Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 2239
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1977  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 50-51

Bilateral peripapillary staphyloma (ectasia)


Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College, Amritsar, India

Correspondence Address:
Daljit Singh
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College, Amritsar
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 659009

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Singh D, Verma A. Bilateral peripapillary staphyloma (ectasia). Indian J Ophthalmol 1977;25:50-1

How to cite this URL:
Singh D, Verma A. Bilateral peripapillary staphyloma (ectasia). Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1977 [cited 2020 Nov 26];25:50-1. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1977/25/4/50/34617

Peripapillary ectasia is a deep excavation involving the posterior pole of the globe so that a normal nerve head with its normal arrangement of vessels is visible at the bottom of a pit in the surrounding tunics.

This condition is amongst the rarest congenital anomalies of the eye. Zimmermann [9] in 1897 described this anomaly in a living dog. The first human case was described by Stock and von Szily [6] in 1906. Since then a total of 16 cases have been described. Out of these only one case showed bilateral ectasias [1] .

Three of reported cases showed an intermittent and marked contraction of the walls of the ectasia (contractile peripapillary staphyloma) [5],[7],[8].

Reported here is the first Indian case showing non-contractile bilateral peripapillary staphyloma.


  Case Report Top


S.S., 19 years male came with the complaints of defective vision in both the eyes since early childhood. Both fundi showed almost similar abnormalities.

On each side the disc was vertically oval, the length being about 2.5 times the breadth, surrounded by a thin strip of choroidal atrophy on the nasal side, above and below. On the temporal side there was a big crescent almost the size of the disc. White looking choroidal vessels were very prominent on the nasal side of the disc.

The choroidal vessels lateral to the crescent appeared normal. The disc appeared to be lying at the bottom of a pit which had very steep margins on the nasal side. Here the depth of the pit was about 10 D. On the temporal side there was only a slight depression which could be detected by an optical section in conjunction with Hruby lens or a Goldmann lens. The steep nasal margin of the pit appeared grey in colour. The retinal vessels crossing the ridge made a very sharp turn before flattening out on the retina. With careful optical section of the retina the limits of the depression could be traced for about 3 DD on the nasal side, 1.5 DD above and below and about 4.5 DD on the temporal side. The lateral part of the depression merged imperceptibly into the surrounding retina. The limits of the depression were also shown by the bending of the retinal vessels. The rest of the fundus was normal.

The fundus picture of the right eye [Figure - 1] was taken with the help of Carl Zeiss Jena slit-lamp (not fundus camera). The improvised technique of photo­graphy will be described in a separate paper. The picture shows the disc and the surrounding retina. The grey ridge of the sclera represents the sharp nasal edge of the ectasia and is marked with arrows.

The peripapillary ectasia described above did not show any movement by breath-holding, Valsalva man­ouver or by throwing strong light into the same or the fellow eye.

Perimetery showed some enlargement of the blind spot commensurate with the atrophic areas around the disc. The grey ridge did not make any scotoma.

Uncorrected vision in both the eyes was 6/60 Corrected vision using-3.0 D sph. with-1.25 D cyl. axis 180 degrees, was 6/12 in each eye.

There was no systemic abnormality. Examination of other members of the family did not show any abnormality.


  Discussion Top


Peripapillary staphyloma needs to be differentiated from:

(a) Coloboma of the optic disc, in which the defect is within the abnormal nerve head itself.

(b) Myopic conus, in which the defect is usually temporal to the disc and progressive.

The depth of the pit has been measured in only six of the reported cases, and ranged from 8 to 20 D. The depth of the pit in our case was about 10 D.

Most of the reported cases had very poor vision. Hancock's [4] patient improved upto 6/18. The case reported by Caldwell et al [1] had normal vision in both the affected eyes. In our patient the vision in both the eyes improved to 6/12.

Histological study has not been done in any human case. Zimmermann [8] who found this condition in a dog performed histological studies. He found the thin scleral ectasia to be lined with remnants of retina and choroid. The optic nerve was atrophic with increase in the interstitial connective tissue. The nerve fibre layer was absent temporally but present else­where.

Francois et al [3] performed elaborate biometric studies on their patient of unilateral peripapillary ectasia with poor vision. All the measurements were within normal limits.

The development of peripapillary ectasia is probably due to the failure in the condensation of the mesoderm which consolidates to form the sclera, a process normally delayed at the posterior pole of the globe [2] .


  Summary Top


The paper describes a rare case of bilateral peripapillary staphyloma. The staphyloma was non-contractile and was about 10 D in depth. The vision was poor but improved to 6,112 with glasses.

 
  References Top

1.
Caldwell, J.B.H., Lears, M.L. and Gilman, M., 1971, Amer. J. Opthal., 71,423.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Duke Elder, 1964, System of Ophthalmology, 3 part 2, p. 540, Henry Kimpton, London.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Francois, J., Goes, F. and Yobbagyi, P. 1967, Ophthalmologica, 154, 446.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hancock, L, 1907, Quoted by Wise et al.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kral, K. and Svarc, D., 1971, Amer. J. Ophthal., 71, 1090.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Sugar, H.S. and Beckman, H., 1969, Amer. J. Ophthal., 68, 895  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Stock, W. and von Szily, A., 1906, Quoted by Wise et al.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Wise, J.B., Maclenn, A.L. and Gass, J.D.N., 1966, Arch. Ophthal., 75, 426.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Zimmermann, 1897, Quoted by Wise et al.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Case Report
Discussion
Summary
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2224    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal