Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 4394
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 159-160

Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India


Kamala Nethralaya, Koramangala, Bangalore, India

Date of Web Publication17-Feb-2009

Correspondence Address:
K S Santhan Gopal
Kamala Nethralaya, Koramangala, Bangalore
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.45513

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Santhan Gopal K S. Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009;57:159-60

How to cite this URL:
Santhan Gopal K S. Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2020 Dec 5];57:159-60. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2009/57/2/159/45513

Dear Editor,

I read the article "an evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India and change following provision of modern instrumentation and training" by Thomas et al. , with great interest. [1] It's a hard hitting, honest article, calling a spade a spade.

A well trained ophthalmologist, (one who is capable of delivering a competent and compassionate care to his patients) is the need of the hour. This need will keep escalating. Such an ophthalmologist is the final outcome of an active interaction between the trainer, trainee and the availability of appropriate instruments over a period of time.

  1. We have a scenario where the trainer is not of adequate standard and the trainee is substandard, due to any number of reasons and instrumentation is also not up to the mark. What would be the quality of the trained residents? It would be too hazardous to guess. In such institutions, just buying some high tech machines will certainly not improve the situation at all. That's predictably what has been shown in this study. There are many institutions falling in this category.

    The article by Murthy et al , [2] clearly enunciates this point, that, there is a need for improvement in the quality of training facilities and research methodologies, in many of the state medical colleges in India. However, for whatever reason/s, the article fails to mention the important prerequisite, which is, that good quality students should be accepted for training.


  2. Trainer is good , trainee is also good and instrumentation is substandard. What will be the standard of the residents coming out? In India there are many institutions of this variety. It is precisely in these institutions, that the world bank loan is most needed to improve the available instruments.


  3. Trainer is substandard and trainee is good and instruments are adequate. What would be the result? There are institutions in India of this type as well.


  4. Trainer is good and trainee is good and instrumentation excellent. What would be quality of the residents coming out? This is the most ideal situation we need to strive for. Thankfully, there are quite a few institutions in India of this type as well. I completely endorse the views of the authors that improving only the instrumentation of the department, will not improve, either the quality of the imparted training or the quality of residents passing out, for obvious reasons.


For a good outcome, we need to have all the three vital components i.e. The trainer , who is of adequate standard and a trainee , who is trainable and instrumentation to facilitate the training job.

In this regard, we need to formulate at the national level , a uniform standard for training the residents and some uniform standard of assessing the residents, who are being accepted for the training.

We cannot manufacture or change the teachers overnight. They need to be trained further to make them aware of their responsibility to the training job wherever needed.

The residents must be chosen carefully and based on merit alone and not on any other dubious extraneous considerations.

Improving the instrumentation alone, in the absence of good trainer and good trainee, will not necessarily improve the quality of imparted training and the quality of residents coming out. As Grover asks inimitably, do we have the necessary will? [3]

 
  References Top

1.
Thomas R, Dogra M. An evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India and change following provision of modern instrumentation and training. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:9-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
2.
Murthy GV, Gupta SK, Bachani D, Sangha L, John N, Tewari HK, Status od speciality training in ophthalmology in India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53:135-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Grover AK. Postgraduate ophthalmic education in India: Are we on the right track? Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:3-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  



This article has been cited by
1 Evaluation of medical college departments of ophthalmology in India
Hayreh, S.S.
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010; 58(1): 83
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1513    
    Printed41    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded205    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal