|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 115-118
Risk factors for intraocular pressure rise following phacoemulsification
Muge Coban-Karatas, Selcuk Sizmaz, Rana Altan-Yaycioglu, Handan Canan, Yonca Aydin Akova
Department of Ophthalmology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey
|Date of Submission||08-Jan-2011|
|Date of Acceptance||03-Nov-2011|
|Date of Web Publication||21-Mar-2013|
Department of Ophthalmology, Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Dadaloglu Mah. 39 sk. No: 6 Yüregir, Adana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Purpose: This study was designed to analyze the risk factors resulting in high intraocular pressure (IOP), which was accepted as IOP higher than 22 mmHg, following uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Materials and Methods: The records of 812 eyes of 584 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification were evaluated. There were 330 men and 254 women ranging between the age of 26 and 89 years (65.4 ± 9.8 years). The preoperative, postoperative first day (day 1), first week (day 7), and first month (day 30) IOP values were analyzed. Data on history of diabetes, glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation (PXF), incision site, capsular staining with trypan blue, and surgeon were recorded. A multinomial regression analysis was performed to analyse the relationship of the factors with postoperative high IOP. Results: The mean IOP was 15.6 ± 4.3 mmHg preoperatively. Postoperatively that were changed to 19.7 ± 9.0 mmHg at day 1, 12.7 ± 4.5 mmHg at day 7, and 12.8 ± 3.7 mmHg at day 30. The factors such as surgeon, presence of PXF, diabetes, surgical incision site, and trypan blue were not related to the postoperative high IOP (P > 0.05, in all). The only factor that related to high IOP at all visits was glaucoma (P < 0.005). Conclusion: According to our results, preoperative diagnosis of glaucoma seems to be the only factor to affect the postoperative IOP higher than 22 mmHg.
Keywords: Intraocular pressure rise, phacoemulsification, risk factors
|How to cite this article:|
Coban-Karatas M, Sizmaz S, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Canan H, Akova YA. Risk factors for intraocular pressure rise following phacoemulsification. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:115-8
Presented in ASCRS Symposium on Cataract, IOL and Refractive Surgery April 3-8, 2009.
Intraocular pressure (IOP) may rise even after uncomplicated cataract surgery which might need intervention. , The response in IOP to phacoemulsification is biphasic, with a transient immediate rise followed by a modest long-term decrease. ,, Postoperative IOP usually peaks 5-7 h after surgery and returns to normal levels in 1-3 days. ,, Although transient, the elevated IOP can cause ocular pain, may increase the risk of sight threatening complications such as retinal vascular occlusion, progressive field loss in advanced glaucoma, and anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in susceptible patients. , Several risk factors such as glaucoma, viscoelastic agent, and surgical procedure for postoperative IOP rise have been identified. , Our aim in this study was to analyze the risk factors that might result in IOP rise following uneventful phacoemulsification.
| Materials and Methods|| |
We retrospectively evaluated the records of 812 eyes of 584 consecutive patients, who underwent uncomplicated clear corneal incision phacoemulsification surgery in our clinic between May 2004 and July 2008. There were 330 men and 254 women ranging between the age of 26 and 89 years (65.4 ± 9.8 years).
All the surgical procedures were performed by two surgeons (RAY and SS). All the patients had peribulbar anesthesia and uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery via 2.85 mm corneal incision placed either temporal, or oblique. Two side port incisions were made to allow access of a second instrument. Dispersive viscoelastic (Viscoat, Alcon, TX, USA) was used to fill the anterior chamber. Continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis was performed routinely. In mature cataracts before performing capsulorhexis, trypan blue was used to dye the capsule. During phacoemulsification, a stop and chop or phaco-chop technique was used. Following, the corneal incision was enlarged to 4.0 mm. The capsule was filled with a cohesive viscoelastic (Provisc, Alcon, TX, USA), and a foldable posterior chamber intraocular lens was implanted in the capsular bag. Viscoelastic was thoroughly removed via bimanual irrigation/aspiration (I/A), and a rock and roll technique was used for the removal of viscolelastic behind the IOL.
The preoperative as well as postoperative first day, first week, and first month visit IOP values were measured by non-contact tonometer (Full Auto Tonometer TX-F, Canon Inc, USA) and recorded. IOP was grouped as normal (≤22 mmHg) and high (≥22 mmHg). All the glaucoma patients were primary open angle glaucoma. Patients that suffer from other types of glaucoma were excluded from the study. Patients who were receiving antiglaucomatous medication also continued to receive the same medication before and after surgery. None of the patients was given prophylactic medication before the surgery. Antiglaucoma drugs that incite more inflammation like prostaglandin analogs were stopped 2 weeks before surgery and an antiglaucoma drop that does not incite inflammation was prescribed. Antiglaucoma drugs that incite more inflammation like prostaglandin analogs were stopped 2 weeks before surgery. An antiglaucoma drug that does not incite inflammation was prescribed and continued for 1 month after surgery. In addition, acetazolamide was not given after the surgery.
All data were entered to SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 10.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and the changes in IOP were compared with paired Student's t-test. Data on prior history of glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation (PXF), incision site, anterior capsular staining, and surgeon were recorded. The relation of these factors with postoperative high IOP at each visit (days 1, 7, and 30) were evaluated using multinomial regression analysis. The level of significance was set at <0.05.
This study was approved by Baskent University Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee (project no: KA10/31).
| Results|| |
The mean preoperative IOP was 15.6 ± 4.3 mmHg (ranged from 7 to 36 mmHg). At day 1, the IOP increased significantly to 19.7 ± 9.0 mmHg (ranged between 6 and 58 mmHg; P < 0.001, 95% CI −4.68 to −3.52). The mean IOP was 12.7 ± 4.5 mmHg (ranged between 6 and 37 mmHg) at day 7, and 12.8 ± 3.7 mmHg (ranged between 6 and 34) at day 30. Compared to the preoperative values, days 7 and 30 IOP values were significantly low (P < 0.001, 95% CI 2.54-3.17 for day 7, and 2.47-3.03 for day 30).
At day 1, the high IOP was detected in 249 (30.7%) eyes with a mean of 30.7 ± 7.5 mmHg. At day 7, the number of patients with high IOP decreased to 26 eyes (8.8%). Similarly, at day 30 only 16 (1.2%) eyes had the high IOP.
The incidences of high IOP with possible associated factors are shown on [Table 1]. Diabetes was present in 100 eyes (12.3%), PXF was observed in 77 eyes (9.5%), and glaucoma in 60 eyes (7.4%). In 477 eyes (58.7%), the operation was performed through a temporal incision, and in 335 eyes (41.3%) a superior oblique incision was performed. Trypan blue was used in 43 eyes (5.3%.).
|Table 1: The distribution of IOP values as normal (≤ 22 mmHg) or high (>22 mmHg) at each visit (day 1, day 7, and day 30) according to the investigated factors such as surgeon, pseudoexfoliation (PXF), glaucoma, PXF and glaucoma, diabetes (DM), incision [so: Superior oblique, t: Temporal], trypan dye [1: Present; 2: Absent]|
Click here to view
With the multinomial regression analysis, none of the factors was related to the high IOP postoperatively (P < 0.05), except glaucoma. Glaucoma was the only factor related to high IOP values during the postoperative period (P = 0.004 at day 1, 0.001 at day 7, and < 0.001 at day 30). Of the 60 glaucomatous eyes, all were receiving the glaucoma medication. The IOP was high in 30 eyes (51.7%) in the first day, in 7 eyes (12.1%) in the first week, and in 6 (10.3%) patients in the first month.
| Discussion|| |
Transient IOP rise may be observed in the early postoperative period after uneventful cataract surgery. ,, In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the risk factors that might affect the IOP rise following uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery. The IOP measurements were recorded at the postoperative days 1, 7, and 30. We accepted 22 mmHg as the cut-off point for high IOP. Thirty percent of all eyes had high IOP at day 1. Among all the factors such as surgeon, diabetes, PXF, glaucoma, incision site, and trypan blue use, the only factor related to postoperative high IOP values was glaucoma (P ≤ 0.001).
Our results indicate that short-term postoperative IOP was higher in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma than in nonglaucomatous eyes (P ≤ 0.001). In another study, glaucoma was reported as a risk factor for pressure rise after phacoemulsification and the incidence of substantial elevation in IOP was similar between the eyes with primary open angle glaucoma and those with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma.  Tong and Miller  retrospectively investigated the preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements of 385 consecutive eyes having uneventful phacoemulsification. Patients with preoperative diagnosis of glaucoma had significantly higher IOP at postoperative first week. Yasutani et al.  also mentioned that a substantial increase in IOP occurred in approximately 13% of the eyes with open angle glaucoma 1 day after phacoemulsification surgery.
In our study, PXF with normal IOP was not significantly correlated with high IOP even in the early postoperative period after uneventful phacoemulsification. Also in two studies, it has been reported that there was no significant difference in the IOP after phacoemulsification in eyes with and without PXF. , On the other hand, a long-term lasting reduction in mean IOP occurred in PXF eyes. ,,, Damji et al.  demonstrated that in the 2 year follow-up, the patients with PXF have a greater IOP lowering effect following phacoemulsification than those without, and the authors concluded that this effect was correlated with the volume of irrigating fluid utilized at the time of surgery. In addition to these results, Cimetta and Cimetta  operated a group of 39 open angle, nonglaucomatous eyes with cataract and PXF syndrome and a control group of open angle, nonglaucomatous eyes with cataract, using a standard phaco technique along with bimanual anterior capsule PXF material aspiration. Phacoemulsification with anterior capsule PXF material aspiration significantly reduced the mean diurnal IOP in the PXF group lasting one year postoperatively. In another retrospective comparative study, 1122 eyes with PXF, 240 with glaucoma and 882 without glaucoma underwent uneventful phacoemulsification. A long-term reduction in mean IOP occurred in PXF eyes with or without glaucoma.  However, IOP rise in the early postoperative period was noted after phacoemulsification in nonglaucomatous eyes with PXF and IOP control was advised. ,, This early IOP rise may be due to severe inflammation after cataract surgery in eyes with PXF due to pathological iris vessels with an increased permeability for protein. In addition, there were eyes with an elevated IOP without inflammation in the PXF group in which the mechanism of IOP rise could not be identified.  However, in this study, with or without glaucoma, we did not observe any relation of PXF to high IOP.
Anterior capsular staining with trypan blue in our study was not associated with high IOP at any postoperative visit (P > 0.05). In a preliminary study, 25 eyes of 25 patients with a unilateral mature or hypermature cataract, trypan blue dye was used to stain the anterior capsule. Adverse reactions related to the dye such as raised IOP were not observed in the immediate postoperative period or at the end of the mean follow-up of 3 months.  In a comparative study, phacoemulsification of 82 patients who had white mature cataract in one eye and senile cataract in the other were operated. Trypan blue dye was used in the white mature cataract and not used in the fellow eye. Postoperative IOP was not significantly different in the two groups.  In a previous study,  wound construction, anesthesia type, the eye operated on, patient age, and sex did not significantly influence the postoperative pressure change. Similarly in this study, there was no correlation between history of diabetes, surgeon, and incision site (P > 0.05). Surgeon's experience was reported as an important factor for the postoperative IOP rise. The mean pressure rise in eyes operated by experienced surgeons was about half the pressure rise in eyes operated by beginners, as beginners often perform intraocular surgery in a more traumatizing manner than experienced surgeons.  In our study, there was no relation between high IOP and surgeon. This was most probably related to the similar experience of two surgeons in present series.
As for the incision site, a study that compares temporal sclerocorneal or clear corneal incision, postoperative IOP was significantly higher in the sclerocorneal tunnel group than in the clear corneal incision group.  In our group, all surgeries were performed via clear corneal incision, so we are unable to compare with different types of incision.
In conclusion, our study demonstrated that following uneventful phacoemulsification, the diagnosis of glaucoma was the only risk factor for IOP higher than 22 mmHg. On the other hand, according to our results, PXF was not a risk factor for high IOP. We believe that patients who have glaucoma are at risk, and should be monitored closely for high IOP following phacoemulsification surgery.
| References|| |
Cohen VM, Demetria H, Jordan K, Lamb RJ, Vivian AJ. First day post-operative review following uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Eye (Lond) 1998;12:634-6.
Dinakaran S, Desai SP, Raj PS. Is the first postoperative day review necessary following uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery? Eye (Lond) 2000;14:364-6.
Fang EN, Kass MA. Increased intraocular pressure after cataract surgery. Semin Ophthalmol 1994;9:235-42.
Tennen DG, Masket S. Short- and long-term effect of clear corneal incision on intraocular pressure. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:568-70.
Obstbaum SA. Cataract surgery and its effect on intraocular pressure [editorial]. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:877.
Bömer TG, Lagreze WD, Funk J. Intraocular pressure rise after phacoemulsification with posterior chamber lens implantation: Effect of prophylactic medication, wound closure, and surgeon's experience. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:809-13.
Jürgens I, Mattheu A, Castilla M. Ocular hypertension after cataract surgery: A comparison of three surgical techniques and two viscoelastics. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1997;28:30-6.
Hayreh SS. Anterior ischemic optic nneuropathy. IV. Occurrence after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:1410-6.
Savage JA, Thomas JV, Belcher CD 3rd, Simmons RJ. Extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology 1985;92:1506-16.
Morgan RK, Skuta GL. Viscoelastic-related glaucomas. Semin Ophthalmol 1994;9:229-34.
Gross JG, Meyer DR, Robin AL,Filar AA, Kelley JS. Increased intraocular pressure in the immediate postoperative period after extracapsular cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 1988;105:466-9.
Mc Guigan LJ, Gottsch J, Stark WJ, Maumenee AE, Quigley HA. Extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber lens implantation in eyes with preexisting glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:1301-8.
Barron BA, Busin M, Page C, Bergsma DR, Kaufman HE. Comparison of the effects of Viscoat and Healon on postoperative intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;100:377-84.
Yasutani H, Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Hayashi F. Intraocular pressure rise after phacoemulsification surgery in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1219-24.
Tong JT, Miller KM. Intraocular pressure change after sutureless phacoemulsification and foldable posterior chamber lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:256-62.
Dosso AA, Bonvin ER, Leuenberger PM. Exfoliation syndrome and phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:122-5.
Fine IH, Hoffman RS. Phacoemulsification in the presence of pseudoexfoliation: Challenges and options. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:160-5.
Cimetta DJ, Cimetta AC. Intraocular pressure changes after clear corneal phacoemulsification in nonglaucomatous pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol 2008;18:77-81
Shingleton BJ, Laul A, Nagao K, Wolff B, O'Donoghue M, Eagan E, et al
. Effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in eyes with pseudoexfoliation: Single surgeon series. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1834-41.
Altan-Yaycioglu R, Canan H, Pelit A, Akova YA. Intraocular pressure in pseudoexfoliative eyes following phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;25:952-4.
Damji KF, Konstas AG, Liebmann JM, Hodge WG, Ziakas NG, Giannikakis S, et al
. Intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification in patients with and without exfoliation syndrome: A 2 year prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1014-8.
Pohjalainen T, Vesti E, Ulusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L. Intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in nonglaucomatous eyes with and without exfoliation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:426-31.
Akinci A, Batman C, Zilelioglu O. Phacoemulsification in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmologica 2008;222:112-6.
Levkovitch-Verbin H, Habot-Wilner Z, Burla N, Melamed S, Goldenfeld M, Bar-Sela SM. Intraocular pressure elevation within the first 24 hours after cataract surgery in patients with glaucoma or exfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology 2008;115:104-8.
Kothari K, Jain SS, Shah NJ. Anterior capsular staining with trypan blue for capsulorhexis in mature and hypermature cataracts. A preliminary study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001;49:177-80.
Ermiº SS, Oztürk F, Inan UU. Comparing the efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification in white mature and other types of senile cataracts. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1356-9.
Schwenn O, Dick HB, Krummenauer F, Krist R, Pfeiffer N. Intraocular pressure after small incision cataract surgery: Temporal sclerocorneal versus clear corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:421-5.
|This article has been cited by|
||Younger Age and Longer Case Times Associated With Emergency Department Visits After Cataract Surgery
| ||Sahil Aggarwal, Andrew Gross, Alex Snyder, Jay Rathinavelu, Terry Kim, Leon Herndon |
| ||American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2023; 245: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Impact of dexamethasone intraocular suspension 9% on intraocular pressure after routine cataract surgery: post hoc analysis
| ||Cynthia Matossian, John Hovanesian, Jason Bacharach, Dario Paggiarino, Keyur Patel |
| ||Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2021; 47(1): 53 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support: scleral-fixated vs retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lenses
| ||Matteo Forlini, Raman Bedi |
| ||Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2021; 47(6): 792 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Influence of the quality of viscoelastic removal on phacoemulsification results. Part 1. Type of the postoperative period course depending on the quality of viscoelastic removal in phacoemulsification
| ||Anna V. Egorova, Alexey V. Vasiliev, Lina Bai |
| ||Ophthalmology Journal. 2021; 14(3): 35 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Effect of a Schlemms Canal Microstent on Early Postoperative Intraocular Pressure after Cataract Surgery
| ||Nazlee Zebardast, Chengjie Zheng, Henry D. Jampel |
| ||Ophthalmology. 2020; 127(10): 1303 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Cataract phacoemulsification performed by resident trainees and staff surgeons: intraoperative complications and early postoperative intraocular pressure elevation
| ||Clįudia Oliveira-Ferreira, Mariana Leuzinger-Dias, Joćo Tavares Ferreira, Joćo Paulo Macedo, Fernando Falcćo-Reis |
| ||Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2020; 46(4): 555 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||IOP Elevation After Cataract Surgery: Results for Residents and Senior Staff at Henry Ford Health System
| ||Adrian J. Elfersy, Robert A. Prinzi, Zuhair H. Peracha, Daniel D. Kim, David A. Crandall, Deborah A. Darnley-Fisch, Nauman R. Imami |
| ||Journal of Glaucoma. 2016; 25(10): 802 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Risk factors for intraocular pressure rise following phacoemulsification
| ||BK Nayak, Prachi Chavan |
| ||Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014; 62(5): 663 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|