|
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2020 | Volume
: 68
| Issue : 1 | Page : 100-103 |
|
Seroprevalence of Lymes disease in the Nagarahole and Bandipur forest areas of South India
Kalpana Babu1, Krishna R Murthy2, M Bhagya1, Praveen R Murthy1, Vinuth N Puttamallesh3, V Ravi4
1 Department of Uveitis and Ocular Inflammation, Vittala International Institute of Ophthalmology and Prabha Eye Clinic and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Uveitis and Ocular Inflammation, Vittala International Institute of Ophthalmology and Prabha Eye Clinic and Research Centre, Bengaluru; Department of Clinical Research, Institute of Bioinformatics, Bengaluru; Department of Clinical Research, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Uveitis and Ocular Inflammation, Vittala International Institute of Ophthalmology and Prabha Eye Clinic and Research Centre; Department of Clinical Research, Institute of Bioinformatics, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
4 Department of Neurovirology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| Date of Submission | 20-May-2019 |
| Date of Acceptance | 14-Aug-2019 |
| Date of Web Publication | 19-Dec-2019 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kalpana Babu
504, 40th Cross, Jayanagar 8th Block, Bengaluru - 560 070, Karnataka
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_943_19
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of Lymes disease in a population at risk in south India. Methods: Prospective ongoing study and included screening of forest workers and staff of Nagarahole and Bandipur forest ranges in South India for Lymes disease. Screening included a detailed questionnaire for Lymes disease, complete ocular and systemic examination by an ophthalmologist and infectious disease specialist and blood collection. ELISA for IgM and IgG antibodies for Borrelia burgdorferi were performed on the collected sera samples. Western blot confirmation was done on the seropositive samples. Ticks were also collected from these forest areas for future studies to detect if they harbor B. burgdorferi. Results: Seroprevalence of 19.9% was noted by ELISA. Western blot confirmation was seen in 15.6% of the seropositive samples. There was significant correlation between seropositivity and exposure to tick bites (P = 0.023). Conclusion: There is a high seroprevalence of infection with B. burgdorferi in the forest areas of Nagarahole and Bandipur ranges in south India.
Keywords: Enzyme linked immunosorbent assays, India, Lymes disease, Seroprevalence, Western blot
How to cite this article:
Babu K, Murthy KR, Bhagya M, Murthy PR, Puttamallesh VN, Ravi V. Seroprevalence of Lymes disease in the Nagarahole and Bandipur forest areas of South India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:100-3 |
How to cite this URL:
Babu K, Murthy KR, Bhagya M, Murthy PR, Puttamallesh VN, Ravi V. Seroprevalence of Lymes disease in the Nagarahole and Bandipur forest areas of South India. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 May 16];68:100-3. Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2020/68/1/100/273276 |
This work was awarded the Col Rangachari Medal for the Best Scientific Paper at the Annual Meeting of the All India Ophthalmological Society, 2019.
Lymes disease is caused by a spirochaete Borrelia burgdorferi. It is transmitted by the bite of infected ticks belonging to the genus Ixodes (deer ticks). The disease is characterized by heterogenous manifestations, overlapping symptoms, and high antigenic variability making the diagnosis difficult. The early phase is characterized by erythema migrans and musculoskeletal symptoms. The late phase is characterized by involvement of nervous system, heart, joints, eyes, and chronic skin changes. If detected in the early phase, it is completely treatable with antibiotics. Late, delayed or inadequate treatment may lead to serious complications.[1] The current definition of Lymes disease includes a patient who develops erythema migrans (EM) within 30 days of exposure in an endemic area or endemic area exposure, without EM, but with signs involving one organ system and a positive laboratory test or no history of exposure, but with EM as well as involvement of two organ systems or no exposure in an endemic area, but with EM and a positive serology.[2] The diagnosis involves a two-step testing initially by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for IgG and IgM antibodies followed by a western blot confirmation.[1] Lymes disease is endemic in the United States and has also been reported from Europe and Australia. In India, Lymes disease is not commonly considered as a differential diagnosis of uveitis. In 2009, we published the first serological and western blot confirmed case of neuroretinitis due to Lymes disease from the forest areas of Nagarahole and Bandipur in south India.[3] Since then we have had two more similar cases from these areas. There has also been an increase in sporadic reports of Lymes disease from India in recent years.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13]
Currently, we do not have any data on the seroprevalence of this disease in our patient population nor do we know if Lyme disease is underdiagnosed in India. The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of Lymes disease in a population at risk in South India and if Lymes disease is under diagnosed in India.
| Methods | |  |
A prospective study was undertaken in March 2017 and the second phase of this study is still going on. Phase 1 of this study was to find the seroprevalence of Lymes disease in a patient population at risk in South India. The population screened included forest workers and staff of the Nagarahole and Bandipur forest ranges in South India. These forest areas were chosen as our initial cases were from these areas.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects ≥18 years of age, working or living in the forest areas of Nagarahole and Bandipur ranges, and those patients capable of giving informed consent were included in the study.
Forest workers and staff were screened in different areas of these ranges in south India. After an informed consent, all participants completed a detailed questionnaire about age, gender, profession, exposure to tick bites, area of residence, symptoms including constitutional symptoms such as fever, malaise and flu like symptoms, skin rashes, eye involvement, nervous system, and joint-related symptoms. Ocular evaluation was done by an ophthalmologist and included best corrected visual acuity, slitlamp, dilated fundus, and intraocular pressure examinations. Extraocular motility and pupillary examinations were done by means of a torch light. Systemic examination was done by an infectious disease specialist.
Blood sampling
About 3.5 mL of peripheral venous blood was collected from the antecubital vein of the subjects after an informed consent. The blood was allowed to clot and the serum was separated by centrifugation. The sera were then transported on dry ice to the base hospital and stored in multiple aliquots at −70°C. All sera samples were screened using an ELISA test for detection of IgM and IgG antibodies for borrelia burgdorferi (NovaLisa ™ Borrelia burgdorferi  i IgM and IgG, Novatech Immunodiagnostica GmBH) and results were interpreted as per manufacturer's instructions. If positive, the samples were tested by western blot technique for confirmation (AESKUBLOT borrelia-G/-M, AESKU diagnostics, Germany). The interpretation of the results was done as per manufacturer's instructions. Seropositivity was defined as positivity of IgG, IgM, or both on ELISA at a given point of time. About 10% of the seropositive samples were tested for rheumatoid factor, Venereal disease research laboratory test (VDRL), and antinuclear antibodies to rule out cross reactivity.
Phase 2 of the study included collection of ticks from these forest areas to verify if they harbor B. burgdorferi. Around 800 ticks were collected from these forest areas by the “tick drag method” and stored at −70°C for further tests such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and genome sequencing on these ticks to detect if these ticks harbor B. burgdorferi.
Statistical analysis including descriptive statistics was done using SPSS package at <5% level of significance. Chi-square tests were done for comparison of categorical variables with seropositivity.
This study had our institutional ethics committee approval and all necessary clearances from the principal conservator of forests, Karnataka. The study on human subjects was conducted as per the declaration of Helsinki.
| Results | | |
About 518 forest workers and helpers were screened. About 472 blood samples with informed consent were taken. The mean age was 36.42 years (18–76 years). There were 425 males (90%) and 47 females (10%). Overall positivity on ELISA was seen in 94 cases (19.9%). In 61 cases (12.9%), the results were indeterminate and negative in 317 cases (67.2%). Confirmation by Western blot was noted in 14 out of 90 seropositive cases (3.2% overall or 15.6% of seropositive samples). There was significant correlation between seropositivity and occupation especially those who were field workers (0.024). There was also significant correlation between seropositivity and exposure to tick bites (0.023). [Table 1] shows the statistical correlation between seropositivity and different variables. The seropositive results were classified into four groups: 1) recent B. burgdorferi infection with previous exposure (IgM+, IG+) in six cases (1.46%); 2) recent B. burgdorferi i nfection only (IgM+, IgG−) in 73 cases (17.76%); 3) past B. burgdorferi infection (IgM−, IgG+) in 15 cases (3.65%), and 4) no B. burgdorferi infection (IgM−, IgG−) in 317 cases (77.13%). [Table 2] shows the western blot confirmation in the different groups, exposure to tick bites, and presence of skin rashes with flu like symptoms in different groups. [Table 3] shows the presence of constitutional, joint, neurological, and ocular symptoms in the different groups. Migratory joint pains was seen in one out of seven cases (1.1%). Bell's palsy was seen in one out of three cases (1.4%) and both were seen in the group with recent infection. Retinal vasculitis was seen in one case (1.1%) in the group who did not have infection. About 10% of seropositive samples were tested for cross reactivity and were negative for VDRL, rheumatoid factor, and antinuclear antibodies. | Table 1: Shows the statistical correlation between seropositivity and different variables
Click here to view |
 | Table 2: Shows the western blot confirmation in the different groups, exposure to tick bites, and presence of skin rashes with flu like symptoms in different groups
Click here to view |
 | Table 3: Presence of constitutional, joint, neurological, and ocular symptoms in the different groups
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
Praharaj et al.[4] noted a seroprevalence of 13% in northeastern states of India and as high as 18% in states like Arunachal Pradesh. The population screened by them included asymptomatic service personnel and their families and tests included detection of IgG antibodies by ELISA in this study. The authors attributed the increased seroprevalence of infection due to the presence of the Ixodes ticks in the Himalayas. Since our report in 2009,[3] there was a case series of similar symptoms from the adjacent Wayanad district in kerala, South India.[5] Jairath V et al.[6] reported five cases of western blot confirmed Lymes disease with characteristic erythema chronic migrans, local lymphadenopathy, and constitutional symptoms and good response to doxycyline. Since then there are multiple reports of Lymes disease from India.[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13] [Table 4] shows review of literature of Lymes disease from India.
In this prospective study, there is a high seroprevalence (19.9%) of B. burgdorferi infection in the Nagarahole and Bandipur forest areas in south india. Cross reactivity on serological tests may take place with other bacteria (Treponema pallidum, Treponema pertenue, nonpathogenic Borrelia, and Leptospira), during certain viral infections that invoke production of polyclonal antibodies such as Epstein–Barr virus, certain autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus) and in liver disease (hepatitis C). 10% of our seropositive samples tested for cross reactivity were negative for VDRL, rheumatoid factor, and antinuclear antibodies.
The western blot or immunoblot enables detection of antibodies against individual components of the organism and thus provides more information than a whole cell-based ELISA regarding which antigens of B. burgdorferi react with serum antibodies. Western blots can be performed to detect either IgM or IgG antibodies. In the Western blot assay, a mixture of bacterial antigens from one or more species enriched with recombinant antigens is subjected to electrophoretic separation which allows isolation of antibodies against individual antigens and arrangement according to their molecular weight. This test has a high specificity and forms the next level of testing after ELISA. Western blot confirmation was noted in 15.6% of our seropositive samples.
Incidentally, Sadanandane et al.[14] in their study on prevalence and spatial distribution of Ixodes tick populations in the forest fringes of western ghats reported the presence of Ixodes species of ticks (0.31%). The areas were the Ixodes ticks were seen were close to the forest areas where we screened the forest workers in our study. Our ongoing phase 2 studies on PCR on the collected ticks from these forests, combined with next generation sequencing based molecular approach [15] would yield more information on the presence of B. burgdorferi in these ticks.
So how do we interpret the current seroprevalence results of this study in a clinical scenario? This is fairly new information as we do not routinely test for Lymes disease in India. The high seroprevalence suggests the presence of B. burgdorferi infection in this population. As a result, it is important to include Lymes serology in our investigative panel especially if the patient is from a population at risk, with history of tick exposure, has characteristic symptoms and signs of Lymes disease. A positive serology in such a scenario will require appropriate treatment with antibiotics.
| Conclusion | | |
There is a high seroprevalence of infection with B. burgdorferi in the forest areas of Nagarahole and Bandipur ranges in south India. A high degree of suspicion for Lymes disease is required even in India, especially in a patient coming from a population at risk, history of tick exposure, with characteristic signs and symptoms, and a positive serology.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the logistic and technical support received. From the Karnataka Forest department; Mr.K.M. Chinnappa and Mr. Praveen Bhargav of 'Wildlife First' organization; Prof. Dr. Placcid D'Souza, Department of parasitology, Govt Veterinary college and hospital, Bengaluru; Dr. Mariamma Philips, Department of biostatistics, NIMHANS.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study is supported by a research grant from the Indian council of medical research (Grant ID NO: 2013-2579).
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Cardenas-de la Garza JA, De la Cruz-Valadez E, Ocampo-Candiani J, Welsh O. Clinical spectrum of Lyme disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019;38:201-8.  |
| 2. | Guliani BP, Kumar S, Chawla N, Mehta A. Neuroretinitis as presenting and the only presentation of Lyme disease: Diagnosis and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:250-2. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 3. | Babu K, Murthy PR. Neuroretinitis as a manifestation of Lyme disease in South India: A case report. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2010;18:97-8. |
| 4. | Praharaj AK, Jetley S, Kalghatgi AT. Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in North Eastern India. Med J Armed Forces India 2008;64:26-8. |
| 5. | Rajeev KR. Lymes disease outbreak in Wayanad: A Times of India report. 2013. |
| 6. | Handa R, Wali JP, Singh S, Aggarwal P. A prospective study of Lyme arthritis in north India. Indian J Med Res 1999;110:107-9. |
| 7. | Patial RK, Kashyap S, Bansal SK, Sood A. Lyme disease in a Shimla boy. J Assoc Physicians India 1990;38:503-4. |
| 8. | Jairath V, Sehrawat M, Jindal N, Jain VK, Aggarwal P. Lyme disease in Haryana, India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2014;80:320-3. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 9. | Kandhari R, Kandhari S, Jain S. Borrelial lymphocytoma cutis: A diagnostic dilemma. Indian J Dermatol 2014;59:595-7. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 10. | Shenthar J, Shetty SB, Krishnamurthy D. Diagnosis not to be missed: Lyme carditis, rare but reversible cause of complete atrioventricular block. Indian Heart J 2014;66:723-6. |
| 11. | Sharma A, Guleria S, Sharma R, Sharma A. Lyme disease: A case report with typical and atypical lesions. Indian Dermatol Online J 2017;8:124-7. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 12. | Guliani BP, Kumar S, Chawla N, Mehta A. Neuroretinitis as presenting and the only presentation of Lyme disease: Diagnosis and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:250-2. [ PUBMED] [Full text] |
| 13. | Tevatia P, Ahmad S, Gupta N, Shirazi N. Lyme disease in north India: A case for concern. Trop Doct 2018;48:352-5. |
| 14. | Sadanandane C, Gokhale MD, Elango A, Yadav P, Mourya DT, Jambulingam P. Prevalence and spatial distribution of Ixodid tick populations in the forest fringes of Western Ghats reported with human cases of Kyasanur forest disease and monkey deaths in South India. Exp Appl Acarol 2018;75:135-42. |
| 15. | Madugundu AK, Muthusamy B, Sreenivasamurthy SK, Bhavani C, Sharma J, Kumar B, et al. A next-generation sequencing-based molecular approach to characterize a tick vector in lyme disease. OMICS 2018;22:565-74. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Occupational Lyme Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
|
| Nicola Magnavita, Ilaria Capitanelli, Olayinka Ilesanmi, Francesco Chirico | | Diagnostics. 2022; 12(2): 296 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Bilateral Facial Nerve Palsy in a Young Woman From West Bengal: Do Not Forget Lyme Neuroborreliosis |
|
| Niladri Kayal, Ritwik Ghosh, ParthaSarathi Mazumdar, Shambaditya Das, Saumyajit Ghosh, Alak Pandit, Julián Benito-Leon | | Neurology India. 2021; 69(4): 997 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Bilateral facial palsy in neuroborreliosis |
|
| Shambaditya Das, Arpan Dutta, Peyalee Sarkar, Souvik Dubey, Durjoy Lahiri, Alak Pandit, Goutam Gangopadhyay, BimanKanti Ray | | Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2021; 24(6): 990 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Clinical and laboratory evidence of Lyme disease in North India, 2016–2019 |
|
| E.V. Vinayaraj, Nitin Gupta, K. Sreenath, Chandan Kumar Thakur, Sheffali Gulati, Vaishakh Anand, Manjari Tripathi, Rohit Bhatia, Deepti Vibha, Deepa Dash, Manish Soneja, Uma Kumar, M.V. Padma, Rama Chaudhry | | Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease. 2021; 43: 102134 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Reviewing the ecological evidence base for management of emerging tropical zoonoses: Kyasanur Forest Disease in India as a case study |
|
| Sarah J. Burthe, Stefanie M. Schäfer, Festus A. Asaaga, Natrajan Balakrishnan, Mohammed Mudasssar Chanda, Narayanaswamy Darshan, Subhash L. Hoti, Shivani K. Kiran, Tanya Seshadri, Prashanth N. Srinivas, Abi T. Vanak, Bethan V. Purse, Ran Wang | | PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2021; 15(4): e0009243 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Commentary: Tick talk: A glimpse into the literature |
|
| Parthopratim Dutta Majumder | | Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020; 68(1): 104 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
.png "Santen")
Search Pubmed for