• Users Online: 3765
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 10  |  Page : 1446-1450

Allergic reactions to atropine eye drops for retardation of progressive myopia in children

1 Department of Pediatric Clinical Optics and Refraction, Jyotirmay Eye Clinic and Ocular Motility Laboratory, Thane; Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Mahatme Eye Bank and Eye Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Pediatric Clinical Optics and Refraction, Jyotirmay Eye Clinic and Ocular Motility Laboratory, Thane, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Dermatology, Avista Clinics, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

Date of Submission01-Feb-2018
Date of Acceptance14-Jun-2018
Date of Web Publication24-Sep-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Mihir Kothari
Department of Pediatric Clinical Optics and Refraction, Jyotirmay Eye Clinic and Ocular Motility Laboratory, Thane - 400 601, Maharashtra
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_165_18

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: To report clinical manifestations of ocular allergy to atropine eye drops used for retardation of progressive myopia in children. Methods: Myopic children, who developed bothersome itching that subsided promptly after cessation of atropine eye drops, were included. History of systemic or ocular allergy, preexisting ocular conditions, and clinical features of allergy were noted. Results: Six children, age 5–15 years, were included. Four developed allergy to 1% atropine sulfate eye drops and two to 0.01% concentration of atropine sulfate. The onset of allergy was within a month to as late as 4 years after using atropine eye drops. The severity of allergy was higher with 1% concentration. The most common symptoms of atropine allergy were itching and burning. The most common signs were lid swelling and hyperemia. The allergic manifestations promptly reversed with the stoppage of eye drops. Reintroduction was possible in three patients, either by reducing the concentration of atropine or using benzalkonium free formulation. Conclusion: Allergy to atropine eye drops in children may develop within a few weeks or after many years of usage. Prompt cessation followed by a reintroduction and continuation of therapy may be possible in few patients.

Keywords: Allergic contact dermatitis, atropine, eye drops, itching, periocular dermatitis

How to cite this article:
Kothari M, Jain R, Khadse N, Rathod V, Mutha S. Allergic reactions to atropine eye drops for retardation of progressive myopia in children. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:1446-50

How to cite this URL:
Kothari M, Jain R, Khadse N, Rathod V, Mutha S. Allergic reactions to atropine eye drops for retardation of progressive myopia in children. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2018 [cited 2022 Sep 27];66:1446-50. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2018/66/10/1446/242002

Atropine eye drops are frequently used for retardation of progressive myopia in children.[1],[2] Incidence of allergic conjunctivitis and allergic dermatitis (with 0.1% and 0.5% atropine eye drops) is reported to be 4.1% and 1.3%, respectively.[1] Contact dermatitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and interface dermatitis (ID) type reactions with 1% atropine eye drops are reported in adults.[3],[4],[5],[6] A concentration as low as 0.0006% could cause allergy.[3]

To our knowledge, this is the first report that describes detailed ocular manifestations of allergy to atropine eye drops in children.

  Methods Top

Children diagnosed with allergy to atropine drops, between April 2014 and December 2017, were included. Only one patient (patient 1) was recruited prospectively. The diagnosis of eye allergy was based on a history of bothersome itching in or around the eyes that was caused due to instillation of atropine eye drops and subsided promptly following its stoppage.

The patients had used 1%, 0.5%, or 0.01% atropine sulfate eye drops. Single drop was instilled in the lying down or reclining position in the lower cul-de-sac. No specific instructions were given with regards to the technique of the instillation or punctal occlusion or periocular care. Patients treated with 1% or 0.5% atropine eye drops were prescribed progressive addition photogray lenses.

  Results Top

Six children age 5–15 years were included [Table 1]. The most common symptoms were itching and burning [Table 2]. The most common signs of atropine allergy were eye lid swelling and periocular redness [Figure 1],[Figure 2],[Figure 3],[Figure 4],[Figure 5],[Figure 6].
Table 1: General characteristics of the patients with atropine allergy

Click here to view
Table 2: Ocular manifestations of allergy to atropine eye drops

Click here to view
Figure 1: (a) Face photograph of patient 1, using 1% atropine eye drops, showing redness, swelling, superficial erosions, and hemorrhagic crusting of both eyes. (b) Picture of right eye showing edema and slough over medial canthus (black arrow). (c) Picture of left eye showing hemorrhagic crusting over lateral canthus area involving periocular skin (black arrow)

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) Face photograph of patient 2, using 1% atropine eye drops, showing periocular diffuse redness and swelling involving both the lids, skin erosions with focal crusting (black arrow), post inflammatory irregular hypopigmentation around lids, and madarosis of both lower lids, with erosion around lower eye lid. (b and c) Magnified picture of right and left eyes showing the typical signs of periocular dermatitis

Click here to view
Figure 3: Face photograph of patient 3, using reconstituted 0.01% atropine eye drops, showing left eye periocular skin rash and redness with exaggerated under eye fold

Click here to view
Figure 4: Face photograph of patient 5, using 1% atropine eye drops, showing edema of both the eye lids bilaterally and crusting over medial canthus in both eyes

Click here to view
Figure 5: Photograph of patient 1 after stopping 1% atropine eye drops in the left eye. (a and b) Photograph showing reduction of lid swelling, erosion, and crusting in the left eye. (c and d) Photograph showing minimal follicular reaction in the upper tarsal conjunctiva

Click here to view
Figure 6: Photographs of patient 1 showing complete resolution of the allergy 10 days after discontinuation of 1% atropine eye drops

Click here to view

In every patient, the symptoms were reduced within 24 h after stopping atropine eye drops and disappeared within a week. To hasten the recovery, in patient 1, twice a day local application of topical stereoid (Chlorocol H eye ointment; Jawa Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Haryana, India) was used.

It was possible to reintroduce atropine eye drops and continue the atropine therapy, albeit with a different formulation (Myopin®) in patient 3 and patient 4 and at a reduced concentration in patient 5.

An “allergy patch test” in patient 1 [Figure 7] was weak positive for 1% atropine sulfate (ICDRG allergy patch test classification)[7] and negative for 0.01% atropine eye drops. In spite of a negative test, she developed unacceptable itching and redness within 2 weeks of using 0.01% atropine eye drops. It was decided to discontinue atropine therapy.
Figure 7: Allergy patch test in patient 1. (a) Picture showing a patch containing atropine 0.01% on the right side of the back of the patient and 1% atropine on the left side. (b) Picture showing absence of reaction to 0.01% atropine and an erythematous reaction (6.2 cm × 4.2 cm) to 1% atropine

Click here to view

In patient 2, severe periocular hypopigmentation developed in addition to complaints of severe itching and periocular redness [Figure 2]. An opinion from dermatologists was sought. Two senior dermatologists felt that hypopigmentation was unrelated to atropine use. An allergy patch test [Figure 8] in him showed absence of reaction to 0.01% and 1% atropine at the end of 48 h. Continued use of 1% eye drops for further 6 months was associated with persistent itching and worsening of hypopigmented patches. 1% atropine eye drops was replaced by reconstituted 0.01% atropine eye drops. His itching and burning significantly reduced, but hypopigmented patches persisted. A therapeutic trial of twice a day topical bimatoprost 0.01% (Lumigan®; Allergan, Bangaluru, India) and tacrolimus 0.1% (Talimus®; Ajanta Pharma, Mumbai, India) was advised to him which resulted in focal areas of repigmentation [Figure 9]. Nevertheless, he was asked to stop 0.01% atropine eye drops and continue the follow-up with the dermatologist.
Figure 8: Photograph of patient 2 demonstrating (a) allergy patch test with control (distilled water), 0.01% atropine and 1% atropine. (b) Lack of hypersensitivity reaction after 48 h

Click here to view
Figure 9: Photograph of patient 2, showing serpinginous depigmentation around the left eye with areas of repigmentation (black arrow) after discontinuation of 1% atropine eye drops and 6 weeks application of topical bimatoprost and tacrolimus while continuing 0.01% atropine eye drops

Click here to view

  Discussion Top

In this study, children developed allergy to atropine eye drops irrespective of their age, gender, or duration of use. The onset was insidious, and the severity was higher with 1% concentration. Reintroduction at a lower concentration, after complete resolution of symptoms, could reduce or eliminate the allergic manifestations.

Manifestations of atropine allergy could be divided into ocular and periocular [Table 3]. Clinicians can differentiate allergy to atropine eye drops from other ocular allergies by stopping the drops in one eye or identifying a lack of typical papillary response seen with other causes of allergic conjunctivitis.
Table 3: Clinical classification of atropine eye allergy

Click here to view

History of allergy was present in 50% children in this series. It is possible that patients with preexisting ocular or systemic allergy or ocular comorbidity, namely, dry eye disease,  Meibomian gland More Details dysfunction, or patients using multiple eye drops may be at a higher risk of allergy.[3],[4],[5],[6] It is not known why patients develop allergy to the very drug that they have tolerated for many years. The ophthalmologist should advice the parents to put drops with punctal occlusion and wipe of the excess from periocular skin.

Elimination of preservatives benzalkonium and chlorbutonol was associated with successful reintroduction of atropine therapy in two patients. Allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis are known to occur with benzalkonium chloride, thimerosal, and alcohols, such as chlorobutanol.[8] Changing the preservative to a stabilized oxychloro complex has resulted in significantly better tolerance of topical medication.[9]

As such, it may not be recommended to make diluted atropine solution from injectable atropine due to chances of contamination, inaccuracy of mixing the two preparations, change in the shelf life, and introduction of BAK/chlorbutol/other excipients.

Hypopigmented patches in the periocular area following the use of topical atropine eye drops are uncommon. The ophthalmologist must immediately stop using the drops and seek dermatological opinion. The diagnostic accuracy of patch test in ocular allergy is not known and patients may continue to be symptomatic despite a negative result.

Once developed, hypopigmented patches may take very long to recover. Permanent hypopigmentation of periocular skin following chronic use of eye drops can happen.[10]

There are two major limitations of our study. (1) The study included only patients with history of itching. We might have missed patients with irritant contact dermatitis who may present with only burning or pain with minimal or no itching. (2) Only one patient was recruited prospectively during the active phase. Hence, the data regarding the incidence of allergy to atropine eye drops were not available.

Nevertheless, the ophthalmologists should suspect an allergy to atropine eye drops in patients with bothersome itching and/or burning and promptly discontinue its use for a quick reversal of symptoms. It might be possible to reinstitute the therapy after a change in formulation or with a reduced concentration of atropine drops.

  Conclusion Top

The ophthalmologists should follow a specific clinical algorithm [Figure 10] to diagnose and manage the patients suspected to have allergy to atropine eye drops. One may restart the eye drops in one eye after a few days or after a patch test and watch for the response. In case of recurrence, change in formulation [Table 4], reducing the concentration, or frequency of application and a simultaneous use of immunomodulator, namely, tacrolimus may help. In some cases, where it may not be possible to reinstitute the therapy, lifestyle modifications should be emphasized to slow the progression of myopia.
Figure 10: Clinical algorithm for management of patients with allergy to atropine eye drops

Click here to view
Table 4: Current available market formulations of atropine eye drops

Click here to view


Ms Anar Sanjay Kothary for providing full texts of the articles.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Chia A, Chua WH, Cheung YB, Wong WL, Lingham A, Fong A, Tan D. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: Safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2). Ophthalmology 2012;119:347-54.  Back to cited text no. 1
Kothari M, Rathod V. Efficacy of 1% atropine eye drops in retarding progressive axial myopia in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:1178-81.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Yoshikawa K, Kawahara S. Contact allergy to atropine and other mydriatic agents. Contact Derm 1985;12:56-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
Decraene T, Goossens A. Contact allergy to atropine and other mydriatic agents in eye drops. Contact Derm 2001;45:309-10.  Back to cited text no. 4
Goossens A. Contact allergic reactions on the eyes and eyelids. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2004;292:11-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
de Misa RF, Suárez J, Feliciano L, López B. Allergic periocular contact dermatitis due to atropine. Clin Exp Dermatol 2003;28:97-8.  Back to cited text no. 6
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing – Recommendations on best practice. Contact Derm 2015;73:195-221.  Back to cited text no. 7
Baudouin C, Labbé A, Liang H, Pauly A, Brignole-Baudouin F. Preservatives in eyedrops: The good, the bad and the ugly. Prog Retin Eye Res 2010;29:312-34.  Back to cited text no. 8
Bagnis A, Papadia M, Scotto R, Traverso CE. Antiglaucoma drugs: The role of preservative-free formulations. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011;25:389-94.  Back to cited text no. 9
Suchi ST, Gupta A, Srinivasan R. Contact allergic dermatitis and periocular depigmentation after using olopatadine eye drops. Indian J Ophthalmol 2008;56:239-40.  Back to cited text no. 10


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10]

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]

This article has been cited by
1 Pupillary Dilation in Research: More than Meets the Eye
Jacob Szpernal, Jane A. Bachman Groth, Niamh Wynne, Vesper Williams, Ryan Spellecy, Catherine Thuruthumaly, Joseph Carroll
Current Eye Research. 2022; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Effect of Atropine Eye Drops Combined with VR-Based Binocular Visual Function Balance Training for Prevention and Control of Juvenile Myopia
Yuping Shi, Zhiqian Zhang
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2022; 2022: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Myopia in India
Amar Pujari, Sujeeth Modaboyina, Divya Agarwal, Gunjan Saluja, Rajeswari Thangavel, Vaishali Rakheja, Rohit Saxena, Namrata Sharma, Jeewan S Titiyal, Atul Kumar
Clinical Ophthalmology. 2022; Volume 16: 163
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Corneal Penetration of Low-Dose Atropine Eye Drops
Henning Austermann, Frank Schaeffel, Ute Mathis, Verena Hund, Frank Mußhoff, Focke Ziemssen, Sven Schnichels
Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(4): 588
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Ocular allergic contact dermatitis from topical drugs
Nir Erdinest, Eleanor Nche, Naomi London, Abraham Solomon
Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology. 2020; 20(5): 528
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded848    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal