Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year
: 2012  |  Volume : 60  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 155--156

Community-acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bilateral Acute Dacryocystitis in a Neonate


Shivcharan Lal Chandravanshi1, Suresh Kumar Sutrakar2, Naresh Bajaj3,  
1 Department of Ophthalmology, S. S. Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Department of Pathology, S. S. Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India
3 Department of Paediatrics, S. S. Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Shivcharan Lal Chandravanshi
Department of Ophthalmology, S. S. Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh
India




How to cite this article:
Chandravanshi SL, Sutrakar SK, Bajaj N. Community-acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bilateral Acute Dacryocystitis in a Neonate.Indian J Ophthalmol 2012;60:155-156


How to cite this URL:
Chandravanshi SL, Sutrakar SK, Bajaj N. Community-acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bilateral Acute Dacryocystitis in a Neonate. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Sep 21 ];60:155-156
Available from: http://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2012/60/2/155/94062


Full Text

Dear Editor,

Bilateral acute dacryocystitis in neonates is a rare condition with very few cases described in literature. [1],[2],[3] We present a case of bilateral acute dacryocystitis secondary to congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO), caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). This was the first case of bilateral acute dacryocystitis secondary to CNLDO, caused by CA-MRSA in our Medline search result, hence we report the case.

A 12-day-old newborn boy (delivered at home) with bilateral acute dacryocystitis since two days was referred to us by his pediatrician. The mother had taken antibiotics for bilateral MRSA mastitis during pregnancy. Ophthalmic examination revealed bilateral lacrimal sac abscess. The size of the lacrimal sac abscess was approximately 1.5 x 1.5 cm OD and 1.5 x 1.0 cm OS [Figure 1]a. Mild compression of the lacrimal sac resulted in regurgitation of purulent discharge from the lower puncta. Both the eyelids showed edema and erythema. The remainder of his ocular examination was normal. Blood and conjunctival swab were sent for culture and sensitivity.{Figure 1}

The newborn was hospitalized and intravenous amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and amikacin were started. Over the next 12 h, swelling and redness increased with bilateral external fistula formation [Figure 1]b. Bilateral incision and drainage of the abscess was performed under general anesthesia. Approximately 2 ml of thick, yellowish collection was aspirated from each site and sent for culture. Gram stain revealed Gram-positive cocci, fibrinous exudates, and both inflammatory and red blood cells. Blood culture was negative. Swab cultures demonstrated Staphylococcus aureus, sensitive to vancomycin, clindamycin and rifampicin, but resistant to methicillin, amoxicillin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin. Mother's breast milk was sterile but recent breast swab culture revealed same organism with identical antibiotic susceptibility. The patient was switched to vancomycin. Topical 5% vancomycin solution was given QID. The lacrimal swelling and erythema resolved completely over the course of two days [Figure 1]c. The mother was also re-treated for mastitis. Probing and irrigation of the nasolacrimal duct was performed in both eyes two weeks after presentation which resolved CNLDO. Patient was free from lacrimal symptoms at six month's follow-up.

Ophthalmic CA-MRSA infections have been previously reported. [4] Neonates may acquire CA-MRSA vertically from their mother's contaminated breast milk or by skin-to-skin contact. [5] CA-MRSA is resistant to mainly beta-lactam antibiotics e.g. penicillin and cephalosporin. On the other hand, Hospital-acquired MRSA is resistant to multiple antibiotics. [4] In the present case, organisms were not only resistant to beta-lactams but also to quinolones and aminoglycosides. Recently, multi-drug-resistant CA-MRSA has also been observed. [6]

The probable source of infection, in the present case, was maternal breast skin, which reached the nasolacrimal system via skin-to-skin contact during breast feeding. Isolation of MRSA with identical antibiotic susceptibility, from mother's breast swabs, conjunctival sac as well as purulent material from lacrimal sac, supports a cause-effect relationship of vertically acquired CA-MRSA in the present case.

To avoid treatment delay, vertical transmission of CA-MRSA should be suspected even in cases of acute dacryocystitis involving otherwise healthy newborns with positive family history of MRSA infection.

References

1Sen DK. Bilateral acute lacrimal sac abscess in a newborn infant. Indian J Ophthalmol 1984;32:25-7.
2Lipton J, Jacobs N, Rosen ES. Bilateral acute dacryocystitis in an infant. Br J Hosp Med 1987;38:251.
3Berson D, Landau L. Bilateral acute dacryocystitis in a premature infant. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1978;15:168-9.
4Rutar T, Chambers HF, Crawford JB, Perdreau-Remington F, Zwick OM, Karr M, et al. Ophthalmic manifestations of infections caused by the USA300 clone of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1455-62.
5Gastelum DT, Dassey D, Mascola L, Yasuda LM. Transmission of community associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from breast milk in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24:1122-4.
6Neela V, Sasikumar M, Ghaznavi GR, Zamberi S, Mariana S. In vitro activities of 28 antimicrobial agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from a clinical setting in Malaysia. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2008;39:885-92.