• Users Online: 96298
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

   Table of Contents      
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 409-412

Cost of making a comprehensive ophthalmologist and role of non-government institutes: Our experience


1 Department of Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Orbit, Oculoplasty and Ocular Oncology, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Cataract and Community Ophthalmology, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication20-Jan-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Javed Hussain Farooqui
Department of Cornea, Refractive Surgery, Dr. Shrofffs Charity Eye Hospital, 5027, Kedarnath Marg, Daryaganj, New Delhi - 110 002
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_980_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Farooqui JH, Mathur U, Das S, Saksena A. Cost of making a comprehensive ophthalmologist and role of non-government institutes: Our experience. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:409-12

How to cite this URL:
Farooqui JH, Mathur U, Das S, Saksena A. Cost of making a comprehensive ophthalmologist and role of non-government institutes: Our experience. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2024 Mar 29];68:409-12. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijo/pages/default.aspx/text.asp?2020/68/2/409/276167



India is at a cross roads of development, probably still a work in progress. On one hand we are emerging as an economic superpower, but on the other, we are being challenged in providing basic healthcare services to masses.[1] Some would argue that the innumerable new hospitals and eye care setups symbolize development; but we wonder where the manpower to run these hospitals is. Do we have enough “well trained” ophthalmologists to make these models successful?

In 2014, Dr. Shroff's Charity Eye Hospital (SCEH), a Non-Government Organization (NGO), based in Delhi with multiple satellite branches, started a 2-year community-based cataract fellowship to train budding ophthalmologists in comprehensive ophthalmology and cataract surgery. Until now 14 ophthalmologists have successfully completed this program and 11 are currently enrolled. The program starts with clinical orientation of enrolled candidates. A 15-day induction program is organized, and candidates are made familiar with workings of the hospital. On first 2 days, there are didactic lectures and hands-on sessions by faculty from various departments on important clinical conditions and diagnostic procedures [Table 1]a and [Table 1]b. Since the trainees are a small group with diverse training background, individual attention is given and if the candidate feels he/she needs more discussion on a particular topic, appropriate arrangements are made. The curriculum of the program is such that the trainee spends the first 3 months at the base hospital, getting trained in clinics for diagnosis and management along with manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) in the Operation room (OR) under direct supervision of faculty members. Equal importance is given to clinical rotations, and the trainee is posted with one faculty member in clinics during the day and afternoons are reserved for surgeries. The trainee is then sent to a residential satellite hospital (once the faculty and trainee are both confident of the trainees clinical skills) to see patients, operate and in process enhance skill and serve the community. He/she is called back to the base hospital (SCEH) in Delhi at the end of 12-15 months for a 1-month phacoemulsification intensive training program. Once the trainee is relatively independent in performing phacoemulsification, he/she is sent to the satellite hospital for last 8-11 months. This is the time when trainee contributes to hospital's revenue by performing paid cataract surgeries alongside the community surgeries, which they had already been performing.
Table 1: (a and b): Schedule for first two days during induction

Click here to view


We did a cost analysis of our training module, to better understand our functioning expenses. We divided the expenses into fixed and annual costs. Fixed costs [Table 2] were the one-time costs incurred by the institute (equipment, infrastructure, salaries of trainers etc.). Annual Cost was divided into three subgroups – first 3 months, 4-15 months and 17-24 months, and the phacoemulsification-training month [Table 3]. Other costs of training the trainers, quality assurances, accommodation charges, stipends and hospital administration charges are discussed in [Table 4].
Table 2: One time and fixed cost. INR: Indian Rupees

Click here to view
Table 3: Annual training costs during different phases of fellowship. MSICS, Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery; OPD, Out Patient Department; VC, Vision Center; INR, Indian Rupees

Click here to view
Table 4: Miscellaneous costs. HBP- Hospital-based Programs, INR- Indian Rupees

Click here to view


The purpose of sharing these figures is to provoke thought in the minds of our readers. How much can various NGOs stretch in preparing ophthalmologists for national duties? Is it just our responsibility, or should the Government be expected to contribute, is a question we feel all the readers should answer. We acknowledge that once the ophthalmologist is trained, he/she does contribute immensely to the functioning of the hospital (and even helps in revenue generation by the end of the training period); but still, costs cannot be ignored. Probably that is the reason why we do not have enough non-government training institutes, and most of the training responsibilities are shared by a handful of non-government institutes nationwide.

Residency programs around the country are doing a very efficient job in preparing ophthalmologists, but there is still scope for major improvements.[2] In the United States, 86% residents[3] feel confident in practicing comprehensive ophthalmology after 3 years of training. We are not sure what that proportion would be in our country, but recent surveys have shown residents to have performed no more than a mean of 75 MSICS[4] and 30 phacoemulsification surgeries[4] during their postgraduation, some figures suggesting 50% of postgraduates not having performed any phacoemulsification during their 3 years.[5] These figures show that even though at the end of 3 years the residents are certified to practice ophthalmology, most of them would not be confident enough to do so. This highlights the role of NGOs like ours, who share Government responsibility by facilitating further skills of ophthalmologists and hence, indirectly in their career development.

Few recommendations can come out of this correspondence. Government should identify centers where these courses can take place, and we could have Government-approved centers for the same. It can be a continuation of the 3-year postgraduation, where in the resident can spend another 2 years at a Government-recognized center, by which he/she betters his/her clinical and surgical skill, and at the same time serves the community at large.

This is the time for all involved partners in ophthalmology training to form a consortium and have representation in government discussions and policy making for training curriculums. A more inclusive approach is needed in coming years where Government should assist consortium members, both intellectually and financially, in preparing a “well trained” ophthalmologist who is independent, confident and can successfully contribute to alleviating preventable blindness from our country.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Anand M. Health status and health care services in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar: A comparative study. Indian J Public Health 2014;58:174-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Honavar SG. Ophthalmology residency training in India: Quo vadis? Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:427-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
3.
McDonnell PJ, Kirwan TJ, Brinton GS, Golnik KC, Melendez RF, Parke DW 2nd, et al. Perceptions of recent ophthalmology residency graduates regarding preparation for practice. Ophthalmology 2007;114:387-91.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Biswas P, Gogate PM, Maskati QB, Natarajan S, Verma L, Bansal PK. Residency evaluation and adherence design study III: Ophthalmology residency training in India: Then and now–improving with time? Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:785-92.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
5.
Gupta A. Ophthalmology postgraduate training in India: Stirring up a hornet's nest. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65:433-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1080    
    Printed25    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded121    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal