• Users Online: 1609
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 61  |  Issue : 8  |  Page : 401-406

Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease

1 Southern Arizona VA Healthcare System, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
2 Department for Ophthalmology of the Federal University, Sao Paulo, Instituto de Olhos Renato Ambrósio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Date of Submission01-Jul-2013
Date of Acceptance08-Jul-2013
Date of Web Publication3-Aug-2013

Correspondence Address:
Michael W Belin
Southern Arizona VA Healthcare System, University of Arizona, 4232 West Summer Ranch Place, Marana, Arizona 85658-4741
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.116059

Rights and Permissions

Scheimpflug cross-sectioning anterior segment imaging offers significant advantages over traditional placido based curvature analysis and ultrasound pachymetry. The accurate measurement of both the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces and the anterior and posterior lens allows for the creation of a three-dimensional reconstruction of the anterior segment. Changes on both the posterior cornea and/or corneal thickness map are earlier indicators of ectatic change than would otherwise be identifiable with only anterior curvature and ultrasonic pachymetry. Scheimpflug imaging also covers significantly more of the cornea than was possible with placido based devices. This added coverage is critical in the proper diagnosis of peripheral diseases such as pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD).

Keywords: Ectatic disease, keratoconus, scheimpflug imaging

How to cite this article:
Belin MW, Ambrósio R. Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61:401-6

How to cite this URL:
Belin MW, Ambrósio R. Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2022 Aug 17];61:401-6. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2013/61/8/401/116059

The last decade has seen a dramatic change in the diagnosis and early identification of keratoconus and other ectatic disorders. As in other subspecialty areas in ophthalmology, imaging techniques have played a large part in this change. Current corneal imaging modalities (e.g., Scheimpflug, optical coherence tomography (OCT)) offer significantly more information than were previously available with placido based anterior corneal analysis. This new tomographic information not only allows for earlier identification of disease but has altered our perception of what constitutes keratoconus, and improves the specificity to exclude false positive cases with suspicious corneal front surface curvature maps.

In the past, the two most commonly used "screening" tools were ultrasonic central pachymetry and placido based computerized videokeratoscopy (topography). The diagnosis and grading of keratoconus were commonly based on these parameters, as with the Amsler-Krumeich classification [Table 1].
Table 1: Amsler-Krumeich keratoconus classification

Click here to view

Central corneal thickness measurements, keratometric readings, and the degree of myopia were used to both diagnose and stage the severity of disease. Visual loss most closely follows changes on the anterior surface and most treatment regimens, such as contact lenses and penetrating keratoplasty, were based on the loss of best spectacle corrected vision. In other words, the Amsler-Krumeich grading system utilized easily measured parameters and the staging followed closely the treatment decision tree.

The advent of corneal refractive surgery and more recently corneal collagen crosslinking, as well as the availability of better imaging systems, revealed the limitations of both diagnosing and treating keratoconus based solely on central corneal thickness and anterior curvature analysis. [2],[3],[4] Refractive surgery puts physical demands on the cornea (removing tissue) necessitating the need to identify those corneas potentially at risk for ectatic change. Collagen cross-linking aims to stabilize early disease and potentially prevent visual loss, dictating that ectatic change is identified prior to significant alterations of the anterior corneal surface.

Ultrasonic central pachymetry only measured one point on the cornea, which typically was not the thinnest point, and did not reflect the overall thickness profile of the cornea. [5] Similarly, videokeratoscopes were limited to measuring only about 50-60% of the anterior cornea and conveyed no information about the corneal periphery and the posterior corneal surface. [6]

A number of newer imaging techniques evolved (e.g., optical cross-sectioning, Scheimpflug photography, OCT) that allowed measurements of both the anterior and posterior cornea, corneal thickness maps, and also provided greater corneal coverage than possible with videokeratoscopes. [7],[8],[9] Of these, rotating Scheimpflug photography currently provides the most useful information for diagnosing early ectatic change. It is also a technique that is rapid and easy to perform, which would be a requisite for use as a screening tool.

Full corneal thickness maps provide a wealth of additional information that was not possible with ultrasonic pachymetry. Scheimpflug derived corneal thickness maps identify the location and magnitude of the thinnest point on the cornea. In a previously published study, differences between the apical readings and thinnest point readings can approach 100 μm in eyes that were previously viewed as "normal" by ultrasonic pachymetry and anterior, placido derived curvature analysis [Table 2]. [10]
Table 2: Pachymetry in microns (μm)

Click here to view

In addition to measuring and locating the true thinnest point, a full thickness map allows one to look at the pachymetric progression or the rate of change in corneal thickness. A single thickness reading is very limited in determining what is normal, in the same way it would be nearly impossible to determine whether an 80 kg individual is normal without knowing the height of the individual. A 4'10" 80 kg individual would be obese, while a 6'4" individual would be gaunt. Similarly, two corneas can have the same central corneal thickness but share dramatically different pachymetric progressions. Abnormal corneas (i.e., corneas showing ectatic change or tendency) have a more rapid thinning from the corneal periphery to the thinnest point. [11] As seen in the example below [Figure 1], both corneas have the same central thickness value, but the cornea on the left has a normal progression from the thinnest point to the periphery (i.e., corneal is normal), while the corneal on the right shows a highly abnormal progression with a much higher rate of change. This more rapid rate of pachymetric progression, when seen in a preoperative cornea, is highly suggestive of ectatic change.
Figure 1: Pachymetric progression graphs. The cornea on the left shows a normal progression in thickness from the thinnest point to the periphery, while the cornea on the right, while having the same central thickness, shows a more rapid (abnormal) rate of change

Click here to view

The other major benefit of newer imaging techniques is the measurement of the posterior corneal surface. Because the posterior surface contributes minimally to the overall refractive power of the eye (due to the minimal difference between the index of refraction of the cornea and aqueous) it was considered less important both diagnostically and therapeutically. Additionally, videokeratoscopes, being a reflective technology, were incapable on measuring anything below the anterior tear film. The posterior cornea, however, is an earlier indicator of ectatic change or ectasia susceptibility and when combined with full pachymetric data serves as a more sensitive screening tool then anterior topography and ultrasound pachymetry combined. [11]

Abnormalities on the posterior cornea can be seen prior to any topographic change on the anterior surface and may be the earliest indicator of ectatic change. Patients with normal placido and ultrasound screening can be seen with highly abnormal posterior corneas often with associated abnormalities in the corneal thickness maps. [12] In the examples below [Figure 2] and [Figure 3], the sagittal curvature map is unremarkable and the central ultrasound pachymetry was within normal limits, but the corneas exhibit significant posterior ectatic change and an abnormal corneal thickness map. These findings represent the early changes seen in keratoconus.
Figure 2: Four map composite display (sagittal curvature, anterior and posterior elevation, and corneal thickness). This cornea shows a significant positive island of elevation (ectasia) on the posterior cornea (right lower map) in spite of a normal anterior surface (upper right and left map)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Four map composite display (sagittal curvature, anterior and posterior elevation, and corneal thickness). This cornea shows a significant positive island of elevation (ectasia) on the posterior cornea (right lower map) in spite of a normal anterior surface (upper right and left map). In this example, the posterior ectasia is significant enough to cause a displacement of the corneal thinnest point (lower left)

Click here to view

A comprehensive refractive screening display (Belin/Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia Display III- (BAD III)) is currently offered on the Pentacam (OCULUS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) that combines nine different tomographic parameters in a unified screening tool. Currently, the display uses the following parameters in a regression analysis to assist the refractive surgeon in identifying patients potentially at risk for ectatic change:

  • Anterior elevation at the thinnest point
  • Posterior elevation at the thinnest point
  • Change in anterior elevation
  • Change in posterior elevaton
  • Corneal thickness at thinnest point
  • Location of thinnest point
  • Pachymetric progression
  • Ambrósio relational thickness
  • Kmax

The BAD III displays each parameter and individually reports them as a standard deviation and then reports a final overall reading that is based on a regression analysis to maximize the separation of normal corneas from those with keratoconus. In the example below [Figure 4], one can see individual abnormalities in both the corneal thickness parameters and on the posterior corneal surface, while the anterior surface parameters remain within normal limits. The combined reading based on the regression analysis of all nine parameters is highly abnormal and diagnostic of subclinical keratoconus, in spite of a normal anterior surface.
Figure 4: Belin/Ambrosio enhanced ectasia display. The display shows abnormalities in all major parameters except those for the anterior corneal surface. Because the anterior surface is still within normal limits, the patient would have good spectacle vision in the presence of (subclinical) keratoconus

Click here to view

[Figure 5] depicts a case of keratoconus where all nine parameters are abnormal. The final overall reading is over 8 standard deviations from the norm, which represents moderate to advanced ectatic change. The Amsler-Krumeich grading system, however, would just barely classify this cornea into stage II.
Figure 5: Belin/Ambrosio enhanced ectasia display. The display depicts a case of moderately advance keratoconus where all the analyzed parameters (anterior and posterior elevation, Kmax, and pachymetric parameters) are highly abnormal

Click here to view

Another area where Scheimpflug imaging has demonstrated significant advantages over anterior curvature analysis is in the accurate diagnosis of pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD). The vast majority of reported cases of PMD are just inferior keatoconus where the sagittal curvature map exaggerates the displacement of the cone [Figure 6]. [13] These eyes do not show the classic band of inferior thinning that is best depicted by a full coverage corneal thickness map [Figure 7]. [14] As the surgical treatment of true PMD differs from keratoconus, the accurate diagnosis has therapeutic implications.
Figure 6: Composite map showing anterior curvature upper left, corneal thickness lower left, anterior elevation upper right, and posterior elevation lower right. The axial curvature map incorrectly locates the "cone" near the periphery, while both the elevation maps and pachymetric map correctly reveals this as a case of inferior keratoconus

Click here to view
Figure 7: Corneal thickness map of a true case of pellucid marginal degeneration. The pachymetric map opened up to a full 12 mm view is the best map to differentiate true pellucid from inferior keratoconus, as true pellucid will show a clear band of corneal thinning near the inferior limbus

Click here to view

  Conclusion Top

Comprehensive corneal analysis used for preoperative refractive screening includes information from the posterior cornea and full pachymetric data. This added information improves the ability of the refractive surgeon to screen patients for occult ectatic disease or to identify patients potentially at higher risk for post laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ectasia. Rotating Scheimpflug cross-sectional analysis meets the criterion for a successful screening tool in that in not only provides the necessary data, but does so in a manner that does not interrupt patient flow nor require skills beyond those of most ophthalmic technicians.

  References Top

Alio JL, Shabeyek MH. Corneal higher order aberrations: A method to grade keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2006;22:539-45.  Back to cited text no. 1
Li Y, Meisler DM, Tang M, Lu AT, Thakrar V, Reiser BJ, et al. Keratoconus diagnosis with optical coherence tomography pachymetry mapping. Ophthalmology 2008;115:2159-66.  Back to cited text no. 2
Greenstein SA, Shah VP, Fry KL, Hersh PS. Corneal thickness changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:691-700.  Back to cited text no. 3
Ciolino JB, Khachikian SS, Belin MW. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound and scheimpflug photography in eyes that have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:75-80.  Back to cited text no. 4
Belin MW, Khachikian SS. New devices and clinical implications for measuring corneal thickness. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:729-31.  Back to cited text no. 5
Belin MW, Ratliff CD. Evaluating data acquisition and smoothing functions of currently available videokeratoscopes. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996;22:421-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
Kim SW, Sun HJ, Chang JH, Kim EK. Anterior segment measurements using pentacam and orbscan II 1 to 5 years after refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2009;25:1091-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
Yazici AT, Bozkurt E, Alagoz C, Alagoz N, Pekel G, Kaya V, et al. Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using visante OCT, orbscan, and pentacam. J Refract Surg 2010;26:127-33.  Back to cited text no. 8
Belin MW, Khachikian SS. Corneal diagnosis and evaluation with the OCULUS pentacam. Highlights Ophthalmol 2007;35:5-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
Khachikian SS, Belin MW, Ciiolino JB. Intrasubject corneal thickness asymmetry. J Refract Surg 2008;24:606-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
Ambrosio R Jr, Caiado AL, Guerra FP, Lousada R, Roy AS, Luz A, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2011;27:753-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
Ambrosio R Jr, Dawson DG, Salomao M, Guerra FP, Caiado AL, Belin MW. Corneal ectasia after LASIK despite low risk: Tomographic and biomechanical findings on the unoperated stable fellow eye. J Refract Surg 2010;26:906-11.  Back to cited text no. 12
Belin MW, Asota IM, Ambrosio R Jr, Khachikian SS. What's in a name: Keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration and related thinning disorders. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:157-62.e1.  Back to cited text no. 13
Walker RN, Khackikian SS, Belin MW. Scheimpflug photographic diagnosis of pellucid margainal degeneration. Cornea 2008;27:963-6.  Back to cited text no. 14


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]

  [Table 1], [Table 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Keratoconus: An updated review
Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido, Gonzalo Carracedo, Asaki Suzaki, Cesar Villa-Collar, Stephen J. Vincent, James S. Wolffsohn
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2022; : 101559
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Multiscale mechanical model based on patient-specific geometry: Application to early keratoconus development
C. Giraudet, J. Diaz, P. Le Tallec, J.-M. Allain
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2022; : 105121
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Efecto de los segmentos anulares intracorneales en la topografía corneal posterior en ojos con queratocono
M.M. Berty, T.F. Eliwa, A.A.M. Gaafar, A.S. Mousa
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Effect of intracorneal ring segments on posterior corneal topography in eyes with keratoconus
M.M. Berty, T.F. Eliwa, A.A.M. Gaafar, A.S. Mousa
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología (English Edition). 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Elevation Matrix Data in the Evaluation of Keratoconus and Normal Corneas
Jaime Tejedor, Francisco J. Gutiérrez-Carmona
Ophthalmology and Therapy. 2022;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Keratoconus: Diagnosis and Staging
Michael W. Belin, Hyun Soo Jang, Mark Borgstrom
Cornea. 2022; 41(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Posterior Polymorphous Corneal Dystrophy in a Pediatric Population
Abdelrahman M. Elhusseiny, Hajirah N. Saeed
Cornea. 2022; 41(6): 734
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 An Update on Pediatric Corneal Imaging Techniques
Taher K. Eleiwa, Abdelrahman M. Elhusseiny, Reem H. ElSheikh, Shazia F. Ali
International Ophthalmology Clinics. 2022; 62(1): 59
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Predicting speed of progression of lens opacification after pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil
Philipp Schindler, Luca Mautone, Vasyl Druchkiv, Toam Katz, Martin Stephan Spitzer, Christos Skevas, Xingjun Fan
PLOS ONE. 2022; 17(5): e0268377
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Trends in Corneal Topography and Tomography Imaging for Keratoconus Management
Alan W Kong, Tessnim R Ahmad, Marcus L Turner, Jackson Barnett, Gurbani Kaur, Neel D Pasricha, Maanasa Indaram
Clinical Ophthalmology. 2022; Volume 16: 1357
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 On the Relationship between Corneal Biomechanics, Macrostructure, and Optical Properties
Francisco J. Ávila, Maria Concepción Marcellán, Laura Remón
Journal of Imaging. 2021; 7(12): 280
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Análise comparativa entre os índices tomográficos em pacientes com ceratocone inicial
Francisco Wellington Rodrigues, Ana Beatriz Vieira Vilela, Julia Faustino Nishi, Rodrigo Egídio da Silva
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia. 2021; 80
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Corneal Tomography Multivariate Index (CTMVI) effectively distinguishes healthy corneas from those susceptible to ectasia
Gildasio Castello de Almeida Jr, Rodrigo Capobianco Guido, Jogi Suda Neto, João Marcos Rosa, Lilian Castiglioni, Luiz Carlos de Mattos, Cinara Cássia Brandão
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2021; 70: 102995
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Lens densitometry for assessment and prediction of cataract progression after pars plana vitrectomy with C3F8-gas for retinal detachment
Philipp Schindler, Luca Mautone, Eileen Bigdon, Vasyl Druchkiv, Martin Stefan Spitzer, Christos Skevas, Demetrios G. Vavvas
PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(7): e0254370
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameters Between Schiempflug Topography and Swept-Source Optic Coherence Based Optic Biometry in Keratoconus and Healthy Subjects
Hande Güçlü, Irfan Akaray, Sultan Kaya, Samira Sattarpanah, Abdülkadir Can Çinar, Kürsad Sakallioglu, Selçuk Korkmaz, Vuslat Gürlü
Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice. 2021; 47(10): 539
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Agreement and Repeatability of Corneal Thickness and Radius among Three Different Corneal Measurement Devices
Sayantan Biswas, Partha Biswas
Optometry and Vision Science. 2021; 98(10): 1196
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Reliability analysis of successive Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology measurements in different keratoconus stages
Elias Flockerzi, Larissa Häfner, Kassandra Xanthopoulou, Loay Daas, Cristian Munteanu, Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz
Acta Ophthalmologica. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Keratoconus detection using OCT corneal and epithelial thickness map parameters and patterns
Yuli Yang, Elias Pavlatos, Winston Chamberlain, David Huang, Yan Li
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2021; 47(6): 759
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Refractive characteristics of keratoconus eyes with corneal Vogt's striae: A contralateral eye study
Tahereh Rakhshandadi, Mohamad-Reza Sedaghat, Farshad Askarizadeh, Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam, Mehdi Khabazkhoob, Abbasali Yekta, Foroozan Narooie-Noori
Journal of Optometry. 2021; 14(2): 183
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Impact of extreme (flat and steep) keratometry on the safety and efficacy of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)
Nikolaus Luft, Jakob Siedlecki, Franziska Reinking, Wolfgang J. Mayer, Benedikt Schworm, Stefan Kassumeh, Siegfried G. Priglinger, Martin Dirisamer
Scientific Reports. 2021; 11(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Evaluation of topographic, tomographic, topometric, densitometric, and aberrometric features of cornea with pentacam HR system in subclinical keratoconus
Haci Hasan Ozkan, Mustafa Koc, Hasan Kiziltoprak, Kemal Tekin, Emre Aydemir
International Ophthalmology. 2021; 41(5): 1729
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Deep Transfer Learning for Improved Detection of Keratoconus using Corneal Topographic Maps
Ali H. Al-Timemy, Nebras H. Ghaeb, Zahraa M. Mosa, Javier Escudero
Cognitive Computation. 2021;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Classification of Keratoconus Based on Anterior Corneal High-order Aberrations: A Cross-validation Study
Sara Ortiz-Toquero, Itziar Fernandez, Raul Martin
Optometry and Vision Science. 2020; 97(3): 169
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Safety and Efficacy of Scleral Lenses for Keratoconus
Daniel G. Fuller, Yueren Wang
Optometry and Vision Science. 2020; 97(9): 741
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
25 Scheimpflug Corneal Densitometry Changes After the Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation
Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat, Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam, Javad Heravian, Michael W. Belin, Renato Ambrósio, Tayebe Gheysari-Alishahi, Seyyed Hossein Ghavami
Cornea. 2020; 39(6): 761
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
26 Corneal Indices Determined with Pentacam in Possible Candidates for Corneal Refractive Surgery
Eduardo R. Alvarez, Giuseppe M. Montesinos, Diego M. Torres Piedra, Nataly T. Palacios, Osvaldo F. Téllez
The Open Ophthalmology Journal. 2020; 14(1): 39
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
27 Multimodal Imaging in Refractive Surgery
Fernando Faria-Correia, Renato Ambrosio Jr, Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte, Marcella Q. Salomão, Nelson Batista Sena Jr., Jorge Haddad, Daniel G. Dawson
Highlights of Ophthalmology. 2020; 48(4ENG): 4
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
28 Imágenes Multimodales en la Cirugía Refractiva
Dr. Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte, Dra. Marcella Q. Salomão, Dr. Nelson Batista Sena Jr., Dr. Jorge Haddad, Dr. Daniel G. Dawson, Dr. Fernando Faria-Correia, Dr. Renato Ambrósio Jr
Highlights of Ophthalmology. 2020; 48(4ESP): 4
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
29 Corneal Ectasia Preferred Practice Pattern®
Francisco J. Garcia-Ferrer, Esen K. Akpek, Guillermo Amescua, Marjan Farid, Amy Lin, Michelle K. Rhee, Divya M. Varu, David C. Musch, Francis S. Mah, Steven P. Dunn
Ophthalmology. 2019; 126(1): P170
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
30 Recent developments in keratoconus diagnosis
Marcella Salomão, Ana Luisa Hoffling-Lima, Bernardo Lopes, Michael W. Belin, Nelson Sena, Daniel G. Dawson, Renato Ambrósio
Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2018; 13(6): 329
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
31 Paradigms, Paradoxes, and Controversies on Keratoconus and Corneal Ectatic Diseases
Marcella Salomão, Bernardo Lopes, Renato Ambrósio, Fernando Faria-Correia, Ícaro Silva-Lopes, Allan Azevedo-Wagner, Faride W Tanos
International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases. 2018; 7(1): 35
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
32 Importance of Screening for Ectatic Corneal Disease Prior to Multifocal Intraocular Lens
Renato Ambrósio, Ramon J Hallal Jr
International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases. 2018; 7(2): 128
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
33 Assessing Progression of Keratoconus and Cross-linking Efficacy: The Belin ABCD Progression Display
Michael W Belin, Jay J Meyer, Josh K Duncan, Rachel Gelman, Mark Borgstrom
International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases. 2017; 6(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
34 Enhanced Screening for Ectasia Risk prior to Laser Vision Correction
Michael W Belin, Renato Ambrósio
International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases. 2017; 6(1): 23
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
35 Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection
Renato Ambrósio, Bernardo T. Lopes, Fernando Faria-Correia, Marcella Q. Salomão, Jens Bühren, Cynthia J. Roberts, Ahmed Elsheikh, Riccardo Vinciguerra, Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2017; 33(7): 434
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
36 Effect of post crosslinking haze on the repeatability of Scheimpflug-based and slit-scanning imaging devices
Rohit Shetty, Aarti Agrawal, Rashmi Deshmukh, Luci Kaweri, HarshaL Rao, Harsha Nagaraja, Chaitra Jayadev
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017; 65(4): 305
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
37 Biomechanically Corrected IOP Measurement
Ahmed Elsheikh, Ashkan Mohammadvali, Kai-Jung Chen
Highlights of Ophthalmology. 2016; 44(4S): 7
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
38 Corneal Deformation Response with Dynamic Ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug Imaging for Detecting Ectatic Corneas
Isaac Ramos, Marcella Q Salomão, Fernando F Correia
International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases. 2016; 5(1): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
39 Corneal Asymmetry Analysis by Pentacam Scheimpflug Tomography for Keratoconus Diagnosis
Jonatán D. Galletti,Pablo R. Ruiseñor Vázquez,Natalia Minguez,Marianella Delrivo,Fernando Fuentes Bonthoux,Tomás Pförtner,Jeremías G. Galletti
Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2015; 31(2): 116
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
40 Comparative Analysis of Anterior Segment Parameters in Normal and Keratoconus Eyes Generated by Scheimpflug Tomography
Faik Orucoglu,Ebru Toker
Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015; 2015: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
41 Managing corneal ectasia prior to keratoplasty
Fernando Faria-Correia,Allan Luz,Renato Ambrósio
Expert Review of Ophthalmology. 2015; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
42 Vergleich der Spezifität und Sensitivität verschiedener gerätegestützter Keratokonusindizes und -klassifikatoren
C. Spira,A. Grigoryan,N. Szentmáry,B. Seitz,A. Langenbucher,T. Eppig
Der Ophthalmologe. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
43 Hornhauttopografie und Keratokonusdiagnostik mittels Scheimpflug-Fotografie
J. Bühren
Der Ophthalmologe. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
44 Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically-normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases
Pablo R. Ruiseñor Vázquez,Jonatán David Galletti,Natalia Mínguez,Marianella Delrivo,Fernando Fuentes Bonthoux,Tomás Pförtner,Jeremías Gastón Galletti
American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
45 Keratoconus Expert Meeting, London, 2014
Ramez Barbara, Adel Barbara, Jamyl Habib Castillo, Rana Hanna, Eran Berkowitz, Beatrice Tiosano
International Journal of Keratoconus and Ectatic Corneal Diseases. 2014; 3(3): 141
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded1101    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 45    

Recommend this journal