• Users Online: 3612
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 56  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 341

Authors' reply

L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication19-Jun-2008

Correspondence Address:
Rajul Parikh
L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, L. V. Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, Andhra Pradesh
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.41425

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Sekhar G C, Thomas R. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:341

How to cite this URL:
Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Sekhar G C, Thomas R. Authors' reply. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2023 Dec 9];56:341. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2008/56/4/341/41425

Dear Editor,

We are grateful for the comments by Skaik YA and before we try to explain ourselves, [1] happily agree with all of them. We hasten to clarify why we omitted most of what we did, but first out, are grateful for only partial disagreement - which implies that there is a lot of agreement too. To explicate: we wrote this article [2] from a clinical perspective and intended it for the "practice section" of the journal, not for research methodology, monitoring and other uses that tests may be put to. We had no idea it would land up in the research methodology section and evoke such legitimate concerns; although out of our control, we do apologize.

Having stated the purpose of the piece clearly in the abstract itself we went on to elaborate on our objective: basic knowledge for the clinical ophthalmologist to apply in day-to-day practice. The reason being that most clinicians that we have interacted with seem to feel that these important concepts belong to medical school public health, microbiology and perhaps research; we intended to demonstrate that these important principles are essential in everyday clinical practice. Essentially, this is part of a series of articles we have written for the journal over a period of time in order to popularize and spread the "word" of clinical epidemiology. [3],[4],[5]

We confess that we were ignorant of the origins of the terms and the seminal reference and thank the writer for this information. There are many books on the subjects and several ways of looking at concepts such as true positives and true negatives. We clearly defined what we meant by these terms when we used them in the text and feel that explicit definitions help reduce disagreement, at least to partial disagreement. We end on that note by quoting Medawar from the preface of our clinical bible: "The innocent belief that words have an essential or inward meaning can lead to appalling confusion and waste of time. It seems to us that the "essentialist" (which invokes ontology and insists that every word has a single, formally correct definition) is simply not up to the task that must be carried out in clinical and health care." [6]

  References Top

Skaik YA. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:341.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Chandra Sekhar G, Thomas R. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:45-50  Back to cited text no. 2
Korah S, Thomas R, Muliyil J. An introduction to clinical decision analysis in ophthalmology. Indian J Ophthalmol 1999;47:41-8  Back to cited text no. 3
Thomas R, Braganza A, Oommen LM, Muliyil J. Confidence with confidence intervals. Indian J Ophthalmol 1997;45:119-23.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Thomas R, Padma P, Braganza A, Muliyil J. Assessment of clinical significance: The number needed to treat. Indian J Ophthalmol 1996;44:113-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology: A basic science for clinical medicine. 2 nd ed. New York: Little, Brown and Co; 1991.  Back to cited text no. 6

This article has been cited by
1 Validation of the ARIC prediction model for sudden cardiac death in the European population: The ESCAPE-NET project
Sabrina J.G.C. Welten, Sharon Remmelzwaal, Marieke T. Blom, Amber A. van der Heijden, Giel Nijpels, Hanno L. Tan, Irene van Valkengoed, Jean-Philippe Empana, Xavier Jouven, Frederik Nybye Ågesen, Peder Emil Warming, Jacob Tfelt-Hansen, Eva Prescott, Reza Jabbari, Petra J.M. Elders
American Heart Journal. 2023;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Comparison of testing for failure of passive transfer in calf serum using four different testing methods
K. Denholm, A. Haggerty, C. Mason, K. Ellis
The Veterinary Journal. 2022; : 105812
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded127    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal