Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 2259
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 159

Investigative modalities in infectious keratitis

Cornea and Anterior Segment Service, L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India

Date of Web Publication17-Feb-2009

Correspondence Address:
Prashant Garg
L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, L. V. Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.45512

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Garg P. Investigative modalities in infectious keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:159

How to cite this URL:
Garg P. Investigative modalities in infectious keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Dec 2];57:159. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2009/57/2/159/45512

Dear Editor,

It was interesting to read the series of articles related to infectious keratitis under the title of symposium in the 3 rd issue of 56 th volume of Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. The article titled "Investigative modalities in infectious keratitis" written by Gupta et al , [1] was of special interest to me. I have following comments related to this article:

  1. While Bard Parker no. 15 blade and Kimura spatula are best for corneal scraping, 21 gauge needle is not a good option because of a higher risk of perforation especially in corneas that are necrotic; calcium alginate swabs are expensive and may not be accessible.
  2. As a standard protocol three smears are prepared from corneal scrapings - one for 10% potassium hydroxide (KOH), second for Gram's stain and the third for Geimsa stain. An additional smear can be prepared for acid fast staining. However, number of smears can be modified based on the size of ulcer and clinical diagnosis.
  3. KOH-Calcofluor white preparation and lactophenol cotton blue stain not only help visualization of Acanthamoeba cysts but also fungal filaments.
  4. Gram's stain has a very limited value for deciding initial treatment. KOH preparation is rather a better choice. This is based on the fact that most antibacterial agents are bactericidal, clinical response in bacterial keratitis is obvious in 72 hours and the drugs used in the treatment of fungal and Acanthamoeba keratitis are toxic and need to be administered for a relatively prolonged period before signs of resolution become obvious. Therefore, treatment against these organisms should be started after laboratory confirmation. KOH preparation has a high specificity and therefore the best test to document these agents. [2]
  5. It is not necessary to keep all plates for two or more weeks. National committee for clinical laboratory standards recommend maintaining blood and chocolate agar for one week and Sabourods dextrose agar and potato dextrose agar for two weeks.
  6. I do not agree with the recommendation of routine microbiology for all corneal ulcer cases because of cost, difficulty in maintaining culture media, non-availability of microbiology facilities to most ophthalmologists, and lack of expertise in interpretation of smears among most ophthalmologists. This is practically impossible even in developed countries as documented in a study by McLeod et al . [3]
  7. Confocal microscope cannot be considered an extremely useful tool in the investigation of microbial keratitis and definitely has no role in assessing prognosis. [4] The instrument is expensive and requires experience in interpretation of images. It offers advantage over routine microbiology only in cases where the infiltrate is deep seated and is not accessible to scraping. Similarly molecular diagnostic techniques require standardization and validation before being considered for routine use.

As a trained cornea specialist I enjoyed reading all four articles related to such an important condition. However, it would have been useful if these had addressed the issue for the Indian scenario keeping in mind the interest of ophthalmologists who first encounter these cases.

  References Top

Gupta N, Tandon R. Investigative modalities in infectious keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:209-13.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
Sharma S, Silverberg M, Mehta P, Gopinathan U, Agrawal V, Naduvilath TJ. Early diagnosis of mycotic keratitis: Predictive value of potassium hydroxide preparation. Indian J Ophthalmol 1998; 46:31-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
McLeod SD, Kolahdouz-Isfahani A, Rostamian K, Flowers CW, Lee PP, McDonnell PJ. The role of smears, cultures and antibiotic sensitivity testing in the management of suspected infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology 1996;103:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
Kaufman SC, Musch DC, Belin MW, Cohen EJ, Meisler DM, Reinhart WJ, et al . Confocal microscopy: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2004;111:396-406.  Back to cited text no. 4

This article has been cited by
1 Corneal epithelial debridement for diagnosis and therapy of ocular surface disease
Lindsay A McGrath,Graham A Lee
Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2014; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Techniques, indications and complications of corneal debridement
Lindsay A. McGrath,Graham A. Lee
Survey of Ophthalmology. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India
Hayreh, S.S.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010; 58(1): 83


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded383    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 3    

Recommend this journal