Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 938
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 146

Spectacle frame induced irritant contact dermatitis


L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, L. V. Prasad Marg, Hyderabad - 500 034, India

Correspondence Address:
M S Sridhar
L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, L. V. Prasad Marg, Hyderabad - 500 034
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.16189

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kompella VB, Dhar S, Aasuri MK, Sridhar M S. Spectacle frame induced irritant contact dermatitis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:146

How to cite this URL:
Kompella VB, Dhar S, Aasuri MK, Sridhar M S. Spectacle frame induced irritant contact dermatitis. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2005 [cited 2020 Dec 1];53:146. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2005/53/2/146/16189

Dear Editor,



Allergic contact dermatitis due to spectacle frames is not common. But, irritant contact dermatitis is not very common. We report such a case.



20-year-old young female patient, a spectacle wearer complained of irritation and itching over the cheeks of the two weeks duration. Examination of the face showed bilateral skin lesions just above the cheeks where the spectacle frame rested. The lesion was crescentic in shape, measuring 3.8 cms x 1.2 cms in its widest part [Figure - 1]a and [Figures 1]b. There was erythema, oedema, oozing of serous discharge along with scaling. She has been wearing the same spectacle frame for the past 8 years. The spectacle frame was plastic in nature (cellulose acetate). She was advised to discontinue the spectacle and was prescribed corticosteriod antibiotic ointment (betamethosone dipropionate 0.025% and neomycin sulphate 0.5%) twice a day over the lesion.



Spectacle frames are broadly classified into two groups [1] - metallic and plastic. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) represent an immunological interaction between a chemical allergen and the skin being a sensitized host. [1] Pruritis is the hallmark of ACD. Diagnosis is made by patch test. Review of literature shows among the metals, nickel is the most common agent causing ACD. [2] Irritant type of contact dermatitis (ICD) is a non immunological reaction by excessive moisture or by acid, alkali or chemicals capable of injuring the skin if persistent contact is allowed. Pruritus develops along with hyperkeratosis and fissuring of the skin. The diagnosis is made clinically on history and negative patch test. [3]



Our case was unique. Heavy spectacles due to thick glasses, sub-tropical climate and facial features of high cheek bones were the contributing factors. The fact that the frame was 8 years old ruled out the possibility of ACD. However, the patch test was not done as the patient was reluctant to undergo the test.



 
  References Top

1.
Dahl MV. Chronic irritant contact dermatitis: Mechanisms, variables and differentiation from other forms of contact dermatitis. Adv Dermatol 1988;3:261.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Grimali F, Romaguera C. Nickel allergy and spectacle frame contact aene. Contact Dermatitis 1978;4:377.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Friedlander MH. Eczematoid reactions of the skin: Ophthalmol Clin North Am 1992;5:195-202.  Back to cited text no. 3
    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1]


This article has been cited by
1 Materials and allergens within spectacle frames: A review
Walsh, G., Wilkinson, S.M.
Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 55(3): 130-139
[Pubmed]
2 Materials and allergens within spectacle frames: a review
Glyn Walsh,S. Mark Wilkinson
Contact Dermatitis. 2006; 55(3): 130
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5218    
    Printed120    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded211    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal