Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1387
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 2501-2504

Unilateral cone dysfunction with asymmetric maculopathy - Clinical features, multimodal imaging and genetic analysis of a novel phenotype

Consultant VR Surgeon, Narayana Nethralaya Eye Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission02-Apr-2020
Date of Acceptance13-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication26-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. B Poornachandra
Consultant Vitreo Retinal Surgeon, Department of Electrophysiology, Retinal Dystrophy & Genetics Clinic, Narayana Nethralya Eye Institute, Bangalore, Karnataka
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_795_20

Rights and Permissions

Keywords: Achromatopsia, electroretinogram, unilateral cone dysfunction, whole exome sequencing

How to cite this article:
Poornachandra B, Bhavaharan B, Thomas S, Mahendradas P, Ghosh A, Jayadev C, Ghosh A, Krishna SG. Unilateral cone dysfunction with asymmetric maculopathy - Clinical features, multimodal imaging and genetic analysis of a novel phenotype. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:2501-4

How to cite this URL:
Poornachandra B, Bhavaharan B, Thomas S, Mahendradas P, Ghosh A, Jayadev C, Ghosh A, Krishna SG. Unilateral cone dysfunction with asymmetric maculopathy - Clinical features, multimodal imaging and genetic analysis of a novel phenotype. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 25];68:2501-4. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/11/2501/299109

Cone dysfunction disorders are characterized by the loss of cone photoreceptors, which are responsible for central and color vision. Two distinct inherited pathologies which affect cone function include achromatopsia and progressive cone dysfunction.[1],[2] Complete or typical achromatopsia is congenital, typically does not show progression, is usually bilateral and symmetric.[3] We report a case of asymmetric maculopathy with unilateral bull's eye macular lesion and severe cone dysfunction.

A 14-year-old male of Indian origin, noticed diminished vision in the right eye following an episode of fever with a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/200 and near vision of N36 in right and 20/30, N6 in the left eye on Snellen's chart. The patient failed to identify any of the plates on color vision testing by HRR (Hardy, Rand and Rittler) in the right eye but was normal in left eye. The anterior segment examination was normal in both eyes. On fundus examination, the right eye had a bull's eye macular lesion [Figure 1]a and the left eye had mild retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) alterations at the fovea [Figure 1]b. Multicolor images also documented asymmetric involvement [Figure 1]c and [Figure 1]d.
Figure 1: (a and b) Fundus and (c and d) multicolor photographs showing asymmetric maculopathy with a bull's eye lesion in the right. (e and f) OCT vertical scans showing foveal thinning with subfoveal loss of outer retinal layers in the right and poorly defined EZ in the left. (g and h) Fundus autofluorescence showing bull's eye configuration in the right and minimal alteration in the left. (i and j) Fluorescein angiography showing dot hyperflourescence in the right and normal appearance in the left

Click here to view

Optical coherence tomography of the right eye showed foveal thinning with subfoveal loss of outer nuclear and photoreceptor layer [Figure 1]e, and disruption of the ellipsoid zone in perifoveolar area with a poorly defined ellipsoid zone in the subfoveolar region in the left eye [Figure 1]f. Autofluorescence imaging showed a bull's eye configuration in the right [Figure 1]g and very subtle changes in left [Figure 1]h, in foveal region. Fluorescein angiography did not suggest any active inflammation [Figure 1]i and [Figure 1]j. Patient was evaluated in Uvea clinic in view of history of fever prior to onset of symptoms, but there were no contributory findings from clinical and hematological work up for inflammation.

Full field electroretinogram (ERG) showed normal 'b' waves in both eyes after 20 minutes of dark adaptation in 0.01 ERG (rod driven response). Dark adapted 3.0 and 10.0 ERG (combined and maximal combined response) showed a mild reduction in the 'a' wave and normal 'b' wave in the right eye [Figure 2]a, but normal responses in the left eye [Figure 2]b. Dark adapted oscillatory response was normal in the left and slightly reduced in the right eye. Light adapted response 3.0 (cone response to single white flash) and 3.0 flicker (cone response to 30Hz flicker) appeared to have mild reduction in the left eye but was 'un-recordable' in the right eye. The patient was followed up for two years and remained status quo [Figure 3]a, [Figure 3]b, [Figure 3]c, [Figure 3]d, [Figure 3]e, [Figure 3]f, [Figure 3]h. Left eye light adapted response appeared near normal [Figure 3]h, so mild reduction on presentation was considered insignificant.
Figure 2: (a) Full field ERG of the right eye showing normal 'b' waves, mild reduction in 'a' wave and reduced dark adapted oscillatory response. Light adapted response 3.0 and 3.0 flicker was unrecordable. (b) Full field ERG of the left eye showing normal responses except for a mild reduction in light adapted responses. (c) Pedigree analysis of the proband (d) Table showing whole exome sequencing report of the proband

Click here to view
Figure 3: Follow up images (a and b) Fundus photographs showing asymmetric maculopathy. (c and d) OCT vertical scan images of the right and left eye showing no improvement or worsening. (e and f) Fundus autofluorescence images showing a bull's eye configuration in the right eye and minimal alteration of foveal autofluorescence in left eye. (g and h) Repeat full field ERG showing unrecordable photopic responses in right eye and near normal photopic response in left eye with unimpaired rod responses

Click here to view

The patient was a product of a non-consanguineous marriage [Figure 2]c, both parents and sibling were normal. To study the gene sequence of this unusual phenotype, whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on the DNA of the blood sample of the proband and unaffected family members. Heterozygous missense mutations of unknown significance were found in four different genes - USH2A, PDE6B, PRPF4, PDE6G [Figure 2]d. In addition, a large heterozygous novel deletion in the CRX gene was identified in the proband, however the unaffected father also had same deletion.

  Discussion Top

Asymmetric maculopathy with unilateral severe cone dysfunction is a rare entity. Though the ERG features resembled achromatopsia in the right eye of our patient, it was a unilateral manifestation. Nomuraet al. reported a 20-year-old Japanese woman with unilateral cone dysfunction and bull's eye maculopathy.[4] Our patient's manifestation was grossly asymmetric clinically, and even more so on the full field ERG. Sievinget al. has reported two cases with gradual color vision deficit, normal vision, and phenotypically normal macula but with subnormal response for rods, grossly abnormal response for cones, and an abnormally prolonged b-wave when long-duration photopic flashes were used.[5] In contrast, our patient had low CDVA, near normal rod responses and no measurable full field photopic ERGs.

Two other similar cases reported also had good visual acuity and a clinically normal macula in the affected eye.[6],[7] Mochizukiet al. also reported a unilateral cone dysfunction, but was predominantly peripheral.[8] Genetic analysis of none of these reported cases is available. One report of a novel nonsense mutation in the CRX gene (19q13.3) mimicked benign concentric annular macular dystrophy with bilateral symmetric bull's eye macular lesions in a mother and son duo.[9]

Sequencing results of our patient did not suggest any pathogenic mutations since the identified variants were heterozygous in nature and was present in the unaffected parents. A possible reason could be because of the limitations of WES which does not determine epigenetic changes, copy number variants and epistatic interactions. The genetic cause of unilateral cone dystrophy may be incomplete penetrance, a novel gene mutation, a somatic genetic variation or a mutation in an epigenetic regulatory locus. It has also been suggested that a different unidentified mutation at a single locus or nonlinked mutations in multiple loci could account for the unusual unilateral presentation in these diseases.[10] These findings indicate that there could be a separate entity of asymmetric cone dysfunction, the pathogenesis and genetic variation for which is still unknown.

This is the first report of a patient of Indian origin with asymmetric maculopathy and unilateral bull's eye macular lesion and severe cone dysfunction in whom the possible genetic mechanism was studied.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

François J, De Rouck A, De Laey JJ. Progressive cone dystrophies. Ophthalmologica 1976;173:81-101.  Back to cited text no. 1
Goodman G, Ripps H, Siegel IM. Cone dysfunction syndromes. Arch Ophthalmol 1963;70:214-31.  Back to cited text no. 2
Ryan SJ, Wilkinson C, Schachat A, Hinton D, Wilkinson C. Retina. 4th ed. C.V. Mosby; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 3
Nomura R, Kondo M, Tanikawa A, Yamamoto N, Terasaki H, Miyake Y. Unilateral cone dysfunction with bull's eye maculopathy. Ophthalmology 2001;108:49-53.  Back to cited text no. 4
Sieving PA. Unilateral cone dystrophy: ERG changes implicate abnormal signaling by hyperpolarizing bipolar and/or horizontal cells. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1994;92:459-71.  Back to cited text no. 5
Zervas JP, Smith JL. Neuro-ophthalmic presentation of cone dysfunction syndromes in the adult. J Clin Neuroophthalmol 1987;7:202-18.  Back to cited text no. 6
Brigell M, Celesia GG. Electrophysiological evaluation of the neuro-ophthalmology patient: An algorithm for clinical use. Semin Ophthalmol 1992;7:65-78.  Back to cited text no. 7
Mochizuki Y, Shinoda K, Matsumoto CS, Klose G, Watanabe E, Seki K, et al. Case of unilateral peripheral cone dysfunction. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2012;3:162-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
Griffith JF, DeBenedictis MJ, Traboulsi EI. A novel dominant CRX mutation causes adult-onset macular dystrophy. Ophthalmic Genet 2018;39:120-4.  Back to cited text no. 9
Farrell DF. Unilateral retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy. Clin Ophthalmol 2009;3:263-70.  Back to cited text no. 10


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded24    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal