• Users Online: 2351
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 59  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 9-11

Dimensions of the foveal avascular zone using the Heidelberg retinal angiogram-2 in normal eyes

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 632002, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Bioengineering, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 632002, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission26-Jul-2009
Date of Acceptance23-Jun-2010
Date of Web Publication16-Dec-2010

Correspondence Address:
Deepa John
Department of Ophthalmology, Schell Eye Hospital, Arni Road, Christian Medical College, Vellore - 632001, Tamil Nadu
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.73706

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: The purpose was to study the dimensions of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) using Heidelberg Retinal Angiogram-2 (HRA-2; Heidelberg Engineering GmBH, Dossenheim, Germany). Materials and Methods: An observational study of the FAZ area and circumference was done with fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) using HRA-2 in 31 normal individuals. The FAZ was studied using both contrast-adjusted and nonadjusted methods. Contrast adjustment was done to obtain better visualization of the finer capillaries around the fovea enabling more precise measurements of the FAZ in normal eyes. Results: The mean area of the FAZ calculated by the contrast-adjusted method was 0.2753 mm 2 (±0.074) and the mean circumference was 2.22 mm (±0.048). By the conventional method, the area and circumference of the FAZ were 0.6241 mm 2 (±0.177) and 3.23 mm (±0.454), respectively. Conclusion: The measurements of area and circumference of FAZ using contrast-adjusted methods were significantly smaller than the conventional method.

Keywords: Fluorescein angiography, foveal avascular zone, Heidelberg Retinal Angiogram-2

How to cite this article:
John D, Kuriakose T, Devasahayam S, Braganza A. Dimensions of the foveal avascular zone using the Heidelberg retinal angiogram-2 in normal eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:9-11

How to cite this URL:
John D, Kuriakose T, Devasahayam S, Braganza A. Dimensions of the foveal avascular zone using the Heidelberg retinal angiogram-2 in normal eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2022 Jul 6];59:9-11. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2011/59/1/9/73706

In vivo and in vitro methods used to measure the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) show variations. [1],[2],[3],[4] An understanding of the correct dimensions of the FAZ is important both for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The size of the FAZ which is supplied by the choroidal circulation determines the amount of retained vision in central retinal artery occlusions if the cilioretinal artery is spared. It also determines the safe size of the laser spot when treating near the fovea and making interpretations of angiograms.

The scanning laser of Heidelberg Retinal Angiogram-2 (HRA-2; Heidelberg Engineering GmBH, Dossenheim, Germany) captures the early phases consistently and affords a detailed study of the perifoveal capillary filling. Studies of the FAZ done by flash fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and analyzed by visual interpretation have limitations.

We used contrast-adjusted methods to measure the FAZ in FFA done using HRA-2. This may provide better visualization of finer capillaries around the fovea, enabling more precise measurements of the FAZ in normal eyes. This study was an attempt to establish normative data and the normal limits of variability in the size of the FAZ using HRA-2.

  Materials and Methods Top

Patients attending our out-patient clinic were invited to volunteer for this study. Our study was approved by our institutional review board and was done from February to June 2005 using HRA-2.

In HRA-2, the video signal generated by a scanning laser ophthalmoscope is converted into digital information. Confocality enhances image detail, contrast, and sharpness. HRA-2 has the ability to acquire dynamic, high-speed movies (up to 16 frames per second), thus facilitating documentation of the early filling stages of the retina (HRA-2).

Volunteers were explained in detail about the possible complications of FFA and written informed consent was obtained from each one of them. Baseline parameters obtained were blood pressure, pulse rate, best-corrected visual acuity, keratometry reading, axial length measurement, color vision recording, Amsler grid charting, and Humphrey Field Analyzer using program 10-2.

Inclusion criteria were subjects aged 20-40 years with best-corrected vision of 20/20 J1 in both eyes. Exclusion criteria were refractive error more than +2.00 diopter (D) or -2.00 D, presence of diabetes, hypertension and renal diseases, or intake of systemic medications like chloroquine, vasodilators, and vasoconstrictors.

Three milliliters of 20% fluorescein was injected in 3 s via a scalp vein needle inserted into the dorsal vein of the hand. A seconds' stopwatch was used to time the duration from the start of the injection of the dye. Fundus video imaging by HRA-2 was started 7 s after the injection of the dye. The video capture was done for 20 s. From this, a single image was selected for each patient at 7-9 s after the dye was seen in the first central retinal artery bifurcation to measure the FAZ [Figure 1]. This corresponded to the arteriovenous phase. The contrast of these images was enhanced using the GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP). Image contrast was improved using manual histogram equalization in GIMP. The criterion for improvement was best visualization of the FAZ. This was initially done manually on four of the best images, adjusting the pixel intensity of the input and output. Pixel intensities thus obtained were mapped on a nonlinear graph (input/output intensity transformation graph). The input output values in the X and Y axes were noted and then applied to all the other images [Figure 2]. After such contrast adjustment, the images were saved and read into an image analysis program written in our lab (using Java). This program allows the user to manually mark an area using the mouse. The area so marked would then have the enclosed area calculated in pixels by the program. Knowing the optical magnification, the area in pixels can be converted to square millimeters. We used a standard optical magnification of one pixel area, i.e., 100 Χ 10?6 mm 2 .
Figure 1: Foveal avascular zone without contrast adjustment

Click here to view
Figure 2: Contrast-adjusted picture of the foveal avascular zone

Click here to view

Statistical analysis was made using intraclass coefficient (ICC). The ICC compared the FAZ area and circumference measured by standard and the contrast-adjusted method.

  Results Top

The study included 31 healthy subjects, 15 males and 16 females (mean age 29.7 years).

The mean area of the FAZ calculated by the contrast-adjusted method was 0.2753 ± 0.074 mm 2 . The vertical diameter was 0.579 ± 0.015 mm and the mean circumference was 2.22 ± 0.048 mm. By the conventional method, the area and circumference of the FAZ measured were 0.6241 ± 0.177 mm 2 and 3.23 ± 0.454 mm, respectively.

The measurements of area and circumference of the FAZ using contrast-adjusted methods were significantly smaller than the conventional method, and there was no correlation between the two methods (ICC = ?0.002, P = 0.502).

There was no statistically significant correlation between the area of the FAZ measured and subjects' age, blood pressure, pulse rate, and foveal threshold.

  Discussion Top

Diverse methods have been used to analyze the FAZ area and diameter. Variations in the measurements of the FAZ in the literature suggest that it may be affected by factors such as age, ethnicity, and eye size. [Table 1] shows the comparative values of the FAZ from various studies. [1],[2],[3],[4]

To the best of our knowledge, few studies have been reported measuring the FAZ in the normal population using HRA-2. Our study was done on the Indian population. Analogous to racial variations seen in the thickness of the choroid, it is possible that there are racial variations in measurements of the FAZ. However, this has not been documented in previous reports.
Table 1: Area of the foveal avascular zone (other studies)

Click here to view

The digital nature of the pictures enables us to manipulate them compared to conventional photographic FFA. The larger FAZ seen with the unadjusted picture is probably due to the loss of detail owing to the lack of contrast. It is unlikely that this reduction in area is an artifact because there is no change in the size of the picture with the adjustments. In addition, there have been other studies where the FAZ area approaches the value from this study. [2] Theoretically, trypsin digest measurements should give the most accurate value but this technique unfortunately destroys the finest of capillaries. [1] Studies on the FAZ are important to define normal values. A good description and understanding of the normal anatomy is important to interpret the FAZ in pathophysiology and plan laser treatment.

In conclusion, the contrast-adjusted method could be a tool used to study digital angiogram pictures. In our study, the FAZ area by the conventional method was 0.6241 ± 0.177 mm 2 and by contrast-adjusted method was 0.2753 ± 0.074 mm 2 .

  References Top

Bresnick GH, Condit R, Syrjala S, Palta M, Groo A, Korth K. Abnormalities of the foveal avascular zone in diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1286-93.  Back to cited text no. 1
Wolf S, Arend O, Toonen H, Bertram B, Jung F, Reim M. Retinal capillary blood flow measurement with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope: Preliminary results. Ophthalmology 1991;98:996-1000.  Back to cited text no. 2
Mansour AM, Schachat A, Bodiford G, Haymond R. Foveal avascular zone in diabetes mellitus. Retina 1993;13:125-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
Arend O, Wolf S, Harris A, Reim M. The relationship of macular microcirculation to visual acuity in diabetic patients. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:610-14.  Back to cited text no. 4


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Association of microvascular biomarkers in fluorescein angiography with macrovascular-related mortality in clinical routine data
Felix Goldbach, Georgios Mylonas, Martin Riegelnegg, Jonas Brugger, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, Bianca S. Gerendas, Zongjin Li
PLOS ONE. 2022; 17(5): e0266423
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Influence of the Size of the Foveal Avascular Zone on Functional and Morphological Parameters in Patients with Early-Stage Diabetic Retinopathy
Marcus Werner Storch, Greta Zinser, Peer Lauermann, Mohammed Haitham Khattab, Anna Nguyen-Höhl, Dirk Raddatz, Katja Gollisch, Josep Callizo, Hans Hoerauf, Nicolas Feltgen
Clinical Ophthalmology. 2022; Volume 16: 1207
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Physics-based modeling of Age-related Macular Degeneration—A theoretical approach to quantify retinal and choroidal contributions to macular oxygenation
Alice C. Verticchio Vercellin, Alon Harris, Greta Chiaravalli, Riccardo Sacco, Brent Siesky, Thomas Ciulla, Giovanna Guidoboni
Mathematical Biosciences. 2021; 339: 108650
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
Qiuzhuo Xu, Weiwei Zhang, Hongjing Zhu, Qiang Chen
Retina. 2021; 41(3): 595
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Quantitative assessment and determinants of foveal avascular zone in healthy volunteers
Lijun Zhou, Fengqun Wang, Ling Wang, Peiyang Shen, Yi Cao, Yushen He, Shigang Yan, Xiangbin Kong, Xiaohe Lu
Journal of International Medical Research. 2021; 49(5): 0300060521
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Association of reduced inner retinal thicknesses with chronic kidney disease
Euan N. Paterson, Meera L. Ravindran, Kayleigh Griffiths, Claire A. Le Velly, Chris C. Cardwell, Rachel V. McCarter, Patrick Nicol, Jay K. Chhablani, Mohammed Abdul Rasheed, Kiran Kumar Vupparaboina, Thomas J. MacGillivray, Mark Harbinson, Alexander P. Maxwell, Ruth E. Hogg, Gareth J. McKay
BMC Nephrology. 2020; 21(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Morphological Characteristics of Normal Foveal Avascular Zone by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Zeiad Eldaly, Wael Soliman, Mohamed Sharaf, Ali Natag Reyad
Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020; 2020: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Quantitative Comparison of Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain OCT Angiography in Healthy Eyes
Mayss Al-Sheikh, Khalil Ghasemi Falavarjani, Tudor C. Tepelus, SriniVas R. Sadda
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2017; 48(5): 385
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Relationship between the foveal avascular zone and foveal pit morphology
Dubis, A.M., Hansen, B.R., Cooper, R.F., Beringer, J., Dubra, A., Carroll, J.
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2012; 53(3): 1628-1636


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Materials and Me...
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded352    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 9    

Recommend this journal