• Users Online: 28422
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
PREFERRED PRACTICE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 12  |  Page : 2895-2898

Screening and prophylaxis of retinal degenerations prior to refractive surgery


Department of Retina and Vitreous, Narayana Nethralaya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Date of Submission27-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance20-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication23-Nov-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Chaitra Jayadev
Department of Retina and Vitreous, Narayana Nethralaya, #121/C, 1st R Block, Chord Road, Rajaji Nagar, Bengaluru - 560 010, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2101_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


The need and demand for surgical correction of refractive errors, particularly myopia, has been increasing. Degenerations involving the peripheral retina are common in myopes and can result in a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. There are no clear guidelines for retinal screening and management of asymptomatic retinal degenerations prior to refractive surgery or for follow-up of these patients. This article aims to provide a set of guidelines for the management of retinal degenerations in eyes undergoing refractive surgeries.

Keywords: Posterior vitreous detachment, refractive surgery, retinal degeneration, retinal detachment


How to cite this article:
Venkatesh R, James E, Jayadev C. Screening and prophylaxis of retinal degenerations prior to refractive surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:2895-8

How to cite this URL:
Venkatesh R, James E, Jayadev C. Screening and prophylaxis of retinal degenerations prior to refractive surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2024 Mar 29];68:2895-8. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2020/68/12/2895/301237



Uncorrected refractive errors continue to be the most common cause of moderate to severe visual impairment in young adults.[1] Refractive errors seen in day-to-day clinical practice include myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism, and presbyopia of which, myopia is the most common.[2] There is either a steep cornea or a longer axial length or a combination of both in myopia. Since the past several decades, surgical correction of refractive errors, particularly myopia, is on the rise. The different refractive surgical techniques used in the treatment of myopia include surface ablation techniques like photorefractive keratotomy, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), femtosecond LASIK and intraocular procedures like intrastromal corneal ring segments, phakic intraocular lens (phakic IOL) and elective refractive lens exchange.[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] Other less commonly used refractive surgeries include radial keratotomy, thermal conductive keratoplasty, automated lamellar keratoplasty, and epikeratoplasty. Newer procedures like small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) are gaining popularity for the correction of myopia.[9]

Degenerations involving the peripheral retina are common in myopes and studies have shown a higher prevalence with increasing grades of myopia.[10],[11],[12],[13] Lattice degeneration, snail-track degeneration, retinal tears/holes, degenerative retinoschisis, cystic retinal tufts, and, rarely, zonular traction tufts, can result in a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and its associated morbidity.[14] A posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) is also more common in myopes and present at a much younger age.[15] During laser-assisted refractive surgeries like LASIK, there are significant ocular mechanical stressors like an increase in intraocular pressure (>65 mm Hg) during application of the microkeratome suction ring, an acoustic shock wave during the laser ablation, and a rapid lowering of intraocular pressure when the suction ring is decompressed.[16] These have the potential to cause changes in the vitreous, retina, and macula. Many patients complain of increased floaters (PVD) after LASIK.[17],[18],[19] Even in newer surgical techniques like the femtosecond LASIK, the incidence of PVD occurrence or progression is either higher or comparable to that seen in the microkeratome LASIK cohort of patients.[20],[21],[22] This may be due to a longer suction time during femtosecond LASIK despite a lower suction pressure.

Small incision lenticule extraction is a relatively new refractive procedure designed to treat a range of refractive errors. In this flap-less procedure, a corneal lenticule is created using a femtosecond laser and then extracted through a small incision.[9] It is reported to achieve similar optical effects femtosecond LASIK with excellent postoperative outcomes.[23] In the SMILE technique, there are no fluctuations in the intraocular pressure as in LASIK. Thus, one can assume that the incidence of PVD following SMILE is less compared to LASIK or femtosecond LASIK. Irrespective of the refractive error grade or the procedure done, a PVD can lead to retinal tears and an RRD.[24] A retinal examination of myopic eyes, both pre- and post-operative, is therefore mandatory. Prophylactic treatment of retinal degenerations which can predispose to retinal tears is advisable.[14],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30]

Given the high incidence of refractive errors (123.7 million) worldwide, and with over 13 million LASIK procedures having been performed in the United States alone, the numbers seeking refractive surgery are only going to increase.[31],[32] While there are guidelines for the treatment of symptomatic and asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration,[33] there are no clear guidelines for retinal screening and management of asymptomatic retinal degenerations prior to refractive surgery or for follow-up of these patients. With this background, this article aims to provide a set of guidelines for the management of retinal degenerations in eyes undergoing refractive surgeries.


  Recommendations for Retinal Screening and Prophylaxis of Retinal Degenerations Prior to Refractive Surgery Top


Need for retinal examination prior to refractive surgery

Predisposing factors for retinal detachment in patients undergoing refractive surgery are the presence of pre-existing retinal tears or holes, new retinal breaks secondary to PVD in pre-existing peripheral retinal degenerations and rarely, development of new retinal breaks post-surgery.[34] Despite the lower suction pressure during femtosecond LASIK, the longer duration is shown to increase the risk of PVD post-surgery.[20],[21],[22] A higher incidence of PVD and subsequently retinal tear and RRD is noted in patients who have undergone phakic intraocular lens surgery or refractive clear lens exchange.[35],[36] Thus, a complete dilated retinal examination with indentation is necessary to identify lesions that need treatment prior to any refractive surgery.

How can the retinal examination be done?

Ideally, the dilated retinal examination should be done by a trained retinal specialist to screen for retinal degeneration and PVD status. Alternatively, one can use a non-mydriatic, ultra-widefield fundus camera to image the retinal periphery.[37],[38] Ultrawide field imaging has high specificity (>99%) and moderate sensitivity (≈57%) for identifying and documenting peripheral retinal lesions.[38] It also helps as an educative tool to sensitize the patient of the risks involved.[37],[38],[39] If need be, a PVD can also be confirmed by an ocular ultrasound.[22]

Prophylaxis for retinal breaks before refractive surgery

Prophylactic laser photocoagulation is recommended for treating predisposing retinal lesions prior to refractive surgery.[40] The guidelines are based on Wilkinson CP recommendations for the treatment for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degenerations to prevent retinal detachment.[33] [Table 1].
Table 1: Treatment recommendations for patients with peripheral retinal degenerations undergoing refractive surgery

Click here to view


Time interval between the laser photocoagulation and refractive surgery

Laser photocoagulation produces a strong adhesive bond between the neurosensory retina and retinal pigment epithelium. After laser photocoagulation of the intact retina, the adhesive force reduces by 50% at 8 hours but increases beyond normal (≈140%) by 24 hours and remains twice normal between 3 days and 4 weeks.[41],[42] Hence, a refractive surgery is recommended after at least a 7-day interval following laser photocoagulation.

Follow-up retinal examination schedule after refractive surgery

Following microtome-assisted LASIK or femtosecond-assisted LASIK, a PVD can occur as early two days post-surgery in 16% of cases and in up to 85% within a month.[20],[22] Patients with increased floaters and/or flashes should be evaluated by a retinal specialist at the earliest to check for the development of PVD, retinal tears, or retinal detachment. Despite a low incidence of retinal detachment after postrefractive surgery, it occurs across a broad spectrum of time interval.[40],[43] When PVD is partial, retinal tears and RRDs can arise in formerly healthy areas as posterior vitreous separation occurs, necessitating periodic retinal examinations.[44] Since myopic patients are at a risk for vision-threatening macular complications like progressive thinning and atrophy, choroidal neovascular membranes, retinoschisis, macular hole, pigment epithelial detachments, and foveal detachments, a long term follow up is mandatory after refractive surgery [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Guidelines for dilated retinal examination prior to refractive surgery

Click here to view



  Conclusion Top


In conclusion, patients undergoing refractive surgery need a thorough retinal examination to look for peripheral lesions. Prophylactic barrage laser photocoagulation needs to be done for predisposing degenerative retinal lesions at least a week before surgery. Retinal examination should be done at regular intervals for a long term to check for the development or progression of PVD, retinal tears, retinal detachment, and macular pathologies.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2017;5:e1221-34.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sheeladevi S, Seelam B, Nukella PB, Borah RR, Ali R, Keay L. Prevalence of refractive errors, uncorrected refractive error, and presbyopia in adults in India: A systematic review. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019;67:583-92.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
Swinger CA. Refractive surgery for the correction of myopia. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1981;101(Pt 4):434-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Binder PS. Radial keratotomy and excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia. J Refract Corneal Surg 1994;10:443-64.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kolahdouz-Isfahani AH, Wu FM, Salz JJ. Refractive keratotomy after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995 1999;15:53-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Lee YC, Park CK, Sah WJ, Hahn TW, Kim MS, Kim JH. Photorefractive keratectomy for undercorrected myopia after radial keratotomy: Two-year follow up. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995 1995;11(3 Suppl):S274-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Renard P, Brochard-Caille B, Licha A, Couderc JL. Correction of myopia by corneal surgery. Radial keratotomy, myopic keratomileusis. Bull Mem Soc Fr Ophtalmol 1986;97:191-3.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kim T-I, Alió Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, Cochener B, Ang M. Refractive surgery. Lancet Lond Engl 2019;393:2085-98.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis 2014;1:3.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lam DSC, Fan DSP, Chan W-M, Tam BSM, Kwok AKH, Leung ATS, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of peripheral retinal degeneration in Chinese adults with high myopia: A cross-sectional prevalence survey. Optom Vis Sci Off Publ Am Acad Optom 2005;82:235-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Pierro L, Camesasca FI, Mischi M, Brancato R. Peripheral retinal changes and axial myopia. Retina Phila Pa 1992;12:12-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Martín Sánchez MD, Roldán Pallarés M. Myopia: Frequency of lattice degeneration and axial length. Arch Soc Espanola Oftalmol 2001;76:291-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Gözüm N, Cakir M, Gücukoglu A, Sezen F. Relationship between retinal lesions and axial length, age and sex in high myopia. Eur J Ophthalmol 1997;7:277-82.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Lewis H. Peripheral retinal degenerations and the risk of retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:155-60.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Yonemoto J, Ideta H, Sasaki K, Tanaka S, Hirose A, Oka C. The age of onset of posterior vitreous detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:67-70.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Chaurasia SS, Gimeno FL, Tan K, Yu S, Tan DT, Beuerman RW, et al.In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation. Investig Opthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:4641-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Arevalo JF. Retinal complications after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:184-91.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Arevalo JF. Posterior segment complications after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008;19:177-84.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mirshahi A, Schöpfer D, Gerhardt D, Terzi E, Kasper T, Kohnen T. Incidence of posterior vitreous detachment after laser in situ keratomileusis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:149-53.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Osman MH, Khalil NM, El-Agha M-S. Incidence of posterior vitreous detachment after femtosecond LASIK compared with microkeratome LASIK. Cornea 2017;36:1036-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Wang T, Wang Y, Zhao S. Comparison of posterior vitreous detachment after femtosecond laser and microkeratome-assisted lase in situ keratomileusis. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi Chin J Ophthalmol 2013;49:309-14.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Gavrilov J-C, Gaujoux T, Sellam M, Laroche L, Borderie V. Occurrence of posterior vitreous detachment after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: Ultrasound evaluation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:1300-4.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Jin Y, Wang Y, Xu L, Zuo T, Li H, Dou R, et al. Comparison of the optical quality between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser LASIK. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:2507973.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Uhr JH, Obeid A, Wibbelsman TD, Wu CM, Levin HJ, Garrigan H, et al. Delayed retinal breaks and detachments after acute posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmology 2020;127:516-22.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Beraru V, Staicu C. Peripheral retinal degenerations predispose to retinal detachment. Oftalmol Buchar Rom 1990 2007;51:13-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Crim N, Esposito E, Monti R, Correa LJ, Serra HM, Urrets-Zavalia JA. Myopia as a risk factor for subsequent retinal tears in the course of a symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment. BMC Ophthalmol 2017;17:226.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Goh YW, Ehrlich R, Stewart J, Polkinghorne P. The incidence of retinal breaks in the presenting and fellow eyes in patients with acute symptomatic posterior vitreous detachment and their associated risk factors. Asia-Pac J Ophthalmol Phila Pa 2015;4:5-8.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hollands H, Johnson D, Brox AC, Almeida D, Simel DL, Sharma S. Acute-onset floaters and flashes: Is this patient at risk for retinal detachment? JAMA 2009;302:2243-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Margo CE, Harman LE. Posterior vitreous detachment. How to approach sudden-onset floaters and flashing lights. Postgrad Med 2005;117:37-42.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Sharma MC, Regillo CD, Shuler MF, Borrillo JL, Benson WE. Determination of the incidence and clinical characteristics of subsequent retinal tears following treatment of the acute posterior vitreous detachment-related initial retinal tears. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;138:280-4.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Blindness and vision impairment [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment. [Last accessed on 2020 Jun 20].  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Corcoran KJ. Macroeconomic landscape of refractive surgery in the United States. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015;26:249-54.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Wilkinson CP. Interventions for asymptomatic retinal breaks and lattice degeneration for preventing retinal detachment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;:CD003170.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Panozzo G, Parolini B. Relationships between vitreoretinal and refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1663-8.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Bamashmus M, Al-Salahim S, Tarish N, Saleh M, Mahmoud H, Elanwar M, et al. Posterior vitreous detachment and retinal detachment after implantation of the visian phakic implantable collamer lens. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2013;20:327-31.  Back to cited text no. 35
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
36.
Ravalico G, Michieli C, Vattovani O, Tognetto D. Retinal detachment after cataract extraction and refractive lens exchange in highly myopic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:39-44.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Liu L, Wang F, Xu D, Xie C, Zou J. The application of wide-field laser ophthalmoscopy in fundus examination before myopic refractive surgery. BMC Ophthalmol 2017;17:250.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Yang D, Li M, Wei R, Xu Y, Shang J, Zhou X. Optomap ultrawide field imaging for detecting peripheral retinal lesions in 1725 high myopic eyes before implantable collamer lens surgery. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2020. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13809.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Mackenzie PJ, Russell M, Ma PE, Isbister CM, Maberley DAL. Sensitivity and specificity of the optos optomap for detecting peripheral retinal lesions. Retina 2007;27:1119-24.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Arevalo JF, Lasave AF, Torres F, Suarez E. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment after LASIK for myopia of up to -10 diopters: 10 years of follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;250:963-70.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Yoon YH, Marmor MF. Rapid enhancement of retinal adhesion by laser photocoagulation. Ophthalmology 1988;95:1385-8.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Folk JC, Sneed SR, Folberg R, Coonan P, Pulido JS. Early retinal adhesion from laser photocoagulation. Ophthalmology 1989;96:1523-5.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Arevalo JF, Ramirez E, Suarez E, Cortez R, Ramirez G, Yepez JB. Retinal detachment in myopic eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995 2002;18:708-14.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Falconio G, Gallenga PE. Treatment of retinal tears and lattice degenerations in fellow eyes in high risk patients suffering retinal detachment: A prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1046-9.  Back to cited text no. 44
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Recommendations ...
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1642    
    Printed52    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded150    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal