Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Year
: 2014  |  Volume : 62  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 248--251

Clinical features and management of ocular lesions after stings by hymenopteran insects


KS Siddharthan, Anita Raghavan, R Revathi 
 Department of Cornea and Refractive Services, Aravind Eye Care System, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence Address:
K S Siddharthan
Aravind Eye Care System, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore - 641 014, Tamil Nadu
India

Abstract

We describe the ocular alterations and the management after stings from Hymenopteran insects. In all the five patients, the insect was identified as bee. The patients presented with significant corneal edema, which resolved dramatically in three of them after removal of stingers. Among the other two one went for permanent corneal decompensation and the other developed Intumuscent cataract with increased intraocular pressure. Although a rare occurrence, ocular trauma caused by Hymenopteran insects has a potential to cause severe ocular damage in humans. A high level of clinical suspicion and immediate removal of the stingers along with administration of high doses of topical and systemic steroids is a must to prevent chances of permanent corneal damage and intraocular complications.



How to cite this article:
Siddharthan K S, Raghavan A, Revathi R. Clinical features and management of ocular lesions after stings by hymenopteran insects.Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:248-251


How to cite this URL:
Siddharthan K S, Raghavan A, Revathi R. Clinical features and management of ocular lesions after stings by hymenopteran insects. Indian J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2022 Sep 30 ];62:248-251
Available from: https://www.ijo.in/text.asp?2014/62/2/248/128637


Full Text

The sting of members of the order Hymenoptera (e.g. bees, wasps, and biting ants) has long been known to cause local and regional reactions, systemic anaphylactic response, and less commonly delayed-type hypersensitivity. Only female hymenopteran insects have stingers, a modified ovipositor. [1] In the act of stinging, these insects introduce two bodily components into the eye, [2] the stinger and the specific venom. The venom of hymenopteran insects contains biologic amines (histamine), polypeptide toxins (melittin), and enzymes (hyaluronidase). [3],[4]

 Case Reports



Case 1

A 34-year-old male presented with history of fall of insect in the left eye (LE) of 2 days duration. LE examination showed an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/200 with diffuse corneal stromal edema and Descemet's membrane folds along with a stinger protruding from the 7° clock limbus [Figure 1]. Anterior chamber (AC) reaction was present. The stinger was immediately removed at the slit lamp and topical antibiotic − steroid eye drops and systemic steroids were started and tapered gradually over 6 weeks. The necrotic area scarred with a localized peripheral anterior synechia by the 4 th week. The corneal edema completely cleared with UCVA improving to 20/20 [Figure 2].{Figure 1}{Figure 2}

Case 2

A 32-year-old female presented with insect injury in right eye (RE) of 10 days duration. RE examination showed a UCVA of 20/400 with diffuse corneal stromal edema and a necrotic area at 5° clock limbus with a suspicious brown particle in its center [Figure 3]. After starting topical and systemic steroids, the necrotic area was explored. About four brown stingers were removed from the deeper layers of the cornea and one from the AC. The necrotic tissue was excised and a patch graft was done. During the third postoperative week, the corneal edema and AC reactions cleared and the UCVA improved to 20/30 [Figure 4].{Figure 3}{Figure 4}

Case 3

A 32-year-old male, presented within hours after injury with insect in the RE. UCVA in the RE was 20/100. A dirty white necrotic area with three brown sharp needle-like foreign bodies lying in various levels of stroma was noted [Figure 5]. The surrounding stroma was edematous. The three foreign bodies hard chitinous in nature were removed. He was treated with topical and systemic steroids in tapering doses. Since the patient showed an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP), low dose steroids were started and tapered by 6 weeks along with antiglaucoma medications. The necrotic area scarred but the stromal edema persisted till the last follow-up at 1 year. The UCVA in the RE was 20/60.{Figure 5}

Case 4

A 70-year-old female presented with severe edema involving the face and arms after stings by honey bee of 1 day duration. Ocular examination of the LE showed stingers protruding from 11 O' clock limbus into the AC with surrounding necrosis along with diffuse granular infiltration and corneal edema. The AC appeared to be filled with a brownish fluid. Visual acuity was perception of light in LE. The ultrasonic B scan was normal. The two stingers along with the brownish, curdy fluid in the AC were removed. Postoperatively, the patient was given tapering doses of topical and systemic steroids. Postoperatively, the corneal infiltration gradually cleared but edema persisted. Complicated cataract developed [Figure 6]. IOP increased up to 48 mm of Hg by the 3 rd week but the patient lost to follow-up.{Figure 6}

Case 5

A 3-year-old girl, presented with a history of bee sting injury in the RE of 4 days duration. Ocular examination of the RE showed diffuse corneal edema along with 2-3 bits of bee stingers embedded in the corneal stroma with surrounding area of necrosis at 8-11 O' clock position. Bee stinger removal was done immediately. Postoperatively, tapering doses of topical and systemic steroids were given. The edema gradually reduced during the postoperative period. At 3 months review, the corneal edema completely cleared with a localized scar at 8 − 11 O' clock. Anterior subcapsular cataract developed with vision dropping to 20/400 in the RE [Figure 7].{Figure 7}

Specular analysis and intraocular pressure measurements in all the 5 cases are consolidated in [Table 1].{Table 1}

 Discussion



In all the five cases, the insect was identified as bee based on the patient's history. Bees use the stinger only as a defensive weapon to inject venom into the tissues of the victim and leave the stinger in the process. [5] If the venom gland is still adherent acutely, attached muscle fibers will continue to contract, resulting in additional venom discharge and more toxicity (case 1 = 2 days; case 2 = 10 days). Even though the time interval between exposure and removal of the stingers is crucial, we also believe that a favorable outcome depends on the type of species [5] of bee responsible for the trauma (case 3 = few hours) [Table 2].{Table 2}

In relation to the several species of bees, it was observed that differences exist between the compositions of venom components, with variations in the levels of enzymes present, suggesting that this can result in different degrees of immunogenic potential and/or toxicity. Bee venoms share both neurotoxic and hemolytic properties. [3] The main toxin in bee venom is melittin, [5],[6] a basic compound with strong surface activity. The chemotaxis of polymorphnuclear leukocytes result in a white corneal infiltrate [3] with surrounding intense stromal edema. This infiltrate mimics a microbial keratitis and in cases associated with severe uveitis it may be misdiagnosed as viral keratouveitis. [7] Unless a high degree of suspicion is maintained, these cases will be treated with antifungals or antibiotics or antivirals and thus deprived of the need to remove the stinger [8] and administer high doses of steroids. The severe eye pain after bee sting is caused by the sudden release of highly concentrated biogenic amines, [5] such as histamine, in the venom. Posterior segment complications [5] like retrobulbar neuritis, papilledema, and optic atrophy have also been reported.

 Conclusion



Although rare, insect stings can result in severe impairment of vision in humans. The retained insect parts are usually very tiny with surrounding inflammatory reactions and necrosis so that they can be easily missed and may mimic microbial keratitis even under slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Since the treatment modalities are entirely different and the earlier the diagnosis, the better the chance of visual prognosis, a high level of clinical suspicion and immediate removal of the stingers along with administration of high doses of topical and systemic steroids will reduce the chances of permanent corneal damage and intraocular complications.

References

1Graft DF, Schuberth KC. Hymenoptera allergy in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 1983;30:873-86.
2Gilboa M, Gdal-On M, Zonis S. Bee and wasp stings of the eye. Retained intralenticular wasp sting: A case report. Br J Ophthalmol 1977;61:662-4.
3Smolin G, Wong I. Bee sting of the cornea: Case report. Ann Ophthalmol 1982;14:342-3.
4Arcieri ES, França ET, de Oliveria HB, De Abreu Ferreira L, Ferreira MA, Rocha FJ. Ocular lesions arising after stings by hymenopteran insects. Cornea 2002;21:328-30.
5Al-Towerki AE. Corneal honeybee sting. Cornea 2003;22:672-4.
6Mackler BF, Kreil G. Honey bee venom melittin: Correlation of nonspecific inflammatory activities with amino acid sequences. Inflammation 1977;2:55-65.
7Jain V, Shome D, Natarajan S. Corneal bee sting misdiagnosed as viral keratitis. Cornea 2007;26:1277-8.
8Razmjooh H, Abtah MA, Roomizadeh P, Mohammadi Z, Abtahi SH. Management of corneal bee sting. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:1697-700.