Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 1085
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
PHOTO ESSAY
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 2516-2518

Beware of artifacts in orbital magnetic resonance imaging


1 Consultant Neuroradiologist, Citi Neuro Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
2 Fellow in Neuroradiology, Citi Neuro Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
3 Department of Electronics and Communications Engineering, RV College of Engineering, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission26-Mar-2020
Date of Acceptance20-Jun-2020
Date of Web Publication26-Oct-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Dandu R Varma
Department of Neuroradiology, Citi Neuro Centre, MLA Colony, Road No 12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, Telangana
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_640_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Keywords: Artifacts, magnetic resonance imaging, orbit


How to cite this article:
Varma DR, Ponnaganti S, Dandu RV. Beware of artifacts in orbital magnetic resonance imaging. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:2516-8

How to cite this URL:
Varma DR, Ponnaganti S, Dandu RV. Beware of artifacts in orbital magnetic resonance imaging. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 24];68:2516-8. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/11/2516/299098



Orbital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is plagued by many artifacts, that sometimes closely mimic pathology.[1] We review the most common artifacts in clinical practice.[2]

Motion artifacts

Optic neuritis is characterized by T2 hyperintensity of the optic nerves [Figure 1]a. Similar changes can also be produced by motion artifacts [Figure 1]b, which are recognizable by the associated blurring of nerve outlines and ghosting [Figure 1]b and [Figure 1]c. Repeating the scan with the patient fixing the gaze removes these artifacts [Figure 1]d.
Figure 1: (a) Bilateral optic neuritis, (b) Eye motion during scanning causes motion artifacts, (c) Motion also produces ghosting and blurring, (d) Repeat MRI of the patient in Figure 1b during eye fixation

Click here to view


Partial volume artifacts

Signal changes similar to optic neuritis [Figure 2]a can occasionally be seen in normal optic nerves [Figure 2]b. This occurs when the nerves are tortuous and the MR section includes adjacent fat, which artifactually increases signal in the nerve [Figure 2]c. Fat suppressed sequences [Figure 2]d are immune to this artifact.
Figure 2: (a) Right optic neuritis, (b) Similar changes in both optic nerves produced by partial volume artifact, (c) Genesis of partial volume artifacts, (d) Fat saturated scan shows normal optic nerves

Click here to view


Similar phenomena can affect the extraocular muscles. Extraocular muscles are enlarged and show T2 hyperintensity in disorders such as orbital myositis [Figure 3]a and thyroid ophthalmopathy. However, even normally, the lateral rectus muscles can appear bulky and hyperintense to rest of the muscles on coronal images [Figure 3]b. Oblique orientation of lateral rectus muscles to the coronal plane makes them more susceptible to this phenomenon [Figure 3]c.
Figure 3: (a) Orbital myositis, (b) Bulky, hyperintense lateral rectus muscles in a normal individual, (c) Obliquity of lateral rectus makes it more prone for partial volume artifact

Click here to view


Susceptibility artifact

Signal changes produced by disorders affecting the inferior rectus muscle, such as myositis [Figure 4]a can occasionally be seen on fat saturated sequences, in individuals with metallic dental implants [Figure 4]b. Disturbance of the magnetic field along the floor of the orbit by dental implants or air in the maxillary sinus interferes with fat saturation and creates a false appearance of edematous changes [Figure 4]c. The artefact is recognizable as it extends beyond the muscle boundaries and is worst inferiorly. A similar artefact can be seen when the patient uses eye makeup (mascara) containing metallic iron particles.
Figure 4: (a) Inferior rectus myositis, (b) Susceptibility artefact due to dental implants (*) causes hyperintensity of all tissues along the orbital floor, (c) Magnetic field disturbance by the metallic dental implant extends into the orbital floor (dotted line)

Click here to view


Chemical shift artifact

The appearance of tumor deposits along the optic nerve [Figure 5]a can be seen even in normal individuals [Figure 5]b as the so-called “Chemical shift artifact.” This artifact is typically seen at the interface between fluid and fat containing structures (such as optic nerve and retroorbital fat) as a band of dark signal intensity on one side (along the frequency encoding direction). This is caused by “mis-mapping” (shift) of the signal from retroorbital fat, in relation to the perioptic fluid [Figure 5]c. Fat suppressed sequences [Figure 5]d are immune to this artifact.
Figure 5: (a) Leukemic deposits on left optic nerve, (b) Curvilinear bands of bright and dark signal along superior and inferior aspects of optic nerves in a normal individual, (c) Illustration of chemical shift artifact, (d) Fat saturated scan in the same individual shows normal optic nerves

Click here to view


This artifact is also seen at the margin of fat containing structures surrounded by fluid (e.g., silicone oil in the globe or intracranial lipomas) and fluid containing structures surrounded by fat (e.g., cysts or hemangiomas within the retroorbital fat). Presence of this artifact gives vital clues in the diagnosis of these conditions.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Brown BA, Swallow CE, Eiseman AS. MRI artifact masquerading as orbital disease. Int Ophthalmol 2001;24:343-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Herrick RC, Hayman LA, Taber KH, Diaz-Marcban P, Kuo MD. Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the orbit: A clinical review. Radiographics 1997;17:707-24.  Back to cited text no. 2
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed285    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded20    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal