• Users Online: 4208
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2007  |  Volume : 55  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 261-266

Application of semi-nested polymerase chain reaction targeting internal transcribed spacer region for rapid detection of panfungal genome directly from ocular specimens

Larsen and Toubro Microbiology Research Centre, Vision Research Foundation, No.18, College Road, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai - 600 006, India

Date of Submission09-Feb-2006
Date of Acceptance21-Feb-2007

Correspondence Address:
K L Therese
Larsen and Toubro Microbiology Research Centre, Vision Research Foundation, No.18, College Road, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai - 600 006
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.33037

Rights and Permissions

Background: The incidence of fungal endophthalmitis has dramatically increased in recent years and rapid detection of fungi using nucleic acid-based amplification techniques is helpful in management.
Aim: To evaluate semi-nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region for detection of panfungal genome in ocular specimens.
Statistical analysis used: Z test for two proportion.
Materials and Methods: Standardization of PCR targeting ITS primers was carried out by determining analytical sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR was determined by serial tenfold dilutions of C. albicans (ATCC 24433) DNA and DNA extracts of laboratory isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus , Fusarium lichenicola (4), other fungal and closely related bacterial strains and also human DNA. Semi-nested PCR was applied onto a total of 168 ocular specimens with clinically suspected fungal etiology during 2003-2005.
Results and Conclusions: PCR was specific and sensitive to detect 1fg of fungal DNA with ITS primers. PCR detected fungal genome in 90 (53.57%) in comparison with the conventional technique, positive in 34 (20.23%) by smear examination and in 42 (25%) by culture. The increase in clinical sensitivity by 28.57% using PCR was found to be statistically significant { P < 0.001 using Z test for two proportion}. The accuracy of the test was found to be 70.85%. PCR proved to be a rapid diagnostic technique for detection of panfungal genome directly from clinical specimens

Keywords: Endophthalmitis, internal transcribed spacer region, semi-nested polymerase chain reaction

How to cite this article:
Bagyalakshmi R, Therese K L, Madhavan H N. Application of semi-nested polymerase chain reaction targeting internal transcribed spacer region for rapid detection of panfungal genome directly from ocular specimens. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:261-6

How to cite this URL:
Bagyalakshmi R, Therese K L, Madhavan H N. Application of semi-nested polymerase chain reaction targeting internal transcribed spacer region for rapid detection of panfungal genome directly from ocular specimens. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2007 [cited 2023 Dec 9];55:261-6. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2007/55/4/261/33037

Table 3: Comparison of results of conventional methods against semi-nested polymerase chain reaction targeting internal transcribed spacer region for detection of panfungal genome

Click here to view
Table 3: Comparison of results of conventional methods against semi-nested polymerase chain reaction targeting internal transcribed spacer region for detection of panfungal genome

Click here to view
Table 2: Results of conventional microbiological investigations done on clinical specimens

Click here to view
Table 2: Results of conventional microbiological investigations done on clinical specimens

Click here to view
Table 1: Categorization of ophthalmic presentation of patients included in the study

Click here to view
Table 1: Categorization of ophthalmic presentation of patients included in the study

Click here to view
The incidence of fungal infections has increased in recent years due to the onset of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and improved medical techniques including the use of antibiotics, immunosuppressive therapy and organ transplantation. [1] Infectious fungal keratitis and endophthalmitis cause extensive ocular morbidity worldwide. [2] Early diagnosis and rapid intervention is a critical element for effective treatment of ocular infections. This has led to the development of culture-independent diagnostic tests such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The potential utility of PCR techniques for improving the diagnosis of fungal infections is well recognized [3] and the use of PCR for this purpose is expanding. Assays targeting Candida , Aspergillus and Fusarium species have been tested in vitreous specimens and recently an assay using panfungal primers has been used more extensively. [4],[5],[6]

The ideal marker to detect a fungal infection should be present in all fungal genera (but should contain enough internal variation in its sequence to define a species) and should be a multicopy gene to maximize the sensitivity of detection. A PCR using universal fungal primers specific for 28SrRNA gene has been evaluated in our earlier study. [6] The technique of PCR using primers amplifying conserved region of the 28SrRNA, 18SrRNA with further separation of genus and species targeting internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, on the basis of exploiting small but phylogenetically important base pair difference of medically important fungi [7] as well as real time PCR [8] is being used for detection of fungal infections . The present study focused on the evaluation of PCR targeting ITS region for detection of fungal genome directly from specimens.

  Materials and Methods Top

A total of 168 specimens consisting of 145 intraocular specimens and 23 corneal scrapings were processed for detection of fungal etiology for the period between 2003-2005. A total of 20 specimens consisting of 12 aqueous humor (AH) collected from patients undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery and eight vitreous fluid (VF) from patients having vitreous hemorrhage, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, inflammation of the eye due to non-infectious etiology were used as controls. However, the break-up of endophthalmitis could be obtained only for 133 as against 145. This was because 12 specimens were received from other referral hospitals located in various parts of India. The exact clinical details could not be obtained for these 12 cases. The clinical details with regard to endophthalmitis and keratitis are provided in [Table - 1]. Informed consent was obtained from the patients from whom the ocular specimens were collected.

Corneal scrapings were collected by the ophthalmologist after application of local anesthetic. The culture plates were inoculated in the form of 'C' curves by the ophthalmologist and the smears were processed for detection of fungal etiology in the microbiology laboratory. The AH samples (50 to 150 ml) were collected aseptically in a tuberculin syringe after application of topical anesthesia. The VF was aspirated by a syringe connected to the suction port of the vitreous cutter at the beginning of vitrectomy. A sterile disposable needle was fixed to the syringe, the air in it expelled carefully without causing aerosols; the needle was capped with a sterile rubber bung and sent to the lab immediately. About 50 to 150 ml of AH and 100 to 200 µl of VF was received in the laboratory for microbiological investigations. On receipt, the specimen was divided into two equal portions. One half was used for DNA extraction and the other half was subjected to conventional methods of direct smear and culture. The specimens (AH and VF, biopsy, corneal scrapings) were processed within 30 min after collection for direct microscopy and culture of bacteria and fungi. Direct microbiological investigations were carried out on cytospinned smears (Cytospin 2 Shandon, Southern Products Limited, Cheshire, England) of intraocular fluids and stained by KOH-Calcofluor white for detection of fungus and Gram''s stain for detection of bacteria. The culture media used for isolation of bacteria and fungi were blood agar and MacConkey agar (incubated aerobically at 37°C), Chocolate agar (10% carbon dioxide), Brucella blood agar (37° C at anerobic work station), Sabouraud's dextrose agar incubated at 25° C in a cooling incubator and liquid medium brain heart infusion broth (BHIB), Thioglycollate broth incubated at 37° C. Culture plates and specially the liquid medium BHIB were incubated for a period of one month to isolate fungus. The fungal isolates were identified using standard mycological methods. [9],[10],[11] The DNA extraction from intraocular fluids and corneal scrapings was carried out using Biogene kit (Biogene, USA), for tissue and purulent specimens, Qiamp DNA minikit (Qiagen, Cat. No. 51304, Germany) was used. The DNA extraction was carried out on fresh specimens according to manufacturer''s instructions. Sensitivity of PCR was determined using serial tenfold dilutions of standard strain of Candida albicans ATCC 24433. Ten mg of C. albicans , A. fumigatus and F. lichenicola DNA was used as the template. Specificity of primers was verified by using DNA extracts of C. albicans (ATCC 90028), C. tropicalis (ATCC 750), C. parapsilosis (ATCC 90018), C. krusei (ATCC 6258) and laboratory isolates of Aspergillus flavus , Aspergillus fumigatus , Aspergillus niger , Aspergillus terreus , Fusarium, Curvularia and Alternaria species, Staphyloccus aureus (ATCC 12228), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, Mycobacterium fortuitum (ATCC 1529), Mycobacterium chelonae (ATCC 1524) and laboratory isolates of Nocardia asteroides, Actinomyces species, herpes simplex virus (HSV) and human leukocyte DNA. For a 50 µl reaction, 8 µl of dNTPs (200µmoles), 5 µl of 1 X PCR buffer (1.5 mM MgCl 2 ,50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris Cl,0.001% gelatin), 6 µl of 25 mM MgCl 2 (1 in 10 diluted to get 1.5 mM) , 10 picomoles of forward primer, ITS 1 - 5' tcc gta ggt gaa cct gcg g 3'and reverse primer ITS 4 - 5' tcc tcc gct tat tat gc 3'targeting ITS region and 10µl of template DNA was used. [12] Amplification was carried out in Perkin Elmer thermal cycler (Model 2700). The first round of amplification yielded 520 - 611 bp product according to different fungal species for ITS region. Thermal cycling consisted of initial denaturation at 95 o for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 o C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55 o C for 60 seconds and extension at 72 o C for 60 seconds followed by final extension at 72 o C for 6 min. Semi-nested amplification was carried out using the same PCR conditions as that of the first round with forward primer ITS 4 and reverse primer ITS 86 - 5' gtg aat cat cga atc ttt gaa c 3'. Five µl of amplified product was transferred from the first round to the second round and amplification was carried out in initial denaturation at 95 o C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 o C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55 o C for 30 seconds and extension at 72 o C for 30 seconds followed by final extension at 72 o C for 5 min. The amplified products were detected using 2% agarose incorporated with 0.5 µg/ml of ethidium bromide. The electrophoresis was carried out at 100 volts and documented using Gel documentation system (Vilber Lourmat).

  Results Top

The sensitivity of semi-nested PCR after two rounds of amplification is shown in [Figure - 1]. The ITS primers had a sensitivity of 1 femtogram of C. albicans DNA (Single C. albicans cell) and a sensitivity to detect 10fg of Aspergillus fumigatus and Fusarium lichenicola DNA. The specificity of ITS PCR is shown in [Figure - 2]. The primers were specific amplifying all the fungal DNA. No amplification was obtained with bacterial, viral and human DNA. The results of conventional microbiological investigations done on clinical specimens is given in [Table - 2]. The conventional microbiological investigations revealed fungal etiology in 34 (20.23%) by smear and in 42 (25%) by culture. There was only a single failure in smear positive case (corneal scraping 1). Fungi were isolated in 33 specimens in which the direct smear revealed the presence of fungal elements. Culture was additionally positive in nine cases. The fungal isolates were A. flavus 14, A. fumigatus 5, A. niger 5, Fusarium species 4 C. parapsilosis 6, C. tropicalis 3, C. albicans 2, T. beigellei 2, A. terreus 1. The results of PCR using ITS primers applied on 168 clinical specimens for detection of fungal genome are given in [Table - 3]. Fungal genome was not detected in all the 20 control specimens. The results of PCR applied on clinical specimens for fungal genome detection are shown in [Figure - 3].

  Discussion Top

Fungal endophthalmitis is often difficult to diagnose and missed, unless proper microbiological studies are performed. Laboratory diagnosis is of great importance and the confirmation of the organism is the key to appropriate therapy. The laboratory diagnosis of fungal infection is highly dependent on traditional methods of microscopy and culture. Culture is considered as the 'gold standard' but its true sensitivity is not known and it is also time-consuming. The eye hospital in which the study was carried out is one of the major referral hospitals and the majority of the patients referred might have undergone several regimes of therapy including antifungal therapy resulting in negative culture results. In addition, the indolent nature and localized infection and fastidious nature of the fungi could have attributed to the lower yield by culture. Since PCR is a sensitive technique and requires the mere presence of DNA, more number of samples were positive as against culture in which the presence of viable organism is essential for isolation. These are the valid findings supporting the high positivity by PCR.

The major drawback of fungal culture is the prolonged period of time, minimum of two to four days and up to three weeks, required for isolation of slow-growing fungus on culture medium. In this study it varied from one to 15 days with an average of three days whereas the results of PCR were available within 5h from the time of collection of specimen. The negative results may be due to less sample volume, prior therapy with antifungal agents and fastidious nature of the organism. Molecular microbiological methods have greater sensitivity and specificity than conventional methods. Multicopy genes, 28SrRNA and ITS region were used as targets to increase the clinical sensitivity and universal panfungal primers were used to broaden the range of detectable fungi. We have proven in our earlier study [6] that clinical sensitivity by using PCR has been increased. Our results of PCR on intraocular specimens to detect fungal genome indicate not only high analytical specificity but also increased sensitivity compared to the conventional methods, which was statistically significant correlating with the study conducted by Ferrer et al . [12] The clinical sensitivity of PCR was increased by 30% as against conventional methods and it was found to be statistically significant ( P <0.001) using Z (normal approximation) test for two proportion. The DNA sequencing by Microseq kit was carried out on 11 fungal PCR positive AC tap specimens and five vitreous aspirate specimens. The results of PCR were validated by DNA sequencing of 11 fungal PCR positive AC tap specimens and five vitreous aspirate specimens. The 11 fungi from AH were identified as Fusarium falciforme (3), Candida albicans (2) Aspergillus flavus (2), Fusarium lichenicola (1) Candida tropicalis (1) Aspergillus fumigatus (1) and Trichosporon species (1). The five fungi in VF were Candida albicans (2) , Aspergillus flavus (1), Aspergillus fumigatus (1) and Fusarium falciforme (1). In patients where the PCR result was positive and culture results negative, the identification of the fungi was obtained by the sequencing of the DNA followed by treatment with the appropriate antifungal therapy. Twenty-five per cent (the remaining were dropouts) of these patients improved with this therapy confirming the PCR result.

The reason for targeting ITS region in the study is that apart from imparting greater threshold for detection as it is a multicopy gene, it also exhibits sequence variation unique for species determination of fungi. Though the other molecular targets like 28SrRNA and 18SrRNA genes are being used for panfungal genome detection, ITS offers an added advantage for determining the species. By application of PCR rapid diagnosis was available within six hours of specimen collection. Furthermore, the results of PCR correlated well with specimens which were culture positive for fungus. Other proposed molecular techniques for fungal identification such as the use of RFLP (Zarzoso et al . [13] Williams et al . [14] Morace et al . [15] ), hybridization with specific probe (Sandhu et al . [16] Lindsley et al . [17] ) and specific nested PCR (Hidalgo et al . [18] ) could be useful in confirming specific fungal infection.

The development of semi-nested PCR for detection of panfungal genome proves to be a useful rapid diagnostic test for detection of fungal infection. However, ITS PCR needs to be applied to a large number of clinical specimens to determine its clinical specificity. To conclude, to the best of our knowledge this is the first study in India conducted applying semi-nested PCR targeting ITS region for detection of fungal genome which proved useful as a rapid diagnostic tool.

  Acknowledgments Top

We thank Alcon Research Laboratories for their technical assistance in carrying out the DNA sequencing work.

  References Top

Sturtevant J. Applications of differential-display reverse transcription-PCR to molecular pathogenesis and medical mycology. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:408-27.   Back to cited text no. 1
Gaudio PA, Gopinathan U, Sangwan V, Hughes TE. PCR based detection of fungi in infected corneas. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:755-60.  Back to cited text no. 2
Okhravi N, Adamson P, Mant R, Mathson MM, Midgley G, Towler HM, et al . PCR and RFLP mediated detection and identification of Candida Species causing intraocular infection. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Science 1998;39:859-66.  Back to cited text no. 3
Jaeger EE, Carroll NM, Choudhury S, Dunlop AA, Towler HM, Matheson MM, et al . Rapid detection and identification of Candida , Aspergillus and Fusarium species in ocular specimens using nested PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2902-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
Anand AR, Madhavan HN, Sudha NV, Therese KL. PCR in the diagnosis of Aspergillus endophthalmitis. Indian J Med Res 2001;114:133-40.  Back to cited text no. 5
Anand AR, Madhavan HN, Neelam V, Lily T. Use of PCR in the diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 2001;108:326-30.  Back to cited text no. 6
Walsh TJ, Francesconi A, Karai M, Chanock SJ. PCR and SSCP for recognition of medically important opportunistic fungi. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:3216-20.  Back to cited text no. 7
Halliday C, Wu QX, James G, Sorrell T. Development of a nested qualitative real - time PCR assay to detect Aspergillus DNA in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:5366-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
Bailey and Scott's diagnostic microbiology, 10 th Ed. Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfield AS, editors. Laboratory methods in basic mycology. Mosby: St. Louis; 1998. p. 870.  Back to cited text no. 9
Rippon JW. Medical mycology: The pathogenic fungi and the pathogenic actinomycetes. Wonsiewicz M, editor. 3 rd ed. Appendix: Common Laboratory contaminants. WB Saunders: Philadelphia; 1988. p. 747-78.  Back to cited text no. 10
Lenette EH, Balows A, Hausler WJ, Shadomy HJ. Manual of clinical microbiology. 4 th ed. Yeasts of medical importance. 1985. Chapter 49. p. 506-42, Chapter 54: Aspergillus and other opportunistic hyaline hyphomycetes. P. 584-94 American society of microbiology: 1985.  Back to cited text no. 11
Ferrer C, Colom F, Frases S, Mulet E, Abad JL, Alio JL. Detection and identification of fungal pathogens by PCR and by ITS2 and 5.8S ribosomal DNA typing in ocular infections. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:2873-9.  Back to cited text no. 12
Esteve-Zarzoso B, Belloch C, Uruburu F, Querol A. Identification of yeasts by RFLP analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999;49:329-37.  Back to cited text no. 13
Williams DW, Wilson MJ, Lewis MA, Potts AJ. Identification of Candida species by PCR and RFLP analysis of ITS region of ribosomal DNA. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2476-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
Morace G, Sangueineth M, Posteraro B, Lo Cascio G, Fadda G. Identification of various medically important Candida species in clinical specimens by PCR -RFLP. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35:667-72.  Back to cited text no. 15
Sandhu GS, Kline BC, Stockman L, Roberts GD. Molecular probes for diagnosis of fungal infection. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:2913-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
Lindsley MD, Hurst SF, Iqbal NJ, Morrison CJ. Rapid identification of dimorphic and yeast like fungal pathogens using specific DNA probes. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:3505-11.  Back to cited text no. 17
Hidalgo JA, Alangaden GJ, Eliott D, Akins RA, Puklin J, Abrams G, et al . Fungal endophthalmitis diagnosis by detection of Candida albicans DNA in intraocular fluid by use of a species-specific polymerase chain reaction assay. J Infect Dis 2000;181:1198-201.  Back to cited text no. 18


  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]

  [Table - 1], [Table - 2], [Table - 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Bacterial and Fungal Keratitis: Current Trends in Its Diagnosis and Management
Surya Prakash Sharma, Sujata Dwivedi, Sunil Kumar, Kuldeep Dhama, Anil Kumar Sharma
Current Clinical Microbiology Reports. 2023;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Consensus and controversies in the science of endophthalmitis management: Basic research and clinical perspectives
Taraprasad Das, Joveeta Joseph, Matthew Simunovic, Andrzej Grzybowski, Ken-Jen Chen, Vivek Pravin Dave, Savitri Sharma, Patrick Staropoli, Harry Flynn
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2023; : 101218
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Development of single-tube real-time PCR assay for the rapid detection of Aspergillus and Fusarium—The two most common causative agents in fungal keratitis
Yamini Tawde, Sourav Das, Amit Gupta, Savitri Sharma, Soham Basak, Twishi Shrimali, Shreya Singh, Shivaprakash M. Rudramurthy, Harsimran Kaur, Anup Ghosh
Mycoses. 2023;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Acute postoperative endophthalmitis: Microbiology from the laboratory to the bedside
Christophe Chiquet, Alain M. Bron, Mats Lundström, Max Maurin
Survey of Ophthalmology. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Utility of investigation for suspected microbial keratitis: a diagnostic accuracy study
Stephen Tuft, Catey Bunce, Surjo De, John Thomas
Eye. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Endophthalmitis: Microbiology and Organism Identification Using Current and Emerging Techniques
Christine L. Tan, Harsha Sheorey, Penelope J. Allen, Rosie C. H. Dawkins
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. 2022; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Filamentous Fungi from Artisanal Cheeses Produced in Canastra Region, Brazil
Isabel Cristina da Rocha César, Meiriele Silva, Samara Aparecida Santana, Jonas Guimarăes e Silva, Célia Lucia de Luces Fortes Ferreira, José Guilherme Prado Martin
SSRN Electronic Journal. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction over Routine Microbial Diagnosis for the Diagnosis of Fungal Keratitis
Himanshu Sekhara Behera, Deepankar Srigyan
Optometry and Vision Science. 2021; 98(3): 280
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Concomitant of Pulmonary Hydatid Cyst and Aspergilloma: A Rare Coinfection
Zahra Zareshahrabadi, Bahador Sarkari, Nadereh Shamsolvaezin, Bizhan Ziaian, Alireza Tootoonchi, Reza Shahriarirad, Kamiar Zomorodian, Larry M. Bush
Case Reports in Infectious Diseases. 2020; 2020: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Screening of Invasive Fungal Infections by a Real-Time Panfungal (pan-ACF) Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay in Patients with Haematological Malignancy
Malini Rajinder Capoor, Shikha Puri, Hitesh Raheja, Ritin Mohindra, Dinesh Kumar Gupta, Pradeep Kumar Verma, Ranadeep Chowdhary
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017; 35(1): 41
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 A rare case of endogenous Aspergillus conicus endophthalmitis in an immunocompromised patient
Wendy M Smith,Gary Fahle,Robert B Nussenblatt,Hatice Nida Sen
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection. 2013; 3(1): 37
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Acute Postoperative Bacillus cereus Endophthalmitis Mimicking Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome
Ekta Rishi,Pukhraj Rishi,Sabyasachi Sengupta,Malathi Jambulingam,Hajib N. Madhavan,Lingam Gopal,K. Lily Therese
Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(1): 181
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Novel diagnosis of fungal endophthalmitis by broad-range real-time PCR detection of fungal 28S ribosomal DNA
Manabu Ogawa, Sunao Sugita, Ken Watanabe, Norio Shimizu, Manabu Mochizuki
Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2012;
[VIEW] | [DOI]
14 PCR for the molecular diagnosis of mycotic keratitis
Philip A Thomas,Philip A Teresa,Joseph Theodore,Pitchairaj Geraldine
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2012; 12(7): 703
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Prospective comparison between conventional microbial work-up vs PCR in the diagnosis of fungal keratitis
N Tananuvat,K Salakthuantee,N Vanittanakom,M Pongpom,S Ausayakhun
Eye. 2012; 26(10): 1337
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Invasive aspergillosis in developing countries
Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Shiv Sekhar Chatterjee, Ashim Das, M. R. Shivaprakash
Medical Mycology. 2011; 49(s1): S35
[VIEW] | [DOI]
17 Diagnostic utility of polymerase chain reaction on intraocular specimens to establish the etiology of infectious endophthalmitis
Sownya, P., Madhavan, H.N.
European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009; 19(5): 812-817
18 Polymerase Chain Reaction-Guided Diagnosis of Mycotic Keratitis: A Prospective Evaluation of Its Efficacy and Limitations
Vengayil, S. and Panda, A. and Satpathy, G. and Nayak, N. and Ghose, S. and Patanaik, D. and Khokhar, S.
Investigative Ophthalmology \& Visual Science. 2009; 50(1): 152-156
19 Mycotic keratitis: An overview of diagnosis and therapy
Shukla, P.K., Kumar, M., Keshava, G.B.S.
Mycoses. 2008; 51(3): 183-199
20 Investigative modalities in infectious keratitis
Gupta, N. and Tandon, R.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008; 56(3): 209-213
21 Newer Emerging Pathogens of Ocular Non-Sporulating Molds (NSM) Identified by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Based DNA Sequencing Technique Targeting Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) Region
Bagyalakshmi, R.
Current Eye Research. 2008; 33(2): 139-147


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Materials and Me...
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded797    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 21    

Recommend this journal