• Users Online: 3815
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 1967  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 98-99


College of Medical Sciences, Varanasi, India

Date of Web Publication21-Jan-2008

Correspondence Address:
K S Mehra
College of Medical Sciences, Varanasi
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Mehra K S. Dacryocystostomy-probing. Indian J Ophthalmol 1967;15:98-9

How to cite this URL:
Mehra K S. Dacryocystostomy-probing. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1967 [cited 2023 Jan 31];15:98-9. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1967/15/3/98/38693

Probing as a permanent cure, for the blockage of naso-lacrimal duct has been advocated in the past, but is not very popular to-day.

Duke Elder (1952) is of the opinion that syringing the lacrimal passage with antibiotics could result in a permanent cure. Dayal (1962) has produced better results by probing followed by syring­ing with corticosteroids, antibiotics and proteolytic enzyme. Mehra (1965) has claimed successful results with visine.

These various agents antibiotics, cor­ticosteroids, proteolytic enzyme and visine have been tried only when pro­bing was successful. When probing is not successful either a dacryocystec­tomy or a dacryocystorhinostomy (D.C.R.) has to be done.

Probing of the naso-lacrimal pass­ages has fallen into disrepute, as it is a blind process, by which a false pass­age can easily be created. However Dayal (1962) and Mehra (1965) have reported successful cases of probing followed by syringing with antibiotics, zonulysin, hycine, visine and other agents. Stallard (1958) intubated an acrylic tube after probing. It was the object of this worker to modify the technique of probing, by cutting down on the sac wall and probing under dir­ect vision, thus reducing the chances of a false passage, whilst at the same time obviating the necessity of the more drastic operations of D.C.R. or sac excision. It has the added advan­tage, that it still leaves the door open to perform either of these two opera­tions, should the procedure under dis­cussion fail.

  Material and Methods Top

The patients in this series were be­tween the ages of 20-50 years and be­longed to both sexes. Their chief com­plaint was watering of the eye, duration varying from five months to three years. The watering was due to block­ed naso-lacrimal duct as confirmed by syringing. In this series only those patients, who had no history of acute or subacute dacryocystitis, were ope­rated, and in whom probing was un­successful through the puncta. Out of the ten cases, four were admitted in the hospital while the rest were treated as out-door patients.

Procedure : Two days before operation the patients were given one in­jection of dicrysticin daily which was continued for a week. One day before operation one ampoule of clauden was given intramuscularly and another one hour before the operation. The cases were operated under local anesthesia.

The incision was the same as that for dacryo-cystectomy, but was extend­ed a little downwards, so as to expose the upper end of naso-lacrimal duct. Skin, orbicularis muscle and lacrimal fascia were incised and the anterior surface of sac defined. The junction of sac and naso-lacrimal duct was also defined clearly. A midline incision 3 mm. long was made in the anterior sac wall, 3 or 4 mm. above the junction of the sac and naso-lacrimal duct. A lacrimal probe of the size of 3 or 4 was passed into the sac cavity through the incision in the sac wall. The probe was passed downwards, backwards and laterally in the direction of the naso-lacrimal duct. Some difficulty was felt in probing. With extra care and by applying some force, the probe could be passed through the naso-lacrimal duct, thus opening up the duct. It was confirmed by seeing the tip of the probe in the nasal cavity. The probe was left there for 5 minutes and then removed. Gentle syringing with the mixture* of 1 cc each of penicillin and streptomycine solutions with Zonu­lysin Hycin and Visine was done through the sac wall incision into the nasolacrimal duct. The incision of the sac wall was closed by two interrupted 0000 catgut sutures. Skin incision was closed by interrupted silk sutures. The patient was put on a course of dexa­methasonet by mouth starting with 2 tablets thrice a day, tapering down to end the course after 10 days, in order to lessen fibrosis. The patient was dressed daily with hycin and visine drops. Skin stitches were removed on the seventh day. On the tenth day of operation syringing with normal saline was done, and the patency of nasola­crimal duct was noted. Syringing with a mixture of penicillin streptomycine, hycine, visine and zonulysin was re­peated every alternate day for two weeks. Patients were called for a fol­low up every week or two weeks, and syringing with the same solution was done.

Those cases, whose watering from the eye was relieved and nasolacrimal duct remarried patent, were labelled as successful cases. Out of the 10 cases so treated, 6 were successful and 4 un­successful, which were treated subse­quently by a D.C.R. or excision of the sac. One case of failure had not taken the full treatment as advised. It appears that in the cases that failed most probably fibrosis deve­loped in the nasolacrimal duct follow­ing oedema, as a result of operative in­terference. A combination of the five different solutions is used because of the report by Mehra (1955) that there is a synergistic action of these drugs when combined.

By this technique the patient is re­lieved of epiphora, which persists after a sac excision and is saved the bothera­tion of undergoing a D.C.R. If probing is not possible after incising the sac wall, then the sac may be removed.

  Summary Top

A technique in which probing is done by incising the wall of the lacrimal sac, followed by syringing with a mixture of penicillin, streptomycin, hycin, zonulysin and visine is described. In 6 patients out of 10 the results were successful.[4]

  References Top

Dayal, Y. (1962), J. All India Ophthal Soc. 10: 61-63.  Back to cited text no. 1
Duke Elder S. (1952), Text Book of Ophthalmology, Vol. 5, p. 5300, Kimp­ton.  Back to cited text no. 2
Mehra. K. S. (1965). Amer. J. of Ophthal. 59: 3.  Back to cited text no. 3
Stallard. H. B. (1958), Eye Surgery, Third Edition, p. 309, John Wright and Sons Ltd., Bristol.  Back to cited text no. 4


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Material and Methods

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal