|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 221-226
Frequency and surgical difficulties associated with pseudoexfoliation syndrome among Indian rural population scheduled for cataract surgery: Hospital-based data
Rajesh S Joshi, Sonali V Singanwad
Department of Ophthalmology, Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Submission||26-Jun-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||26-Sep-2018|
|Date of Web Publication||23-Jan-2019|
Dr. Rajesh S Joshi
77, Panchatara Housing Society, Manish Nagar, Somalwada, Nagpur - 440 015, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Purpose: To study the frequency and intraoperative difficulties associated with pseudoexfoliation (PXF) syndrome at a tertiary eye care center in a rural central India. Methods: This study included patients scheduled for cataract surgery who were diagnosed with PXF syndrome. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic evaluation, including slit-lamp examination, tonometry, gonioscopy, and ophthalmoscopy before the surgery. Cataract surgeries were performed by a single surgeon who reported the intraoperative difficulties. Results: In total, 1022 phakic eyes of 1823 patients were evaluated, 226 of whom (22.1%) were diagnosed with PXF syndrome. Most eyes (n = 81, 35.8%) with PXF syndrome were ≥81 years old. Eighty-six eyes (38.1%) had bilateral involvement, whereas 70 (30.9%) had right or left eye involvement. Further, PXF material was distributed on the iris, pupil, and lens in 70 eyes (30.9%) and on the pupillary margin in 36 eyes (15.9%). The mean pupillary dilation was 5.1 (±1.4) mm in patients with PXF syndrome compared with 7.2 (±1.6) mm in those without it (P = 0.03). Grade VI cataract was observed in 93 eyes (41.2%) and hypermature cataract was the most commonly observed cataract stage. Twenty-one eyes (9.3%) had increased intraocular pressure. Intraoperative difficulties were encountered in 62 eyes (27.4%) with poor pupillary dilation being the most common problem (32 eyes, 14.2%), followed by zonular dehiscence (18 eyes, 8%). Conclusion: This hospital-based study showed that PXF syndrome is common in Indian rural population and that the intraoperative complication rate in these patients is high.
Keywords: Phacoemulsification in pseudoexfoliation, pseudoexfoliation, pseudoexfoliation in Indian population
|How to cite this article:|
Joshi RS, Singanwad SV. Frequency and surgical difficulties associated with pseudoexfoliation syndrome among Indian rural population scheduled for cataract surgery: Hospital-based data. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:221-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Joshi RS, Singanwad SV. Frequency and surgical difficulties associated with pseudoexfoliation syndrome among Indian rural population scheduled for cataract surgery: Hospital-based data. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 May 18];67:221-6. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2019/67/2/221/250692
Pseudoexfoliation (PXF) syndrome is commonly diagnosed by the appearance of a grayish white fibrillar material, also called PXF material, on the pupillary margin, which may also appear on the lens surface, lens zonules, iris surface, corneal endothelium, trabecular meshwork, and anterior hyaloid surface. Its appearance on the surface of the intraocular lens and on the posterior capsule has also been reported. It is a generalized disorder wherein the extracellular material is also observed in extraocular tissues.
PXF syndrome is the most common cause of both open- and closed-angle glaucoma worldwide.[4–8] It is a clinically important syndrome as it is associated with zonular weakness as well as delayed dislocation of the crystalline and intraocular lens.[9–14] The prevalence of PXF syndrome reported in most studies varies (0.69–23%) with region and the study design,,,,,,,,,,,,, including that reported in Indian population (0.69–3.8%).,,, Presently, there is only one study on prevalence of PXF in the rural population in central India by Jonas et al. This study has reported the prevalence of PXF as 0.95%. However, intraoperative cataract surgical difficulties associated with PXF have not been studied in these patients in this region. In the present study, we aim to evaluate the frequency of this syndrome in patients visiting a tertiary eye care center in rural India for cataract surgery and its associated intraoperative difficulties to design strategies to reduce perioperative complications.
| Methods|| |
This prospective, cross-sectional, and observational study was conducted from January 2016 to May 2017 at a tertiary eye care center located in a rural area of central India. All patients provided written informed consent, and the study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the hospital. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery and diagnosed with PXF syndrome during the study period were consecutively included. Patients with both pseudophakia and PXF syndrome, those <50 years old, and those with cataract due to uveitis, trauma, or systemic diseases were excluded. Demographic characteristics evaluated were age, sex, and place of residence (rural or urban). Patients having PXF were screened by the general physician for any systemic problem. Investigations like blood pressure, blood sugar, and electrocardiogram (patients with cardiovascular disease) were performed. Any systemic ailments were noted.
All patients underwent a visual acuity test using the Snellen chart as well as a complete ocular examination performed by a trained ophthalmologist (Dr. Rajesh Joshi) using a slit lamp before and after pupil dilation using a mydriatic (an ophthalmic solution containing 0.8% tropicamide and 5% phenylephrine hydrochloride). PXF syndrome was confirmed by the presence of fluffy white granular material on the lens surface, iris, or pupillary margin [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by applanation tonometry before and after pupil dilation, and gonioscopy was performed using a 3-mirror goniolens. Nuclear hardness was evaluated using a slit lamp after pupil dilation to determine the cataract and its grading based on the Lens Opacity Classification System (LOCS-III).
|Figure 1: (a) Pseudoexfoliative material distributed on the lens, pupillary margin, and the iris. (b) Pseudoexfoliative material distributed along the zonules|
Click here to view
Pupillary dilatation was measured under an operating microscope with a caliper. Any pupillary dilatation <5 mm was considered to be poor pupillary dilatation. Patients suspected of having glaucoma (due to the presence of optic nerve head abnormalities, history of glaucoma, and IOP >21 mm Hg) were screened for glaucoma according to the International Society for Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology criteria. A single surgeon (Rajesh Joshi) performed the cataract surgeries in all study patients by phacoemulsification technique through clear corneal 2.8 mm temporal incision (Galaxy Pro Phacoemulsifier, Appasamy Associates, Chennai, India). At the end of the surgical procedure surgeon reported the intraoperative difficulties. Patients with zonular dehiscence <90° were implanted with capsular tension ring (PMMA, 12–12.5 mm size, Polymer Technologies International, Vadodara, Gujarat, India).
The statistical analysis was performed using the EPI INFO 7.0 software (27 SEP 2017). Pearson's Chi-square test and t-test were used to test the significance of data at 95% confidence interval.
| Results|| |
In total, 1022 phakic eyes of 1823 patients were evaluated during the study period, 226 (eyes) of whom (22.1%) were diagnosed with PXF syndrome (frequency out of 1022 eyes). All patients were residents of the same district, with most patients living in rural areas (198/226 patients in rural areas; 28/226 patients in urban areas; P = 0.02). The mean age of the patient was 80.41 (±6.3) years in the PXF group and 68.55 (±6.4) years in the non-PXF group (P = 0.04). The age-wise distribution of patients with PXF syndrome is shown in [Table 1]. Most patients (n = 81, 35.8%) with PXF syndrome were ≥81 years old. Further, 119 patients were males (52.7%) and 107 were females (47.3%; male:female = 1:1.11; P = 0.07). Eighty-six eyes (38.1%) exhibited bilateral involvement and 70 eyes (30.9%) exhibited right or left eye involvement. Distribution of the PXF material in various ocular structures is shown in [Table 2]. The PXF material was distributed on the iris, pupil, and lens in 70 eyes (30.9%) and on the pupillary margin in 36 eyes (15.9%). Sixty eyes demonstrated equal distribution of the PXF material on the iris and lens (26.6%). Distribution of patients with PXF syndrome across different cataract grades is presented in [Table 3]. High-grade cataract was common in PXF syndrome. Ninety-three eyes (41.2%) diagnosed with PXF syndrome had Grade VI cataract. Morphologically, hypermature cataract was the most commonly observed, followed by mature cataract. Distribution of eyes with PXF syndrome across different cataract stages is depicted in [Table 4].
Increased IOP was observed in 21 eyes (9.3%; odds ratio, 1:9.76; 95% confidence interval with confidence interval limit 7.76–11.76; P = 0.05). The mean IOP was 24 (±6) mm Hg. One eye (0.4%) had chronic angle-closure glaucoma, 18 eyes (8%) had open-angle glaucoma, and 2 (0.9%) had lens-induced glaucoma. Twelve eyes (5.3%) had lens subluxation.
The mean pupillary dilation was 5.1 (±1.4) mm in patients diagnosed with PXF syndrome compared with 7.2 (±1.6) mm in patients without it (P = 0.03). Pupillary dilation in patients with PXF material distributed on the pupillary margin, iris, and lens (4.2 ± 0.5 mm) was significantly less than that in patients with PFX material distributed on the lens or iris alone (5 ± 0.7 mm, P = 0.05). The mean preoperative visual acuity of patients with PXF syndrome was 0.098 ± 0.07.
A single surgeon performed the cataract surgeries in all patients and reported the intraoperative difficulties, which are presented in [Table 5]. Intraoperative difficulties were reported in 62 (27.4%) eyes, 32 of whom (14.2%) presented poor pupillary dilation, 12 of them (5.3%) needed iris retractors at the beginning of the surgery, and 5 eyes (2.2%) needed iris retractors during the nucleus removal and cortical aspiration stage. Iris capture with the phaco tip occurred in one of these patients (0.4%) during nucleus removal. Further, zonular dehiscence was the second most common complication that occurred in 18 eyes (8%), necessitating capsular tension ring placement to stabilize the zonular apparatus. Posterior capsular rupture occurred in three eyes (1.3%), for which anterior vitrectomy was performed, and the intraocular lens was placed over the anterior capsular rim. Five eyes (2.2%) were converted to small-incision cataract surgery from phacoemulsification because of extended capsulorhexis in two eyes and stony hard nucleus in three eyes. None of the patient had complete capsular bag removal instance.
Diabetes (n = 3, 1.3%), hypertension (n = 7, 3.1%), and ischemic heart disease (n = 3, 1.3%) were seen in patients with PXF. Psychiatric illness or hearing loss was not seen in any patient.
| Discussion|| |
The frequency of PXF syndrome in patients presenting scheduled for cataract surgery in the present study was 22.1%. To date, only two hospital-based studies on PXF syndrome (one in 1968 and another in 1984) have been conducted in India., However, several population-based studies have been reported in India ,,, and other countries.,,,,,,,,, We observed a wide variation in the prevalence of PXF syndrome reported in these studies. The possible reasons for this variation across studies are racial differences, environmental influences, and different screening strategies. The results of the present study support this variability. The frequency of PXF syndrome in our study (22.1%) was higher than that in most other hospital-based studies, namely 7.4% in Lamba and Giridhar, 6% in the 50–60-year-age group in Govetto et al., 6.45% in Pakistan, 19.53% in Yemen, 11% in Turkey, 3.5% in Riyadh, 1.5%, Northern Nigeria, 4.14% in Upper Egypt, and 1.87% in India  and higher in study by Gelaw and Tibebu 35.82% and Sufi et al. 26.32%. The study by Lamba and Giridharhave stated prevalence of PXF on OPD basis, while the present study evaluated the frequency of PXF based on patients presenting for cataract surgery.
Sufi et al. evaluated the frequency of PXF in camp patients scheduled for cataract surgery in Kashmir, India. They have shown prevalence of PXF in the tune of 26.32%, that is higher than our study. This could be due to high prevalence of cataract in the Kashmiri population and camp-based study in contrast to the present study which is hospital based.
In the population-based study conducted by Jonas et al. in rural areas of central India, the prevalence of PXF syndrome in individuals aged >30 years was 1.5% that is lower than that in our study. A lower prevalence than that in our study was also found in various population-based studies from South India (3.8%), Andhra Pradesh (0.69%), Myanmar (3.4%), rural South India (6%), North China (5.8%), Reykjavik (10.7%), Finland (8.1%), and Thessaloniki, Greece (11.9%). A variable prevalence rate was noted in various population-based studies worldwide.
In our study, the frequency of PXF syndrome was 4.42% in 51–60-year-age group, which further increased to 35.8% in ≥81-year-age group. We included patients >50 years in our study as PXF and hard cataract is common after 50 years. In a hospital-based study conducted by Govetto et al. on the prevalence of PXF syndrome among patients scheduled for cataract surgery, the syndrome was not observed in patients aged < 50 years. In their study, two patients (6.1%) between 50 and 60 years old, 11 (7.3%) between 60 and 70 years old, 83 (19.1%) between 70 and 80 years old, and 149 (31.7%) >80 years old had PXF syndrome. Similar observations were noted by Al-Shaer et al. in Yemen, wherein 10.1% patients between 41 and 50 years old and 28.8% >81 years old had the syndrome, as well as in other studies from North Nigeria, Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), South India, Turkey, and Ethiopia.,
In our study, gender-wise distribution of PXF syndrome showed no sex predominance, consistent with the results of a study from South India, Hisayama (Japan), Australia, Beijing, Saudi Arabia, and Central India  as well as with those of studies by Lamba and Girdhar., However, some reports have suggested male predominance ,, and a Reykjavik study has suggested female predominance.
Bilateral involvement was observed in 86 eyes (38.1%), whereas right or left eye involvement was observed in 70 eyes (31%). In the study by Gelaw and Tibebu, 48 patients (33.3%) had unilateral involvement, whereas 96 patients (66.7%) had bilateral involvement. Most studies have reported bilateral involvement more than unilateral involvement, as the unilateral disease is expected to progress to bilateral condition.,,, Another possible explanation is that Asian people have a high prevalence of bilateral PXF syndrome.
In our study, the PXF material was distributed on the iris, pupil, and lens in 70 eyes (30.9%) and on the pupillary margin in 36 eyes (15.9%). This contrasts with the findings of the study by Idakwo et al. in which all patients had the PXF material on the peripheral zones of the lens and eight had on the pupillary margin. Furthermore, Al- Saleh et al. reported the PXF material on the iris margin in 62.3% patients and on the pupillary margin in 0.11% patients. This discrepancy could be due to late presentation of patients in our study.
Almost equal number of eyes had nuclear (n = 26, 11.5%) and cortical (n = 25, 11.1%) cataract, whereas hypermature cataract was observed in 98 eyes (43.4%). This is in disagreement with the findings of the study from South India, Sri Lanka, Ethiopia, and North Nigeria. High prevalence of hypermature cataract in our study could be because of late presentation of patients for cataract surgery due to common belief in rural India that surgery for cataract is required after it matures. Grade VI cataract based on LOCS III classification was observed in 93 eyes (41.3%). This result is in agreement with the results of Govetto et al.
Numerous studies have shown a correlation between increased IOP and PXF syndrome.[6–8,15–21,22–26] However, one study from South India has reported no such correlation. In our study, 21 eyes (9.3%) had glaucoma, which is considerably less compared with the number of patients in the study by Govetto et al. (16.7%), Al-Saleh et al. (45%), Yildirim et al. (26%), Shazly et al. (30.3%), Sood (34%), as well as a South Indian study (16.7%), a Turkish study (50%), and the Blue Mountains Eye Study (14%).,
Lamba and Giridhar (9%), a North Nigerian study (4.4%), and the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study (4.2%) reported a low incidence of glaucoma. Low incidence of glaucoma in our study could be due to the incidental finding of glaucoma in PXF syndrome, as suggested by Philip et al.
The mean pupillary dilation was 5.1 (±1.4) mm in patients diagnosed with PXF syndrome compared with 7.2 (±1.6) mm in patients without it (P = 0.03). This is similar to the results of the study by Philip et al., wherein 96.7% eyes diagnosed with PXF syndrome had pupillary dilation of ≤6 mm. Govetto et al. also reported that pupillary dilation is significantly less in PXF patients than in non-PXF patients.
Pupillary dilation in patients with PXF material distributed on the pupillary margin, iris, and lens (4.2 ± 0.5 mm) was significantly less than that in patients with PXF material distributed on the lens or iris alone (5 ± 0.7 mm, P = 0.05). This could be due to the accumulation of PXF material on the iris and the pupillary sphincter, making pupils rigid and consequently unable to dilate.
Intraoperative difficulties in cataract surgery in patients with PXF syndrome have been reported in various studies.,,,, However, Shastri and Vasavada have reported that intraoperative performance of cataract surgery in PXF eyes is comparable to that in non-PXF eyes. In our study, intraoperative difficulties occurred in 62 eyes (27.4%) while performing cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Naik and Gadewar have reported intraoperative complications in 26% (13/50) and 42% (21/50) patients during phacoemulsification and small-incision cataract surgery, respectively. The common intraoperative complication observed in our study was zonular dehiscence (n = 18, 8%), consistent with the findings in several studies.,,,, This complication is expected in patients with PXF syndrome, particularly in cases of high-grade cataract. Another complication is non-dilating pupil or decreased pupil dilation during the surgery. In our study, 12 eyes needed iris retractors at the beginning of the surgery and 5 during the nucleus removal and cortical aspiration stage. In one of these eyes, the iris got trapped into the phaco tip while chopping the nucleus. To prevent repeated entry of the iris in the phaco probe, iris retractors were applied at the two corners.
Five eyes (2.2%) were converted to small-incision cataract surgery from phacoemulsification due to extended capsulorhexis in two eyes and stony hard nucleus in three eyes.
Various studies have exhibited association between PXF and systemic diseases like hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, angina, hearing loss, and psychiatric illness.,,, Systemic illnesses seen in the present study were diabetes (n = 3, 1.3%), hypertension (n = 7, 3.1%), and ischemic heart disease (n = 3, 1.3%). The studied population being an old age population it was difficult to draw correlation between PXF and these diseases and was out of the scope of the study.
| Conclusion|| |
In this hospital-based study in rural India, the frequency of PXF in patients scheduled for cataract surgery was 22.1%. No significant difference was observed in its frequency between sexes. The occurrence of PXF syndrome was found to be associated with age and small pupils. However, no association was observed with glaucoma. None of the patients had associated systemic diseases. Zonular weakness and small pupils were common intraoperative difficulties. Thus, we suggest that capsular tension ring and iris retractors be kept alongside to tackle these problems and avoid suboptimal postoperative visual outcome.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Naumann GO, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Küchle M. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome for the comprehensive ophthalmologist: Intraocular and systemic manifestations. Ophthalmology 1998;105:951-68.
Joshi RS. Psudoexfoliation on the posterior capsule. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:376-7.
] [Full text]
Ritch R, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U. Exfoliation syndrome. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;45:265-315.
Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Lommatzsch J, Küchle M, Konstas AG, Naumann GO. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in aqueous humor of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome/glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1117-25.
Ritch R, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U. Exfoliation (pseudoexfoliation) syndrome: Toward a new understanding. Acta Ophthalmol 2001;79:213-7.
Arvind H, Raju P, Paul PG, Baskaran M, Ramesh SV, George RJ, et al
. Pseudoexfoliation in South India. British J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1321-3.
Rao V, Doctor M, Rao G. Prevalence and prognosis of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma in western India. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol 2015;4:121-7.
Arnarsson A, Damji KF, Sverrisson T, Sasaki H, Jonasson F. Pseudoexfoliation in the Reykjavik eye study: Prevalence and related ophthalmological variables. Acta Ophthalmol 2007;85:822-7.
Shingleton BJ, Neo YN, Cvintal V, Shaikh AM, Liberman P, O'donoghue MW. Outcome of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantion in eyes with pseudoexfoliation and weak zonules. Acta Ophthalmol 2017;95:182-7.
Drolsum L, Ringvold A, Nicolaissen B. Cataract and glaucoma surgery in pseudoexfoliation syndrome: A review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:810-21.
Jehan FS, Mamalis N, Crandall AS. Spontaneous late dislocation of intraocular lens within the capsular bag in pseudoexfoliation patients. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1727-31.
Kuchle M, Viestenz A, Martus P, Handel A, Junemann A, Naumann GO. Anterior chamber depth and complications during cataract surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:281-5.
Mönestam EI. Incidence of dislocation of intraocular lenses and pseudophakodonesis 10 years after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2009;116:2315-20.
Østern AE, Sandvik GF, Drolsum L. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92:184-91.
Jonas JB, Nangia V, Matin A, Bhojwani K, Sinha A, Khare A, et al
. Pseudoexfoliation: Normative data and associations. The Central India Eye and Medical Study. PLoS One 2013;8:e76770.
Viso E, Rodríguez-Ares MT, Gude F. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome among adult Spanish in the Salnés eye study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010;17:118-24.
Anastasopoulos E, Topouzis F, Wilson MR, Harris A, Pappas T, Yu F, et al
. Characteristics of pseudoexfoliation in the Thessaloniki eye study. J Glaucoma 2011;20:160-6.
Landers J, Henderson T, Craig J. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in indigenous Australians within central Australia: The central Australian ocular health study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;40:454-7.
Kang JH, Loomis S, Wiggs JL, Stein JD, Pasquale LR. Demographic and geographic features of exfoliation glaucoma in 2 United States-based prospective cohorts. Ophthalmology 2012;119:27-35.
Abdul-Rahman AM, Casson RJ, Newland HS, Muecke J, McGovern S, Aung TH, et al
. Pseudoexfoliation in a rural Burmese population: The Meiktila eye study. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1325-8.
Rudkin AK, Edussuriya K, Sennanayake S, Senaratne T, Selva D, Sullivan TR, et al
. Prevalence of exfoliation syndrome in central Sri Lanka: The Kandy eye study. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:1595-8.
Thomas R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnaiah S. Pseudoexfoliation in southern India: The Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1170-6.
Krishnadas R, Nirmalan PK, Ramakrishnan R, Thulasiraj RD, Katz J, Tielsch JM, et al
. Pseudoexfoliation in a rural population of southern India: The Aravind comprehensive eye survey. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:830-7.
Foster PJ, Seah SK. The prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Chinese people: The Tanjong pagar survey. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:239-40.
Miyazaki M, Kubota T, Kubo M, Kiyohara Y, Iida M, Nose Y, et al
. The prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in a Japanese population: The Hisayama study. J Glaucoma 2005;14:482-4.
Aström S, Lindén C. Incidence and prevalence of pseudoexfoliation and open-angle glaucoma in northern Sweden: I. Baseline report. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:828-31.
Chylack LT, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, et al
. The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of cataract study group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831-6.
Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:238-42.
Sood NN. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation of the lens capsule in India. Acta Ophthalmol 1968;46:211-4.
Lamba PA, Giridhar A. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Indian J Ophthalmol 1984;32:169-73.
] [Full text]
Govetto A, Lorente R, de Parga PV, Rojas L, Moreno C, Lagoa F, et al
. Frequency of pseudoexfoliation among patients scheduled for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:1224-31.
Rao RQ, Arain TM, Ahad MA. The prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Pakistan. Hospital based study. BMC Ophthalmol 2006;6:27.
Al-Shaer M, Bamashmus M, Al-Barrag A. Point prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in patients scheduled for cataract surgery in eye camps in Yemen. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2010;17:74-7.
] [Full text]
Yildirim N, Yasar E, Gursoy H, Colak E. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome and its association with ocular and systemic diseases in Eskisehir, Turkey. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10:128-34.
Al-Saleh SA, Al-Dabbagh NM, Al-Shamrani SM, Khan NM, Arfin M, Tariq M, et al
. Prevalence of ocular pseudoexfoliation syndrome and associated complications in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2015;36:108-12.
Idakwo U, Olawoye O, Ajayi BG, Ritch R. Exfoliation syndrome in Northern Nigeria. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:271-7.
Shazly TA, Farrag AN, Kamel A, Al-Hussaini AK. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma in Upper Egypt. BMC Ophthalmol 2011;11:18.
Gelaw Y, Tibebu Y. Clinical characteristics of cataract patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, South West Ethiopia. Ethiopian J Health Sci 2012;22:1-6.
Sufi AR, Mufti AA, Nazir N, Qureshi T, Ramzan R. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in patients scheduled for cataract surgery in eye camps in Kashmir. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2014;2:137-9. [Full text]
You QS, Xu L, Wang YX, Yang H, Ma K, Li JJ, et al
. Pseudoexfoliation: Normative data and associations: The Beijing eye study 2011. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1551-8.
Forsman E, Cantor RM, Lu A, Eriksson A, Fellman J, Järvelä I, et al
. Exfoliation syndrome: Prevalence and inheritance in a subisolate of the Finnish population. Acta Ophthalmol 2007;85:500-7.
Mccarty CA, Taylor HR. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Australian adults. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:629-33.
Philip SS, John SS, Simha AR, Jasper S, Braganza AD. Ocular clinical profile of patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome in a tertiary eye care center in South India. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2012;19:231-6.
] [Full text]
Gunes A, Yasar C, Tok L, Tok O. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Turkish patients with senile cataract. Semin Ophthalmol 2016;21:1-5.
Mitchell P, Wang JJ, Hourihan F. The relationship between glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation: The Blue Mountains eye study. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1319-24.
Hemalatha BC, Shetty SB. Analysis of intraoperative and postoperative complications in pseudoexfoliation eyes undergoing cataract surgery. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:NC05-8.
Scorolli L, Campos EC, Bassein L, Meduri RA. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome: A cohort study on intraoperative complications in cataract surgery. Ophthalmologica 1998;212:278-80.
Sufi AR, Singh T, Mufti AA, Rather MH. Outcome of phacoemulsification in patients with and without pseudoexfoliation syndrome in Kashmir. BMC Ophthalmol 2012;12:13.
Turalba A, Cakiner-Egilmez T, Payal AR, Gonzalez-Gonzalez LA, Chomsky AS, Vollman DE, et al
. Outcomes after cataract surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation: Results from the veterans affairs ophthalmic surgery outcomes data project. Can J Ophthalmol 2017;52:61-8.
Shastri L, Vasavada A. Phacoemulsification in Indian eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1629-37.
Naik AU, Gadewar SB. Visual outcome of phacoemulsification versus small incision cataract surgery in pseudoexfoliation syndrome-A pilot study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:NC05-8.
Anastasopoulos E, Founti P, Topouzis F. Update on pseudoexfoliation syndrome pathogenesis and associations with intraocular pressure, glaucoma and systemic diseases. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015;26:82-9.
Holló G. Exfoliation syndrome and systemic cardiovascular diseases. J Glaucoma 2014;23 (8 Suppl 1):S9-11.
Samarai V, Samarei R, Haghighi N, Jalili E. Sensory-neural hearing loss in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Int J Ophthalmol 2012;5:393-6.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]
|This article has been cited by|
||Complications and visual outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with pseudoexfoliation
| ||Vivek M. Singh, Revathy Yerramneni, Tanvi Madia, Sai Prashanthi, Pravin K. Vaddavalli, Jagadesh C. Reddy |
| ||International Ophthalmology. 2021; 41(7): 2303 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of perioperative complications in patients with PEX Syndrome during cataract surgery
| ||Sabite Emine Gökce, Ceyda Baskan |
| ||International Ophthalmology. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Manual small incision cataract surgery: a viable option for cataract with pseudoexfoliation
| ||Sruthi Rajendran, A. R. Rajalakshmi, K. Srikanth, G. Ezhumalai |
| ||International Ophthalmology. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Predicting zonular strength based on maximum pupillary mydriasis in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome
| ||Manas Nath, Annamalai Odayappan, Koushik Tripathy, Palaniswamy Krishnamurthy, Sivagami Nachiappan |
| ||Medical Hypotheses. 2021; 146: 110402 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Management of cataract in a case of retinitis pigmentosa with bilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome
| ||Sucheta Parija, Koyel Chakraborty |
| ||BMJ Case Reports. 2021; 14(2): e238936 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||One Year Outcomes and Stability of a Novel Scleral Anchored Intraocular Lens
| ||Edoardo Abed, Matteo Forlini, Edlira Bendo, Aurelio Imburgia, Alessandro Mularoni, Corrado Gizzi, Giuseppe Santino, Daniele Corazza, Giacomo Costa, Giovanni William Oliverio |
| ||Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021; 2021: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Study of patients with Pseudoexfoliation syndrome undergoing cataract surgery
| ||G Srinivasan, Deepa R |
| ||IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty. 2021; 7(2): 184 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Associated Factors Among Adults at Gondar University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Tertiary Eye Care and Training Center: A Cross-Sectional Study
| ||Betelhem Temesgen Yibekal, Nebiyat Feleke Adimassu, Fisseha Admassu Ayele |
| ||Clinical Optometry. 2021; Volume 13: 249 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||The Complications of Cataract Surgery in Patients with Pseudoexfoliation
| ||Tatjana Sarenac Vulovic, Dusan Todorovic, Nenad Petrovic, Svetlana Jovanovic |
| ||Serbian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2021; 0(0) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Investigation of Possible Role of Chlamydia in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome
| ||Serpil Gonca, Mehmet Sami Serin, Ayça Yilmaz, Özgün Oktay, Ayse Serin, Zehra Öksüz |
| ||Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2021; 14(5) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Visual impairment in pseudoexfoliation from four tertiary centres in India
| ||Aparna Rao, Niranjan Raj, Amiya Pradhan, Sirisha Senthil, Chandra S. Garudadri, P. V. K. S Verma, Prakriti Gupta, Sanjoy Bhattacharya |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2020; 15(5): e0233268 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||A study of visco assisted mechanical pupil stretching for nucleus prolapse in cases of non or mid dilating pupil during small incision cataract surgery
| ||Smitha Shyam Kumar, Sandhya Ramachandra |
| ||IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty. 2020; 6(3): 212 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|