• Users Online: 3331
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 141-143

Gains beyond cosmesis: Recovery of fusion and stereopsis in adults with longstanding strabismus following successful surgical realignment

Institute of Ophthalmology, JN Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh-202 001, India

Date of Submission24-Mar-2007
Date of Acceptance16-May-2008
Date of Web Publication17-Feb-2009

Correspondence Address:
Abadan K Amitava
4/758, Taban Cottage, Friends Colony, Dodhpur, Aligarh 202 001
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.45505

Rights and Permissions

We evaluated recovery of binocularity in 15 chronically strabismic, non-fusing (with neutralizing prisms) adults following successful surgical alignment. We included ≥12-year-olds, with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/60, and excluded those with: anisoacuity >2 lines-Snellen; failed realignment judged by >10 prism diopters (PD) horizontal and >4 PD vertical. Six-week outcomes were: fusion by Worth Four-Dots (WFDT) and Bagolini striated glasses (BSG) and stereopsis by Titmus test and the Netherlands organisation for applied scientific research (TNO) test. Baseline data in medians (range): age 18 (12-40) years, strabismus 45 (19-95) PD, duration 14 (0.5-24) years, 12 females; 12 exotropes, three esotropes; visual acuity was 20/20 in 10, while none had BCVA <20/60. Postoperative strabismus measured 6 PD (range:0-10). By six weeks none suppressed: WFDT findings showed eight fused at distance and 13 at near; and on BSG figures were 10 and 13 respectively. Stereopsis was demonstrated by 13 on Titmus and by 10 on TNO tests.  It is concluded that longstanding strabismic adults with good vision can recover fusion and stereopsis following successful squint surgery.

Keywords: Adult strabismus, binocularity, fusion, stereopsis

How to cite this article:
Fatima T, Amitava AK, Siddiqui S, Ashraf M. Gains beyond cosmesis: Recovery of fusion and stereopsis in adults with longstanding strabismus following successful surgical realignment. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:141-3

How to cite this URL:
Fatima T, Amitava AK, Siddiqui S, Ashraf M. Gains beyond cosmesis: Recovery of fusion and stereopsis in adults with longstanding strabismus following successful surgical realignment. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2023 Feb 4];57:141-3. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2009/57/2/141/45505

Apart from cosmesis, adults undergoing strabismus surgery stand to gain from recovery of fusion, stereopsis, expanded field (in esotropia), elimination of torticollis, better psychosocial functioning and enhanced job opportunities. [1] Factors adversely affecting recovery of stereopsis are visual acuity (VA) <20/60 due to any cause, optic neuritis, anisometropia and strabismus. Earlier, surgery was considered beneficial provided patients had good VA and achieved successful alignment. Subsequent reports [2],[3] indicated recovery of some fusion [4],[5] and stereopsis even in those who had strabismus onset before visual maturity ( [6] Significant factors predictive of postoperative fusion were the absence of previous surgery, VA ≥20/40, and normal retinal correspondence in exotropes and fusion during prism adaptation, absence of infantile esotropia, and an increase in vertical deviation in esotropes. Duration of misalignment did not predict the recovery of stereoacuity. [7] In acquired strabismus, better stereopsis was achieved if misalignment was of <12 months although patients with longer duration did demonstrate fusion and stereopsis. [8],[9]

The aim of the study was to assess the recovery of fusion and stereopsis after squint surgery in adults with chronic strabismus that demonstrated no binocularity preoperatively.

  Materials and Methods Top

After obtaining ethical approval from the institutional review board, we included patients with constant strabismus, age ≥12 years and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/60 Snellen in the deviated eye, and excluded those with any measurable stereopsis or sensory fusion using neutralizing prisms, anisoacuity (BCVA) >2 Snellen's line or failed surgical realignment. Successful alignment was considered to be ≤10 prism diopters (PD) horizontal and ≤4 PD vertical.

Main outcome measures were fusion (central and peripheral) using Worth Four Dots (WFDT) and Bagolini striated glasses (BSG), and stereopsis, employing the Titmus and the Netherlands organisation for applied scientific research (TNO) tests.

After informed consent, we assessed VA, cycloplegic refraction, BCVA, and performed biomicroscopy and ophthalmoscopy. Stereopsis was considered gross (3000 arc-sec) if the patient passed only the Titmus 'fly' test, coarse: 60-800 arc-sec and fine as 15-60 arc-sec, and true if ≤100 arc-sec.

  Results Top

The demographic details, preoperative and postoperative results are presented in [Table 1]. Most had a long history of constant strabismus. Large angles (>40 PD) were measured in nine; five had 20-40 PD, while one had <20 PD. Median strabismus was 45 PD (range 18-95) preoperatively and 6 PD (range 0-10) at six weeks postoperatively. Patients 5 and 6 underwent bilateral surgeries.

Postoperative fusion responses are depicted in [Table 2]. By six weeks none suppressed. Postoperative stereopsis is presented in [Table 3]. By six weeks, some stereopsis was present in 13 on Titmus and 10 on TNO tests; while true stereopsis was seen in five on Titmus and three on TNO tests.

  Discussion Top

In our study the majority of adults with longstanding strabismus and no prior binocularity, demonstrated both fusion and stereopsis following successful postoperative alignment. Various studies have reported recovery of binocularity postoperatively in adults. [7],[8],[9],[10] Lal et al. retrospectively analyzed 21 adults (median age= 59 years) with large angled acquired strabismus and reported measurable stereoacuity in 67% and fine (≤ 60 arc-sec) in 44%. [7] This was irrespective of the duration of strabismus. In Fawcett's series of 23 cases of acquired strabismus, 96% recovered some measurable stereopsis: 70% demonstrating fine stereopsis (≤ 60 arc-sec) on the Titmus circles and 30% on the Randot Preschool stereoacuity test. [8],[9] Such excellent results were probably accounted for by a period of binocularity preceding strabismus and/or occasions (due to intermittency) or fields (in incomitancy) wherein fusion was possible. In Fawcett's series a significant proportion regained fine stereopsis when aligned ≤12 months of misalignment as compared to those aligned after >12 months. Age, strabismus type, or pre-surgical sensory fusion did not predict stereopsis. Patients demonstrating pre-surgical capacity for true stereopsis (40-100 arc-sec) were more likely to demonstrate stereopsis postoperatively ( P <0.05).

Although recovery is more likely if there has been a period of binocularity during the critical period of visual development, this notion is now being questioned. [1] Moreover, even visually mature patients lose stereoacuity following strabismus. [1] In acquired strabismus following head trauma, the latter may itself disrupt central fusional pathways adversely affecting recovery of stereopsis. [7] Two of our patients who did not recover stereopsis had a history of head trauma (Patients 11 and 14, [Table 1]).

Does binocularity improve with time? Lal et al. [7] followed their patients for one year and reported continued improvement. However, five of our patients who completed follow-up of one year did not demonstrate further improvement.

Can ≤10 PD of horizontal deviation be considered as successful motor alignment consistent with sensory success (true stereopsis)? Recent research suggests that a horizontal deviation ≤4PD will enable macular fusion (<100 arc-sec) whereas larger angles (5-10 PD) may be just sufficient for binocularity. [11] Interestingly, two of the five patients who showed stereopsis <100 arc-sec had a deviation between 5-10 PD.

Titmus tests consistently yielded a better response than the TNO, although both provide monocular clues. The Frisby test and the new Preschool Randot test are considered more valuable for quantification, but were not available to us.

Our study was not without limitations. It has a small sample of 15 patients which did not justify subgroup analyses. Since 12 of the 15 patients were exotropes, the results may be biased towards them.

Nevertheless, we found that the majority of patients with good vision with non-fusing large angle chronic strabismus can regain fusion and stereopsis after successful surgical alignment. Some may recover true stereopsis. Larger studies need to validate whether better motor alignment yields more favorable results and which tests of binocularity should be considered best. Meanwhile all adults presenting with strabismus should have their eyes aligned promptly for functional gains, namely: fusion and, stereopsis.

  References Top

Beauchamp GR, felius J, Stager Sr DR, Beauchamp CL. The utility of strabismus in adults. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2005;103:164-72.  Back to cited text no. 1
Baker JD. The value of adult strabismus correction to the patient. J AAPOS 2002;6:136-40.  Back to cited text no. 2
Mills DM, Coats DK, Donahue SP, Wheeler DT; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Strabismus surgery for adults: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1225-62.  Back to cited text no. 3
Mets MB, Beauchamp C, Haldi BA. Binocularity following surgical correction of strabismus in adults. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2003;101:201-5; discussion 205-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
Mets MB, Beauchamp C, Haldi BA. Binocularity following surgical correction of strabismus in adults. J AAPOS 2004;8:435-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
Beauchamp GR, Black BC, Coats DK, Enzenauer RW, Hutchinson AK, Saunders RA, et al. The management of strabismus in adults--I: Clinical characteristics and treatment. J AAPOS 2003;7:233-40.  Back to cited text no. 6
Lal G, Holmes JM. Postoperative stereoacuity following realignment for chronic acquired strabismus in adults. J AAPOS 2002;6:233-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
Fawcett SL, Felius J, Stager DR. Predictive factors underlying the restoration of macular binocular vision in adults with acquired strabismus. J AAPOS 2004;8:439-44.  Back to cited text no. 8
Fawcett SL, Stager DR Sr, Felius J. Factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in adults with acquired strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:931-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
Eustis HS. Maximizing binocular vision outcomes in strabismus patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:1044-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
Leske DA, Holmes JM. Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis. J AAPOS 2004;8:28-34.  Back to cited text no. 11


  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Measures and variability with age of low contrast acuity and near stereoacuity in children
Vibha Baldev, Shailja Tibrewal, Suma Ganesh, Atanu Majumdar, Arvind Chandna
Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2022; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Factors Determining Improvement in Stereopsis and Binocularity After Good Postoperative Alignment in Patients With Childhood-Onset Strabismus
Anupam Singh, Nisheeta Patnaik, Sanjeev K Mittal, Ajeet S Bhadoria, Rakesh Panyala, Ramanuj Samanta, Barun Kumar, Omna Chawla
Cureus. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Predictive factors of stereopsis outcomes following strabismus surgery
Mohammad Eshaghi, Amir Arabi, Shahram Banaie, Toktam Shahraki, Sarvin Eshaghi, Hamed Esfandiari
Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology. 2021; 13: 2515841421
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 A dichoptic feedback-based oculomotor training method to manipulate interocular alignment
Andrea Caoli, Silvio P. Sabatini, Agostino Gibaldi, Guido Maiello, Anna Kosovicheva, Peter Bex
Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
Vandana Kohli, Bharat Mehta, Sandeep Kumar, Sharad Sahu
Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2017; 4(2): 80
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Sensory eye balance in surgically corrected intermittent exotropes with normal stereopsis
Lixia Feng, Jiawei Zhou, Li Chen, Robert F. Hess
Scientific Reports. 2015; 5(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 The effect of amblyopia treatment on stereoacuity
Catherine E. Stewart,Michael P. Wallace,David A. Stephens,Alistair R. Fielder,Merrick J. Moseley
Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2013; 17(2): 166
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 How far can we manage diplopia and strabismus?
Mimura, O.
Japanese Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2010; 64(9): 1474-1478
9 Gains beyond cosmesis: Recovery of fusion and stereopsis in adults with longstanding strabismus following successful surgical realignment
Gopal, K.S.S.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010; 58(2): 171
10 Authoręs reply
Fatima, T., Amitava, A.K., Siddiqui, S., Ashraf, M.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010; 58(2): 172
11 Case corner: Complicated fixation switch diplopia
Arnoldi, K.
American Orthoptic Journal. 2009; 59(1): 111-115


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Materials and Me...
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded332    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 11    

Recommend this journal