• Users Online: 158
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 56  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 81


Department of Ophthalmology, Pt. J. N. M.Medical College, Raipur (C.G.), India

Date of Web Publication21-Dec-2007

Correspondence Address:
Nidhi Pandey
Department of Ophthalmology, Pt. J. N. M.Medical College, Raipur (C.G.)
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.37582

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Pandey N, Chandrakar A K, Garg M L, Patel SS. Oculosporidiosis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:81

How to cite this URL:
Pandey N, Chandrakar A K, Garg M L, Patel SS. Oculosporidiosis. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2022 Aug 19];56:81. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2008/56/1/81/37582

Dear Editor,

We read with interest the article entitled 'Oculosporidiosis in a tertiary care hospital of western Orissa, India: a case series'.[1] We would like to make a few comments on the report as well as share some of our own experiences.

The etiological agent, of rhinosporidiosis, Rhinosporidium seeberi described as a phycomycete by Ashworth in 1923, has for long been a subject of taxonomic uncertainty, because the organism can neither be isolated nor cultured. Some authors postulated that the agent is not a fungus but a prokaryotic cyanobacterium called Microcystis aeruginosa.[2] However, through molecular biological analysis of the organism's ribosomal DNA, the responsible agent is now considered by most as an aquatic protistan parasite belonging to a novel group of fish parasites that infect fish and amphibians, located phylogenetically between the fungal animal divergence.[3]

Apart from the regions mentioned by the authors, Chhattisgarh is another area where the disease is endemic, probably because of the hot and humid climate. Here, it is mostly seen in agricultural laborers belonging to low socioeconomic status. Most of the affected persons give a history of taking bath in stagnant ponds which is shared by cattle who harbor this disease.[4]

The term subcutaneous involvement separately mentioned in the text and also mentioned as a separate column in [Table 1] is probably involvement of the lacrimal sac showing spread to adjacent areas.

In our ongoing series started in 2001, we found recurrence in both conjunctival and lacrimal sac rhinosporidiosis. Conjunctival growths recurred less often than growths in the sac. Whether it was a true recurrence or re-infection is difficult to prove, especially in cases of conjunctival growth, because they are relatively easily removed in toto unlike those involving the sac. Cauterizing the base of the lesion after surgery may further help in reducing recurrences.

In the series presented, the authors have mentioned a low recurrence rate, at the same time reporting a recurrence in two out of five cases of lacrimal sac rhinosporidiosis (with subcutaneous involvement) within one year (40% recurrence, if lacrimal sac rhinosporidiosis is considered separately), which cannot be considered a low recurrence rate.

We routinely use povidone iodine 5% in all our cases after excision of the growth. Arseculeratne et al. have reported a metabolic inactivation of endospores on exposure to certain biocides including povidone iodine. This might prevent recurrence of the disease due to autoinoculation of the endospores contaminating the adjacent mucosal surfaces during surgery.[5]

The organism has also been reported to affect skin and bones apart from sites mentioned by the authors. It has also been our experience that in long-standing extensive involvement of the lacrimal sac, the surrounding bones get eroded.

Lacrimal gland involvement, as mentioned in the report (page 300 column 2 line15) has not yet been reported to the best of our knowledge, if so, it must be a unique case worth investigation.

  References Top

Chowdhury RK, Behera S, Bhuyan D, Das G. Oculosporidiosis in a tertiary care hospital of western Orissa, India: A case series. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:299-301.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Ahluwalia KB. Culture of the organism that causes rhinosporidiosis. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:523-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
Herr RA, Ajello L, Taylor JW, Arseculeratne SN, Mendoza L. Phylogenetic analysis of Rhinosporidium seeberi's 18S Small-subunit Ribosomal DNA groups this pathogen among members of the Protoctistan Mesomycetozoa clade. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2750-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
Mukherjee PK. Rhinosporidiosis. In: Fraunfelder FT. Roy FH, editors. Current ocular therapy, 5th ed. WB Saunder Company: Philadelphia; 2000. p. 66-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
Arseculeratne SN, Atapattu DN, Balasooriya P, Fernando R. The effects of biocides (antiseptics and disinfectants) on the endospores of Rhinosporidium seeberi. Indian J Med Microbiol 2006;24:85-91.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded214    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal