trabecular meshwork to increase the aqueous outflow. The mechanisms by which intraocular pressure (IOP) is lowered could be mechanical, biologic, or by division of adjacent cells. It is commonly used as an adjunct to medical therapy, but is contraindicated if the angle is obstructed, e.g., peripheral anterior synechia (PAS) or developmental glaucomas. About 75% of individuals will show a significant fall in IOP after argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT), and the response is similar with selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT). The effects of LT are not always long lasting, with about 10% of individuals showing a rise in IOP with every passing year. Laser thermal sclerostomy, ab interno or externo, is an alternative to other full-thickness filtration procedures. Longer wavelengths in the infrared range have water-absorptive characteristics that facilitate perforation of the sclera. These lasers can be used to avoid intraocular instrumentation and minimize conjunctival trauma.



How to cite this article:
Sihota R. Lasers in primary open angle glaucoma.Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:114-117


How to cite this URL:
Sihota R. Lasers in primary open angle glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2024 Mar 29 ];59:114-117
Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2011/59/7/114/73698


Full Text

Lasers have been used in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma, POAG, over the years, with the hope that they would eventually replace medical and surgical therapy. So far, however, lasers have been found to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP) to a small extent and over a short term, in POAG. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the various laser procedures for the management of POAG.

 Laser Trabeculoplasty



Laser trabeculoplasty (LT) is the most common laser procedure used in the treatment of POAG. [1] It is an application of argon, diode, or selective laser energy to the surface of the trabecular meshwork (TM) to increase the aqueous outflow, as a treatment of glaucoma. The procedure has been used for a long time, but its position in the therapy of POAG, whether as primary therapy or after medical treatment, is found to be inadequate and is still to be determined. There are many advantages to this therapy, as patient compliance is not required, and its complications are few and minor.

Mechanism of action

The mechanism by which laser applications influence IOP is not well studied; however, there are three major theories: [2],[3],[4],[5]



Mechanical theory: This suggests that LT causes thermal changes in the trabecular beams, causing a contraction and shrinkage of trabecular beams at the site of application. This exerts a pull on surrounding beams, opening up the intertrabecular spaces.Biologic theory: It is thought that laser energy causes tissue injury with a resultant cascade of events. Macrophages are attracted, and they alter the secreted extracellular matrix, allowing an increased aqueous outflow. Upregulation of interleukin I and tumor necrosis factor also upregulates metalloproteinase expression.Cell division theory: Proponents of this theory propose that laser applications stimulate cell division in the anterior TM, providing pluripotent cells for the repopulation of lasered sites. Loss of endothelial cells over the trabecular beams causes the peripheral corneal endothelial cells to divide and slide over the lasered areas. These cells produce different extracellular matrix, enhancing the aqueous outflow.In selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) the melanin in the TM is targeted with pulse duration, 3 ns, that is shorter than the thermal relaxation time of the tissues, thereby minimizing the thermal effects. The pulse duration or transmission of energy to the TM is about 1,000 times less in SLT. There is therefore no or little photocoagulation-induced thermal damage. [5]

Indications

In POAG, the indications are as follows:



when IOP remains above "target" IOP despite maximally tolerated medical therapywhen patients find it difficult to administer drops or are noncompliantpseudoexfoliation glaucomawhen surgery needs to be deferred due to a patient's systemic status.In secondary glaucomas, the indications are as follows:



pseudophakic glaucomaglaucoma with pseudophakia.

The contraindications are as follows:



Narrow anglesPresence of peripheral anterior synechiaeUveitisAdvanced glaucomaDevelopmental glaucomas.Methodology

Various antireflective lenses may be used for LT, the clinical gonioscope, a four-mirror lens, or the Ritch trabeculoplasty lens which has two mirrors at 59°, permitting a view of the inferior angle, and two others inclined at 64°, for viewing the superior angle. Two of these mirrors have a planoconvex lens overlying them, to produce Χ1.4 magnification, reducing the spot size and increasing the laser power by a factor of 2. A Latina lens, made of quartz is used for SLT.

The eye is pretreated with a drop of brimonidine or a beta blocker, if not contraindicated, just before or immediately after the procedure.

In argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT), a spot size of 50 μm, 0.1-s duration, is applied to the junction of the anterior pigmented and posterior nonpigmented TM, with the power titrated to achieve blanching. The spot should be well focused and circular for best results. The power required depends on the pigmentation of the TM, and in Indian eyes is generally around 800 mW. Power adjustments may be required in different quadrants of the same eye. Approximately 100 laser spots are equally spaced over 360° of the angle, or 50 over 180°.

SLT utilizes a spot size of 400 μm and starts with a power of around 0.8-1 mJ for lightly pigmented TM. The power can be titrated till it causes champagne bubbles to form. Confluent spots are applied for best results. In more heavily pigmented TM, around 0.6 mJ may be used. A total of 360° of the TM is lasered, except in an eye with a heavily pigmented TM, when 180° is done first, and the remaining 180° later, if needed.

The spot size of ALT is 50 μm, compared to 400 μm with SLT. The size determines the energy delivered per unit area, so that ALT uses 40-70 mJ per pulse versus 0.6-1.2 mJ by SLT. In ALT, the pulse duration is 0.1 s as compared to 3 ns in SLT [Table 1].{Table 1}

Efficacy

This can only be assessed after 6 weeks, at about 3 months, when all cellular and biologic changes have taken effect. About 75% of individuals will show a significant fall in IOP after ALT, and the response is similar with SLT. The effects of LT are not always long lasting, with about 10% of individuals showing a rise in IOP with every passing year. [6],[7],[8],[9] Repeat ALT does not give more than 2-3 mmHg of a fall in IOP, whereas SLT has been shown to be more effective as a repeat procedure, in about 50% of eyes, both after ALT and SLT. The glaucoma laser treatment trial showed that 7 years after ALT, laser-treated eyes had a lower IOP, better fields, and better optic nerve head parameters, than eyes treated with medication. Twenty-five percent of ALT eyes did not require any other medication. [6] Five-year follow-up of SLT has shown an approximate 20% reduction in IOP, in 60-70% of eyes. [10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] Damji et al. have shown similar efficacy for ALT and SLT over time. [14],[18] Factors related to the success of LT were a higher baseline IOP and more pigmented eyes [Table 2]. {Table 2}

Complications

A potential complication is a temporary increase in IOP, which is treated with drugs. The effects of LT are not always long lasting:



IOP can spike in 3-5% of eyes, commonly occurring 1-4 h after the procedure.Peripheral goniosynechiae can be seen after both ALT and SLT.A chronic rise in IOP may be seen in a few eyes with both ALT and SLT.Corneal haze and scarring have been reported after SLT.Iritis and even choroidal effusion have been reported after SLT.

Failure of trabeculoplasty may be a result of



argon laser burns in TM causing thermal damage to collateral tissuesrepair of injured TM with scarring (increase collagen tissue within TM) migration of corneal endothelial cells to the TMfilling up of intertrabecular spaces with collagen and corneal endothelial cellsincreased obstruction to aqueous outflow.Laser trabeculoplasty as ALT and SLT, or by other lasers, [19] is a safe procedure for a similarly moderate lowering of IOP. The question about collateral damage during the procedure is still to be definitively answered.

 Laser-Based Filtration Procedures



Lasers are being investigated to replace or augment traditional glaucoma filtration surgery. Many procedures have been tried experimentally; however, there are a few in clinical trials currently.

Laser thermal sclerostomy ab interno or externo

Laser thermal sclerostomy, ab interno or externo, is an alternative to other full-thickness filtration procedures. Longer wavelengths in the infrared range have water-absorptive characteristics that facilitate perforation of the sclera. These lasers can be used to avoid intraocular instrumentation and minimize conjunctival trauma.

A thulium, holmium, chromium-doped YAG crystal laser [20] has been evaluated to create thermal ab externo sclerostomies. The near infrared laser, 2100 nm, is a long-pulsed, compact, self-contained, solid-state laser operating in the near-infrared. Energy was delivered via a specially designed 22-gauge optic probe that emits energy at a right angle to the long axis of the fiber. This can therefore be passed subconjunctivally to the limbus. Pulse energies of 80-120 mJ were used. Total energy levels to produce full-thickness sclerostomies ranged from 1.4 to 7.2 J. Subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil injections were administered. Twenty-five percent of cases failed within the initial 6 months, and 5% additionally by 12 months.

Full-thickness ab externo sclerotomies have been shown to produce early hypotony, and a high rate of failure over time.

An ab interno sclerotomy has been advocated to prevent scarring of the conjunctiva. A continuous wave neodymium YAG laser has been tried on rabbits, creating two sclerostomies ab interno on one eye in rabbits, using a 200-μm diameter quartz optical fiber. A viscoelastic substance is injected subconjunctivally in the area of the proposed bleb. The probe is passed across the anterior chamber, to the TM, where the sclerostomy is made. Well-defined filtering blebs were seen immediately postoperation, but after the fifth day, the conjunctival blebs had disappeared. After thermal stress had faded, the collagen appeared to undergo a process of repolymerization. By day 10, the lumen had become occluded by a loose meshwork of phagocytes, fibroblasts, and proliferating capillaries. These new vessels and the loose nature of the canal-occluding framework and of the surrounding regenerating collagenous tissue could have further permitted percolation and transport of aqueous humor, since IOP remained low, despite the disappearance of filtering blebs. Eighty percent of full-thickness fistulas remained patent, maintaining significant IOP reduction; the others were blocked by the iris. A pilot therapeutic trial was conducted in pseudophakic patients with advanced open angle glaucoma. Six full-thickness sclerostomies and three guarded sclerostomies were created in nine patients by 193-nm excimer laser ablation. After 6 months' follow-up, IOP was controlled in eight of the nine patients. Early postoperative complications included hyphema, temporary fibrinous sclerostomy occlusion, profound early hypotony, and suprachoroidal hemorrhage in one case. Conjunctival laser wounds were self-sealing. Small-bore laser sclerostomy procedures are functionally equivalent to conventional full-thickness procedures, producing early postoperative hypotony, with an increased risk of suprachoroidal hemorrhage in association with this. Iris incarceration is the most common problem associated with laser sclerostomies. Overdrainage, hypotony, and cataract formation are also commonly seen. Laser sclerostomy retains all the risks of a free filtering procedure when it works, and also has a high risk of failure. It is currently still being evaluated.

Laser deep sclerectomy

Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) lasers have the inherent property of losing effectiveness when in contact with liquid; the full penetration of the sclera by mistake is almost impossible. They have therefore been studied for use in nonpenetrating deep sclerectomies. The CO 2 laser ablates the sclera to an optimal thickness that allows percolation of the intraocular fluid, as the CO 2 laser essentially stops ablating as soon as it comes in contact with the percolating aqueous. [21]

Erbium YAG-laser-assisted deep sclerectomy [22],[23]

Klink et al.[22] dissected the deep corneoscleral lamella in deep sclerectomy with a pulsed erbium YAG laser, with energy 40-100 mJ and frequency 5-10 Hz. Schlemm's canal was unroofed and the lamella thinned until the aqueous percolated continuously through the membrane. The complete success rates were 83.3% at 3 months and 50% at 12 months. Qualified success was 91.7% at 3 months, 92.9% at 12 months, and 78.6% at 50.5 months. The number of glaucoma medications was reduced from 3.07 ± 0.92 preoperatively to 1.14 ± 1.41 at 50.5 months. A single case of anterior-chamber penetration, requiring iridectomy, was the only intraoperative complication.

The use of erbium

YAG laser for performing a deep sclerectomy procedure seems to be a safe and relatively effective alternative to the conventional surgical procedure.

In summary, lasers have been used successfully over the years in POAG for adjunctive IOP lowering by a trabeculoplasty, while other procedures are still being developed.

References

1Wise JB, Witter SL. Argon laser therapy for open angle glaucoma: a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97:319-22.
2Samples J. Effect of wavelengths on trabecular cell division after laser trabeculoplasty [Abstract 1673]. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 1990;31:344.
3Alvarado JA, Alvarado RG, Yeh RF, Franse-Carman L, Marcellino GR, Brownstein MJ. A new insight into the cellular regulation of aqueous outflow: How trabecular meshwork endothelial cells drive a mechanism that regulates the permeability of Schlemm's canal endothelial cells. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1500-5.
4Ma YR, Lee BH, Yang KJ, Park YG. The efficacy of .02% brimonidine for preventing intraocular pressure rise following argon laser trabeculoplasty. Korean J Ophthalmol 1999;13:78-84.
5Kramer TR, Noecker RJ. Comparison of the morphologic changes after selective laser trabeculoplasty and argon laser trabeculoplasty in human eye bank eyes. Ophthalmology 2001;108:773-9.
6Glaucoma Laser Trial Research Group. The Glaucoma Laser Trial (GLT) and Glaucoma Laser Trial Follow-up Study: 7. Results. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:718-31.
7Agarwal HC, Sihota R, Das C, Dada T. Role of argon laser trabeculoplasty as primary and secondary therapy in open angle glaucoma in Indian patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:733-6.
8Amon M, Menapace R, Radax U, Wedrich A, Skorpik C. Long-term follow-up of argon laser trabeculoplasty in uncontrolled primary open-angle glaucoma: a study with standardized extensive preoperative treatment. Ophthalmologica 1990;200:181-8.
9Lotti R, Traverso CE, Murialdo U, Frau B, Calabria GA, Zingirian M. Argon laser trabeculoplasty: Long-term results. Ophthalmic Surg 1995;26:127-9.
10Latina MA, Sibayan SA, Shin DH, Noecker RJ, Marcellino G. Q-switched 532-nm Nd: YAG laser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty): a multicenter, pilot, clinical study. Ophthalmology 1998;105:2082-8.
11Feldman RM, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL, Crapotta JA, Fahmy IA, Ali MA. Long-term efficacy of repeat argon laser trabeculoplasty. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1061-5.
12Hong BK, Winer JC, Martone JF, Wand M, Altman B, Shields B. Repeat selective laser Trabeculoplasty. J Glaucoma 2009;18:180-3.
13Melamed S, Ben Simon GJ, Levkovitch-Verbin H. Selective laser trabeculoplasty as primary treatment for open-angle glaucoma: a prospective, nonrandomized pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:957-60.
14Damji KF, Bovell AM, Hodge WG, Rock W, Shah K, Buhrmann R, et al. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty: results from a 1-year randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1490-4.
15Juzych MS, Chopra V, Banitt MR, Hughes BA, Kim C, Goulas MT, et al. Comparison of long-term outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty vs argon laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1853-9.
16Lanzetta P, Menchini U, Virgili G. Immediate intraocular pressure response to selective laser trabeculoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:29-32.
17Lai JS, Chua JK, Tham CC, Lam DS. Five-year follow up of selective laser trabeculoplasty in Chinese eyes. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004;32:368-72.
18Hodge WG, Damji KF, Rock W, Buhrmann R, Bovell AM, Pan Y. Baseline IOP predicts selective laser trabeculoplasty success at 1 year post-treatment: results from a randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1157-60.
19Detry-Morel M, Muschart F, Pourjavan S. Micropulse diode laser (810 nm) versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: comparative short-term safety and efficacy profile. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol 2008;308:21-8.
20Onda E, Ando H, Jikihara S, Kitazawa Y. Holmium YAG laser sclerostomy ab externo for refractory glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 1996-1997;20:309-14.
21Duan X, He Z, Zhang X. A comparative study of the effects of ab externo superpulse carbon dioxide laser-assisted trabeculectomy with conventionaltrabeculectomy in rabbits. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28:109-13.
22Pallikaris IG, Kozobolis VP, Christodoulakis EV. Erbium: YAG laser deep sclerectomy: An alternative approach to glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2003;34:375-80.
23Klink T, Schlunck G, Lieb WE, Klink J, Grehn F. Long-term results of Erbium YAG-laser-assisted deep sclerectomy. Eye 2008;22:370-4.