Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 2569
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
ARTICLES
Year : 1980  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 19-21

Blindness due to leprosy


Department of Ophthalmology, Thanjavur Medical College, Thanjavur, India

Correspondence Address:
N Radhakrishnan
Department of Ophthalmology Thanjavur Medical College ,Thanjavur, Tamilnadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 7203592

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Radhakrishnan N, Albert S. Blindness due to leprosy. Indian J Ophthalmol 1980;28:19-21

How to cite this URL:
Radhakrishnan N, Albert S. Blindness due to leprosy. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 1980 [cited 2020 Oct 21];28:19-21. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?1980/28/1/19/31041

Table 4

Click here to view
Table 4

Click here to view
Table 3

Click here to view
Table 3

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 2

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
Table 1

Click here to view
There are approximately 18 million people in the world suffering from leprosy. Three million patients are in our country and Tamil Nadu alone has one million leprosy patients as its share. Leprosy probably has the highest incidence of ocular involvement of any infectious disease affecting man. The incidence of ocular lesions of leprosy varies from approximately 15% of the patients with tuber­culoid leprosy to approximately 100% of patients with long standing lepromatous leprosy.

It is aptly and only said that leprosy is a disease horrible to live with and difficult to die from. When the threat of blindness is also added to the patient's natural dread of the disease, the condition is indeed terrifying.

The aim of this paper is to give the details of incidence of blindness in the leprosy patients, various causes of blindness and the role of an ophthalmologist to prevent blindness due to leprosy.


  Methods and material Top


320 inmates of leprosy beggars rehabilita­tion home [Table - 1],[Table - 2] Manaiaripatti, Thanjavur district were examined with bino­cular loupe and torch light for ocular mani­festations of leprosy.

Patients with gross loss of vision in one eye or both eyes i.e. less than 3 metres vision with best possible correction were listed and causes of blindness studied in detail. [Table - 3]

Patients with unilateral or bilateral lagophthal­mos were examined in detail for the following findings :- cause of lagophthalmos, corneal sensation, corneal damage due to exposure, Bell's phenomenon, paralytic ectropion and visual acuity [Table - 4].


  Discussion Top


On analysing the results it is found that 14% of the eyes are blind and the major causes of blindness are exposure keratitis due to lagophthalmos 25%, leucoma and various forms of keratitis 25%, iridocyclitis 10%, sclerits with sclerosing keratitis 10%, cataract 10%.

Blindness mentioned here due to cataract is operable and usually prognosis of cataract surgery in leprosy patients is excellent. Wound healing is good and incidence of endophthal­mitis is rare.

17 patients had lagophthalmos and out of these 7 patients had bilateral facial palsy. 3 patients are blind both eyes due to exposure keratitis. Apart from VII nerve paralysis, lagophthalmos may result due to the following causes also in leprosy (1). Primary leprous myositis resulting in weakness of orbicularis muscle. (2) due to rigidity of the lids when involved in a reacting tuberculoid path. (3) due to extensive atrophy of the skin and orbicula­ris muscle. Anyhow in our studies all cases of lagophthalmos were not due to facial nerve paralysis. Degree of damage to cornea due to exposure is highly variable depending upon 1. Degree of orbicularis weakness 2. Corneal sensation. 3. Amount of mucin and meibomian secretion and 4. Blink reflex.

It is surprising to note that six patients even though have lagophthalmos for the past few years their cornea is absolutely normal. No evidence of exposure keratitis is observed. These patients have normal corneal sensation, good Bell's phenomenon, normal lacrimal gland function and also good blink reflex.

This proves that the damage of exposure keratitis essentially due to mechanical defect­lagophthalmos can be overcome by the non mechancial physiological factors inherent in the individual patient. Tears, precorneal film and corneal sensitivity are factors which make the insult of lagophthalmos either a tolerable or intolerable burden to the eye.

Prevention of Blindness

As ophthalmologists, we have to screen the Hansen's patients regularly, periodically catching the cases with corneal pathology and iridocyclitis at a very early stage. Trea­ting these condition effectively, along with good control of the systemic disease can go a long way in lowering the incidence of blindness due to Hansen's diseases. Timely tarsorraphy or temporalis sling operation or prescription of protective glasses will help the patients to escape from exposure keratitis and to retain his vision.

Conclusion

Inspite of years of research and enormous number of conferences on leprosy, the disease still remains a major medical problem. Nevertheless blindness from leprosy can be a thing of the past if an early diagnosis and appropriate treatment is undertaken. Further more, recently developed drugs hold an additio­nal promise for improved results. As Wayson has stated "Instead of thinking leprosy as a disease of foul smelling sores and grotesque facial mutilations we shall consider it as a communicable affection of protean manifesta­tions, and do our best for their eye care and prevent the misery of blindness to occur on them."


  Acknowledgement Top


Our sincere thanks to Dr. G.M. Yahya, Dean & Dr. M. Naimudin chief ophthalmic surgeon Thanjavu medical College for their encouragement to present this paper. We are also thankful to Dr. Rajagopal, medical officer, Leprosy Beggars Rehabilitation Home Manaiaripatti for his help in examining the inmates of the home.[5]

 
  References Top

1.
Albert, H., 1973, Amer. J. Ophthalmol. 75:3.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Allen, J.H., 1960 Amer. J. Ophthalmol. 61:987.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Choyce, D.P., 1969, Brit. J. Ophthalmol. 24:217.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Holmes, W.J. 1957, J. Amer. Ophthalmol. SOC., V145.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wayson, W.E., 1933, Ear, Nose and Throat, Laryngoscope 43:991.  Back to cited text no. 5
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3], [Table - 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Methods and material
Discussion
Acknowledgement
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1874    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal