Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 3060
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1977  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 28-32

Genetics studies in retinoblastoma


Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam-2, India

Correspondence Address:
K Srinivasa Rao
Prof. of pathology, Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal 506 007
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 612588

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Rao K S, Krishna G R, Rao C R. Genetics studies in retinoblastoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 1977;25:28-32

How to cite this URL:
Rao K S, Krishna G R, Rao C R. Genetics studies in retinoblastoma. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1977 [cited 2020 Dec 1];25:28-32. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1977/25/1/28/34597

Retinoblastoma is the most common in­traocular tumour of childhood and it is second to malignant melanoma of the uvea among all intraocular. tumours. It is frequently observed at birth. It usually appears in children under five years of age and is less frequent after seven years. It has however,occasionally been reported in adults.

It is postulated that the development of a retinoblastoma is dependent upon the presence of a single dominant gene. The number of such genes in the population is constantly in­creasing as a result of mutations, and also di­minishing because of deaths of affected persons.

Falls and Neel [2] have calculated this rate of mutatian to be 2.3x10 -5 per generation. With­out therapy most retinoblastoma genes would be diminished because the affected persons would not live long enough to transmit their mutant genes. For the reasons not now un­derstood, all persons who possess this paricular gene do not develop a retinoblastoma. This "failure of penetrance" probably accounts for those unusual kind reds exhibiting "horizontal" rather than "vertical" constellation (i.e., several affected siblings whose parents are normal). One explanation for failure of penetrance is that a cellular alteration to malignant change is required and that in certain cases such chan­ges do not occur. This concept would also account for the occurrence of unilateral cases and explain the multicentric origin that com­monly is observed.

A substantial number of pedigrees, mostly showing affected sibships, are now available. From the accumulated literature it appears that there is no high rate of parental consanguinity in affected sibships, that some of the affected sibs are now known to have themselves trans­mitted the disease, and that there are now, many pedigrees with transmission over two or three generations. The available material gives little support for recessive inheritance and suggests dominance with incomplete expressivitv and penetrance.

Vogel [16] holds that germinal mutations account for only a minority of the cases of retinoblastomas, most cases being genuinely sporadic. The risk of transmission by a mem­ber of a known retinoblastoma family, whether affected in one year or both, is rather less than 50 per cent characteristic of dominance, owing to incomplete penetrance and expression of the same.

From the statistical study of incidence of retinoblastoma it would appear, either geneti­cally determined or by somatic mutation. Within the past five years a number of syn­dromes usually involving mutiple system asso­ciated with gross alteration in either structure or total number of chromosomes have been reported. Among these, the most common structurally described is a deletion of a long arm of the chromosome-named as 13 q-syn­drome. This seems to be associated with high incidence of retinoblastoma. Multiple conge­nital malformations are also described in gross chromosomal abnormalities. The relatively high incidence of retinoblastoma in D-deletion syndrome adds great importance to their re­cognition. It suggests the possibility that the gene locus responsible for the familial forms of the tumour might eventually be found on chromosome-13. A genetic component in­volved in the normal development of the eye is apparently located on the long arm of the No.13 chromosome.


  Methods and Material Top


Chromosome analysis was done by the modified method of Moorehead ct al.[11] Karyotyping was done according to Denver typing. We used a modification of the Trypsin and Giemsa banding technique of Seabright. [10]

From the records of King George Hospital, Visakhapatnam, about 14,657 new patients attended the Ophthalmic department every year. Out of them about 5 to 7 are the retinoblastoma patients. The inci­dence of retinoblastoma in this institution is 0.03%.

The total cases that are seen in Ophthalmic depart­ment for 3 years, i.e., 1973 to 1975 are 13. Out of them three are bilateral.

From the family history and pedigrees analysed there are no similar complaints in the family for at least two or three generations except in one family where, there is evidence of transmission of the same complaint for three generations. This shows that if an abnormal gene once formed, will be transmitted to the affected individual's off-spring as an autosomal dominant gene with incomplete penetrance in two successive generations (71 out of 137 recorded families) and there are several authenticated examples of transmission for three or four successive generations, but if the penetrance of 80% as calculated by Vogel [16] is accep,ed its failure results in many apparently normal individuals, male or female, acting as carriers so that the incidence of neoplasm is lower than the expected 50% characteristic of Mendelian dominant transmission. Thus if the proband and his father or mother are affected. the off-spring will have a 40% chance of having a neoplasm. One or more gene­rations are frequently missed so that the pedigrees often show a horizontal rather than a vertical alignment, reve­al siblings of a normal (but carrier) parent being affected (10 affected) sibs. [5],[8],[11] There are 75% consanguineous histories among the parents in our series of studies.


  Genetic Studies - Results Top


Ten cases had unilateral retinoblastoma and three cases had bilateral retinoblastomas with sporadic occurrence, the former with somatic mutation type and the latter with ger­minal mutation type. In one case there is transmission for three generations continuously in the sibs of histories in the pedigrees analysed where there is consanguinity.

But in all other 12 cases there is no trans­mission in any other sibs and there is neither horizontal nor vertical transmission history in the pedigrees analysed, though there are 75% histories of consanguinity in the parents. Vogel [16] and Smith and Sorsby [13] also have reported similarly in their cases involving 80-90% of all sporadic somatic mutation types.

It is a significant point of observation in our series of study that 75% of cases show paren­teral consanguinity, the available material and pedigree studies and vertical transmission stu­dies, do not indicate or give support for recessive inheritance and suggest dominance with incomplete penetrance and expressivity

Somatic anomalies of distinctive features like aplastic thumbs. microcephaly, protruding tri­goncephaly, upper teeth, low set ears, cleft or high arched palate micrognathia, and mentally retarded growth and development have been re­ported by Wilson et al [17] but were not found in our series. Only one case showed polydactaly and one case showed mental retardation with microcephaly.

Karyotype analysis was done in seven cases (i.e., from 6th to 12th).

6th case -A 1 upper arm breaks.

7th case -Normal

8th case -D deletion syndrome.

9th case -D deletion syndrome.

tOth case -Normal

11th case --Normal

12th case -Triploidy. 69-chromosomes.

i 3th case -D deletion syndrome.

The pedigrees are analysed in 13 cases where in one case there is evidence of trans­misson of this tumour in three generations successively. In this case the present family members that are available to our study are three brothers. The eldest brother married to uncle's niece where lie had two daughters and one son. Among the three children two daughters affectcd with this tumour expired in Kakinada General Hospital. The second brother affected bilaterally with this tumour aged 37 years now, got his left eye enucleated in Madras and the rightr eye was irradiated at the age of two years in Madras General Hospital. His right eye vision is 6/36 and is working as a public works inspector. There is evidence of old irridated retinoblastoma multiple foci on fundus examnation, He married his uncle's niece and had one male child and this child was brought to this Hospital in Stage III. We have exanterated the right orbit and blood transfusion was given but on third postoperative day the child expired. The third brother of this family married to a distant relation, i. e., no consanguinity, having two children and on examination no evidence of this tumour. The detailed pedigree analysis is shown. In other 12 cases there is no neither horizontal nor vertical transmission histories in pedigrees analysed, though there are 75% cons­anguineous histories among the parents.

In our study 10 cases are unilateral and three cases are bilateral. The important point to be stressed here is that in bilateral cases mental retardation development is a constant feature. A germinal mutation affecting every cell inherited affection. A somatic mutation occuring precursor retinal cells developing in one eye never to involve the other eye. A phe­nocepy which results in the tumour cells deve­loping in retina.

The question of danger of further sibs being affected can be dismissed in all cases of spo­radic retinoblastoma, bilateral not less than unilateral.

It needs to be stressed that in sporadic uni­lateral retinoblastoma it is essential to probe deeply in the family history, for rare irregular dominance with its serious implications can easily be overlooked.

In this connection, however it must be remembered that cases which are apparently sporadic may in fact be familial, thus Machlim [9] in a study of all retinoblastoma occuring in a 17 year period in Ohio, found that if the pedigrees of apparently sporadic cases were checked from every available source, some 10.5 % revealed the disease in collateral lines. Somatic mutation type probably involved 80 to 90 % of all sporadic cases [6],[10],[13],[16] this type is not transmitted. General mutation type are transmitted as an irregular dominant trait with incomplete penetrance, and the tragedy is that the majority of these cases tend to be bila­teral. [1],[3],[13]


  Discussion Top


From the accumulated literature it appears that there is no high rate of parental consan­guinity in affected sibships, that some of the affected sibs are now known to have themselves transmitted the diseases, and that there are now many pedigrees with transmission over two or three generations. But it is an interesting point to note in our series of study that 75% of cases show parenteral consanguinity. The available material and pedigree studies and vertical transmission studies of the families, do not indicate or give support for recessive inheritance and suggest dominance with in­complete penetrance and expressivity.

Out of 13 cases 10 are unilateral and three are bilateral. This shows that most of the cases are sporadic (96%) and most frequently unilateral. The sporadic cases occur either as a sporadic mutation or a new germinal mutation.

Bilateral incidence is 23 % in our studies and in literature the incidence is 20 to 30 of cases. The second eye is affected independe­ntly and not by metastasis or continuity via the chiasma. The high incidence of bilateral affe­ction is dominantly inherited retinoblastorna as recorded in the literature and in the off­spring of survivors from sporadic bilateral retinoblastoma as a dominant disorder either in transmission or as a new mutation. This disorder, though fully or almost fully penetrant, is not always fully expressed.

The parents are consanguineous in all the three bilateral cases. The parents are consan­guineous in seven unilateral cases and non­consanguineous in three unilateral cases. Men­tal retardation is a eonstant feature in all the three bilateral cases. All the three bilateral cases have been reported histologically as un­differentiated or pseudorosette type.

The incidence of retinoblastoma is 0.03,0 in this institution. Two sexes are affected equally. The youngest patient was 1 month old and the oldest 14 years. Except in one case (where the pedigree is shown), in other cases there is neither horizontal nor vertical trans­mission history in pedigrees analysed, though there are 75 % consanguineous histories among the parents.

Except in one case all other cases are of sporadic occurrence with somatic mutation type in 10 cases and germinal mutation type in three cases.

The study of these cases do not indicate or give support to recessive inheritance and suggest dominance with incomplete penetrance and expressivity.

The most common structurally described disorder is a common of a long arm of the chromosome-13 named as 13-syndrome and this seems to be associated with high incidence of retinoblastoma.

Of the 13 cases studied there were three deaths.


  Summary Top


Genetic studies in 13 cases of retinobla­stomas were made. The pedigrees of 13 cases showed that 75 ,°o of cases show parente­ral consanguinity. Somatic anomalies were not constant in our series. In 12 cases no other siblings were affected though 75% showed consanguinity. Only one case showed vertical and horizontal transmission in 3 generations. The available material gives little support for recessive inheritance and suggests dominance with incomplete expressivity and penetrance.

 
  References Top

1.
Dollfus and Aubert, 1953, Gliomas and Pseudogliomas, Paris.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Falls and Neel, 1951, Arch. Opthal., 46, 367.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Giffith A.D. and Sorsby A., 1944, Brit. J. Opthal. 28, 279.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Grace E. et al, 1971, J. Med. Genetik, 8, 351.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hemmaes, Neziand and Schappert-Kimmijser, 1964, Met. J. Genet., 108, 1906.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Klein, 1962, Human Genetik, 2, 72.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Moorhead et at, 1960, Expt. Cell. Res., 20, 613.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Mecklin, 1959, Arch. Opthal., 62, 343.   Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Machlim, 1959, Arch. Opthal., 62, 843.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Machester, 1961, Arch. Opthal., 62, 546.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Newton, 1902, Aust. Med. Gaz., 21, 236.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sovik, 1952, Amer J. Opthal., 35, 1611.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Smith S.M. and Sorsby A., 1958 Ann. Hum, Genet., 23, 50.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Sorsby A. 1970, Opthalmic Genetics, 156.   Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Taylor A., 1970, Human Genetik, 10, 362.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Vogel F., 1954, 1957, 1961, Modern Trends in Opthal., 4, Butterworth London, 6, 47.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Wilson W.J., Joseph W, Towner and Fee Jimoto, 1973, J. Hunt Genet., 25, 1, 57.  Back to cited text no. 17
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4], [Figure - 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Methods and Material
Genetic Studies ...
Discussion
Summary
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1977    
    Printed37    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded2    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal