• Users Online: 91399
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

    Article Cited by others

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Factors affecting treatment outcome in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: A retrospective analysis from South India

Bhandari Sahil, Sengupta Sabyasachi, Yadalla Dayakar, Rajagopalan Jayagayathri, Velis Girish Bharat, Talele Deepti, Kushwaha Sameer

Year : 2015| Volume: 63| Issue : 10 | Page no: 759-762

   This article has been cited by
 
1 Spontaneous resolution rates in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction managed with massage or topical antibiotics compared with observation alone
Brian G Mohney, Saraniya Sathiamoorthi, Ryan D Frank
British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021; : bjophthalm
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Retrospective analysis of silicon intubation by Ritleng probe and Sutupak suture fixed in silicone tube in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Milind Killedar, Pooja Sasurkar, Nikhil Gokhale, Mitali Shah, Rahul Visapure
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021; 69(8): 2095
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Efficacy of Office-Based Nasolacrimal Duct Probing
Austin Bach, Elizabeth Ann Vanner, Roberto Warman
Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus. 2019; 56(1): 50
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Should we continue lacrimal massage till 1 year or perform an office probing at 6 months? A clinical decision analysis approach
Mihir Kothari, Vivek Rathod, Kruti Shah, Khushboo Shikhangi, Renu Singhania
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017; 65(2): 167
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]

 

Read this article