• Users Online: 2425
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 601-603

Surgical outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular hole

Department of Vitreo-Retina, Sankara Eye Care Institutions, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission05-Apr-2013
Date of Acceptance05-Jun-2013
Date of Web Publication7-Nov-2013

Correspondence Address:
Prabhushanker Mahalingam
Sankara Eye Centre, Sathy Road, Sivanandapuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.121090

Rights and Permissions

We are presenting the initial results of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique for large macular hole. Five eyes of five patients with large diameter macular hole (>700 μm) were selected. All patients underwent inverted ILM flap technique for macular hole. Anatomical closure and functional success were achieved in all patients. There was no loss of best-corrected visual acuity in any of the patients. Inverted ILM flap technique in macular hole surgery seems to have a better hole closure rates, especially in large diameter macular holes. Larger case series is required to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique.

Keywords: Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique, macular hole, macular hole surgery

How to cite this article:
Mahalingam P, Sambhav K. Surgical outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular hole. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:601-3

How to cite this URL:
Mahalingam P, Sambhav K. Surgical outcomes of inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular hole. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2022 Sep 28];61:601-3. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2013/61/10/601/121090

Full-thickness macular holes are a relatively common cause of a significant reduction in central visual acuity. In 1988, Gass proposed a classification system for idiopathic macular holes, as well as a new hypothesis for its pathogenesis, which emphasizes the role of the vitreo-macular tangential traction in the formation of macular holes. [1]

Macular hole surgery is a well-established method for the treatment of idiopathic macular holes. The rationale for surgery is the identification and treatment of these vitreo-retinal traction forces, either tangential, antero-posterior or both.

The procedure for macular hole surgery is pars plana vitrectomy, posterior vitreous removal, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, filling of the vitreous cavity with a gas bubble and post-operative face-down positioning for 1 week. [2],[3]

This is a conventional procedure in cases with small to moderate holes but in cases with large holes, the anatomical and functional success is difficult to achieve. The inverted ILM flap technique improves both functional and anatomical outcome following vitrectomy, for large macular holes. [4] This study was done to present the initial surgical results of this technique.

  Materials and Methods Top

It was a prospective, non-randomized, interventional case-series study of patients with large macular holes. All patients in the study had idiopathic large macular holes as determined by bio microscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Exclusion criteria were macular holes of < 700 μm and macular hole due to other causes. Demographic and clinical data were collected for all patients, including age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure. Slit-lamp bio microscopy of the anterior segment and fundus with +90 D was also done. The diagnosis of macular hole in all patients was confirmed using spectral-domain OCT. The minimum linear diameter (MLD) of the macular hole was measured. Institutional ethical committee approval was obtained. After taking informed consent, surgery was done in all the patients. The follow-up was done at day 1, day 7, 1 month, 2 months and 6 months. Final BCVA was recorded and complete ophthalmic evaluation with OCT imaging was done during all the visits.

Surgical technique

All patients underwent 23G three-port pars plana vitrectomy with posterior vitreous detachment induction using Triamcinolone acetonide. Brilliant Blue dye assisted ILM peeling was done and instead of completely removing the ILM, a remnant of ILM attached to the margins of the macular hole was left in place and inverted into the hole after trimming with cutter. Fluid air exchange was performed. All surgeries were performed by a single vitreo-retinal surgeon. The patients were advised to maintain prone position for 5 days.

  Results Top

Demographic data and variables were analyzed [Table 1]. There were a total of five patients. The mean age of patients was 67.00 ± 5.41 years. All patients were women and pseudo-phakic. The mean minimal linear diameter of the macular holes was 811.4 μm (728-995 μm) [Figure 1], [Figure 3], [Figure 5]. Mean BVCA pre-operatively was 1.22 log-MAR units (1.10-1.22 log MAR units). Post-operatively, mean BCVA was 1.10 log MAR units (1.0-1.52 log MAR units). Improvement of visual acuity was registered in all patients (100%) [Figure 2], [Figure 4], [Figure 6]. There were no intraoperative or post-operative complications. All the patients were followed up for a period of 6 months.
Figure 1: Pre-operative optical coherence tomography of patient one

Click here to view
Figure 2: Post-operative optical coherence tomography of patient one

Click here to view
Figure 3: Pre-operative optical coherence tomography of patient three

Click here to view
Figure 4: Post-operative optical coherence tomography of patient three

Click here to view
Figure 5: Pre-operative fundus photo of patient one

Click here to view
Figure 6: Post-operative fundus photo of patient one

Click here to view
Table 1: Demographic and clinical profile of patients

Click here to view

  Discussion Top

The improvement in technique and development of finer instrumentation in vitreo-retinal surgery has significantly improved the surgical outcome of macular holes in terms of anatomical and functional success. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group showed a clear benefit in closure rates and final visual acuity with surgery versus observation for stage III and IV macular hole. [5]

The single most reliable factor affecting the surgical outcome following surgery is the size of the hole. A number of studies have established that the MLD of the hole is closely related to the rate of anatomic success. Also, it has been shown that the most favorable outcomes for visual recovery were associated with better initial visual acuity.

Among all the different techniques for macular hole surgery, the one with the most positive effect on final outcome is vitrectomy with ILM peeling, in order to release tangential forces acting on the macular hole (MH). In addition to promoting hole closure, peeling of the ILM also reduces the probability of its reopening. [6],[7] Dye assisted technique is safe and useful in visualizing the ILM, leading to the performance of successful peeling of ILM with minimal damage to the retina. Brilliant blue selectively stains the ILM and can be safely used for staining the ILM. [8] The peeled-off ILM contains Müller cell fragments which can induce gliosis and helping in closure of macular hole. Thus, if a segment of peeled-off ILM is left attached, it may provoke gliosis both inside the retina and on the surface of the ILM. The ILM also may be a scaffold for tissue proliferation. Michalewska et al. observed closure of the macular hole by a thin membrane with an appearance consistent with the ILM. [4]

Our study found that the closure rate of macular hole following this technique was 100% and the functional outcome were also better. But, a larger study group and longer follow-up period is required to further evaluate this method.

  References Top

Gass JD. Idiopathic senile macular hole. Its early stages and pathogenesis. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:629-39.  Back to cited text no. 1
Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:654-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
Benson WE, Cruickshanks KC, Fong DS, Williams GA, Bloome MA, Frambach DA, et al. Surgical management of macular holes: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1328-35.  Back to cited text no. 3
Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman RA, Nawrocki J. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology 2010;117:2018-25.  Back to cited text no. 4
Freeman WR, Azen SP, Kim JW, el-Haig W, Mishell DR 3 rd , Bailey I. Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes. Results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:11-2.  Back to cited text no. 5
Yamanishi S, Emi K, Motokura M, Oshima Y, Nakayama M, Watanabe M. Visual outcome of macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2001;105:788-93.  Back to cited text no. 6
Park DW, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR, Dugel PU, Jacobsen J. Macular hole surgery with internal-limiting membrane peeling and intravitreous air. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1392-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
Enaida H, Hisatomi T, Hata Y, Ueno A, Goto Y, Yamada T, et al. Brilliant blue G selectively stains the internal limiting membrane/brilliant blue G-assisted membrane peeling. Retina 2006;26:631-6.  Back to cited text no. 8


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 360° inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for idiopathic macular holes?=?250 µm,?>?250 and?=?400 µm, and?>?400 µm
Gregor Kastl, Peter Heidenkummer, Michael Janusz Koss
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Treatment outcomes of macular holes in the setting of uveitis: a scoping review
Mohamed Kamel Soliman, Dalia M. Tohamy, Ahmed B. Sallam, Tarek Tabbaa, Shree K. Kurup
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 ILM Flap Repositioning for Persistent Macular Hole
Gregor Kastl, Peter Heidenkummer
Case Reports in Ophthalmology. 2022; : 499
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Modern approaches to the surgical treatment of large full-thickness macular holes
Aleksandr N Samoylov, Timur R Khaibrakhmanov, Gul'chachak A Khaibrakhmanova, Polina A Samoylova
Kazan medical journal. 2022; 103(1): 119
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Surgical Aspects of Recurrent Macular Holes Treatment
A. N. Samoylov, T. R. Khaibrakhmanov, G. A. Khaibrakhmanova, P. A. Samoilova
Ophthalmology in Russia. 2022; 19(1): 58
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 A Review of Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Large Idiopathic Macular Holes
Aneesha Kalur, Justin Muste, Rishi P. Singh
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2022; 53(1): 52
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Commentary: Macular hole surgery – A tweak here and there
Giriraj Vibhute, Shrinivas Joshi, Guruprasad Ayachit, Apoorva Ayachit
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022; 70(1): 186
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Long-term Comparison of Superior Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Creation and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole Closure
Hee Weon Kim, Yang Jae Kim, Daruchi Moon, Si Yeol Kim
Journal of Retina. 2021; 6(1): 21
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Broad internal limiting membrane peeling with adjunctive plasma–thrombin for repair of large macular holes
Kyle A Bolo, Stanley Chang
European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021; 31(3): 1338
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 A novel video overlay guided enlargement of area of ILM peeled versus inverted flap technique: A long-term study in large macular holes
Subhendu Kumar Boral, Deepak Agarwal, Arnab Das, Debdulal Chakraborty, Tushar Kanti Sinha
European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021; 31(6): 3277
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap vs Complete Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Large Macular Holes in Nonposturing Surgery
Rubina Rahman, Mohammad Waseem Sarfraz, Mohamad El-Wardani
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases. 2021; : 2474126421
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Eyes with Idiopathic Macular Holes that Underwent Surgery Using the Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM) Flap Technique Versus the Conventional ILM Peeling Technique
Yujie Yan, Tong Zhao, Chuan Sun, Haipeng Zhao, Xingwu Jia, Zhijun Wang
Advances in Therapy. 2021; 38(4): 1931
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Combination of Inverted ILM Flap Technique and Subretinal Fluid Application Technique for Treatment of Chronic, Persistent and Large Macular Holes
Lyubomyr M. Lytvynchuk, Andrii Ruban, Carsten Meyer, Knut Stieger, Andrzej Grzybowski, Gisbert Richard
Ophthalmology and Therapy. 2021; 10(3): 643
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Macular microvasculature differences in patients with macular hole after vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane removal or single-layered temporal inverted flap technique
Aylin Karalezli, Sema Tamer Kaderli, Sabahattin Sul
Eye. 2021; 35(10): 2746
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
Mun Yueh Faria, Helena Proença, Nuno G. Ferreira, David Cordeiro Sousa, Eliana Neto, Carlos Marques-Neves
Retina. 2020; 40(7): 1299
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
Carmen Baumann, Stephen Kaye, Danilo Iannetta, Ziyaad Sultan, Rahul Dwivedi, Ian Pearce
Retina. 2020; 40(10): 1955
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Comparative Evaluation of Standard ILM Peel With Inverted ILM Flap Technique In Large Macular Holes: A Prospective, Randomized Study
S. Manasa, Prateek Kakkar, Atul Kumar, Parijat Chandra, Vinod Kumar, Raghav Ravani
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2018; 49(4): 236
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Autologous Neurosensory Retinal Free Flap Treatment for a Large Macular Hole
Ratimir Lazic, Nataša Draca, Vesna Cerovic, Dinko Katic, Stefan Mladenovski, Nikica Gabric
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina. 2018; 49(9)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 The Expansion of RPE Atrophy after the Inverted ILM Flap Technique for a Chronic Large Macular Hole
Hisanori Imai, Atsushi Azumi
Case Reports in Ophthalmology. 2014; 5(1): 83
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Perfluoro-n-Octane–Assisted Single-Layered Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Macular Hole Surgery
Min Kyu Shin,Keun Heung Park,Sung Who Park,Ik Soo Byon,Ji Eun Lee
Retina. 2014; 34(9): 1905
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Materials and Me...
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded362    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 20    

Recommend this journal