Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3273
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLE
Year : 1970  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 78-81

Sympathetic keratitis presumably herpetic


The Department of Ophthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Correspondence Address:
I S Jain
The Department of Ophthalmology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Jain I S, Dev S. Sympathetic keratitis presumably herpetic. Indian J Ophthalmol 1970;18:78-81

How to cite this URL:
Jain I S, Dev S. Sympathetic keratitis presumably herpetic. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1970 [cited 2020 Dec 5];18:78-81. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1970/18/2/78/35068

Since clinical case reports of sym­pathetic uveitis following Herpetic Keratouveitis in the other eye are rare, though such a possibility was sug­gested by Haldiman; [4],[1],[2],[8] therefore the authors feel reporting of the fol­lowing case is of interest.


  Case Report Top


Patient named K. L. 55 years old Hindu male, presented in the eye O.P.D. on 14th of August, 1968, with the complaints of pain, redness, and complete loss of vision in the left eye for the past four weeks. The history dates back to March, 1968 when some rubbish fell in his left eye and the eye became red and painful. It became alright with treatment after some time. Four weeks ago, he again developed sudden redness and pain in the same eye, and the sight deteri­orated rapidly to complete blindness over a period of 10 days.

Past history

Treated for syphilis 35 years ago but denies any history of exposure.

Personal and family history

Married, has got eight children, the eldest 40 years old, and youngest 10 years old. No history of abortions in his wife.

Examination

General physical examination: well built; pulse 96/mt regular, of good volume; B.P. 155/95 mm Hg.

Systemic examination : Central nervous system, cardiovascular, res. piratory and abdominal systems did not reveal anything of significance.

Ocular Examination: Visual acuity in the right eye was 6/24 unaided and 6/9 with -1.0 Dcyl. axis 165; There was not even perception of light in the left eye. Right eye was white and quiet and the fundus was normal. There was slight photophobia in the left eye, the patient tended to keep the eye closed. There was slight in­jection of the conjunctiva and lacri­mation. The cornea showed epithelial oedema and folds in the descemet's membrane. The endothelium also showed oedema. Flare in the anterior chamber could not be judged with certainty because of corneal haze. Corneal sensation was absent. There was no corneal epithelial staining. Pupil was dilated due to atropine. Tension digitally was normal.

A provisional diagnosis of viral kerato-uveitis was made and the patient was admitted in the hospital on 21st Aug., 1968 for treatment. He was treated locally with chloromy­cetin ointment and atropine ointment 1% thrice daily and orally with Tab. Vitamin C. 500 mgm, b.d. and hot fomentations t.d.s. After two days the patient was put on Betnesol-N eye drops, 4 hourly.

Investigations

No organism could be grown on culture from a scraping of the corneal lesion. However epithelial scrapings from the cornea showed many mono­nuclear cells. Urine examination, total and differential blood-counts showed no abnormality. Haemoglo­bin was 15 gm%, ESR 20 mm Ist hr. (Wintrobe). Stool examination re­vealed cysts of E. Coli and Iodo en­tamoeba. Fasting blood sugar was 113 mgm%. ENT and dental check ups were normal. VDRL Test nega­tive.

Progress:

With the above line of treatment the patient showed gradual improve­ment with subjective relief in the pain, redness, and watering in the left eye. Objectively corneal oedema started re­gressing and after three days the pa­tient could count fingers close to the face. The visual improvement conti­nued and vision was 6/60 on 30th August 1968; Funds examination at this stage revealed a normal optic disc and a white ill defined spot, of the size of a paise just below and nasal to the disc which appeared to be an isolated patch of opaque nerve fibres.

On 1st Sept. 1968, the patient sud­denly developed watering redness and marked diminution of vision in the right eye, only counting fingers close to his face.. The condition in the left eye had almost fully recovered to nor­mal by this date. On examination, the right eye revealed an almost simi­lar clinical picture as it was in the left eye on admission. There was gross corneal oedema, folds in desce­met's membrane, but no flare or KP's could be sen due to corneal haze. Cor­neal sensation dull. Pupil was small in size, non reactive. Eye ball was tender. No staining of cornea was pre­sent. A similar line of therapy was instituted in the right eye i.e. atropine drops 1% and local cortico-sterioid drops frequently. The eye condition completely recovered by 10th Septem­ber, 1968, and the patient was dischar­ged on 14th Sept., 1968 with the final visual acquity of 6/12 right eye and 6/24 in his left eye with glasses.

The patient was last seen on 6-11-1968 and the visual acquity was maintained and had no ocular com­plaints.


  Discussion Top


The present case, showed mainly endothelial and stromal involvement primarily and there was no preceding epithelial involvement in the form of dendritic keratitis.

Irvine and Kimura[5] have supported the theory of primary involvement of the endothelium, by their ability to culture the virus from the endothelium and this confirmed their belief in the long-known entity of "Herpes cornea posterior."

The concept that Herpes simplex virus was strictly epitheliotropic has changed recently by the demonstration of virus in corneal stromal cells by flourescent - antibody technique in rabbits and by electron microscopy in both rabbits and humans.

There is however no unanimity of opinion yet, as to whether the virus spreads to the endothelium by a hema­togenous route or through the cornea or limbus. Viraemia in rabbits has been demonstrated after three days of inoculation of the virus in the epithe­lium (Irvine and Kimura[5]).

The loss of even perception of light in the present case, suggests that there was involvement of the optic nerve as well. Rarely one does come across cases with retrobulbar neuritis or papillitis having no PL and then re­covering good vision following treat­ment.

There is, however, ample experi­mental support to the above premise.

Goodpasture and Teague[3], and Marinesco and Diaganesco[9] demon­strated spread of the Herpes virus along the optic nerve to the central nervous system after inoculation of the eyes of animals with Herpes virus.

Vel Hagen[11], and Rinaldi[10] even demonstrated that 15% of their ani­mals developed violent uveitis in the uninoculated eye, sometimes even asso­ciated with papillitis. Recently Kimu­ra [7],[6] and his colleagues have verified these findings by demonstrating the presence of the virus in the uveal tract, retina and the opitic nerve of the sympathising eye. In the experi­mental model, the uveitis in the first eye usually subsided in about 12 days, while the inflammation in the fellow eye developed after 7-14 days, and during this period signs of encephalitis were sometimes evident. Histopatho­logical studies of the sympathising uveitis showed that the inflammation spread by way of the optic nerve to the chiasma and across to the other eye.

In the present case report the other eye was involved after nearly 7-8 weeks of involvement of the first eye eye and coincided with almost full recovery of its condition. Complete loss of vision in the originally invol­ved eye must be due to involvement of the optic nerve during the process of spread to the other eye, and its subsequent functional recovery demon­strates that the damage done to the optic nerve is transitory and not per­manent.

The history of treatment for syphilis thirtyfive years ago is not sufficient to consider syphilis as the etiological agent in the present case for various reasons. The clinical picture in the eye was far from syphilitic in nature, as there was no vascularisation, no severe anterior uveitis, neither any re­sidual changes of scarring, ghost ves­sels or iris atrophic changes after the condition cleared. There were no other signs of acquired or congenital syphilis in the body.

Although in the present case we could not culture any virus because of inadequate facilities, but the only clue of its being viral in origin was increased number of mononuclears in the epithelial scraping, which was done in the later recovering stage of the disease.


  Summary Top


A rare clinical case report of sym­pathetic "Keratitis" presumably viral in origin is described, where along with deep stromal keratitis there was involvement of the optic nerve leading to complete loss of vision. Sub­sequently after 7-8 weeks, the other eye was similarly involved, giving rise to a condition of so called "sympathe. tic" Herpetic Keratitis. There was eventually good visual recovery in both the eyes.

 
  References Top

1.
Cavara and di Ferdinando : Boll. Ocu­list, 28: 1 (1949).  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ferrante and Moro : Atti Soc. Med. Chir. Padora, 27: 447 (1949).  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Goodpasture and Teaque: J. Med. Res. 44: 121, 139 (1923).  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Haldimann: Ophthalmologica, 99: 187 (1940).  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Irvine, R. A., and Kimura, S. J. Ex­perimental Stromal Herpes simplex keratitis in Rabbits. Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc. 65: P. 189-210 (1967).  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Katsnelson; Voinov and Kaplina: Vestn. Ophthal. 3: 61 (1962).  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Kimura, S. J. Trans. Amer. Ophthal. Soc. 60: 440 (1962).  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Legrand : Bull. Soc. Ophthal. Fr., 592 (1959).  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Marinesco and Diaganesco : Amn. Inst. Pasteur, 37: 753, 1923.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Rinaldi: Riv. Pato1, Sper. 12: 416, 1934.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Velhagen, V. G.. Arch. Ophthal. (Berlin), 119: 325, 1927.  Back to cited text no. 11
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Case Report
Discussion
Summary
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1151    
    Printed23    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal